Breaking: Woman shot while trying to kill ICE agents in Minnesota

[el midgetron]

IM2 Superbadbrutha

 

[progressive hunter]

If they need to in order to protect our elected officials, fine with me.

Why is it ok for Wilson to defend himself but Capital police are expected to stand there and wait to be assaulted? Explain that to me.

all the elected officials had been evacuated ,,

because wilson was in the [process of being assaulted by a guy much larger than him that had already tried to take his gun,,
you even admitted wilson was defending himself not shooting someone that hadnt even attacked like byrd did,,

 

[el midgetron]

Here is:

A State Department official confirms it all:

The Democrats, via the Biden–Harris terrorist administration, knew and deliberately imported criminals from around the world on a daily basis.

Daniel Fitzgerald, a State Department official responsible for allocating U.S. foreign aid and bribes across the Western Hemisphere, confirms on videotape:

“I wish people knew that we’re letting in criminals daily.”

Despite USAID pouring over $4 billion into programs over four years, the “Great Replacement Theory” is real—the deliberate importation and protection of illegal immigrants is intended to fundamentally alter—and ultimately overthrow—the Constitutional Republic of the United States, and take down Western civilization with it.

— The State Department official, Daniel Fitzgerald, affirmed:

“Oh, yeah. So all the good, honest, hardworking Mexicans stay in Mexico, and all the pieces of garbage come to the United States. And the Mexican government has no reason to stop it, because their garbage goes to another country and sends money back to them.”

— When asked about the ultimate goal behind such policies, the official responded:

“They want to change the demographics of the United States. Traditional, standard Americans are not leftists. Latin Americans are all leftists. It literally is. It’s just—it literally is essential to try to change the demographics of the United States.”

In other words, the Democrats’ goal is crystal clear—to overthrow the Constitutional Republic of the United States—so it is imperative that the f**king losers—the Republican Majority Congress—codify Trump’s policies into law.

And @JamesOKeefeIII is the news!

 

[XponentialChaos]

all the elected officials had been evacuated ,,

All of them? That’s a lie.

because wilson was in the [process of being assaulted by a guy much larger than him that had already tried to take his gun,,

So it’s ok for police to defend themselves from one guy that’s bigger than them, but they’re not allowed to defend themselves against hundreds of violent rioters? Make it make sense.

 

[el midgetron]

it takes some serious psychological disassociation to navigate the liberal establishment narrative.

 

[progressive hunter]

All of them? That’s a lie.



So it’s ok for police to defend themselves from one guy that’s bigger than them, but they’re not allowed to defend themselves against hundreds of violent rioters? Make it make sense.

if byrd would have been shooting at all the rioters I would agree with you but he wasnt and the threat you claimed was there didnt change,,

now if you want to pass a law that allows for all rioters be shot before they can become a direct threat I would vote for that law,,

do you want that law??

 

[el midgetron]

Back when they weren’t paid to riot and distract from billions of fraud.

 

[XponentialChaos]

if byrd would have been shooting at all the rioters I would agree with you but he wasnt and the threat you claimed was there didnt change,,

He didn’t need to shoot at all of them. He shot at one. That stopped them from advancing. That’s better than shooting multiple.

now if you want to pass a law that allows for all rioters be shot before they can become a direct threat I would vote for that law,,

do you want that law??

So you would support shooting all of the Jan 6 rioters. Wow. No I don’t want them. I’m content with preserving life by only taking out the leader.

 

[progressive hunter]

He didn’t need to shoot at all of them. He shot at one. That stopped them from advancing. That’s better than shooting multiple.




So you would support shooting all of the Jan 6 rioters. Wow.

no it didnt,, everyone of them was still there doing the exact same things outside of that small area,,

not all of them were rioting,, some walked through open doors with CP allowing them in,,

 

[XponentialChaos]

no it didnt,, everyone of them was still there doing the exact same things outside of that small area,,

not all of them were rioting,, some walked through open doors with CP allowing them in,,

They stopped trying to break through that barricade. Works for me.

Why is it ok for police to defend themselves from one guy larger than them, but it’s not ok for police to defend themselves from hundreds of them? I don’t get it.

If Michael Brown was a 100-pound guy and had 99 other guys that size with him, is Wilson supposed to just sit there and wait to be assaulted by them? That doesn’t make any sense whatsoever.

 

[progressive hunter]

They stopped trying to break through that barricade. Works for me.

Why is it ok for police to defend themselves from one guy larger than them, but it’s not ok for police to defend themselves from hundreds of them? I don’t get it.

If Michael Brown was a 100-pound guy and had 99 other guys that size with him, is Wilson supposed to just sit there and wait to be assaulted by them? That doesn’t make any sense whatsoever.

in that small area maybe,, but nothing else changed,,

I dont play make believe,, the fact is brown was much larger than the cop and after trying to take the cops gun continued to attack him,,

the world is a better place without brown in it,,

 

[XponentialChaos]

in that small area maybe,, but nothing else changed,,

I dont play make believe,, the fact is brown was much larger than the cop and after trying to take the cops gun continued to attack him,,

the world is a better place without brown in it,,

I’m fine with the shooting of Brown.

I don’t understand why you think Wilson should be able to defend himself but Byrd is supposed to just stand there and wait to be assaulted. Makes absolutely no sense.

It’s ok to defend yourself against one. It’s not ok to defend yourself against many? lol ridiculous.

 

[progressive hunter]

I’m fine with the shooting of Brown.

I don’t understand why you think Wilson should be able to defend himself but Byrd is supposed to just stand there and wait to be assaulted. Makes absolutely no sense.

It’s ok to defend yourself against one. It’s not ok to defend yourself against many? lol ridiculous.

so now that youre losing the argument youre now OK with the brown shooting..

my how claims change,,

wilson was under a direct threat and byrd wasnt and his shooting her changed nothing that was happing in the capital,,

 

[XponentialChaos]

so now that youre losing the argument youre now OK with the brown shooting..

my how claims change,,

I’ve never said otherwise. Prove me wrong or admit you’re lying.

wilson was under a direct threat and byrd wasnt and his shooting her changed nothing that was happing in the capital,,

Police were under direct intentional threat in both situations. They were assaulting police, just like how Brown was assaulting Wilson.

Both justified shootings.

 

[el midgetron]

 

[el midgetron]

 

[progressive hunter]

I’ve never said otherwise. Prove me wrong or admit you’re lying.



Police were under direct intentional threat in both situations. They were assaulting police, just like how Brown was assaulting Wilson.

Both justified shootings.

alright then lets pass a law that allows all rioters to be shot on sight,,

problem solved,,

 

[el midgetron]

It’s totally manufactured outrage. Liberal establishment programming.

 

[el midgetron]

 

[el midgetron]