Bush didn't just lie........

[sealybobo]

Check this out. Hillary just didn't lie...

This ain't about her and no ones watching your video. If it has teeth Republicans will run a million commercials.

Sorry boy who cried wolf.

This is vindication bush lied and was at fault for the global recession

 

[Hutch Starskey]

As with the Reagan administration (and with many of the same people behind the scenes), the purpose of the Bushleague was to propel America into a situation that would leave succeeding administrations, and even generations, little if any choice. The policies establish by the clique would have to be pursued.

Nailed it!

Their Goal: The neoconservative agenda

Established in the spring of 1997 and funded largely by the energy and arms industries,the Project for the New American Century was founded as the neoconservative think tank whose stated goal was to usher in a “new American century”. Having won the cold war and no military threat to speak of, this group of ideologues created a blueprint for the future whose agenda was to capitalize upon our surplus of military forces and funds and forcing American hegemony and corporate privatization throughout the world. In theirstatement of principles they outline a fourfold agenda:

1) Increase an already enormous military budget at the expense of domestic social programs

2) Toppling of regimes resistant to our corporate interests
3) Forcing democracy at the barrel of a gun in regions that have no history of the democratic process
4) Replacing the UN’s role of preserving and extending international order
(This all can be read in their own words at www.newamericancentury.org



Project for the New American Century (PNAC)-All about them

 

[GWV5903]

This ain't about her and no ones watching your video. If it has teeth Republicans will run a million commercials.

Sorry boy who cried wolf.

This is vindication bush lied and was at fault for the global recession

You just might have more credibility if you tried to say...."This video is altered, she never uttered anything of the sort..."

Or better yet...

Words cannot describe how f'ing stupid you are...

 

[GWV5903]

Having won the cold war and no military threat to speak of,

Yeah that little country called the USSR was run by saints and nuns...

Are you 21 yet?

1) Increase an already enormous military budget at the expense of domestic social programs

So tell me what are the programs we spend more money on than Defense?

2) Toppling of regimes resistant to our corporate interests

You forgot that those regimes signed deals to reap the rewards International Corporations brought to the table...

3) Forcing democracy at the barrel of a gun in regions that have no history of the democratic process

I know they are such wonderful places to live, their regimes have done a super job of providing basic services...

4) Replacing the UN’s role of preserving and extending international order

Did you forget Rwanda? Or maybe Darfur? How about Israel, Syria, India, Pakistan, Kosovo, Liberia, Congo, etc...

You're either blind or stupid, which one is it?

 

[hunarcy]

Nobody gives a shit about your big head or the hot air in it.......it's obvious what you are trying to do, deflecting....trying to get away from the original argument, the OP...the fact that Bush lied......because you were never able to prove that he didn't....Faun or Dot or whoever said it was right, all you are doing is Kazzing.

I did not say what you falsely ascribed to me. When do you stop kazzing?

he doesn't.

Bye bye

Couldn't stand being exposed......right?

Much more likely that kaz just doesn't want to waste time on a closed minded lying troll such as yourself. You ignore that which you don't agree with and keep up the steady drum beat of your lie as if it will make your lie true.

But, on the off chance you're just ignorant, why not read this?

No Lie

"...For according to Woodward, there's no evidence the 43rd president of the United States "lied" the nation into war.

Bush's political opponents like to make this claim to delegitimize not just the war but his entire presidency. No man who knowingly and dishonestly took a nation to war is worthy of any kind of honor, hence history's reluctance to focus on the substantive accomplishments of President Lyndon Johnson. Whatever good he did is eclipsed by his use of a fabricated incident in the Gulf of Tonkin to secure congressional authority to increase the number of combat troops being sent to South Vietnam. The notion that Bush lied in similar fashion about Iraq discredits – in the eyes of his political opponents certainly – everything he did, everything he stood for and everything he accomplished.

It's a brutal axe but, according to Woodward, one that is itself based on an untruth. An argument could certainly and persuasively be made, he told moderator Chris Wallace on "Fox News Sunday," that the Iraq War was a mistake, but "there was no lying in this that I could find."...:

 

[Dot Com]

Fear mongering was much more effective

George W. Bush didn t just lie about the Iraq War. What he did was much worse.

What the Bush administration launched in 2002 and 2003 may have been the most comprehensive, sophisticated, and misleading campaign of government propaganda in American history. Spend too much time in the weeds, and you risk missing the hysterical tenor of the whole campaign.

In the summer of 2002, the administration established something called the White House Iraq Group, through which Karl Rove and other communication strategists like Karen Hughes and Mary Matalin coordinated with policy officials to sell the public on the threat from Iraq in order to justify war. "The script had been finalized with great care over the summer," White House press secretary Scott McClellan later wrote, for a "campaign to convince Americans that war with Iraq was inevitable and necessary."
In that campaign, intelligence wasn't something to be understood and assessed by the administration in making their decisions, it was a propaganda tool to lead the public to the conclusion that the administration wanted. Again and again we saw a similar pattern: An allegation would bubble up from somewhere, some in the intelligence community would say that it could be true but others would say it was either speculation or outright baloney, but before you knew it the president or someone else was presenting it to the public as settled fact.





.

true.

 

[Faun]

Nobody gives a shit about your big head or the hot air in it.......it's obvious what you are trying to do, deflecting....trying to get away from the original argument, the OP...the fact that Bush lied......because you were never able to prove that he didn't....Faun or Dot or whoever said it was right, all you are doing is Kazzing.

I did not say what you falsely ascribed to me. When do you stop kazzing?

he doesn't.

Bye bye

Couldn't stand being exposed......right?

Much more likely that kaz just doesn't want to waste time on a closed minded lying troll such as yourself. You ignore that which you don't agree with and keep up the steady drum beat of your lie as if it will make your lie true.

But, on the off chance you're just ignorant, why not read this?

No Lie

"...For according to Woodward, there's no evidence the 43rd president of the United States "lied" the nation into war.

Bush's political opponents like to make this claim to delegitimize not just the war but his entire presidency. No man who knowingly and dishonestly took a nation to war is worthy of any kind of honor, hence history's reluctance to focus on the substantive accomplishments of President Lyndon Johnson. Whatever good he did is eclipsed by his use of a fabricated incident in the Gulf of Tonkin to secure congressional authority to increase the number of combat troops being sent to South Vietnam. The notion that Bush lied in similar fashion about Iraq discredits – in the eyes of his political opponents certainly – everything he did, everything he stood for and everything he accomplished.

It's a brutal axe but, according to Woodward, one that is itself based on an untruth. An argument could certainly and persuasively be made, he told moderator Chris Wallace on "Fox News Sunday," that the Iraq War was a mistake, but "there was no lying in this that I could find."...:

Nah, kaz just doesn't like it when others calling him out for kazzing. When that occurs, he picks up his ball and sulks home.

 

[kaz]

Nobody gives a shit about your big head or the hot air in it.......it's obvious what you are trying to do, deflecting....trying to get away from the original argument, the OP...the fact that Bush lied......because you were never able to prove that he didn't....Faun or Dot or whoever said it was right, all you are doing is Kazzing.

I did not say what you falsely ascribed to me. When do you stop kazzing?

he doesn't.

Bye bye

Couldn't stand being exposed......right?

Much more likely that kaz just doesn't want to waste time on a closed minded lying troll such as yourself. You ignore that which you don't agree with and keep up the steady drum beat of your lie as if it will make your lie true.

But, on the off chance you're just ignorant, why not read this?

No Lie

"...For according to Woodward, there's no evidence the 43rd president of the United States "lied" the nation into war.

Bush's political opponents like to make this claim to delegitimize not just the war but his entire presidency. No man who knowingly and dishonestly took a nation to war is worthy of any kind of honor, hence history's reluctance to focus on the substantive accomplishments of President Lyndon Johnson. Whatever good he did is eclipsed by his use of a fabricated incident in the Gulf of Tonkin to secure congressional authority to increase the number of combat troops being sent to South Vietnam. The notion that Bush lied in similar fashion about Iraq discredits – in the eyes of his political opponents certainly – everything he did, everything he stood for and everything he accomplished.

It's a brutal axe but, according to Woodward, one that is itself based on an untruth. An argument could certainly and persuasively be made, he told moderator Chris Wallace on "Fox News Sunday," that the Iraq War was a mistake, but "there was no lying in this that I could find."...:

Nobody gives a shit about your big head or the hot air in it.......it's obvious what you are trying to do, deflecting....trying to get away from the original argument, the OP...the fact that Bush lied......because you were never able to prove that he didn't....Faun or Dot or whoever said it was right, all you are doing is Kazzing.

I did not say what you falsely ascribed to me. When do you stop kazzing?

he doesn't.

Bye bye

Couldn't stand being exposed......right?

Much more likely that kaz just doesn't want to waste time on a closed minded lying troll such as yourself. You ignore that which you don't agree with and keep up the steady drum beat of your lie as if it will make your lie true.

But, on the off chance you're just ignorant, why not read this?

No Lie

"...For according to Woodward, there's no evidence the 43rd president of the United States "lied" the nation into war.

Bush's political opponents like to make this claim to delegitimize not just the war but his entire presidency. No man who knowingly and dishonestly took a nation to war is worthy of any kind of honor, hence history's reluctance to focus on the substantive accomplishments of President Lyndon Johnson. Whatever good he did is eclipsed by his use of a fabricated incident in the Gulf of Tonkin to secure congressional authority to increase the number of combat troops being sent to South Vietnam. The notion that Bush lied in similar fashion about Iraq discredits – in the eyes of his political opponents certainly – everything he did, everything he stood for and everything he accomplished.

It's a brutal axe but, according to Woodward, one that is itself based on an untruth. An argument could certainly and persuasively be made, he told moderator Chris Wallace on "Fox News Sunday," that the Iraq War was a mistake, but "there was no lying in this that I could find."...:

The three of them are on ignore for circle jerking. Like above. So I didn't see it until you quoted them, hunarcy.

basically you covered it when you pointed out they are trolls

 

[rightwinger]

Check this out. Hillary just didn't lie...

Sooner or later, Conservatives will realize that it was not the Clintons responsible for the Iraq war

 

[Mertex]

Nobody gives a shit about your big head or the hot air in it.......it's obvious what you are trying to do, deflecting....trying to get away from the original argument, the OP...the fact that Bush lied......because you were never able to prove that he didn't....Faun or Dot or whoever said it was right, all you are doing is Kazzing.

he doesn't.

Bye bye

Couldn't stand being exposed......right?

Much more likely that kaz just doesn't want to waste time on a closed minded lying troll such as yourself. You ignore that which you don't agree with and keep up the steady drum beat of your lie as if it will make your lie true.

But, on the off chance you're just ignorant, why not read this?

No Lie

"...For according to Woodward, there's no evidence the 43rd president of the United States "lied" the nation into war.

Bush's political opponents like to make this claim to delegitimize not just the war but his entire presidency. No man who knowingly and dishonestly took a nation to war is worthy of any kind of honor, hence history's reluctance to focus on the substantive accomplishments of President Lyndon Johnson. Whatever good he did is eclipsed by his use of a fabricated incident in the Gulf of Tonkin to secure congressional authority to increase the number of combat troops being sent to South Vietnam. The notion that Bush lied in similar fashion about Iraq discredits – in the eyes of his political opponents certainly – everything he did, everything he stood for and everything he accomplished.

It's a brutal axe but, according to Woodward, one that is itself based on an untruth. An argument could certainly and persuasively be made, he told moderator Chris Wallace on "Fox News Sunday," that the Iraq War was a mistake, but "there was no lying in this that I could find."...:

Nah, kaz just doesn't like it when others calling him out for kazzing. When that occurs, he picks up his ball and sulks home.

You mean she picks up her dusting rag and goes home to finish her Stepford duties..........

 

[Mertex]

Check this out. Hillary just didn't lie...

Sooner or later, Conservatives will realize that it was not the Clintons responsible for the Iraq war

I seriously doubt they'll ever reach that conclusion....not when they keep parroting the same lies over and over.

 

[Faun]

Nobody gives a shit about your big head or the hot air in it.......it's obvious what you are trying to do, deflecting....trying to get away from the original argument, the OP...the fact that Bush lied......because you were never able to prove that he didn't....Faun or Dot or whoever said it was right, all you are doing is Kazzing.

Bye bye

Couldn't stand being exposed......right?

Much more likely that kaz just doesn't want to waste time on a closed minded lying troll such as yourself. You ignore that which you don't agree with and keep up the steady drum beat of your lie as if it will make your lie true.

But, on the off chance you're just ignorant, why not read this?

No Lie

"...For according to Woodward, there's no evidence the 43rd president of the United States "lied" the nation into war.

Bush's political opponents like to make this claim to delegitimize not just the war but his entire presidency. No man who knowingly and dishonestly took a nation to war is worthy of any kind of honor, hence history's reluctance to focus on the substantive accomplishments of President Lyndon Johnson. Whatever good he did is eclipsed by his use of a fabricated incident in the Gulf of Tonkin to secure congressional authority to increase the number of combat troops being sent to South Vietnam. The notion that Bush lied in similar fashion about Iraq discredits – in the eyes of his political opponents certainly – everything he did, everything he stood for and everything he accomplished.

It's a brutal axe but, according to Woodward, one that is itself based on an untruth. An argument could certainly and persuasively be made, he told moderator Chris Wallace on "Fox News Sunday," that the Iraq War was a mistake, but "there was no lying in this that I could find."...:

Nah, kaz just doesn't like it when others calling him out for kazzing. When that occurs, he picks up his ball and sulks home.

You mean she picks up her dusting rag and goes home to finish her Stepford duties..........

He did once say he's the wife in his marriage when his wife earns more than him, so yeah.

 

[Mertex]

Bye bye

Couldn't stand being exposed......right?

Much more likely that kaz just doesn't want to waste time on a closed minded lying troll such as yourself. You ignore that which you don't agree with and keep up the steady drum beat of your lie as if it will make your lie true.

But, on the off chance you're just ignorant, why not read this?

No Lie

"...For according to Woodward, there's no evidence the 43rd president of the United States "lied" the nation into war.

Bush's political opponents like to make this claim to delegitimize not just the war but his entire presidency. No man who knowingly and dishonestly took a nation to war is worthy of any kind of honor, hence history's reluctance to focus on the substantive accomplishments of President Lyndon Johnson. Whatever good he did is eclipsed by his use of a fabricated incident in the Gulf of Tonkin to secure congressional authority to increase the number of combat troops being sent to South Vietnam. The notion that Bush lied in similar fashion about Iraq discredits – in the eyes of his political opponents certainly – everything he did, everything he stood for and everything he accomplished.

It's a brutal axe but, according to Woodward, one that is itself based on an untruth. An argument could certainly and persuasively be made, he told moderator Chris Wallace on "Fox News Sunday," that the Iraq War was a mistake, but "there was no lying in this that I could find."...:

Nah, kaz just doesn't like it when others calling him out for kazzing. When that occurs, he picks up his ball and sulks home.

You mean she picks up her dusting rag and goes home to finish her Stepford duties..........

He did once say he's the wife in his marriage when his wife earns more than him, so yeah.

You're probably right.......I might have been confusing him with another wrong-winger.....they all sound alike.....

 

[g5000]

Fear mongering was much more effective

George W. Bush didn t just lie about the Iraq War. What he did was much worse.

What the Bush administration launched in 2002 and 2003 may have been the most comprehensive, sophisticated, and misleading campaign of government propaganda in American history. Spend too much time in the weeds, and you risk missing the hysterical tenor of the whole campaign.

In the summer of 2002, the administration established something called the White House Iraq Group, through which Karl Rove and other communication strategists like Karen Hughes and Mary Matalin coordinated with policy officials to sell the public on the threat from Iraq in order to justify war. "The script had been finalized with great care over the summer," White House press secretary Scott McClellan later wrote, for a "campaign to convince Americans that war with Iraq was inevitable and necessary."
In that campaign, intelligence wasn't something to be understood and assessed by the administration in making their decisions, it was a propaganda tool to lead the public to the conclusion that the administration wanted. Again and again we saw a similar pattern: An allegation would bubble up from somewhere, some in the intelligence community would say that it could be true but others would say it was either speculation or outright baloney, but before you knew it the president or someone else was presenting it to the public as settled fact.





.

Did you get this in an email from the Trump campaign?

 

[rightwinger]

Fear mongering was much more effective

George W. Bush didn t just lie about the Iraq War. What he did was much worse.

What the Bush administration launched in 2002 and 2003 may have been the most comprehensive, sophisticated, and misleading campaign of government propaganda in American history. Spend too much time in the weeds, and you risk missing the hysterical tenor of the whole campaign.

In the summer of 2002, the administration established something called the White House Iraq Group, through which Karl Rove and other communication strategists like Karen Hughes and Mary Matalin coordinated with policy officials to sell the public on the threat from Iraq in order to justify war. "The script had been finalized with great care over the summer," White House press secretary Scott McClellan later wrote, for a "campaign to convince Americans that war with Iraq was inevitable and necessary."
In that campaign, intelligence wasn't something to be understood and assessed by the administration in making their decisions, it was a propaganda tool to lead the public to the conclusion that the administration wanted. Again and again we saw a similar pattern: An allegation would bubble up from somewhere, some in the intelligence community would say that it could be true but others would say it was either speculation or outright baloney, but before you knew it the president or someone else was presenting it to the public as settled fact.





.

Did you get this in an email from the Trump campaign?

Was Trump running last May?

 

[easyt65]

George W. Bush didn t just lie about the Iraq War. What he did was much worse.

Hillary did as well. She made the case to go to war and then voted to give Bush the authorization to do so; yet liberals can't find it within themselves to blame anyone else but Bush.



Hillary got Americans killed by HER OWN incompetence then lied...then called the grieving family members 'liars'...and Liberals defend her. The hypocritical rabid partisanship demonstrated constantly by Liberals is truly amazing.

 

[GWV5903]

Sooner or later, Conservatives will realize that it was not the Clintons responsible for the Iraq war

Sooner or later Liberal Idiots such as yourself will realize that the Clintons, Reid, Burger, Albright, Kerry, Pelosi, et al, supported the invasion of Iraq to dethrone Saddam Hussein...

It's in living color...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSwSDvgw5Uc

 

[rightwinger]

George W. Bush didn t just lie about the Iraq War. What he did was much worse.

Hillary did as well. She made the case to go to war and then voted to give Bush the authorization to do so; yet liberals can't find it within themselves to blame anyone else but Bush.



Hillary got Americans killed by HER OWN incompetence then lied...then called the grieving family members 'liars'...and Liberals defend her. The hypocritical rabid partisanship demonstrated constantly by Liberals is truly amazing.

What the Bush administration launched in 2002 and 2003 may have been the most comprehensive, sophisticated, and misleading campaign of government propaganda in American history. Spend too much time in the weeds, and you risk missing the hysterical tenor of the whole campaign.

That's not to say there aren't plenty of weeds. In 2008, the Center for Public Integrity completed a project in which they went over the public statements by eight top Bush administration officials on the topic of Iraq, and found that no fewer than 935 were false, including 260 statements by President Bush himself. But the theory on which the White House operated was that whether or not you could fool all of the people some of the time, you could certainly scare them out of their wits. That's what was truly diabolical about their campaign.

Evidently, Hillary believed what Bush was telling her.......Fool me once......

 

[rightwinger]

Sooner or later, Conservatives will realize that it was not the Clintons responsible for the Iraq war

Sooner or later Liberal Idiots such as yourself will realize that the Clintons, Reid, Burger, Albright, Kerry, Pelosi, et al, supported the invasion of Iraq to dethrone Saddam Hussein...

It's in living color...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSwSDvgw5Uc

Bush asked for approval to invade
Bush was given approval if he thought it was necessary


Now it is the Democrats fault for not telling him to go **** himself

 

[Dot Com]

George W. Bush didn t just lie about the Iraq War. What he did was much worse.

Hillary did as well. She made the case to go to war and then voted to give Bush the authorization to do so; yet liberals can't find it within themselves to blame anyone else but Bush.



Hillary got Americans killed by HER OWN incompetence then lied...then called the grieving family members 'liars'...and Liberals defend her. The hypocritical rabid partisanship demonstrated constantly by Liberals is truly amazing.

What the Bush administration launched in 2002 and 2003 may have been the most comprehensive, sophisticated, and misleading campaign of government propaganda in American history. Spend too much time in the weeds, and you risk missing the hysterical tenor of the whole campaign.

That's not to say there aren't plenty of weeds. In 2008, the Center for Public Integrity completed a project in which they went over the public statements by eight top Bush administration officials on the topic of Iraq, and found that no fewer than 935 were false, including 260 statements by President Bush himself. But the theory on which the White House operated was that whether or not you could fool all of the people some of the time, you could certainly scare them out of their wits. That's what was truly diabolical about their campaign.

Evidently, Hillary believed what Bush was telling her.......Fool me once......

easyt believed it too apparently. Still does lol