Bringing manufacturing back to the US, but no jobs for the working class

[Hollie]

Anyone who believes that manufacturing jobs are coming back to America is simply an idiot.

In fact, I have something for them...

“… because I say so”

Shouldn’t you and your Cult hero be out killing Jews?

 

[Hollie]

Learn how to read, CLOWN.

The stank of Trump's ass has affected your brain.

Keep your nose out of Trump’s ass.

 

[Clipper]

Keep your nose out of Trump’s ass.

You're already there. And ya like it.

 

[Hollie]

You're already there. And ya like it.

It was you who announced your nose position.

 

[Clipper]

It was you who announced your nose position.

Learn how to read, MAGA idiot.

 

[Hollie]

Learn how to read, MAGA idiot.

Learn how not to make yourself a buffoon, Coconut tree groupie.

 

[Clipper]

Learn how not to make yourself a buffoon, Coconut tree groupie.

You mad cuz your boy got taken to the wooidshed on those tarrifs & had to back down? You poor things.

 

[MarcATL]

“… because I say so”

Shouldn’t you and your Cult hero be out killing Jews?

Explain how manufacturing jobs are going to return to America idiot.

Also, who's my cult hero?

 

[Hollie]

Explain how manufacturing jobs are going to return to America idiot.

Also, who's my cult hero?

As one example, angry little stereotype,

AI Overview

“Several car manufacturers are investing heavily in the US, with Hyundai announcing a $21 billion investment, including a steel plant in Louisiana, and Honda shifting production of the next-generation Civic to Indiana, citing potential tariffs as a factor.

You’re slow so I’m happy to lend an assist. Ford, like other car manufacturers does all the design and technology innovation of their vehicles in the Great Satan. Assembly is done in Mexico, cheap labor, poor quality assembly.

You’re something of a Stereotype praying at the altar of your Cult hero Malcolm X.

 

[scruffy]

Say what you will about Snopes, but they actually contacted the company with the contract which is more than can be said about any of you lazy assholes including the DOGE incels that cancelled the contract.

Snopes is a paid Democrat shill.

 

[beagle9]

We are a global trading sucker for the planet.

Well many of us in America were, but what about the one's that went to China in search of manufacturing and cheap labor to make American product's, otherwise to send back through the 10% tariff wall into America where the American tycoons made huge profits on the entire set up ??

Now Trump is attempting to straighten it all out, but we were so entangled with China that who knows what's going to go on in order to fix this thing ...

Big time negotiations needs to go on for sure, and yes we need to get ourselves back down off of the dependency baby chair that we've climbed so precariously upon, otherwise by relying so heavily on Chinese manufacturing and it's cheap labor for American consumer goods, but shamefully at a cost of our American job's and our American manufacturing.

American greedy business tycoons done this to us over time, and yes we can wean ourselves off of the Chinese bottle, but let's be rational about it.

China has been a trade partner that's made many American business men wealthy beyond their wildest dream's, so there is something to be said for that.

If China was using it's wealth generated to build itself into a mega power, and was engaging in nefariousness and wrongful ways, then yes let's for sure address that problem as we work our way out of this mess.

Trade between China and America can go on, but it just needs gaurd rails put in place, and a 10% tariff working in both directions.

 

[beagle9]

Keep your nose out of Trump’s ass.

It's the only way he knows what it smells like.. Great reply.

 

[Nobody911]

Uncertainty always exists. The Trump administration should have a Plan B and Plan C in place. This approach reflects the professionalism expected in any job, don’t you think?

Analyzing the success of President Trump's policies in 2025 aimed at boosting domestic industries involves examining several factors, including the economic impact of tariffs, the potential for re-shoring production, and the broader geopolitical context.

## Analysis of Trump's Policies

1. Tariffs and Trade Policies:
- Economic Impact: The imposition of tariffs on imports from countries like China, Canada, and Mexico is intended to protect U.S. industries and encourage domestic production. However, these tariffs can lead to higher costs for consumers and businesses, potentially reducing demand and economic growth[1][2].
- Re-shoring Production: The goal of re-shoring production is to bring manufacturing back to the U.S., which could create jobs and boost domestic industries. However, this process is complex and depends on various factors, including labor costs, regulatory environments, and technological advancements[3][5].

2. National Security and Economic Leverage:
- IEEPA Authority: Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs is part of a broader strategy to address national security concerns and economic leverage. This approach aims to pressure other countries into more favorable trade agreements[4][6].
- Reciprocal Tariffs: The introduction of a baseline 10% tariff on all countries, with higher rates for countries with significant trade deficits, is designed to achieve reciprocity in trade relations. This could lead to negotiations for better trade terms but also risks retaliation and trade wars[4][6].

3. Domestic Manufacturing Renaissance:
- Promises vs. Reality: While Trump promises a manufacturing renaissance, achieving this goal is challenging. It requires significant investments in infrastructure, technology, and workforce development, as well as favorable economic conditions[5].
- Challenges: The U.S. faces stiff competition from countries with lower labor costs and established supply chains. Additionally, tariffs can disrupt global supply chains, potentially harming U.S. industries that rely on imported components[1][5].

## Potential Outcomes

• Short-term Success: In the short term, some domestic industries might benefit from protectionist policies, such as steel and aluminum, due to reduced competition from imports[1][8].
• Long-term Challenges: Over the long term, the success of these policies depends on whether they can lead to sustainable economic growth, job creation, and increased competitiveness without causing significant economic harm due to trade wars and higher consumer prices[5][8].

In conclusion, while Trump's policies aim to boost domestic industries, their success is uncertain and depends on various factors, including the response of other countries, the resilience of the U.S. economy, and the ability to navigate complex global trade dynamics.

sources:
[1] Tracking the Economic Impact of the Trump Tariffs
[2] Trump's 2025 Executive Orders | Holland & Knight
[3] https://ustr.gov/sites/default/file...resident Trump's 2025 Trade Policy Agenda.pdf
[4] Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Declares National Emergency to Increase our Competitive Edge, Protect our Sovereignty, and Strengthen our National and Economic Security
[5] Trump Is Promising a Manufacturing Renaissance. Is That Even Possible?
[6] Regulating Imports with a Reciprocal Tariff to Rectify Trade Practices that Contribute to Large and Persistent Annual United States Goods Trade Deficits
[7] Federal Register :: Request Access
[8] The Intellectual Origins of Trump’s Economic Policies

 

[beagle9]

Uncertainty always exists. The Trump administration should have a Plan B and Plan C in place. This approach reflects the professionalism expected in any job, don’t you think?

Analyzing the success of President Trump's policies in 2025 aimed at boosting domestic industries involves examining several factors, including the economic impact of tariffs, the potential for re-shoring production, and the broader geopolitical context.

## Analysis of Trump's Policies

1. Tariffs and Trade Policies:
- Economic Impact: The imposition of tariffs on imports from countries like China, Canada, and Mexico is intended to protect U.S. industries and encourage domestic production. However, these tariffs can lead to higher costs for consumers and businesses, potentially reducing demand and economic growth[1][2].
- Re-shoring Production: The goal of re-shoring production is to bring manufacturing back to the U.S., which could create jobs and boost domestic industries. However, this process is complex and depends on various factors, including labor costs, regulatory environments, and technological advancements[3][5].

2. National Security and Economic Leverage:
- IEEPA Authority: Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs is part of a broader strategy to address national security concerns and economic leverage. This approach aims to pressure other countries into more favorable trade agreements[4][6].
- Reciprocal Tariffs: The introduction of a baseline 10% tariff on all countries, with higher rates for countries with significant trade deficits, is designed to achieve reciprocity in trade relations. This could lead to negotiations for better trade terms but also risks retaliation and trade wars[4][6].

3. Domestic Manufacturing Renaissance:
- Promises vs. Reality: While Trump promises a manufacturing renaissance, achieving this goal is challenging. It requires significant investments in infrastructure, technology, and workforce development, as well as favorable economic conditions[5].
- Challenges: The U.S. faces stiff competition from countries with lower labor costs and established supply chains. Additionally, tariffs can disrupt global supply chains, potentially harming U.S. industries that rely on imported components[1][5].

## Potential Outcomes

• Short-term Success: In the short term, some domestic industries might benefit from protectionist policies, such as steel and aluminum, due to reduced competition from imports[1][8].
• Long-term Challenges: Over the long term, the success of these policies depends on whether they can lead to sustainable economic growth, job creation, and increased competitiveness without causing significant economic harm due to trade wars and higher consumer prices[5][8].

In conclusion, while Trump's policies aim to boost domestic industries, their success is uncertain and depends on various factors, including the response of other countries, the resilience of the U.S. economy, and the ability to navigate complex global trade dynamics.

sources:
[1] Tracking the Economic Impact of the Trump Tariffs
[2] Trump's 2025 Executive Orders | Holland & Knight
[3] https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/reports/2025/President Trump's 2025 Trade Policy Agenda.pdf
[4] Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Declares National Emergency to Increase our Competitive Edge, Protect our Sovereignty, and Strengthen our National and Economic Security
[5] Trump Is Promising a Manufacturing Renaissance. Is That Even Possible?
[6] Regulating Imports with a Reciprocal Tariff to Rectify Trade Practices that Contribute to Large and Persistent Annual United States Goods Trade Deficits
[7] Federal Register :: Request Access
[8] The Intellectual Origins of Trump’s Economic Policies

Very interesting reading and analysis. There are many question's and assurances that need answered. Like you say, everything or every chess move made needs to be well thought out with instant back up plan's. The only way out of this IMHO, is through very thorough negotiations that harbor no hostilities between negotiators, because everyone has blame in the current sorry state of affairs this world has since gotten itself into.

 

[frigidweirdo]

That's where company plans and SS come in. Also, assets acquired over a working lifetime, mainly in the form of a paid off house, are the foundation of many retirements. Seniors hold the most assets including real estate, stocks, bonds, etc. of any demographic.

All pension schemes run on you pay me now at your current value of the currency, and we pay out at the future value of the currency. Otherwise it wouldn't work. Inflation is designed to reduce the value of people's money so they spend it rather than hoarding it.

There are two sorts of people. Those that work and earn enough to be able to buy extra things for their retirement, and those that can't and end up relying on their SS pensions. These pensions require people to pay in now, and receive later. This requires enough workers to pay for the pensions now, which is something like 3 workers for every one retired person, depending on how much is paid out to retirees.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The jobs coming back to America are NOT unskilled labor jobs. These are going to require moderate to high skilled workers.

You need to be fluent in machine languages, ladder logic, and automation/robotics which requires at least a basic understanding of hydraulics and electronics.

Meaning that you paid attention in math and science classes and didn't say, "I'll never use this stuff in the real world"

Starting salaries for these types of jobs are $150k/yr. Sure AI can give answers for office jobs and likely do the work....but AI can't change a $2 gasket that a million dollar machine needs replaced before it will work again.

And how do you think all those low paid, lazy Trump supporters will cheer this?

 

[Hollie]

You mad cuz your boy got taken to the wooidshed on those tarrifs & had to back down? You poor things.

Were you in the woodshed with your nose up Trum’s ass?

 

[beagle9]

All pension schemes run on you pay me now at your current value of the currency, and we pay out at the future value of the currency. Otherwise it wouldn't work. Inflation is designed to reduce the value of people's money so they spend it rather than hoarding it.

There are two sorts of people. Those that work and earn enough to be able to buy extra things for their retirement, and those that can't and end up relying on their SS pensions. These pensions require people to pay in now, and receive later. This requires enough workers to pay for the pensions now, which is something like 3 workers for every one retired person, depending on how much is paid out to retirees.

So what happened to the money that was paid in by the worker for over 40 year's, otherwise that is usually seen in most life spans of workmanship lived ?

It was stolen instead of accumulating interest in what should have been a true worker retirement fund set up.

The straw that should have broken the camels back, and showed the most disrespect towards the American worker, was when government gave the illegals hotel stay in modern hotels with credit cards and etc to boot.

The Democrat's are truly some horrible people for what they pulled on the American taxpayers.

Hopefully Trump rights the ship, and does so very quickly as he loves to say.

 

[beagle9]

And how do you think all those low paid, lazy Trump supporters will cheer this?

Keep thinking those thoughts, and your party will become more irrelevant than it already is.

 

[Clipper]

Were you in the woodshed with your nose up Trum’s ass?

No, you were. At MAL, Kristie.