You know the answer to that one.
What's the answer ?
Ok, so answer these question's if you will.
Now you do know exactly what he means when he says that those who are (questionable leftist) in which the Democrat party has since stood up for as Democrat's always do for various political reasons, did indeed vote for Harris all because of that support in which was given to them by Harris and the Democrat's for whom marketed themselves (for the maximizing of vote counts), as a party that is inclusive no matter what is involved in that vote count right ??
It's a failed strategy it appears today. Probably taken to far in most cases..
Do you think that those who have been stood up for by the leftist Democrat's, and by the support given them by the whole of the Democrat party, are going to refuse it and not use it to it's maximum degree ? Yes, they will embrace it and use it to it's ultimate limits regardless of what the majority think. It's abusive to the majority right ?
Is it seen as normal or abnormal when it comes to various fetishes, addictive behaviours, habits, and weird thinkings found in characters who flaunt or take their actions out into a supposed civilized society without the majority agreeing with such things ?? So what if that society by a majority rejects such thing's over all, otherwise even when the majority is against those things being out in the open or pushed by the Democrat party for merely vote count purposes ?? Are the Democrat party leader's masters of exploitation as they dredge the bottoms deeper for votes ?
Should poles be conducted and/or taken seriously, and if negative or positive results are found, then should the poles be honored if majorities are being found for and/or against certain thing's being allowed in a supposed civilized society ??
The nation is splitting along many lines now, and so going against the grain is a tough area to be found in, otherwise if losing the majority support in that area.