Brett Kavanaugh was forced out of a DC restaurant by protesters amid anger at SCOTUS overturning Roe v Wade

[Curried Goats]

So the "best of democracy" would be us hounding Soyomayor in her home and out of restaurants and then making fake reservations at those restaurants, punishing hourly workers.

Right?

So we are clear

So long as you're not trying break into her home, or stand out side her home, threatening her with guns, then yes. She's a Supreme Court Justice, she more than most should have to hear from the people who's lives she makes determinations about. That's part of the responsibility that comes with being a public official. If you're afraid of the judgment of the public then you're in the wrong job.

 

[Curried Goats]

Do not be so sure this won't happen. Gloves are off now.

And what Sue? You protesting things you disagree with isn't a frightening proposition for me. Try looking outside your snowflake perspective.

 

[iceberg]

So you believe if the Supreme Court decides against your opinion that you have a Constitutional right to harass the Justices who believe differently. That's your "democracy". No thanks. Not for me.

You know for a fact he'd shit kittens 8f they did to him what he advocates for others.

 

[jknowgood]

The Conservative Justices just want to declare victory and move on

But they have opened up the Hornets Nest and now must deal with the consequences

Okay, well Schumer made threats to Kavanaugh talking he will pay. So we need an investigation into his involvement with the guy that tried to kill Kavanaugh and protesters following his every move. Even death threats, you agree? I mean he has to live with the consequences right?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Harassment of Supreme Court justices appalls pro-choice WaPo columnist: 'Beyond the pale'​

Pro-choice Washington Post deputy editorial page editor Ruth Marcus condemned the harassment of conservative Supreme Court justices in a recent piece, claiming that specifically picketing at Justices’ homes is "beyond the pale."

Marcus’ column followed the recent reports that Justice Brett Kavanaugh was chased out of Morton’s steakhouse in D.C. by protesters on Wednesday night.

MSN

www.msn.com

 

[jknowgood]

Again, it does not say they threatened him. You can draw the ire of people across this country in a thousand different ways, no matter who you are or what you do, if the expression of your opinion bumps painfully into theirs for whatever reason. To say, they are wrong to have those feelings, is to disavow human nature, so protest is allowed, as long as no violence is carried out or threatened. There was nothing in the article to suggest any violence took place. Would I like it, if in Justice Kavanaugh's place? No. But would I recognize the right to protest as guaranteed by the same Constitutional Law of the land he upholds, protects and rules on daily? Yes, and so would you.

The protesters were demanding the restaurant owner to kick him out the front door. What do you think would've happened if the owner did? With the reputation you loons have, they probably would've killed him. Heck one ready has tried to do it.

 

[White 6]

The protesters were demanding the restaurant owner to kick him out the front door. What do you think would've happened if the owner did? With the reputation you loons have, they probably would've killed him. Heck one ready has tried to do it.

Bullshit. Again you make the same mistake. What part of "I actually read the ******* linked article, do you not get"? Continuing to make bullshit assertions not to be found in the article is not going to be productive to discussion. This thread, with the linked OP thread post article does not support your line of thinking or assertions, making you look very poor at the points you are trying to assert.
Have you thought of finding another article, with authoritative reporting, that what you say could possibly be true, and starting another thread without the flaws of not being backed up with supporting facts, as this one was started? Or would you rather beat your head against the same wall with the same results, some more?

 

[Meister]

Your idiot non sequitur is your problem, not mine. I don't have to account for every stupid thing you say.

You just have to account for every stupid thing YOU say. That's would be a full time job.
Now lap it up, because the states have taken over the laws pertaining to abortions. As it
should be.

 

[BS Filter]

You know for a fact he'd shit kittens 8f they did to him what he advocates for others.

Yep. Typical leftist.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Oh shut up.

Stop meddling in our politics.

Obviously a question that you cant answer.

 

[Curried Goats]

Harassment of Supreme Court justices appalls pro-choice WaPo columnist: 'Beyond the pale'​

MSN

www.msn.com

She's entitled to her opinion, are we supposed to give a shit about it?

 

[BS Filter]

I think you big brave leftist loons should go to a Proud Boys home and "protest".

 

[Tommy Tainant]

You're a repulsive liar.

Which bit is a lie, lady who invents vax stats ?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

I think you big brave leftist loons should go to a Proud Boys home and "protest".

Is that the same proud boys who start crying in court when they are found guilty ?

 

[BS Filter]

Is that the same proud boys who start crying in court when they are found guilty ?

Yes. Go for it, big brave lefty.

 

[BS Filter]

The summer of love proved liberal protesters are violent and your leaders supported them by not asking them to stop. Everyone of them should get a Jan 6 hearings.

Democrat leaders cheered them on. Deplorable.

 

[BS Filter]

Kavanaugh and his cohorts better get used to it

They will be accosted any time they appear in public
Actions have consequences

Even the Washington Post says you're wrong.

Harassment of Supreme Court justices appalls pro-choice WaPo columnist: 'Beyond the pale'

Pro-choice Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus rebuked protesters harassing conservative Supreme Court justices, claiming it's "counterproductive" and "beyond the pale."

www.foxnews.com

 

[tahuyaman]

Wow. Big whoop. According to your article, he never saw or heard the protestors, but left before dessert. How horrible! Of course, I rarely eat deserts when going out to dinner, as often stuffed by the time I finish salad or soup and main course. This is hysterical nonsense.

So you excuse this crap. Cool.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I sure do Sue, what would you be protesting her for?

Not knowing what a woman is?

 

[White 6]

So you excuse this crap. Cool.

The right to peacefully assemble and protest on a sidewalk, as is protected by the Constitution? Sure. Are you wishing to do away with parts of the Constitution?