Breaking: Woman shot while trying to kill ICE agents in Minnesota

Imminent means an activity is already underway where it’s proven that the next step in the progression will be lethal
Babbit did not pose that.
She was climbing through the window, which makes her an imminent threat.
 
Idiot talk. Staged FBI ( over 200 ) + paid ANTIFA plants were there setupbefore the Presidents speech. They broke windows as crowd arrived.

They also unlocked magnetic doors and invited them in. You really are anti American scum 100%
Dominic Pezzola was not a paid antifa plant. He was a Proud Boy.
 
Because none of them were reasonably in fear for their lives.
More than 50 officers were injured in the riot, some requiring hospitalization. They were sprayed with bear mace, knocked down, struck with flagpoles, metal pipes, stolen police shields and crutches.

Many officers also testified they suffer PTSD from that day's events. Seems like they had reasonable fear for their lives to me.
 
The normalization and encouragement of violence on the left needs to stop!

The left needs to learn that murdering people because you disagree with what they believe is NOT OK.

Democrats and their media are 100% to blame for this.

How many more times is this going to happen??


Marv

Does your personal jesus lie?
 
She was climbing through the window, which makes her an imminent threat.
Non upright, diminutive to begin with, not approaching the murderous coward , unarmed , crept up upon and no one yet has produced an audio of her being directed to stop by her murderer.
 
You have no moderate stances so how in the world can you “moderate”???
Oh, you thought this some sort of government board, or one not governed by rules for moderation. Incorrect. They do not appear to care about political stance, but merely if having the ability and willingness to enforce established policy in support of the business model of attract posters to discuss a wide range of topics, as the driver of business, regardless of opinion or political bias. Supporting and enforce policy is something I have no problem with, as business and the US government paid me to successfully do for many years. Yet, I get to post in open board threads, as I did, when they recruited me. But, as is the case in this thread, the thread is not about me, but a discussion of Breaking: Woman shot while trying to kill ICE agents in Minnesota, and a total review of Moderation Actions on the thread shows, I have not moderated the thread. So, without that, I cannot be removed simply because you disagree or hold some animus toward me personally based on difference of perspective. A casual look by any member at rules for posting will bear this out.

Do, you have some opinion, link or observation in discussion of the woman being shot by ICE agents? Might be a good time to make it instead of a pointless attack on a member's responses, simply because of their job or perceived position in some organization, that you do not understand and is off-topic of the woman getting shot by ICE.
 
More than 50 officers were injured in the riot, some requiring hospitalization. They were sprayed with bear mace, knocked down, struck with flagpoles, metal pipes, stolen police shields and crutches.

Many officers also testified they suffer PTSD from that day's events. Seems like they had reasonable fear for their lives to me.
How many lives were lost? The only deceased were protestors
It’s gotta be more than a feeling, you need visual sighting to conclude your own life needs protecting with a lethal response
 
15th post
Oh, you thought this some sort of government board, or one not governed by rules for moderation. Incorrect. They do not appear to care about political stance, but merely if having the ability and willingness to enforce established policy in support of the business model of attract posters to discuss a wide range of topics, as the driver of business, regardless of opinion or political bias. Supporting and enforce policy is something I have no problem with, as business and the US government paid me to successfully do for many years. Yet, I get to post in open board threads, as I did, when they recruited me. But, as is the case in this thread, the thread is not about me, but a discussion of Breaking: Woman shot while trying to kill ICE agents in Minnesota, and a total review of Moderation Actions on the thread shows, I have not moderated the thread. So, without that, I cannot be removed simply because you disagree or hold some animus toward me personally based on difference of perspective. A casual look by any member at rules for posting will bear this out.

Do, you have some opinion, link or observation in discussion of the woman being shot by ICE agents? Might be a good time to make it instead of a pointless attack on a member's responses, simply because of their job or perceived position in some organization, that you do not understand and is off-topic of the woman getting shot by ICE.
All your requests about what you feel I should be providing, I have already provided .
 
Back
Top Bottom