Ten Questions About Last Nights Debate

[JimBowie1958]

I was getting pretty sleepy, but I cannot remember these questions.

1. When did the moderator ask Hillary about her staff being directed to destroy evidence that was subpoena'd by Congress? That sounds like Obstruction of Justice, so why didnt the moderator think it was a worthy question?

2. The same goes for Hillary's accepting bribes from foreign governments while she was Secretary of State. She and her husband Bill are still taking contributions, recently a $250k/plate dinner fund raiser. Doesn't America deserve to know what was promised to those donors for buying such an absurdly expensive meal?

3. Why do moderators ignore the Wollman Rink incident that demonstrated Trumps ability to untangle and repair government spawned disasters? Isnt this a very relevant question in our day of Federali disasters across this nation?

4. Why do these media Marxists think that continuing with the same failed "War on Everything" process that has failed over and over and over and over for the last 40 years will suddenly work under Hillary when she has had plenty of time to make that system work and has not? Why would new "Wars on Everything" work when they have NEVER WORKED and are just ways of creating good PR for corporate contracting boondoggles?

5. When did someone ask Hillary what changed in the TPP treaty that changed her mind about it being the Gold Standard of trade agreements? When did she publicly break with Obama and work to oppose that treaty (other than making this thin gesture of "I'm agin it!")

6. Where were the questions about securing our national borders?

7. Where were the questions about how we are going to vet a mob of Muslim "refugees" that ISIS has repeatedly stated they would infiltrate to get terrorists into the USA? What about Hillary's plan to bring in more than 550k more?

8. Where were the questions about Hillary Clinton's nepotism, hiring her daughter to head the Clinton Foundation for $900k annually and her brother being given similar cushy jobs with CF? Is that why they have such a dismal success rate and Haitians claiming that the funding was stolen and now tens of thousands of Haitians are STILL suffering because the Clinton's stole so much of the money?

9. Where did someone ask why Hillary felt she had to spend a week "prepping" for the debate? Cant she just answer the questions honestly without spinning lies for an entire week?

10. Where were the questions about how Hillary cheated Bernie Sanders supporters of a fair chance to win the Democratic Party primaries?

Why weren't any of these questions asked? IS this another case of the Marxist media spinning things for their comrade candidate?

 

[TheOldSchool]

So in other words, why wasn't the debate a partisan attack on Hillary

 

[Snouter]

TheOldSchool, do you think the repeated questions about Obama's controversial birth certificate and allowing Crooked Hillary to babble incoherently about Rosie O'Donnell and a Spanish beauty pageant contestant with absolutely no questions about Crooked Hillary's decades in government was partisan on behalf of Crooked Hillary?

 

[JimBowie1958]

TheOldSchool, do you think the repeated questions about Obama's controversial birth certificate and allowing Crooked Hillary to babble incoherently about Rosie O'Donnell and a Spanish beauty pageant contestant with absolutely no questions about Crooked Hillary's decades in government was partisan on behalf of Crooked Hillary?

The only reason the Birther issue is still alive is that idiot Dimbocrats think it somehow proves Republicans to be racists, lol, like making sure the Constitution is followed is racists when the candidate is black.

roflmao

 

[JakeStarkey]

What staff was destroyed after Congress asked for it? What bribes? What disasters has Trumped unraveled as opposed to the ones he created? What "media Marxists"? <<< Those for starters

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

JimBowie and Snouter each is an alt right racist and culturalist far out of touch with mainstream America.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

So in other words, why wasn't the debate a partisan attack on Hillary

No. In other words, why wasn't there any balance in the types of questions asked.

You are a hyper partisan hack, and are incapable of noticing the disparity in questioning. JimBowie is a Trump supporter and so while I can't speak for him in terms of his desiring the sort of partisan attack on Hillary that you support against trump, his listing questions that were not asked does not imply he wanted such.

You radical leftist hacks tend to project your own attitudes upon any who do not march in goosestep with you, and so assume everybody else is just as rigid and unthinking as you are.

I don't like either candidate, but can see the obvious bias of the moderator when it came to his protecting Hillary while going after Trump.

 

[The VOR]

TheOldSchool, do you think the repeated questions about Obama's controversial birth certificate and allowing Crooked Hillary to babble incoherently about Rosie O'Donnell and a Spanish beauty pageant contestant with absolutely no questions about Crooked Hillary's decades in government was partisan on behalf of Crooked Hillary?

Talk about babbling incoherently. You must have been pretty sleepy too.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The bias of the mod was to the truth.

 

[TheOldSchool]

So in other words, why wasn't the debate a partisan attack on Hillary

No. In other words, why wasn't there any balance in the types of questions asked.

You are a hyper partisan hack, and are incapable of noticing the disparity in questioning. JimBowie is a Trump supporter and so while I can't speak for him in terms of his desiring the sort of partisan attack on Hillary that you support against trump, his listing questions that were not asked does not imply he wanted such.

You radical leftist hacks tend to project your own attitudes upon any who do not march in goosestep with you, and so assume everybody else is just as rigid and unthinking as you are.

I don't like either candidate, but can see the obvious bias of the moderator when it came to his protecting Hillary while going after Trump.

You're mistaken. Hillary whupped his ass so badly, you're brain is convinced it must have been a conspiracy. Remember, Trump bragged about not preparing for the debate.

 

[GaryDog]

Donald Trump was a coked-out babbling orange basketball with a serious personality disorder. But other than that, he did great, right?

 

[JakeStarkey]

I wondered if he had a drug problem.

 

[The VOR]

I wondered if he had a drug problem.

Speaking of drug problems and addictions: Where the hell have two of his top supporters, sarah palin and chris christie been?

One can only guess Sarah is hitting the pipe and the bottle real hard again, and Crispy Creme must have OD'd on, you guessed it, cream donuts, again.

 

[RodISHI]

The whole debate was not a debate. At the very least a debate moderator should be asking similar pertinent questions to each participant. There was no balance on the part of the moderator; he sucked at keeping it real or balanced.

So in other words, why wasn't the debate a partisan attack on Hillary

No. In other words, why wasn't there any balance in the types of questions asked.

You are a hyper partisan hack, and are incapable of noticing the disparity in questioning. JimBowie is a Trump supporter and so while I can't speak for him in terms of his desiring the sort of partisan attack on Hillary that you support against trump, his listing questions that were not asked does not imply he wanted such.

You radical leftist hacks tend to project your own attitudes upon any who do not march in goosestep with you, and so assume everybody else is just as rigid and unthinking as you are.

I don't like either candidate, but can see the obvious bias of the moderator when it came to his protecting Hillary while going after Trump.

You're mistaken. Hillary whupped his ass so badly, you're brain is convinced it must have been a conspiracy. Remember, Trump bragged about not preparing for the debate.

Being able to smile while you are burning and attempting to sling a little shit but not answer pertinent questions isn't winning a debate. Holding political or public office takes more than just being able to smile and lie. Acting like your in a miss congeniality contest doesn't cut it and neither does lying through your smiling teeth. Hillary lost.

 

[Syriusly]

I
2. The same goes for Hillary's accepting bribes from foreign governments while she was Secretary of State. She and her husband Bill are still taking contributions, recently a $250k/plate dinner fund raiser. Doesn't America deserve to know what was promised to those donors for buying such an absurdly expensive meal?

Why didn't Lester Holt bring up right wing nut jobs claims?

Why indeed.....

 

[Syriusly]

I was getting pretty sleepy, but I cannot remember these questions.

1. When did the moderator ask Hillary about her staff being directed to destroy evidence that was subpoena'd by Congress? That sounds like Obstruction of Justice, so why didnt the moderator think it was a worthy question?

2. The same goes for Hillary's accepting bribes from foreign governments while she was Secretary of State. She and her husband Bill are still taking contributions, recently a $250k/plate dinner fund raiser. Doesn't America deserve to know what was promised to those donors for buying such an absurdly expensive meal?

3. Why do moderators ignore the Wollman Rink incident that demonstrated Trumps ability to untangle and repair government spawned disasters? Isnt this a very relevant question in our day of Federali disasters across this nation?

4. Why do these media Marxists think that continuing with the same failed "War on Everything" process that has failed over and over and over and over for the last 40 years will suddenly work under Hillary when she has had plenty of time to make that system work and has not? Why would new "Wars on Everything" work when they have NEVER WORKED and are just ways of creating good PR for corporate contracting boondoggles?

5. When did someone ask Hillary what changed in the TPP treaty that changed her mind about it being the Gold Standard of trade agreements? When did she publicly break with Obama and work to oppose that treaty (other than making this thin gesture of "I'm agin it!")

6. Where were the questions about securing our national borders?

7. Where were the questions about how we are going to vet a mob of Muslim "refugees" that ISIS has repeatedly stated they would infiltrate to get terrorists into the USA? What about Hillary's plan to bring in more than 550k more?

8. Where were the questions about Hillary Clinton's nepotism, hiring her daughter to head the Clinton Foundation for $900k annually and her brother being given similar cushy jobs with CF? Is that why they have such a dismal success rate and Haitians claiming that the funding was stolen and now tens of thousands of Haitians are STILL suffering because the Clinton's stole so much of the money?

9. Where did someone ask why Hillary felt she had to spend a week "prepping" for the debate? Cant she just answer the questions honestly without spinning lies for an entire week?

10. Where were the questions about how Hillary cheated Bernie Sanders supporters of a fair chance to win the Democratic Party primaries?

Why weren't any of these questions asked? IS this another case of the Marxist media spinning things for their comrade candidate?

Essential Jimmie is wondering why the moderator asked Trump any questions, and why the moderator didn't just attack Hillary Clinton.

 

[ChrisL]

TheOldSchool, do you think the repeated questions about Obama's controversial birth certificate and allowing Crooked Hillary to babble incoherently about Rosie O'Donnell and a Spanish beauty pageant contestant with absolutely no questions about Crooked Hillary's decades in government was partisan on behalf of Crooked Hillary?

That's a good point. While Donald Trump is an asshole, those things have LITTLE to do with running a country. The debate was kind of like a summary of negative attack ads.

 

[kaz]

So in other words, why wasn't the debate a partisan attack on Hillary

He had no problem going to the birther subject or other attacks on Trump. It was a partisan attack on Trump. Should have gone after both or neither

 

[Syriusly]

TheOldSchool, do you think the repeated questions about Obama's controversial birth certificate and allowing Crooked Hillary to babble incoherently about Rosie O'Donnell and a Spanish beauty pageant contestant with absolutely no questions about Crooked Hillary's decades in government was partisan on behalf of Crooked Hillary?

The only reason the Birther issue is still alive is that idiot Dimbocrats think it somehow proves Republicans to be racists, lol, like making sure the Constitution is followed is racists when the candidate is black.
o

Donald Trump spent 5 years going full Birther. Donald Trump spent 5 years suggesting to Americans that our first African American President was not born in the United States, and is a Muslim, and implied that he may have had someone killed because of it.

Donald Trump supporters want a hand wave to ignore Donald Trump choosing to bring Birtherism mainstream. Because of course it shows what a gullible idiot Trump is

He doesn't have a birth certificate. He may have one, but there's something on that, maybe religion, maybe it says he is a Muslim," Trump told Fox News in 2011. "I don't know. Maybe he doesn't want that."

 

[cereal_killer]

JimBowie1958 did you expect anything different? The corrupt political machine is a huge dinosaur and a lot of people are involved in it. Trump is leading the charge against a very powerful and corrupt entity that has maintained control for decades, so its not, nor will it ever, be a fair fight.

Look at all the brainwashed sheep who are going along with it all, oblivious to the reality of the situation. They've been programmed to believe their opinions are their opinions, while the ones leading the fight see behind the curtain of lies and deception.

This is going to be our toughest battle we'll ever have to fight. It really is David vs Goliath, so strap on your chin strap its only going to get tougher as November draws closer. This was only Round 1.

 

[Syriusly]

So in other words, why wasn't the debate a partisan attack on Hillary

He had no problem going to the birther subject or other attacks on Trump. It was a partisan attack on Trump. Should have gone after both or neither

Poor Donald- just as he said- the "Democrat' Lester Holt was going to be biased against him.

(of course Donald lied about that like he lies about everything)