Busy Hurricane Season is predicted for 2024

SunsetMommy doesn't mention WHY they expect a busy hurricane season.
Besides La Nina, there is the RECORD WARM SOUTHERN ATANTIC OCEAN.
More Evidence of AGW.
The Hurricane Zone water is astonishingly near 3 degrees warmer in June than in past early seasons.


""Waters across the Atlantic’s tropical belt — extending from the coast of Africa through the Caribbean — are hotter now than in any other late May on record, with over 90% of the area’s sea surface engulfed in record or near-record warmth. The extent of marine heat has never been greater heading into a hurricane season, outpacing by wide margins the previous late May record-holder in 2005, a year remembered for one of the most active and destructive hurricane seasons in modern history.
An image showing how much hotter the Atlantic basin is in 2024 than it was in 2025.

About 67% of the tropical Atlantic experienced record or near-record warm sea surface temperature anomalies in late May 2005 using 1981-2024 records, a notably smaller extent than May 2024.
The Atlantic Main Development Region (area outlined by the black boxes above) is the Warmest on record (since 1981) going into a hurricane season.

Although record-setting sea surface temperatures alone don’t guarantee a busy hurricane season, they do strongly influence it, especially when the abnormal warmth coincides with the tropical belt known as the Main Development Region, or MDR, the area where 85% of Category 3, 4, and 5 hurricanes form. When considered alongside a developing La Niña — the periodic cooling of the equatorial Pacific that reduces storm-busting Atlantic wind shear — the unprecedented ocean heat is driving up seasonal hurricane outlooks higher than ever before.

Colorado State University — the group that pioneered seasonal hurricane forecasts in the 1980s — issued its most aggressive April forecast last month in almost 30 years of doing such preseason outlooks. NOAA, the parent agency of the National Weather Service, will release its first 2024 hurricane season outlook May 23, and expectations are for similarly bullish numbers.



What’s behind the record-breaking Atlantic heat?

The exceptional warm-up of the North Atlantic began in earnest last spring and continued through the 2023 hurricane season. Despite one of the strongest El Niño events on record, which would typically deter hurricane activity, the Atlantic churned out 20 named storms last season, the fourth-highest number since 1950, according to NOAA. Forecasters largely credited the record-warm tropical Atlantic for counteracting the heavy hand of El Niño.".."



yaleclimateconnections.org

What you need to know about record-breaking heat in the Atlantic » Yale Climate Connections

The ocean heat could fuel an unusually active hurricane season.
yaleclimateconnections.org
yaleclimateconnections.org
`
 
He is so ignorant that he doesn't realize there have been published papers on it and the Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years (LINK)
book which cites over 100 published research goes into detail which I have in my climate related library.


"Every 1500 Years"?

I put up the last 12,000 with only ONE Unnatural SPIKE. Our AGW.

(which has since Spiked MUCH higher since this 2011 Marcott
Now well UP THRU the Top of the Box)
1720754634337.png



Anyone see "Every 1500 years"

The Sun has Set for LYING Tommy.

``
 
Last edited:
"Every 1500 Years"?

I put up the last 12,000 with only ONE Unnatural SPIKE. Our AGW.

(which has since Spiked MUCH higher since this 2011 Marcott
Now well UP THRU the Top of the Box)
View attachment 975619


Anyone see "Every 1500 years"

The Sun has Set for LYING Tommy.

``
What I see is a bogus temperature reconstruction that doesn't match the polar region data.
 
What I see is a bogus temperature reconstruction that doesn't match the polar region data.

It is FRAUD because of different data points of different resolutions grafted together.

Grafting yearly data onto proxy data is science malpractice.

Abu doesn't even know D-O events consist of because he never read the book.
 
It is FRAUD because of different data points of different resolutions grafted together.
You're demonstrating your ignorance. The assembly of different proxies dramatically increases the accuracy of the final reconstuction.
Grafting yearly data onto proxy data is science malpractice.
Bullshit.
Abu doesn't even know D-O events consist of because he never read the book.
I begin to think deniers bringing up D-O events is analogous to those who first bring up Hitler in an argument about politics. YOU have already stated that our current event is not a D-O event, so please explain what you think the ******* relevance might be.
 
Post 195 will help you while Abu's chart is a pile of garbage for obvious reasons.
As for Abu's chart (actually from Marcotte et al and Science magazine) I'd like you to explain this idea you seem to have that the more data a study has, the less accurate are its results. Because that flies in the face of a lot of established statistics and analysis.
 
As for Abu's chart (actually from Marcotte et al and Science magazine) I'd like you to explain this idea you seem to have that the more data a study has, the less accurate are its results. Because that flies in the face of a lot of established statistics and analysis.

I have already explained this over 25 times but your Swiss cheese brain keeps losing it thus not going to bother anymore.


The Resolution in the proxy part is radically different from the monthly/yearly data thus not valid to graft them together.


Marcott has long ago disavowed that big uptick which I have quoted him at least 35 times, you prefer to lie instead to use a chart that even Realclimate doesn't use because Marcott told them it isn't valid.
 
You're demonstrating your ignorance. The assembly of different proxies dramatically increases the accuracy of the final reconstuction.

Bullshit.

I begin to think deniers bringing up D-O events is analogous to those who first bring up Hitler in an argument about politics. YOU have already stated that our current event is not a D-O event, so please explain what you think the ******* relevance might be.

Your claim is why many can't take you seriously because what you state is utterly STUPID!!!


You're demonstrating your ignorance. The assembly of different proxies dramatically increases the accuracy of the final reconstuction.

Proxies have VARIABLE and normally LOW-resolution values which makes it impossible to greatly increase the accuracy by lumping them together, you are demonstrating stupidity.
 
Your claim is why many can't take you seriously because what you state is utterly STUPID!!!
Then why weren't you able to explain the relevance of D-O events to the current warming?
Proxies have VARIABLE and normally LOW-resolution values which makes it impossible to greatly increase the accuracy by lumping them together, you are demonstrating stupidity.
If you'd actually read some of the text of people doing multivariate analysis for proxy reconstructions, you would see that all of that is known and accounted for. You simply don't know what the **** you are talking about.
 
Actually I stopped SunsetMommy from using his OLD Marcott citations with MY lastest ones.
Then he STFU and went away... as he does whenever I reappear.. he Disappears.
He then KNOWINGLY REPEATS LIES because he's an OCD RW conspiracist.

Remember Sunsetboy?


I posted the evidence numerous times already which you IGNORED because you can't address it
Here is what Marcott stated about that red uptick for the 20th time:

LINK

Your propensity to lie is well known after all I corrected you on this around 20 times already.
Here is what Marcott said More Recently for the 20th Time.

and here is what Marcott Said Most Recently for the Fifth or Sixth Time.
So you are knowingly LYING hoping I'm not around.[/b]

Yes and I REFUTED you AS ALWAYS re Marcott as you were using OBSOLETE Citations.

How about Marcott 2021 ? (not 2013, NOT pre 2009 decades)


  • NATURE PODCAST
    10 November 2021 Nature

Climate special: the past and future of the Earth's climate​


Reassessing 24,000 years of global temperatures, and on the ground at COP26.
[......]

Interviewee: Shaun Marcott
"..The past record provides perspective. Papers like this basically point out, just at the very basic level, what has happened before and where we are in that context and where we’re heading towards. In a Prior paper that we had, we said statistically we don’t really know if today is any warmer than what we call the warm period of the last 10,000 years.
This paper has said actually, We’ve Left what was Normal.
That’s an important perspective to have when you think about where We’re off to, considering these Temperatures that we’re Trajecting towards, as far we know, we Haven’t seen in 50 Million years or so, and the world was a lot Different then."".

[......]
Nature
Climate special: the past and future of the Earth's climate
- - - -


Sunset Tommy cannot even debate Climate!
He Dumps an article from somewhere (like WTFUWT) and says: ""You must refute this paper or you lose.""

WUWT Tommy himself is NOT EVEN CONVERSANT on the topic, and unlike me cannot lay out his position AND/OR why.
He put me on IGNORE after my SIX attempts to make him explain his position on warming and whether and if it was even warming at all.
He could Not!!

He prefers the motor mouth Crick who Unlike me doesn't Crush him with 100%/180° Rebuttal as I just did above AGAIN using his own source: Marcott.
(He Fallaciously/ posted COLD WEATHER DAYS in Skooker's anti-Science "Skeptics Winning" thread as if it was Not warming, but in fact cooling.)

So here Again: ANOTHER SUNSET for TOMMY.

`
 
Last edited:
Actually I stopped SunsetMommy from using his OLD Marcott citations with MY lastest ones.
Then he STFU and went away... as he does whenever I reappear.. he Disappears.
He then KNOWINGLY REPEATS LIES because he's an OCD RW conspiracist.

Remember Sunsetboy?


Here is what Marcott said More Recently for the 20th Time.

and here is what Marcott Said Most Recently for the Fifth or Sixth Time.
So you are knowingly LYING hoping I'm not around.[/b]

Yes and I REFUTED you AS ALWAYS re Marcott as you were using OBSOLETE Citations.

How about Marcott 2021 ? (not 2013, NOT pre 2009 decades)


  • NATURE PODCAST
    10 November 2021 Nature

Climate special: the past and future of the Earth's climate​


Reassessing 24,000 years of global temperatures, and on the ground at COP26.
[......]

Interviewee: Shaun Marcott
"..The past record provides perspective. Papers like this basically point out, just at the very basic level, what has happened before and where we are in that context and where we’re heading towards. In a Prior paper that we had, we said statistically we don’t really know if today is any warmer than what we call the warm period of the last 10,000 years.
This paper has said actually, We’ve Left what was Normal.
That’s an important perspective to have when you think about where We’re off to, considering these Temperatures that we’re Trajecting towards, as far we know, we Haven’t seen in 50 Million years or so, and the world was a lot Different then."".

[......]
Nature
Climate special: the past and future of the Earth's climate
- - - -


Sunset Tommy cannot even debate Climate!
He Dumps an article from somewhere (like WTFUWT) and says: ""You must refute this paper or you lose.""

WUWT Tommy himself is NOT EVEN CONVERSANT on the topic, and unlike me cannot lay out his position AND/OR why.
He put me on IGNORE after my SIX attempts to make him explain his position on warming and whether and if it was even warming at all.
He could Not!!

He prefers the motor mouth Crick who Unlike me doesn't Crush him with 100%/180° Rebuttal as I just did above AGAIN using his own source: Marcott.
(He Fallaciously/ posted COLD WEATHER DAYS in Skooker's anti-Science "Skeptics Winning" thread as if it was Not warming, but in fact cooling.)

So here Again: ANOTHER SUNSET for TOMMY.

`
What does Marcott say about the previous interglacial being 2C warmer than today with 26 ft higher seas than today with 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2 than today?
 
Actually I stopped SunsetMommy from using his OLD Marcott citations with MY lastest ones.
Then he STFU and went away... as he does whenever I reappear.. he Disappears.
He then KNOWINGLY REPEATS LIES because he's an OCD RW conspiracist.

Remember Sunsetboy?


Here is what Marcott said More Recently for the 20th Time.

and here is what Marcott Said Most Recently for the Fifth or Sixth Time.
So you are knowingly LYING hoping I'm not around.[/b]

Yes and I REFUTED you AS ALWAYS re Marcott as you were using OBSOLETE Citations.

How about Marcott 2021 ? (not 2013, NOT pre 2009 decades)


  • NATURE PODCAST
    10 November 2021 Nature

Climate special: the past and future of the Earth's climate​


Reassessing 24,000 years of global temperatures, and on the ground at COP26.
[......]

Interviewee: Shaun Marcott
"..The past record provides perspective. Papers like this basically point out, just at the very basic level, what has happened before and where we are in that context and where we’re heading towards. In a Prior paper that we had, we said statistically we don’t really know if today is any warmer than what we call the warm period of the last 10,000 years.
This paper has said actually, We’ve Left what was Normal.
That’s an important perspective to have when you think about where We’re off to, considering these Temperatures that we’re Trajecting towards, as far we know, we Haven’t seen in 50 Million years or so, and the world was a lot Different then."".

[......]
Nature
Climate special: the past and future of the Earth's climate
- - - -


Sunset Tommy cannot even debate Climate!
He Dumps an article from somewhere (like WTFUWT) and says: ""You must refute this paper or you lose.""

WUWT Tommy himself is NOT EVEN CONVERSANT on the topic, and unlike me cannot lay out his position AND/OR why.
He put me on IGNORE after my SIX attempts to make him explain his position on warming and whether and if it was even warming at all.
He could Not!!

He prefers the motor mouth Crick who Unlike me doesn't Crush him with 100%/180° Rebuttal as I just did above AGAIN using his own source: Marcott.
(He Fallaciously/ posted COLD WEATHER DAYS in Skooker's anti-Science "Skeptics Winning" thread as if it was Not warming, but in fact cooling.)

So here Again: ANOTHER SUNSET for TOMMY.

`

Wall o' text ... sure sign the writer never attended college ... English 101 ... brevity ... it's simple courtesy to the readers ...
 
Wall o' text ... sure sign the writer never attended college ... English 101 ... brevity ... it's simple courtesy to the readers ...
NOT "a wall of text," (Tommy puts of walls of meaningless graphs, and un-excerpted Link Dumps)
just an avg amt of content for a SCIENCE post, with larger Fonted and Bolded citation/refutation so that even when it's quoted the point is remade.
With the Crucial Marcott citation Highlighted.
and NO REBUTTAL anywhere.
Sunset Tommy is a Liar, and you put up little-no-content.
ReinyDays is the peanut gallery here with little on topic info ever posted. Much less a 'wall.'
Back to Mensa and the group above it (Intertel) for me, back to mowing the lawn for ReinyDays.
noblesse oblige
`
 
Last edited:
15th post
NOT "a wall of text
Correct. Your posts are more like a wall of gibberish. Your posts reveal that you are not an educated person who is capable of articulating clear, concise and well thought out responses.
 
Correct. Your posts are more like a wall of gibberish. Your posts reveal that you are not an educated person who is capable of articulating clear, concise and well thought out responses.
HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAHAAAAhaaahahahaahaa... oi vey...
 
Correct. Your posts are more like a wall of gibberish. Your posts reveal that you are not an educated person who is capable of articulating clear, concise and well thought out responses.

Maybe Abu will convert Celsius to Fahrenheit for us ... his algebra skill are in question ... he sure as hell can't use differentials ...
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom