Zone1 Breaking News: The Earth is Older than 6,000 years old

Neither does the Bible say that the universe revolves around the Earth, which is what the early Catholic church insisted upon at one time and would burn you at the stake for questioning.

That is why words matter so much I reckon. LOL.
So what? What's your point as it pertains to the age of the earth?
 
So what? What's your point as it pertains to the age of the earth?
My point is that atheists and Christians alike often interpret the Bible in a horrible, horrible fashion, then create a myriad of strawmans as a result

Just tired of it is all.
 
The surface of the earth was shaped by cataclysmic events including floods over perhaps billions of years. All the evidence gets mixed together into an incomprehensible mess.
 
My point is that atheists and Christians alike often interpret the Bible in a horrible, horrible fashion, then create a myriad of strawmans as a result

Just tired of it is all.
Is believing that God created an existence in a state of journeying rather than all at once a horrible interpretation?

Because this isn't a gotcha thread. It's a thread for serious discussion. I don't see how my interpretation doesn't give God the most glory. Because I think my interpretation gives God the most glory.
 
Is believing that God created an existence in a state of journeying rather than all at once a horrible interpretation?

Because this isn't a gotcha thread. It's a thread for serious discussion. I don't see how my interpretation doesn't give God the most glory. Because I think my interpretation gives God the most glory.
No Social Promotion in Heaven. God Flunked Out of His Grade School.

Reminds me of what we called Supply (Force Service Regiment), "FSR stands for '**** up, Stumble, and Re-group.'"
 
No Social Promotion in Heaven. God Flunked Out of His Grade School.

Reminds me of what we called Supply (Force Service Regiment), "FSR stands for '**** up, Stumble, and Re-group.'"
I wasn't really expecting you to contribute anything of value.
 
Why not? Because the evidence against that is overwhelming.

Are you arguing that it would be more powerful for God to create the universe as it is to make it look like it is billions of years old, rather than for God to will existence into being and have it evolve and unfold according to his plan?

What purpose would God have in trying to trick us into believing the universe only looks like it was created billions of years ago? Whereas the purpose of God breathing existence into being and it unfolding exactly as he planned reveals his majesty and glory and serves as a test.

See Romans 1:18-23
Pray
Then Pay
That's the Way
To Make My Day



St. Paul was a collectivist. His primary interest was in the collection plate.
 
"Creation Week" was God setting the table for modern man, just like the inventor of "Monopoly". Without the game board and the various pieces and rules there's no game.

Sure. And ain't you the guy who after /winning/ a court case wrongly brought against you by someone else, was lulled into thinking you still had to pay all of the court costs for it?
 

Noah’s Flood or Millions of Years, It Can’t Be Both

Either the rock record is the evidence of millions of years, or it is largely the evidence of Noah’s Flood. It can’t be both. If we believe the earth is billions of years old and shows no sign of a worldwide Flood, then that belief contradicts the biblical account of Noah. If we accept God’s testimony regarding the Flood, we cannot logically believe in millions of years.

Proof! It can't be both!

Is the flood a lie?
What proof is there it is millions of years old?
 
This is true.
It's all just some crazy theory.

I don't think any particular deception was going on. Genesis was written best we can estimate about 1400 BC, and I think the author was simply trying to put things in as best a context as he knew how.

Or maybe in the very limited terms in which things had been related to him.

I mean, if you were to try to explain what a smartphone was for and how the microchip operated to a neolithic man from Borneo, you would not get too far.
 
Sure. And ain't you the guy who after /winning/ a court case wrongly brought against you by someone else, was lulled into thinking you still had to pay all of the court costs for it?
The case was brought by the city, A felony charge was reduced to disorderly conduct and discharged with nominal court costs, no fines. I didn't win anything as even the disorderly conduct charge was false.
 
15th post
The case was brought by the city, A felony charge was reduced to disorderly conduct and discharged with nominal court costs, no fines. I didn't win anything as even the disorderly conduct charge was false.

Thanks, that explains the charges.
 
I'm not following your logic.
From Rote to Rot

Neither are the Quantum Quacks. Germans were educated in absolute obedience. When they got PhDs, they were finally allowed to think for themselves but didn't know how. Irrational German physics previewed irrational German politics.
 
From Rote to Rot

Neither are the Quantum Quacks. Germans were educated in absolute obedience. When they got PhDs, they were finally allowed to think for themselves but didn't know how. Irrational German physics previewed irrational German politics.
That's about as interesting as your last post.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom