People who hate Bush will never give him any credit in regards to his works in Africa.
Don't forget to ask this question, "By refusing to support organizations that teach "safe sex", how many NEW infections did that create?"
Giving out medicine is great, but if your actions, based on ideology creates more disease than it helps, then where is the benefit?
The right can't see that safe sex and information is the ONLY really reliable way to reduce infection. Worse, they are relying on medicine that is developed by scientists. All viruses are difficult to treat because they constantly "evolve". The right doesn't even believe in evolution.
Teenage pregnancies and syphilis have risen sharply among a generation of American school girls who were urged to avoid sex before marriage under George Bush's evangelically-driven education policy, according to a new report by the US's major public health body.
In a report that will surprise few of Bush's critics on the issue, the Centres for Disease Control says years of falling rates of teenage pregnancies and sexually transmitted disease infections under previous administrations were reversed or stalled in the Bush years. According to the CDC, birth rates among teenagers aged 15 or older had been in decline since 1991 but are up sharply in more than half of American states since 2005. The study also revealed that the number of teenage females with syphilis has risen by nearly half after a significant decrease while a two-decade fall in the gonorrhea infection rate is being reversed.
The number of Aids cases in adolescent boys has nearly doubled.
US teen pregnancy and syphilis rates rose sharply during George Bush's presidency, Centres for Disease Control finds | World news | guardian.co.uk
Research from the heavily studied Rakai district in southern Uganda suggests that increased condom use, coupled with premature death among those infected more than a decade ago with the AIDS virus, are primarily responsible for the steady decline in HIV infections in that area.
Uganda's HIV rate drops, but not from abstinence / Study concludes basis of Bush policy apparently irrelevant - SFGate
BOSTON, Feb. 23 -- Abstinence and sexual fidelity have played virtually no role in the much-heralded decline of AIDS rates in the most closely studied region of Uganda, two researchers told a gathering of AIDS scientists here.
It is the deaths of previously infected people, not dramatic change in human behavior, that is the main engine behind the ebbing of the overall rate, or prevalence, of AIDS in southern Uganda over the last decade, they reported.
Uganda's AIDS Decline Attributed to Deaths (washingtonpost.com)
Some critics of PEPFAR feel that American political and social groups with moral rather than public health agendas are behind several requirements of PEPFAR, pointing to the mandates that one-third of prevention spending in 2006–2008 be directed towards abstinence-until-marriage programs and that all funded organizations sign an anti-prostitution pledge. PEPFAR also does not fund needle exchange programs, which are widely regarded as effective in preventing the spread of HIV.[17] The requirement for prevention spending was lifted with the PEPFAR reauthorization in 2008,[10] but some critics worry that some funds could still be spent on abstinence programs. The Center for Health and Gender Equity and Health GAP outline their criticism of PEPFAR on a website known as PEPFAR Watch.
President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
PEPFAR Watch — The Global AIDS Relief Monitor
There is convincing evidence that this approach to prevention was a failure. While
PEPFAR was very successful in getting treatment to millions of people, according to a study published in the Annals of Medicine,
the pace of new infections in PEPFAR focus countries
continued to grow.
The Politics of PEPFAR: The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief [Abstract]
Finally, the conservative Christian influence on AIDS policy will continue to make U.S. programs a target for international criticism.
Collectively these lessons also explain why the hope of building a long-term liberal-conservative coalition supporting future humanitarian objectives has been dashed.
When the conservatives became interested in what previously had been a liberal issue, they took programmatic control. This left liberals in the awkward position of being on the outside of decisions but unable to be too critical because President Bush was providing far more funding and attention to the AIDS issue than any previous president. Whether liberal groups and legislators would have been so supportive of PEPFAR in 2003 had they known what policies would be implemented by 2007 is an interesting question.
Letter to President Bush - The Body
Letter to President Bush
From Treatment Action Group
We continue to be troubled that sound public health information is being measured against a political standard and not by science. We refer to the fact that information about condoms and condom efficacy virtually disappeared from the CDC Web site for more than a year. Scientific studies have proven numerous times that condoms work and public health experts continue to advise that condoms should be a part of a comprehensive approach to HIV and STD prevention.
-------------------------------------------------------
I seriously don't understand you people. You sit in front of a computer. Anyone of you can do a search on the Internet and find out the truth when these policies have been so thoroughly discussed. It's great that Bush supported giving medicine to those suffering from a terrible disease, but when it wasn't his policies that reduced the amount of new infections, but people dying, then how effective were his methods?
They haven't worked here. Why would anyone expect them to work over there?
You can't yell and scream at the truth. It's the truth. It just "is".
My suggestion. Do some research. Read from people who have actually "studied" the situation. Not right wing websites. They don't believe facts, data and study.
And saying that scientists don't believe in facts, data and study is ridiculous.
So go ahead, yell and scream at me. Rep me.
Get really mad. But prove me wrong. Show me the "study".