If candidates were treated like products, would the result be more salutary? Would voters pay more attention to their ‘purchase’?????
And, would Biden fall victim to the ‘Lemon Law’???
1.By this point, most sentient individuals, perhaps 30 or 40 million, who voted for Democrats, are suffering a deep buyer’s remorse. But today’s lesson will explain why, beyond the fear of the cancel culture, Obama’s call to violence ('I want you to argue with them and get in their face'), and the riots and media censorship, why your own behavior edged you in that direction: you treated a national election like a common purchase.
Professor Gad Saad turns your political choice into a consumer’s behavior in the marketplace, and explains why you made such a horrendous mistake.
2. We humans are a combination of thinking and feeling organisms, and our decisions generally involve both. “The challenge is to know when to activate the cognitive (thinking) versus the affective (feeling) systems.” And that challenge represents a defining difference between the Right and the Left.
3. “…consumers use one of two routes of persuasion when processing a message. The central route involves cognitive effort, namely the consumer will carefully evaluate the message’s substantive informational content (such as the seven reasons why a particular mutual fund is the best one to invest in). The peripheral route on the other hand relies on the use of non- substantive cues in arriving at an attitude (using an endorser’s physical attractiveness [Orange Man Bad] in forming an attitude toward investing in a mutual fund). In this case, the peripheral cue is not directly relevant in judging the logical merits of the message.
The route that is activated depends on a consumer’s motivation and ability to process information. [See the prob for Democrat voters?]
4. The negative hysteria surrounding Donald Trump is rooted in peripheral processing (“his mannerisms disgust me”). Trump’s detractors should perhaps be spending more effort engaging their central route of persuasion by evaluating his policy positions in a dispassionate and detached manner.
5. I would be remiss to not remind that even leading up to the election I made this point:
I can name dozens of Biden policies I voted against.....and Trump policies I voted for.
Let's see you name the Biden policies you voted for, or the Trump policies you voted against.
That challenge is even more significant today, viewing the mess the Democrats have produced.
And, would Biden fall victim to the ‘Lemon Law’???
1.By this point, most sentient individuals, perhaps 30 or 40 million, who voted for Democrats, are suffering a deep buyer’s remorse. But today’s lesson will explain why, beyond the fear of the cancel culture, Obama’s call to violence ('I want you to argue with them and get in their face'), and the riots and media censorship, why your own behavior edged you in that direction: you treated a national election like a common purchase.
Professor Gad Saad turns your political choice into a consumer’s behavior in the marketplace, and explains why you made such a horrendous mistake.
2. We humans are a combination of thinking and feeling organisms, and our decisions generally involve both. “The challenge is to know when to activate the cognitive (thinking) versus the affective (feeling) systems.” And that challenge represents a defining difference between the Right and the Left.
3. “…consumers use one of two routes of persuasion when processing a message. The central route involves cognitive effort, namely the consumer will carefully evaluate the message’s substantive informational content (such as the seven reasons why a particular mutual fund is the best one to invest in). The peripheral route on the other hand relies on the use of non- substantive cues in arriving at an attitude (using an endorser’s physical attractiveness [Orange Man Bad] in forming an attitude toward investing in a mutual fund). In this case, the peripheral cue is not directly relevant in judging the logical merits of the message.
The route that is activated depends on a consumer’s motivation and ability to process information. [See the prob for Democrat voters?]
4. The negative hysteria surrounding Donald Trump is rooted in peripheral processing (“his mannerisms disgust me”). Trump’s detractors should perhaps be spending more effort engaging their central route of persuasion by evaluating his policy positions in a dispassionate and detached manner.
5. I would be remiss to not remind that even leading up to the election I made this point:
I can name dozens of Biden policies I voted against.....and Trump policies I voted for.
Let's see you name the Biden policies you voted for, or the Trump policies you voted against.
That challenge is even more significant today, viewing the mess the Democrats have produced.
