*BUSTED* Obama, LIAR- Emails prove he KNEW about Libya attacks within 2 hours

If this wasn't the election year and it being so close to the election y'all wouldn't be saying nothing about this. Get real.
Y'all don't give a dam! about what happen over there, just as long as it's not about somebody in your family.

I know what you're going to say, they are family, right!
 
If this wasn't the election year and it being so close to the election y'all wouldn't be saying nothing about this. Get real.
Y'all don't give a dam! about what happen over there, just as long as it's not about somebody in your family.

I know what you're going to say, they are family, right!

I only care that Americans were slaughtered by terrorists because it's an election year? That is one of the stupidest things I've heard on here for quite some time. This fiasco has nothing to do with the election EXCEPT that the Obama Administration tried to cover up how badly they handled it BECAUSE of the looming election.

We're talking about terrorists killing a US Ambassador at our embassy. This isn't something that's trivial and being blown out of proportion by election year politics...this is a serious cluster fuck by the State Department, the military and the White House.

The fictional "two AM phone call" that's always brought up when campaigns talk about who do you want answering that call that requires a tough decision actually CAME on 9/11 and the Obama White House essentially put them on hold for seven hours. That's not leadership...that's an abdication of leadership.
 
If this wasn't the election year and it being so close to the election y'all wouldn't be saying nothing about this. Get real.
Y'all don't give a dam! about what happen over there, just as long as it's not about somebody in your family.

I know what you're going to say, they are family, right!

I only care that Americans were slaughtered by terrorists because it's an election year? That is one of the stupidest things I've heard on here for quite some time. This fiasco has nothing to do with the election EXCEPT that the Obama Administration tried to cover up how badly they handled it BECAUSE of the looming election.

We're talking about terrorists killing a US Ambassador at our embassy. This isn't something that's trivial and being blown out of proportion by election year politics...this is a serious cluster fuck by the State Department, the military and the White House.

The fictional "two AM phone call" that's always brought up when campaigns talk about who do you want answering that call that requires a tough decision actually CAME on 9/11 and the Obama White House essentially put them on hold for seven hours. That's not leadership...that's an abdication of leadership.

Thanks, you made my point.
 
(That is one of the stupidest things I've heard on here for quite some time.)

By you saying that is what did it.
 
Republicans, this tapdancing of yours on American graves for political gain makes you look like you're more loyal to your party than to your country.

But then, you are more loyal to your party than to your country. Republicans are very similar to the old Soviet communists in that aspect of their behavior. If they have to screw their own country to gain political power, they will do so, and they will not be sorry about it at all.
 
Republicans, this tapdancing of yours on American graves for political gain makes you look like you're more loyal to your party than to your country.

But then, you are more loyal to your party than to your country. Republicans are very similar to the old Soviet communists in that aspect of their behavior. If they have to screw their own country to gain political power, they will do so, and they will not be sorry about it at all.

Fuck you, Mamooth...Four Americans are dead because of this Administration's incompetence and we've been lied to about it right from the start by our President, Vice President and Secretary of State all because they didn't want to be embarrassed politically right before the election.

As for who's similar to the old Soviet's? Who's been caught red handed telling lies about what happened? Who used a pliant Main Stream Media to disseminate their narrative that this wasn't a terrorist attack but a mob protesting the YouTube video that got out of control?
 
Readers might be interested in this story just out that has eyewitness accounts of what happened that night. It also provides some insight as to some of the confusion regarding the video being suspected in initial reports.

Libyan witnesses recount organized Benghazi attack

TRIPOLI, Libya — It began around nightfall on Sept. 11 with around 150 bearded gunmen, some wearing the Afghan-style tunics favored by Islamic militants, sealing off the streets leading to the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi. They set up roadblocks with pick-up trucks mounted with heavy machine guns, according to witnesses.


The trucks bore the logo of Ansar al-Shariah, a powerful local group of Islamist militants who worked with the municipal government to manage security in Benghaz...i

There was no sign of a spontaneous protest against an American-made movie denigrating Islam’s Prophet Muhammad. But a lawyer passing by the scene said he saw the militants gathering around 20 youths from nearby to chant against the film. Within an hour or so, the assault began, guns blazing as the militants blasted into the compound.

The witness accounts gathered by The Associated Press give a from-the-ground perspective for the sharply partisan debate in the U.S. over the attack that left U.S. ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans dead. They corroborate the conclusion largely reached by American officials that it was a planned militant assault. But they also suggest the militants may have used the film controversy as a cover for the attack.

Ansar al-Shariah, the group whose members are suspected in the attack, is made up of militants with an al-Qaida-like ideology, but it is not clear whether it has any true ties to the terror organization. Made up mainly of veterans of last year’s civil war, it is one of the many powerful, heavily armed militias that operate freely in Libya and in Benghazi, while government control remains weak. Some Benghazi officials have praised Ansar al-Shariah for helping keep order in the city, even as they note its jihadi ideology.


With its arsenal of weapons, the group is capable of carrying out such an attack on the consulate on its own and even on relatively short notice. Islamist militias in Benghazi had in previous months threatened to attack the compound.


U.S. officials say they are still investigating whether there is an al-Qaida connection. They say members of Ansar al-Shariah called members of al-Qaida’s branch in North Africa outside of Libya and boasted of the attack. The administration has even said it is prepared to carry out drone strikes against the branch, known as al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb, or AQIM, if a link is proven. But the officials also acknowledge the calls alone do not yet prove AQIM was involved.


A day after the Benghazi attack, an unidentified Ansar al-Shariah spokesman said the militia was not involved "as an organization" — leaving open the possibility members were involved. He praised the attack as a popular "uprising" sparked by the anti-Islam film, further propagating the image of a mob attack against the consulate.

Well worth the read: Libyan witnesses recount organized Benghazi attack - BostonHerald.com
 
Obama did not deny requests for help in Benghazi: Aide | The Ticket - Yahoo! News

Fox News Channel reported Friday that American officials in the compound repeatedly asked for military help during the assault but were rebuffed by CIA higher-ups. At a press briefing one day earlier, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, asked why there had not been a quicker, more forceful response to the assault, complained of "Monday-morning quarterbacking." Panetta said he and top military commanders had judged it too dangerous to send troops to the eastern Libyan city without a clearer picture of events on the ground.



The "basic principle is that you don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on; without having some real-time information about what's taking place," he said during a joint question-and-answer session with Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff General Martin Dempsey.

"As a result of not having that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area, General Ham, General Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation," Panetta said. General Carter Ham commands the U.S. Africa Command.

And the CIA has denied that anyone in its chain of command rejected requests for help from the besieged Americans.

But Weekly Standard Editor Bill Kristol, in a post published Friday, doubted Panetta's explanation and said the fault must lie with Obama himself. "Would the secretary of defense make such a decision on his own? No," Kristol wrote. "It would have been a presidential decision."

"He's wrong," said Vietor.
 
Republicans, this tapdancing of yours on American graves for political gain makes you look like you're more loyal to your party than to your country.

But then, you are more loyal to your party than to your country. Republicans are very similar to the old Soviet communists in that aspect of their behavior. If they have to screw their own country to gain political power, they will do so, and they will not be sorry about it at all.

Fuck you, Mamooth...Four Americans are dead because of this Administration's incompetence and we've been lied to about it right from the start by our President, Vice President and Secretary of State all because they didn't want to be embarrassed politically right before the election.

As for who's similar to the old Soviet's? Who's been caught red handed telling lies about what happened? Who used a pliant Main Stream Media to disseminate their narrative that this wasn't a terrorist attack but a mob protesting the YouTube video that got out of control?

What is a Mamooth? :confused:
 
Republicans, this tapdancing of yours on American graves for political gain makes you look like you're more loyal to your party than to your country.

But then, you are more loyal to your party than to your country. Republicans are very similar to the old Soviet communists in that aspect of their behavior. If they have to screw their own country to gain political power, they will do so, and they will not be sorry about it at all.

That's a better description of Obama.
 
Al Quaeda has learned someone very important about obamamerica. This new country will leave it's people to die if it's politically expedient to do so. It wasn
t 4 American left to be slaughtered. It was 30. Only the actions of Dougherty and Woods, who violated orders got those to safety that they did. It was obama's intention that they all die.
 
Al Quaeda has learned someone very important about obamamerica. This new country will leave it's people to die if it's politically expedient to do so. It wasn
t 4 American left to be slaughtered. It was 30. Only the actions of Dougherty and Woods, who violated orders got those to safety that they did. It was obama's intention that they all die.

Yes. Obama froze like a deer in the headlights and got those guys killed all because of an election.
 
Republicans, this tapdancing of yours on American graves for political gain makes you look like you're more loyal to your party than to your country.

But then, you are more loyal to your party than to your country. Republicans are very similar to the old Soviet communists in that aspect of their behavior. If they have to screw their own country to gain political power, they will do so, and they will not be sorry about it at all.

Fuck you, Mamooth...Four Americans are dead because of this Administration's incompetence and we've been lied to about it right from the start by our President, Vice President and Secretary of State all because they didn't want to be embarrassed politically right before the election.

As for who's similar to the old Soviet's? Who's been caught red handed telling lies about what happened? Who used a pliant Main Stream Media to disseminate their narrative that this wasn't a terrorist attack but a mob protesting the YouTube video that got out of control?

What is a Mamooth? :confused:

Mamooth is one more progressive apologist who refuses to hold this Administration accountable for it's actions and accuses anyone who does want an honest accounting of what happened in Libya of trying to "politicize" the issue...the same charge that was made when Holder's Justice Department refused to prosecute for blatant voter intimidation or turn over documents on Fast & Furious.

This Administration believes that it can tell lies to the American people and not take heat for it. Why? Because the Main Stream Media is so far in the tank for them that they won't report on those lies.
 
Oldstyle isn't actually treasonous, like his hero Issa is. He's just 'effin stupid.

FOX says it, OldStyle believes it, and no amount of real-world evidence can ever convince him otherwise. Any facts that contradict his cult masters must clearly be a liberal conspiracy. Fast & Furious was entirely Issa's fabrication, the whole world knows that, but Oldstyle will go to his grave still spouting the same discredited lies about it, because he still believes the lies.

And a "big hairy mamooth" is what someone called me once, a girl who was a poor speller. Catholic school grad, so not her fault.
 
Last edited:
Oldstyle isn't actually treasonous, like his hero Issa is. He's just 'effin stupid.

FOX says it, OldStyle believes it, and no amount of real-world evidence can ever convince him otherwise. Any facts that contradict his cult masters must clearly be a liberal conspiracy. Fast & Furious was entirely Issa's fabrication, the whole world knows that, but Oldstyle will go to his grave still spouting the same discredited lies about it, because he still believes the lies.

And a "big hairy mamooth" is what someone called me once, a girl who was a poor speller. Catholic school grad, so not her fault.

To believe the narrative that the Obama White House had put out about what happened in Libya you'd have to totally suspend any rational examination of events. What this Administration SAID simply doesn't jive with what we now know. Either they are totally clueless or they deliberately chose to mislead the American people. Go ahead and pick your poison!

Fast & Furious is a "fabrication" to you? I suppose our Ambassador and three others being murdered is also something that conservatives have "made up" to embarrass the President?
 
Oldstyle isn't actually treasonous, like his hero Issa is. He's just 'effin stupid.

FOX says it, OldStyle believes it, and no amount of real-world evidence can ever convince him otherwise. Any facts that contradict his cult masters must clearly be a liberal conspiracy. Fast & Furious was entirely Issa's fabrication, the whole world knows that, but Oldstyle will go to his grave still spouting the same discredited lies about it, because he still believes the lies.

And a "big hairy mamooth" is what someone called me once, a girl who was a poor speller. Catholic school grad, so not her fault.

Mamooth
Male of the species with excessive back hair, also prone to mating with female having same condition.
Urban Dictionary: Mamooth

OK, i see now. He talking about this (mammoth)
Mammoth.gif

not this mamooth
 
Here's an example of what serious journalism, sounds like, Foxbot dupes...

“There’s a lot of Monday-morning quarterbacking going on here,” Mr. Panetta told reporters at the Pentagon, adding that “the basic principle is that you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on, without having some real-time information about what’s taking place.”

As a result, Mr. Panetta said, he and two top commanders “felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation.” The commanders are Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Gen. Carter F. Ham of Africa Command, which oversees American military operations in Africa, including Libya.

Mr. Panetta was at the White House for a regular meeting on the afternoon of Sept. 11 as the first reports of the attack unfolded, an American official said. By that evening Mr. Panetta had consulted with General Dempsey and General Ham and had ordered a number of American military forces in the region to move closer to Libya.

Defense officials say they did not receive a request for military support from the State Department as the attack unfolded.

In response to Mr. Panetta’s decision, a small Special Operations “strike force” team moved from Central Europe to the Sigonella Air Base in Sicily while two Navy destroyers already in the Mediterranean were moved off the Libyan coast. A rapid-reaction team of elite Marines left Rota, Spain, and arrived to protect the American Embassy in Tripoli, the Libyan capital, the next day.

But a senior military official said that uncertainty about what was happening on the ground in Libya delayed the decision about where to send the Special Operations forces until about 9 p.m. in Washington, or 3 a.m. on Sept. 12, in Libya.

Ultimately, the decision relayed from the military’s Joint Staff in Washington was “to get close but not into Libya,” the official said. The task force then deployed over the next 24 hours to Sigonella, which is about an hour by plane from Benghazi. But by that time the shooting was over and the Americans were eventually evacuated.

As Mr. Panetta told reporters on Thursday, “This happened within a few hours, and it was really over before we had the opportunity to really know what was happening.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/26/w...tuation-in-benghazi.html?ref=todayspaper&_r=0

Are you kidding? If Leon Panetta couldn't figure out that our Embassy was under attack and needed help from the streaming video they were receiving and the reports coming in from both the Embassy itself and the Annex a mile away then WHY THE FUCK IS HE IN A POSITION OF AUTHORITY?

We had Americans whose lives were in mortal danger...calling out repeatedly for help...and everyone connected to this Administration sat on their hands. It's been quite apparent that the Obama Administration is "challenged" when it comes to leadership but for the love of God this wasn't exactly a tough call to make. Our embassy is under attack and our diplomats are about to be overrun and slaughtered...Gee...what should we do?

You send the cavalry you fucking progressive morons!!! You don't debate the ramifications. You don't weigh the political pros and cons. You act!!!

The more I find out about this the more pissed off I am about it. I can't believe that those poor bastards at the Annex fought against overwhelming odds for almost SEVEN HOURS while Leon Panetta and the rest of this Administration "diddled" themselves. You want a reason to get these clowns out of the White House? The fiasco in Bengazi is about as big a "reason" as you could hope to find.

My heart goes out to the families of those men.

My God. They fought a seven hour battle when aide was an hour away. I can't even begin to imagine what was running through their minds.

Barry, his State Deparment, Panetta and the rest of his administratioin aren't worth the sweat off those mens balls.
 

Forum List

Back
Top