- Moderator
- #181
Yes putting oil into water and increasing pollution will definitely create jobs, not to mention we cant protect it from a terrorsts attack
The pipeline wouldn't put oil into water or increase pollution, but you already knew that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes putting oil into water and increasing pollution will definitely create jobs, not to mention we cant protect it from a terrorsts attack
The Rail to nowhere
Spirit flies roundtrip LAX to LAS for $125, so $16B would buy 128 million tickets
Liberals are the biggest fucking morons on the planet
Yeah, let's spend billions on something that's impossible to protect from a terrorist attack and is a proven money pit at a time when we're dead broke. But let's NOT allow a pipeline to be built without government money that will not only create jobs but give us better insurance against trouble in the Middle East. Gotta love the rational thinking of progressives!
Yes putting oil into water and increasing pollution will definitely create jobs, not to mention we cant protect it from a terrorsts attack
Yes putting oil into water and increasing pollution will definitely create jobs, not to mention we cant protect it from a terrorsts attack
The pipeline wouldn't put oil into water or increase pollution, but you already knew that.
Oh so according to you trains cannot not stop themselves, and that oil doesn't leak out of a pipe that's been broken.Yeah, let's spend billions on something that's impossible to protect from a terrorist attack and is a proven money pit at a time when we're dead broke. But let's NOT allow a pipeline to be built without government money that will not only create jobs but give us better insurance against trouble in the Middle East. Gotta love the rational thinking of progressives!
Yes putting oil into water and increasing pollution will definitely create jobs, not to mention we cant protect it from a terrorsts attack
If terrorists blow up a pipeline we shut it down...fix it and go on. If they blow up the tracks to a high speed rail line then hundreds of people will be killed or maimed.
You mean these..Heard any news stories about leaks polluting the ground water? Gee...wonder why that is?
Yes putting oil into water and increasing pollution will definitely create jobs, not to mention we cant protect it from a terrorsts attack
The pipeline wouldn't put oil into water or increase pollution, but you already knew that.
I see so according to you oil spilling into water does not put oil into water Or that emitting sulfur dioxide, Carbon, and Nitrogen dioxide is not increasing pollution. Perhaps the problem here is that you don't know anything
The bizarre part is that liberals actually believe that the pretty new train is infrastructure. It isn't. It won't help anyone or anything in California. Here's a solution. Solves the whole problem.
A bullet train from California to Las Vegas will primarily benefit the casinos. That's the only possible entity that could benefit. It won't bring business to the state, it won't help Californians get jobs. Most of the train won't even be in California. The solution is to let the casinos set up a specal fund to pay for it.
this train was shot down in the last election......i believe they are talking about another one connecting SF and OC....
It seems like an article of faith that if the democrats spend money on a rail line that doesn't go anywhere, it will save lives and keep oil from the pipeline from spilling into water.
The rail line is now a shibboleth yet devoid of any real meaning.
The pipeline wouldn't put oil into water or increase pollution, but you already knew that.
I see so according to you oil spilling into water does not put oil into water Or that emitting sulfur dioxide, Carbon, and Nitrogen dioxide is not increasing pollution. Perhaps the problem here is that you don't know anything
Why would the oil spill into the water? Furthermore, whether or not we build the pipeline has no bearing whatsoever on whether or not the oil gets sold and used so there is no net increase in the level of pollution.
Perhaps the problem here is that you don't know anything.
It seems like an article of faith that if the democrats spend money on a rail line that doesn't go anywhere, it will save lives and keep oil from the pipeline from spilling into water.
The rail line is now a shibboleth yet devoid of any real meaning.
yup. every projection has been re-worked from the 'savings' between an airflight ticket and a rail ticket and the cost and time to completion...
when Gov. Christie was pressured to come up money to add to federal funds for a commuter rail tunnel from newark to NYC he said no, we could not afford it.
here? we are in worse shape than them, but brown wants to raise and taxes and has pledged money for the hi speed rail......what a joke.
Oh so according to you trains cannot not stop themselves, and that oil doesn't leak out of a pipe that's been broken.Yes putting oil into water and increasing pollution will definitely create jobs, not to mention we cant protect it from a terrorsts attack
If terrorists blow up a pipeline we shut it down...fix it and go on. If they blow up the tracks to a high speed rail line then hundreds of people will be killed or maimed.
By the way, Star...I know you haven't gotten the memo on this yet but that part of the country is literally crisscrossed with pipelines already.
You mean these..Heard any news stories about leaks polluting the ground water? Gee...wonder why that is?
Two Years On, Tar Sands Spill Casts Long Shadow | Mother Jones
and
Concerns about drinking water, wildlife after oil spill in Nampa - www.kivitv.com
On average in America alone there are around 4million gallons of oil spilled a year
McKibben: "Constantly and Disastrously" Leaking U.S. Pipelines Are the Mess in the Middle of the Keystone XL Debate | ThinkProgress
The XL pipeline already in Canada has has 12 oil spills a year
After 12 Oil Spills in One Year, TransCanada Says Proposed Keystone XL Pipeline Will Be Safest in U.S. | ThinkProgress
Oh so according to you trains cannot not stop themselves, and that oil doesn't leak out of a pipe that's been broken.If terrorists blow up a pipeline we shut it down...fix it and go on. If they blow up the tracks to a high speed rail line then hundreds of people will be killed or maimed.
By the way, Star...I know you haven't gotten the memo on this yet but that part of the country is literally crisscrossed with pipelines already.
You mean these..Heard any news stories about leaks polluting the ground water? Gee...wonder why that is?
Two Years On, Tar Sands Spill Casts Long Shadow | Mother Jones
and
Concerns about drinking water, wildlife after oil spill in Nampa - www.kivitv.com
On average in America alone there are around 4million gallons of oil spilled a year
McKibben: "Constantly and Disastrously" Leaking U.S. Pipelines Are the Mess in the Middle of the Keystone XL Debate | ThinkProgress
The XL pipeline already in Canada has has 12 oil spills a year
After 12 Oil Spills in One Year, TransCanada Says Proposed Keystone XL Pipeline Will Be Safest in U.S. | ThinkProgress
Ah yes...Mother Jones and ThinkProgress! What, nothing from Huffington Post? It's hard to have a rational discussion with someone who gets all of their information from sites that are so biased as to be worthless.