Brief synopsis of last night's debate

[francoHFW]

people all over the world are dying to come here just for the right to not have parental leave; or any number of other things you idiots say they have and are so great in other countries

Yes, scum bucket....we are INDEED being flooded by Swedes and Danes, right ???

(Is this moron allowed on the computer during homework time?)

YAWN

put it this way leftard; how many of your citizens are flooding into Sweden and Denmark? i mean cuz its so bad here and so much better over there right??

They won't allow Americans in. The whole EU- unless you're megarich.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

That was, as the Donald would say, a very low-energy affair.

I agree.

None of them came out of it looking like a winner. And none of them talked about what matters and the plans they have for what they didn't talk about.

No winners in that debate.

LOL, a perfect description of both Republican debates; The Dems debate was substantive, as everyone with both feet in reality understand.

Yes indeed, it was a great debate. Each candidate explained how they would expand the welfare government dependency state. You must have loved it.

Keep swallowing the propaganda from greedy idiot Pub billionaires...Welfare has only been expanded by the ruin of the nonrich in this country by Reaganism and the Bush Depression. We and New Guinea are the only 2 countries without paid parental leave. Thanks Pubs and silly dupes.

There you go, upset that we Republicans didn't expand the welfare state. And yes, making other people pay for parental leave is the welfare state. And no, Lesotho and Swaziland are tied with us for not having parental leave.

The Dismal State Of Parental Leave In The U.S. Made Clear In One Chart

 

[Wry Catcher]

That was, as the Donald would say, a very low-energy affair.

I agree.

None of them came out of it looking like a winner. And none of them talked about what matters and the plans they have for what they didn't talk about.

No winners in that debate.

LOL, a perfect description of both Republican debates; The Dems debate was substantive, as everyone with both feet in reality understand.

Yes indeed, it was a great debate. Each candidate explained how they would expand the welfare government dependency state. You must have loved it.

The way you framed the debate is dishonest. We (once) had a government of the people, for the people and by the people. Today we have a government of callous conservatives, of the power elite, for the power elite and (paid for) by the power elite.

That you are too dumb to understand this is pitiful.

 

[hortysir]

I didn't make it past the introduction segment.

Any experienced hunter can spot which ones are decoys and which one is the real duck

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

That was, as the Donald would say, a very low-energy affair.

I agree.

None of them came out of it looking like a winner. And none of them talked about what matters and the plans they have for what they didn't talk about.

No winners in that debate.

LOL, a perfect description of both Republican debates; The Dems debate was substantive, as everyone with both feet in reality understand.

Yes indeed, it was a great debate. Each candidate explained how they would expand the welfare government dependency state. You must have loved it.

The way you framed the debate is dishonest. We (once) had a government of the people, for the people and by the people. Today we have a government of callous conservatives, of the power elite, for the power elite and (paid for) by the power elite.

That you are too dumb to understand this is pitiful.

We still have a country of the people, by the people and for the people, we just have to get rid of Commie liberals that think "for the people' means giving them things they should be giving themselves.

 

[bedowin62]

That was, as the Donald would say, a very low-energy affair.

I agree.

None of them came out of it looking like a winner. And none of them talked about what matters and the plans they have for what they didn't talk about.

No winners in that debate.

LOL, a perfect description of both Republican debates; The Dems debate was substantive, as everyone with both feet in reality understand.

Yes indeed, it was a great debate. Each candidate explained how they would expand the welfare government dependency state. You must have loved it.

The way you framed the debate is dishonest. We (once) had a government of the people, for the people and by the people. Today we have a government of callous conservatives, of the power elite, for the power elite and (paid for) by the power elite.

That you are too dumb to understand this is pitiful.

talk about dishonestly framing an argument you moronic hypocrite!!
what you see as others not understanding something is in reality just them being cognizant enough to recognize pontificating Progressive hypocrites aren't the answer; indeed are in many ways part of the very problems they sanctimoniously cry about

ur a joke dude

 

[bedowin62]

moronic Progressive douchebags idea of "for the People" means goverment takes everything from everybody (either you give it up willingly or they take it forcefully),and gives "the People" back what the government deems they should have, no more and no less.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

O'Malley looked good last night. Definitely wasnt a loss for that guy

O'Malley doesn't DESERVE any votes from anybody once he fucking APOLOGIZED for having said (a few weeks back) that ALL LIVES MATTER.

Yep. He fucking APOLOGIZED for having had the audacity to SAY such a thing.

Doesn't matter that what he said was absolutely and undeniably right.

They pounced on him, those true believer socialist Democrat hack bastards. And like a completely craven pussy, he APOLOGIZED.

Sad.

Pathetic.

OH NOES, He Apologized?!?!? Wow that means something important

He apologized for saying All Lives Matter. Why in the holy fuck would somebody apologize for saying something like that?

So you can cry about it maybe?

Are you fuckin stupid?

Of COURSE Closed Minded is stupid.
He truly thinks that one OWES anybody an apology for contending that ALL lives matter.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

moronic Progressive douchebags idea of "for the People" means goverment takes everything from everybody (either you give it up willingly or they take it forcefully),and gives "the People" back what the government deems they should have, no more and no less.

Yes indeed.

"Liberals believe that if you make money, you are not entitled to it, but if you want money--you are."
Ken Blackwell

 

[francoHFW]

moronic Progressive douchebags idea of "for the People" means goverment takes everything from everybody (either you give it up willingly or they take it forcefully),and gives "the People" back what the government deems they should have, no more and no less.

Yes indeed.

"Liberals believe that if you make money, you are not entitled to it, but if you want money--you are."
Ken Blackwell

The amazing lengths the dupes will go to protect the ridiculous wealth of megarich Pubs and giant corps who screw them every day. READ sig.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

moronic Progressive douchebags idea of "for the People" means goverment takes everything from everybody (either you give it up willingly or they take it forcefully),and gives "the People" back what the government deems they should have, no more and no less.

Yes indeed.

"Liberals believe that if you make money, you are not entitled to it, but if you want money--you are."
Ken Blackwell

The amazing lengths the dupes will go to protect the ridiculous wealth of megarich Pubs and giant corps who screw them every day. READ sig.

It's not protecting anybody. We believe that all people should be treated equal unlike liberals who believe in dividing the country, and then deciding who gets what.

So you tell me, who is greedier: A man that makes money and wishes to keep what he made, or a man that doesn't make anything and wishes to take the money from the man that made it?

 

[francoHFW]

moronic Progressive douchebags idea of "for the People" means goverment takes everything from everybody (either you give it up willingly or they take it forcefully),and gives "the People" back what the government deems they should have, no more and no less.

Yes indeed.

"Liberals believe that if you make money, you are not entitled to it, but if you want money--you are."
Ken Blackwell

The amazing lengths the dupes will go to protect the ridiculous wealth of megarich Pubs and giant corps who screw them every day. READ sig.

It's not protecting anybody. We believe that all people should be treated equal unlike liberals who believe in dividing the country, and then deciding who gets what.

So you tell me, who is greedier: A man that makes money and wishes to keep what he made, or a man that doesn't make anything and wishes to take the money from the man that made it?

When everyone is taxed about the same- like NOW, dupe- 99% of new wealth goes to the 1%.

 

[francoHFW]

moronic Progressive douchebags idea of "for the People" means goverment takes everything from everybody (either you give it up willingly or they take it forcefully),and gives "the People" back what the government deems they should have, no more and no less.

Yes indeed.

"Liberals believe that if you make money, you are not entitled to it, but if you want money--you are."
Ken Blackwell

The amazing lengths the dupes will go to protect the ridiculous wealth of megarich Pubs and giant corps who screw them every day. READ sig.

It's not protecting anybody. We believe that all people should be treated equal unlike liberals who believe in dividing the country, and then deciding who gets what.

So you tell me, who is greedier: A man that makes money and wishes to keep what he made, or a man that doesn't make anything and wishes to take the money from the man that made it?

NOBODY WANTS TO BE ON WELFARE. And Dems want a safety net, NOT FOR THEMSELVES. For idiots like you.

 

[Freiheit]

As long as one kept in mind "If a politicians lips are moving he/she is lying" the "debate" was entertaining.

 

[francoHFW]

As long as one kept in mind "If a politicians lips are moving he/she is lying" the "debate" was entertaining.

Another clever Pub dupe.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

moronic Progressive douchebags idea of "for the People" means goverment takes everything from everybody (either you give it up willingly or they take it forcefully),and gives "the People" back what the government deems they should have, no more and no less.

Yes indeed.

"Liberals believe that if you make money, you are not entitled to it, but if you want money--you are."
Ken Blackwell

The amazing lengths the dupes will go to protect the ridiculous wealth of megarich Pubs and giant corps who screw them every day. READ sig.

It's not protecting anybody. We believe that all people should be treated equal unlike liberals who believe in dividing the country, and then deciding who gets what.

So you tell me, who is greedier: A man that makes money and wishes to keep what he made, or a man that doesn't make anything and wishes to take the money from the man that made it?

When everyone is taxed about the same- like NOW, dupe- 99% of new wealth goes to the 1%.

Everybody is taxed the same now? What planet are you living on?

Nearly half of you people don't even pay income tax in this country. Where do you get taxed the same from?

If 99% of the new wealth goes to the 1%, that means only 1% of the wealth goes to the 99% of us.

Of course we both know you are lying, but that's typical of your kind.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

moronic Progressive douchebags idea of "for the People" means goverment takes everything from everybody (either you give it up willingly or they take it forcefully),and gives "the People" back what the government deems they should have, no more and no less.

Yes indeed.

"Liberals believe that if you make money, you are not entitled to it, but if you want money--you are."
Ken Blackwell

The amazing lengths the dupes will go to protect the ridiculous wealth of megarich Pubs and giant corps who screw them every day. READ sig.

It's not protecting anybody. We believe that all people should be treated equal unlike liberals who believe in dividing the country, and then deciding who gets what.

So you tell me, who is greedier: A man that makes money and wishes to keep what he made, or a man that doesn't make anything and wishes to take the money from the man that made it?

NOBODY WANTS TO BE ON WELFARE. And Dems want a safety net, NOT FOR THEMSELVES. For idiots like you.

Welfare is an option--not a mandate. Nobody has to be on welfare. I'm not on welfare and neither are millions of other real Americans. Of course, we have a secret, it's called work; work and don't spend money you don't have such as having children at a young age when you can't support them.

 

[Wry Catcher]

That was, as the Donald would say, a very low-energy affair.

I agree.

None of them came out of it looking like a winner. And none of them talked about what matters and the plans they have for what they didn't talk about.

No winners in that debate.

LOL, a perfect description of both Republican debates; The Dems debate was substantive, as everyone with both feet in reality understand.

Yes indeed, it was a great debate. Each candidate explained how they would expand the welfare government dependency state. You must have loved it.

The way you framed the debate is dishonest. We (once) had a government of the people, for the people and by the people. Today we have a government of callous conservatives, of the power elite, for the power elite and (paid for) by the power elite.

That you are too dumb to understand this is pitiful.

We still have a country of the people, by the people and for the people, we just have to get rid of Commie liberals that think "for the people' means giving them things they should be giving themselves.

You're full of shit. Anyone who uses the phrase "Commie liberals" has never had an original thought in their life. You're simply an echo of right wing propaganda, too dumb to have an opinion formed from within.

 

[bedowin62]

I agree.

None of them came out of it looking like a winner. And none of them talked about what matters and the plans they have for what they didn't talk about.

No winners in that debate.

LOL, a perfect description of both Republican debates; The Dems debate was substantive, as everyone with both feet in reality understand.

Yes indeed, it was a great debate. Each candidate explained how they would expand the welfare government dependency state. You must have loved it.

The way you framed the debate is dishonest. We (once) had a government of the people, for the people and by the people. Today we have a government of callous conservatives, of the power elite, for the power elite and (paid for) by the power elite.

That you are too dumb to understand this is pitiful.

We still have a country of the people, by the people and for the people, we just have to get rid of Commie liberals that think "for the people' means giving them things they should be giving themselves.

You're full of shit. Anyone who uses the phrase "Commie liberals" has never had an original thought in their life. You're simply an echo of right wing propaganda, too dumb to have an opinion formed from within.

actually idiot liberals in Obama's inner circle have admitted to being communists; Van Jones is one example. Obama communications Director says she greatly admires Mao Tse-tung


libs are losers who lie to themselves

 

[bedowin62]

people who chant "change!!" like they belong to some sort of progressive madrassa should avoid accusing others of never having an original thought