Especially "special" was when they paused from claiming the FBI is a commie deep state groomer cabal to praise the FBI for not looking into multiple accusations of sexual assault and the questionable financial past of Kavanaugh.
Yeah, especially when they get up in your face and you shoot them dead for threatening your life, huh? These little fantasy exchanges come to a natural conclusion at some point and if someone is going to lose, it shouldn't be a SCOTUS justice who was just doing their duty.
Thank God
We can see the construction of the cult fantasy from the ground up, in this post.
This is a bullshit argument. ^^^
Shouldn't you be at an abortion clinic, getting your jollies by screaming in women's faces?
They obviously are tough guys. I don't see any blm/antifa punks harassing them. I've seen them disperse the blm/antifa vermin by just showing up.You're under the delusion that these Proud Boys are tough guys.
Is THAT why they used halfwit hillbillies to attack police at the capitol,, while they shouted orders? Is that why they put an unarmed women at the tip of the spear?
Washington Post, you lying shithead.A foxnews article about ancient uber-insider Ruth Marcus, who still thinks it's the 1990s.
You can't fail much harder than that.
That was not in the article either. It did not say Justice Kavanaugh was threatened at the restaurant, nor did he find it necessary to pull a gun and shoot somebody. Alarmist posts can be fun, but get real. It is not germane as it is not what happened. Nobody known to be threatened at the restaurant and nobody brandishing a pistol much less shooting somebody for the heck of it, lacking any threat, as the article stated, Justice Kavanaugh did not see or hear the protestors outside, sounds like he may have been unaware until after the main course.
The dinner seemed like such a great idea at the time.
If that was what it's about, you might have a point. Too bad you're totally ignoring the real point. That's because you're a failure at this.
Well whatever method you want to use to determine biological sex, whether it's chromosomes or sex organs there is a certain percentage of the population that doesn't fit neatly into those categories, from people with xyy chromosomes who typically develope normal male features, with male sex organs who are able to have children to people born with xy chromosomes, develop typically female physical appearances but can have a combination of internal sex organs including gonads instead of ovaries.
See. It's you with the simple picture book view of biology. I couldn't of picked a better way to demonstrate that then you have right here. You could be standing right next to someone who looked physically like a woman and yet had xy chromosomes, a vagina and internal testicles and you'd never be the wiser.
Looks like Schumer was right
Apparently the Handmaiden judge hasn't yet received permission from her husband to show her face in public.
