XponentialChaos
Diamond Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 34,301
- 12,596
- 1,435
Since you claim to know this.
What would make it necessary?
If his life was actually in danger.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Since you claim to know this.
What would make it necessary?
And how would you know when that was.If his life was actually in danger.
I said the law does not require he be hit in order to defend himself. Pay attention and get off the sauce.So you ADMIT he was never HIT.
Better her than me.I think he was trigger-happy and made a poor decision.
I might agree.
One poor decision on her part followed by potentially one on his part.
If she doesn't make hers, his never happens.
Nobody put her in danger.
She put him in danger.
Just how much justifies him pulling a gun...you are going to tell us.
he was hit by a car coming at him not fleeing from him,,According to police experts, he made a big mistake standing in front of a car that may flee.
He was hit by a fleeing car before. You’d think he would have learned this lesson by now.
I think he put himself into a bad position. I think she was trying to flee, not attack him. I think he may have been jumpy from his previous incident and made a really bad decision.
I’d argue that he put himself into a very questionable position that lead him to believe that his life was in danger when it clearly wasn’t.
I hope he gets the chair.
he was hit by a car coming at him not fleeing from him,,
youre retarded arent you,,
Don't really care about police experts. Especially since they never agree on much.According to police experts, he made a big mistake standing in front of a car that may flee.
More left wing assumptions and assignment of priority. You don't disappoint.He was hit by a fleeing car before. You’d think he would have learned this lesson by now.
And we care what you think why?I think he put himself into a bad position.
Talk about a bad position. Especially when you can see their guns.I think she was trying to flee
Of this, I have no doubt.not attack him.
More guesswork and justification for a point of view. Pretty sloppy.I think he may have been jumpy from his previous incident and made a really bad decision.
Yes, that is what you are doing. And someone will decide if that was the case.I’d argue that he put himself into a very questionable position that lead him to believe that his life was in danger when it clearly wasn’t.
Stand in front of my car and see how you make out. She AIMED her vehicle at him. The video is clear.If his life was actually in danger.
What's clear is that is that isn't clear.The car was clearly trying to flee the scene, not kill him. You retard.
Since you know his life wasn't in danger, why don't you tell us when it would be in danger.According to police experts, he made a big mistake standing in front of a car that may flee.
He was hit by a fleeing car before. You’d think he would have learned this lesson by now.
I think he put himself into a bad position. I think she was trying to flee, not attack him. I think he may have been jumpy from his previous incident and made a really bad decision.
I’d argue that he put himself into a very questionable position that lead him to believe that his life was in danger when it clearly wasn’t.
Funny you fuckers were silent at Waco/Ruby Ridge.If the government is out murdering people, that's something we should all be upset about.
You fuckwits say you need to be armed like the ******* Zombies are coming, and we should just learn to "live" with school shootings, because we need our guns to fights the government.
And here you have the kind of government abuse you guys say you are against, and you are pretty much breaking out the kneepads.
You know the Admins are getting really tried of you making work for them.That's not the point. Rules are rules. Talk to me about it in PMs if you wish, otherwise be patient.
I don't care if she didn't mean to run him over.Stand in front of my car and see how you make out. She AIMED her vehicle at him. The video is clear.
Don't really care about police experts. Especially since they never agree on much.
More left wing assumptions and assignment of priority. You don't disappoint.
And we care what you think why?
Talk about a bad position. Especially when you can see their guns.
Of this, I have no doubt.
But it really doesn't matter when it's going down.
She shouldn't have moved the car. She knew he was there.
More guesswork and justification for a point of view. Pretty sloppy.
Yes, that is what you are doing. And someone will decide if that was the case.
If she doesn't move the car, she's tucking her kids in for the night.
It's not like people have not used cars to attempt to hit ICE agents in the past.
Not sure what the road surface was like and what was she thinking....he'd just move? What if he slipped?
You skipped this part:
Law enforcement and correctional officers of the Department of Justice may use deadly force only when necessary, that is, when the officer has a reasonable belief that the subject of such force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer or to another person.
1. Whiny leftist claims to “murder” are pointless. Leftist retards were anxious for a confrontation. You “ICE Watch” groupies desperately wanted this,I'm sure she was panicked when three of his buddies in masks with guns started screaming obscenities at her.
Not sure why you think this guy harrassing two CITIZENS makes him look better.
1) Parking violations don't merit murder.
2) Last time I checked, we still have a first Amendment, and she has every right to taunt thugs.
3) She wasn't steering "right at them". Ross ran in front of her car as she tried to get around him.
Wait, she was trying to flee the scene, leaving her wife there? That doesn't make any sense.
View attachment 1203712
He wasn't standing in front of the vehicle until she turned towards him.
His bodycam video makes it quite apparent.