Ten Questions About Last Nights Debate
- Thread starter JimBowie1958
- Start date
God hasn't stopped by asking any question- but if he does, I will ask him about why the adulterer Donald Trump is being seriously considered for President.
I think driving the kommunist klown kar in circles is making you loopy, come again?
He was against the War ask Sean HannityThat guy will say anything!
He's not a disciple of truth and pure logic like Spock, Hillary and you are, huh?
From his publisher (and you know this- but you are kazzing)
"You're undoubtedly aware of the brouhaha stirred up by Breitbart about the erroneous statement in a client list Acton & Dystel published in 1991 (for circulation within the publishing industry only) that Barack Obama was born in Kenya. This was nothing more than a fact checking error by me — an agency assistant at the time," Goderich wrote. "There was never any information given to us by Obama in any of his correspondence or other communications suggesting in any way that he was born in Kenya and not Hawaii. I hope you can communicate to your readers that this was a simple mistake and nothing more."
The only question is why you keep kazzing.
I think driving the kommunist klown kar in circles is making you loopy, come again?
kaz kazzing about kommunist klown kars........what a kazzer.
ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,723
- 1,830
I think driving the kommunist klown kar in circles is making you loopy, come again?
He was against the War ask Sean Hannity
He's not a disciple of truth and pure logic like Spock, Hillary and you are, huh?
And I threw a football the whole length of a football field...Just ask Alex Jones
Dragonlady
Designing Woman
You think that asking why Hillary exposed our secret and top secret information to the who's who of America's enemies, is not important? The woman flat out lied to the American public for years, on purpose, for her own political gain. And it was only this summer she admitted that gosh, she shouldn't have done that. How is this not a debate issue when the trustworthiness of the candidate is at issue?
That is classic though. A Hillary supporter is concerned about the "trustworthiness of the candidate."What a tool
Except she didn't expose your top secret information at all. People in business don't put truly sensitive information in email because IT'S NOT SECURE. There was nothing that sensitive on her server. And her server was never hacked. The FBI found no lies in her interview with them, and recommended no charges.
Bush had a private server in the White House and deleted 50,000 emails. Where's the outrage about that?
You think that asking why Hillary exposed our secret and top secret information to the who's who of America's enemies, is not important? The woman flat out lied to the American public for years, on purpose, for her own political gain. And it was only this summer she admitted that gosh, she shouldn't have done that. How is this not a debate issue when the trustworthiness of the candidate is at issue?
That is classic though. A Hillary supporter is concerned about the "trustworthiness of the candidate."
Except she didn't expose your top secret information at all. People in business don't put truly sensitive information in email because IT'S NOT SECURE. There was nothing that sensitive on her server. And her server was never hacked. The FBI found no lies in her interview with them, and recommended no charges.
Bush had a private server in the White House and deleted 50,000 emails. Where's the outrage about that?
That wasn't the issue, Mrs. Mao. It wasn't that she had a "private e-mail server." It's what she did with it.
Your argument is that I have a car, bank robbers use cars, therefore I'm a bank robber. It's like four year old logic.
And wow, they mark e-mails secret and top secret, but that's OK, Mao's wife says they aren't really secret, no one actually uses them that way. OK, well, I suppose it's fine then.
Your standards are constantly changing ...
JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,840
- 2,220
- Thread starter
- #89
Here server was NOT SECURED. Do y9ou have any clue what that means? IT means that anyone could go through all her files and the Clintonistas would never know it.
And she had at least 21 Top Secret emails with top classified information in them and anyone that wanted to look could, like the Russians, Chicoms, Iranians, etc.
And Bushes emails were not under subpoena at the time he deleted them.
What Mrs. Mao is saying is dumber than that. She's saying it's OK to send around e-mails marked secret or top secret because no one puts sensitive information in e-mails. Amazing, she's saying anyone should be allowed to just decide that for themselves and do whatever they want. Makes security clearances irrelevant, doesn't it?
Dragonlady
Designing Woman
None of the emails were marked when Hillary received them. They were classified AFTER the fact. This was confirmed by FBI Director Comey. She said nothing of the kind, and neither did I.
As usual you're lying, misleading and trying to pretend she did something horrible, when in reality, she didn't. What about Bush and his 50,000 emails on the private server? Where is your outrage there?
Zoom-boing
Platinum Member
If he can manage to legally not pay any taxes, you view that as a bad thing? IT'S HIS MONEY! If he manages to legally not pay any taxes, he's fucking brilliant. smh
Zoom-boing
Platinum Member
The 2008 form was the short form which didn't have a lot of info and that's why the birther issue kept on happening. Once the long form was released the birther issue died. obama taking 3 or 4 years to produce to the long form caused all the speculation that he was hiding something ... just like all the speculation that Trump is hiding something because he hasn't released his taxes.
The start of the 'obama isn't a real American' came from the left, was embraced by the right, and grew into birtherism.
"The idea of going after Obama’s otherness dates back to the last presidential election—and to Democrats. Long before Trump started in, Hillary Clinton’s chief strategist, Mark Penn, recognized this potential vulnerability in Obama and sought to exploit it. In a March 2007 memo to Clinton (that later found its way to me), Penn wrote: “All of these articles about his boyhood in Indonesia and his life in Hawaii are geared toward showing his background is diverse, multicultural and putting it in a new light,” he wrote. “Save it for 2050. It also exposes a very strong weakness for him—his roots to basic American values and culture are at best limited. I cannot imagine America electing a president during a time of war who is not at his center fundamentally American in his thinking and his values.”
Penn also suggested how the campaign might take advantage of this. “Every speech should contain the line that you were born in the middle of America to the middle class in the middle of the last century,” he advised Clinton. “And talk about the basic bargain as about [sic] the deeply American values you grew up with, learned as a child, and that drive you today.” He went on: “Let’s explicitly own ‘American’ in our programs, the speeches and the values. He doesn’t … Let’s add flag symbols to the backgrounds [of campaign events].”
Penn was not a birther. His memo didn’t raise the issue of Obama’s citizenship. Furthermore, he was acutely aware of the political danger that a Democrat would court by going after Obama in this way, even subliminally: “We are never going to say anything about his background,” he wrote. Still, his memo is the earliest example of a strategy that metastasized. The Republican tactic has been to make explicit what Penn intended to be merely implicit—and then carry it to its furthest extreme. Soon, the belief spread among many voters that Obama had been educated in a radical madrassa, that he was secretly a Muslim, and, finally, that he had not even been born in the U.S."
The Democratic Roots of the Birther Movement
cereal_killer
Platinum Member
or you can go to the Washington post from '03 and 5 days AFTER the war started to see him calling the war "a mess"
I think driving the kommunist klown kar in circles is making you loopy, come again?
He was against the War ask Sean Hannity
Hollywood Partyers, Soldiering On
I'll let you take that up with the head of the FBI since he said you are repeatedly wrong.
It's amazing, if Hillary said she was a virgin, you'd believe her
JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,840
- 2,220
- Thread starter
- #96
Nah, we dont want to confuse the libtards with facts; they might have to flee to a safe space if we do.or you can go to the Washington post from '03 and 5 days AFTER the war started to see him calling the war "a mess"
I think driving the kommunist klown kar in circles is making you loopy, come again?
He was against the War ask Sean Hannity
Hollywood Partyers, Soldiering On
cereal_killer
Platinum Member
perhaps they will watch the 2003 interview with Neil Cavuto in which he said:Nah, we dont want to confuse the libtards with facts; they might have to flee to a safe space if we do.or you can go to the Washington post from '03 and 5 days AFTER the war started to see him calling the war "a mess"
I think driving the kommunist klown kar in circles is making you loopy, come again?
He was against the War ask Sean Hannity
Hollywood Partyers, Soldiering On
"Well, he's either got to do something or not do something perhaps, because perhaps he shouldn't be doing it yet," Trump said in 2003.
"And perhaps we should be waiting for the United Nations,”
The "he" he was referring to was George Bush and the potential for the Iraq war.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Portland State professor suspended after self-identifying as a member of 'Hamas'- Started by DigitalDrifter
- Replies: 2
-
The daily drama unfolds, and we are still putting up with it- Started by C_Clayton_Jones
- Replies: 4
-
-
Marines Deployed To Another Third-World Country Full Of Hostile Foreigners- Started by Votto
- Replies: 3
-
