Bubba's Encore: I Did Not Have Sex With That Sex Slave

[paulitician]

There is proof he was good friends with this Billionaire pedophile and did visit the island several times. Why do you think he visited the island several times? Just stopping by to say 'hey?'

I went to school with a guy who ended up smoking crack and went to prison for armed robbery. Does that mean I'm guilty too? Guilt by association doesn't quite cut it. Come up with facts instead of innuendo, and you might have something.

Are you good friends with degenerate pedophiles who own sex slave islands? And do you visit said pedophiles and islands often? Because Bill Clinton is and did.

Why do you think he visited that island so often? Given his sordid pervert past, do you actually believe he showed up to just say 'hello?'

I believe you believe it.........with no evidence at all.

There is evidence he visited his pedophile buddy and island several times. That's on record. So tell us, why do you think he visited that island several times? Just curious.

No idea why he visited. I visited New Orleans, and they had crappy levees. Did my going there have anything to do with the flooding that happened there? Unless you come up with something more solid than a bunch of crazies making accusations, you got nothing.

Ha, you have no idea? Go figure? Yeah, he visited his pedophile buddy and sex slave island just to say 'hi.' A known degenerate pervert just happens to show up on a sex slave island. He definitely wasn't there to partake in the sex acts. No way, impossible to believe. Man, only a delusional Democrat/Clinton sycophant could live in such denial.

 

[BULLDOG]

NO, THE LAWSUIT DOESN'T SAY THAT. The article you wingnutters are presenting as 'evidence' does!!!!

Oh well, that's a relief, then. The Clinton's will undoubtedly sue the NE for libel if that's the case.

PUBLIC figure, like the Prince Bubba, um read up on it sometime, but thanks for agreeing, it was the TRASHY newspaper and right wing nutters who made the claim, the lawsuit only said 'famous people'

British law. Read up on it sometime.

In the US? lol US PAPERS

Weird, Clinton's a PUBLIC figure, know how much leeway they have with him? lol

Honesty, try it

The Daily Mail disagrees. Read up on it.

The Daily mail also questions whether overpopulation will force us to eat our dead. Read up on it.

 

[Carib Gyal]

Oh well, that's a relief, then. The Clinton's will undoubtedly sue the NE for libel if that's the case.

PUBLIC figure, like the Prince Bubba, um read up on it sometime, but thanks for agreeing, it was the TRASHY newspaper and right wing nutters who made the claim, the lawsuit only said 'famous people'

British law. Read up on it sometime.

In the US? lol US PAPERS

Weird, Clinton's a PUBLIC figure, know how much leeway they have with him? lol

Honesty, try it

The Daily Mail disagrees. Read up on it.

The Daily mail also questions whether overpopulation will force us to eat our dead. Read up on it.

Doesn't sound libelous, but you know those Brits. Read up on them.

 

[007]

 

[paulitician]

Keep in mind people, young girls were held captive and repeatedly raped on this island. That has been proven. And Bill Clinton was there. So you do the math. It's not about Republican vs. Democrat. These young girls still haven't received real justice.

 

[007]

 

[g5000]

He didn't visit his pedophile buddy and island several times, to merely say 'hello.'

Evidence?

Oh. You have none. Right.

 

[BULLDOG]

I went to school with a guy who ended up smoking crack and went to prison for armed robbery. Does that mean I'm guilty too? Guilt by association doesn't quite cut it. Come up with facts instead of innuendo, and you might have something.

Are you good friends with degenerate pedophiles who own sex slave islands? And do you visit said pedophiles and islands often? Because Bill Clinton is and did.

Why do you think he visited that island so often? Given his sordid pervert past, do you actually believe he showed up to just say 'hello?'

I believe you believe it.........with no evidence at all.

There is evidence he visited his pedophile buddy and island several times. That's on record. So tell us, why do you think he visited that island several times? Just curious.

No idea why he visited. I visited New Orleans, and they had crappy levees. Did my going there have anything to do with the flooding that happened there? Unless you come up with something more solid than a bunch of crazies making accusations, you got nothing.

Ha, you have no idea? Go figure? Yeah, he visited his pedophile buddy and sex slave island just to say 'hi.' A known degenerate pervert just happens to show up on a sex slave island. He definitely wasn't there to partake in the sex acts. No way, impossible to believe. Man, only a delusional Democrat/Clinton sycophant could live in such denial.

How long have you had this ability to see what happens in places you aren't at, or read people's minds? That's the only way you could know what you claim, because there is no tangible evidence of it otherwise.

 

[007]

Keep in mind people, young girls were held captive and repeatedly raped on this island. That has been proven. And Bill Clinton was there. So you do the math. It's not about Republican vs. Democrat. These young girls still haven't received real justice.

... and what were you doing during your visits to the island, Bubba?

 

[g5000]

Keep in mind people, young girls were held captive and repeatedly raped on this island. That has been proven. And Bill Clinton was there. So you do the math.

Paulitician math? 1 + 1 = Eleventy-two.

 

[007]

 

[BULLDOG]

Keep in mind people, young girls were held captive and repeatedly raped on this island. That has been proven. And Bill Clinton was there. So you do the math. It's not about Republican vs. Democrat. These young girls still haven't received real justice.

It's about evidence. You got any?

 

[paulitician]

Are you good friends with degenerate pedophiles who own sex slave islands? And do you visit said pedophiles and islands often? Because Bill Clinton is and did.

Why do you think he visited that island so often? Given his sordid pervert past, do you actually believe he showed up to just say 'hello?'

I believe you believe it.........with no evidence at all.

There is evidence he visited his pedophile buddy and island several times. That's on record. So tell us, why do you think he visited that island several times? Just curious.

No idea why he visited. I visited New Orleans, and they had crappy levees. Did my going there have anything to do with the flooding that happened there? Unless you come up with something more solid than a bunch of crazies making accusations, you got nothing.

Ha, you have no idea? Go figure? Yeah, he visited his pedophile buddy and sex slave island just to say 'hi.' A known degenerate pervert just happens to show up on a sex slave island. He definitely wasn't there to partake in the sex acts. No way, impossible to believe. Man, only a delusional Democrat/Clinton sycophant could live in such denial.

How long have you had this ability to see what happens in places you aren't at, or read people's minds? That's the only way you could know what you claim, because there is no tangible evidence of it otherwise.

Just another Democrat/Clinton sycophant living in blissful ignorance. Sure, a known degenerate pervert just happens to visit a secluded sex slave island to just say 'hey.' Sure thing.

 

[paulitician]

Keep in mind people, young girls were held captive and repeatedly raped on this island. That has been proven. And Bill Clinton was there. So you do the math. It's not about Republican vs. Democrat. These young girls still haven't received real justice.

It's about evidence. You got any?

Yup, and Ted Kennedy didn't kill that young girl and get away with it either. I hear ya.

 

[BULLDOG]

Keep in mind people, young girls were held captive and repeatedly raped on this island. That has been proven. And Bill Clinton was there. So you do the math. It's not about Republican vs. Democrat. These young girls still haven't received real justice.

... and what were you doing during your visits to the island, Bubba?

Damn, you ran out of steam pretty quick didn't you? You got nothing but slanderous photo shop pictures? Oh well, we knew that's all you had to start with.

 

[g5000]

None of the girls has accused Clinton of having sex with them, much less accusing of being forced to have sex with Clinton.

They have accused many other leading political figures. Clinton's name is not on the list of accused.

So I would strongly suggest you sick little retards stop your mental masturbations.

 

[Foxfyre]

There is no proof being shown what so ever regarding this innuendo, if there were, and Clinton was involved in these sex parties, then I would be against him and want him imprisoned....period.

But I have seen the way the right wing works, and the way the National enquirer works, and am NOT stupid enough to believe this kind of speculative garbage, until there are more facts that actually show it to be true.

I can't help that you all have no integrity and accept merely gossip and a gossip Mag Rag....that's your choice, but I wont be brought down to your level, so excuse me...while I pass on your bash fest based on gossip.

There is proof he was good friends with this Billionaire pedophile and did visit the island several times. Why do you think he visited the island several times? Just stopping by to say 'hey?'

I went to school with a guy who ended up smoking crack and went to prison for armed robbery. Does that mean I'm guilty too? Guilt by association doesn't quite cut it. Come up with facts instead of innuendo, and you might have something.

If you had a record on file of drug violations and being a chronic user, your regular association with this person would definitely affect public perception and would have much more significance than your just going to the same school with that person. This would not be anywhere near the scandal that it has become if Bill Clinton was not already on very public record of all sorts of sexual misconduct, accusations, allegations, and documented incidences.

The frustrating thing to a lot of us is that a Republican candidate is required to be squeaky clean and above reproach or he is demonized to ridiculous lengths and is considered unelectable. The same standard does not seem to apply to a popular Democrat however, who will be forgiven for just about anything and anything that can be denied will be denied. Hillary of course was not implicated in any of that, but she continues to use Bill for whatever political hay she can make with him.

It is rather pathetic when we set the bar so low for what we expect from our national leaders.

Squeaky clean? You mean like Gingrich? Obviously, you give accusations and allegations the same credibility as you might facts. Just because the right wing goes all "Hair On Fire" crazy about something doesn't mean there is any thing to it. Your little reference to past history demonstrated the reason for common disbelief of all right wing claims

There goes Gingrich's wife's presidential run in 2016.

LOL. Indeed.

I have to agree with Boedicca that it is interesting to watch the leftwingers who love Clinton defend him so passionately and indignantly. They simply cannot bring themselves to acknowledge that his history puts him at a much higher degree of suspicion than the average citizen would be. But they are frantically dragging Republicans out of the woodwork along with their alleged 'crimes' presumably as proof that Clinton isn't so bad and shouldn't be suspect. (How lame is a defense when they have to resort to the 'the other guys are worse' mantra in order to make their own guy look better?)

As I said, it is unfortunate that any of us set the bar so low for what we expect from our elected leaders.

 

[BULLDOG]

I believe you believe it.........with no evidence at all.

There is evidence he visited his pedophile buddy and island several times. That's on record. So tell us, why do you think he visited that island several times? Just curious.

No idea why he visited. I visited New Orleans, and they had crappy levees. Did my going there have anything to do with the flooding that happened there? Unless you come up with something more solid than a bunch of crazies making accusations, you got nothing.

Ha, you have no idea? Go figure? Yeah, he visited his pedophile buddy and sex slave island just to say 'hi.' A known degenerate pervert just happens to show up on a sex slave island. He definitely wasn't there to partake in the sex acts. No way, impossible to believe. Man, only a delusional Democrat/Clinton sycophant could live in such denial.

How long have you had this ability to see what happens in places you aren't at, or read people's minds? That's the only way you could know what you claim, because there is no tangible evidence of it otherwise.

Just another Democrat/Clinton sycophant living in blissful ignorance. Sure, a known degenerate pervert just happens to visit a secluded sex slave island to just say 'hey.' Sure thing.

One little provable fact, and you won't be just another crazy teabagger.

 

[BULLDOG]

Keep in mind people, young girls were held captive and repeatedly raped on this island. That has been proven. And Bill Clinton was there. So you do the math. It's not about Republican vs. Democrat. These young girls still haven't received real justice.

It's about evidence. You got any?

Yup, and Ted Kennedy didn't kill that young girl and get away with it either. I hear ya.

You gave up on the Clinton thing huh?

 

[BULLDOG]

There is proof he was good friends with this Billionaire pedophile and did visit the island several times. Why do you think he visited the island several times? Just stopping by to say 'hey?'

I went to school with a guy who ended up smoking crack and went to prison for armed robbery. Does that mean I'm guilty too? Guilt by association doesn't quite cut it. Come up with facts instead of innuendo, and you might have something.

If you had a record on file of drug violations and being a chronic user, your regular association with this person would definitely affect public perception and would have much more significance than your just going to the same school with that person. This would not be anywhere near the scandal that it has become if Bill Clinton was not already on very public record of all sorts of sexual misconduct, accusations, allegations, and documented incidences.

The frustrating thing to a lot of us is that a Republican candidate is required to be squeaky clean and above reproach or he is demonized to ridiculous lengths and is considered unelectable. The same standard does not seem to apply to a popular Democrat however, who will be forgiven for just about anything and anything that can be denied will be denied. Hillary of course was not implicated in any of that, but she continues to use Bill for whatever political hay she can make with him.

It is rather pathetic when we set the bar so low for what we expect from our national leaders.

Squeaky clean? You mean like Gingrich? Obviously, you give accusations and allegations the same credibility as you might facts. Just because the right wing goes all "Hair On Fire" crazy about something doesn't mean there is any thing to it. Your little reference to past history demonstrated the reason for common disbelief of all right wing claims

There goes Gingrich's wife's presidential run in 2016.

LOL. Indeed.

I have to agree with Boedicca that it is interesting to watch the leftwingers who love Clinton defend him so passionately and indignantly. They simply cannot bring themselves to acknowledge that his history puts him at a much higher degree of suspicion than the average citizen would be. But they are frantically dragging Republicans out of the woodwork along with their 'crimes' presumably as proof that Clinton isn't so bad.

As I said, it is unfortunate that any of us set the bar so low for what we expect from our elected leaders.

Just 1 little provable fact tying Clinton to anything bad that might have happened there is too much to ask for?