TheDude
Gold Member
Nice spin.
Breaking News On The Russia Investigation
- Thread starter toobfreak
- Start date
Nice spin.
TheDude
Gold Member
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 151,819
- 35,301
- 2,180
but there was and it happened. so what you gonna do bubba?
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 151,819
- 35,301
- 2,180
nobody, well fk hairball, here you are talking about it.
Theowl32
Diamond Member
- Dec 8, 2013
- 23,643
- 18,723
- 2,415
lol!
xyz
Gold Member
- Oct 5, 2016
- 7,970
- 1,386
- 195
Can you find a reasonable excuse why there wouldn't be a Russian agent who infiltrated, or someone who was doing their computer work was recruited by the Russians?
I bet they have quite a few in the White House as well, with security clearances even.
toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
- Thread starter
- #28
I bet the WH is FULL of Russian agents with security clearances! They probably got there with all of the Muslim agents from the "Brotherhood" Obama had weekly meetings with! Or maybe they came on board with all of the covert Chinese Spies the Clintons routinely sold our military secrets to in the 1990's.
kiwiman127
Comfortably Moderate
Watergate took over two years to come to a head. Watergate, also did not dominate the news over the over two year investigation and drama. The news came in waves, not day-to-day headlines for two years straight.
Man, you folks have quite the imagination.
kiwiman127
Comfortably Moderate
This time the investigations is dealing with a foreign entity, not centered in one city. Also, technology can be a benefit and also a hindrance.
I'm a patient fella, you don't see me saying one thing or another. I'll just wait for the investigation to come to a conclusion.
Besides, look how long the investigation took for Benghazi and it's still not complete.
toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
- Thread starter
- #33
The only data that matters is what came HERE and is in the DNC server or elsewhere in the election system. If it isn't HERE it could not have affected the election.
As a former designer of global telecom technology, I would dispute that.
I can respect that. As to Benghazi, the main reason it has dragged on so long is because the Intel agencies are still dragging their feet fighting not to release the requested info!
jillian
Princess
toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
- Thread starter
- #35
As a follow up, as previously mentioned by the Original Tree, ex-spy, VIPS member, and former NSA technical director of 30 years, Bill Binney reported to Tucker Carlson that as far as the Trump-Russia investigation, many within the CIA are worried there is nothing to support the allegation! And that this entire affair is nothing but agenda-driven by people who are committed to seeing a lie through, and that would of course include the DNC. the MSM, and many factions within the GOP. They have access to and have examined the network log coming out of the DNC server that traces packets and gives much info on activity. 1,976 MB of data were downloaded in only 87 seconds, far too brief to have gone over the internet. The only option left is that the server was hacked by someone right there within the facility! Of course, all of this could be cleared up for certain, the so far, the DNC has refused to turn the server over to the CIA for further analysis. WHY?
this is the fourth or fifth thread on this...and a little late, it's been debunked... 
the assumption by the alleged retired NSA IT guys that the speed was too fast for guciffer to receive the emails on July 5th 2016 over the internet at the time of the transfer... and this is why the Russians could not have done the hacking, they say, unless it was a download from a memory card and the memory card had to come from someone inside the DNC is just utterly ridiculous!!!!!!!!!!
1- the memory stick to Guciffer could have come from the Russians who hacked the DNC over the period of 2015 thru 2016.
2. the FBI tried for over a year to warn the DNC they were being hacked.
3. Guciffer is Russian...lying and claiming to be Romanian....but it was noted that he was in Russia....something to do with meta data showing such....anyway, if he was in Russia, the FSB (the new KGB)with internet service speeds faster than our CIA can probably get. in the USA...the download speed of the DNC email files could have taken a nano second to send to Guciffer from the stolen files the FSB had on hand from their thefts earlier in the year!
READ THIS
The Nation Article About the DNC Hack Is Too Incoherent to Even Debunk
But this article is neither conclusive proof nor strong evidence. It’s the extremely long-winded product of a crank, and it’s been getting attention only because it appears in a respected left-wing publication like The Nation. Anyone hoping to read it for careful reporting and clear explanation is going to come away disappointed, however.
If you want to get to the actual claims being made, you’ll have to skip the first 1,000 or so words, which mostly consist of breathtakingly elaborate throat-clearing. (“[H]ouses built on sand and made of cards are bound to collapse, and there can be no surprise that the one resting atop the ‘hack theory,’ as we can call the prevailing wisdom on the DNC events, appears to be in the process of doing so.”) About halfway through, you get to the crux of the article: A report, made by an anonymous analyst calling himself “Forensicator,” on the “metadata” of “locked files” leaked by the hacker Guccifer 2.0.
This should, already, set off alarm bells: An anonymous analyst is claiming to have analyzed the “metadata” of “locked files” that only this analyst had access to? Still, if I’m understanding it correctly, Lawrence’s central argument (which, again, rests on the belief that Forensicator’s claims about “metadata” are meaningful and correct) is that the initial data transfer from the DNC occurred at speeds impossible via the internet. Instead, he and a few retired intel-community members and some pseudonymous bloggers believe the data was transferred to a USB stick, making the infiltration a leak from someone inside the DNC, not a hack.
The crux of the whole thing — the opening argument — rests on the fact that, according to “metadata,” the data was transferred at about 22 megabytes per second, which Lawrence and Forensicator claim is much too fast to have been undertaken over an internet connection. (Most connection speeds are measured at megabits per second, not megabytes; 22 megabytes per second is 176 megabits per second.) Most households don’t get internet speeds that high, but enterprise operations, like the DNC — or, uh, the FSB — would have access to a higher but certainly not unattainable speed like that.
the assumption by the alleged retired NSA IT guys that the speed was too fast for guciffer to receive the emails on July 5th 2016 over the internet at the time of the transfer... and this is why the Russians could not have done the hacking, they say, unless it was a download from a memory card and the memory card had to come from someone inside the DNC is just utterly ridiculous!!!!!!!!!!
1- the memory stick to Guciffer could have come from the Russians who hacked the DNC over the period of 2015 thru 2016.
2. the FBI tried for over a year to warn the DNC they were being hacked.
3. Guciffer is Russian...lying and claiming to be Romanian....but it was noted that he was in Russia....something to do with meta data showing such....anyway, if he was in Russia, the FSB (the new KGB)with internet service speeds faster than our CIA can probably get. in the USA...the download speed of the DNC email files could have taken a nano second to send to Guciffer from the stolen files the FSB had on hand from their thefts earlier in the year!
READ THIS
The Nation Article About the DNC Hack Is Too Incoherent to Even Debunk
But this article is neither conclusive proof nor strong evidence. It’s the extremely long-winded product of a crank, and it’s been getting attention only because it appears in a respected left-wing publication like The Nation. Anyone hoping to read it for careful reporting and clear explanation is going to come away disappointed, however.
If you want to get to the actual claims being made, you’ll have to skip the first 1,000 or so words, which mostly consist of breathtakingly elaborate throat-clearing. (“[H]ouses built on sand and made of cards are bound to collapse, and there can be no surprise that the one resting atop the ‘hack theory,’ as we can call the prevailing wisdom on the DNC events, appears to be in the process of doing so.”) About halfway through, you get to the crux of the article: A report, made by an anonymous analyst calling himself “Forensicator,” on the “metadata” of “locked files” leaked by the hacker Guccifer 2.0.
This should, already, set off alarm bells: An anonymous analyst is claiming to have analyzed the “metadata” of “locked files” that only this analyst had access to? Still, if I’m understanding it correctly, Lawrence’s central argument (which, again, rests on the belief that Forensicator’s claims about “metadata” are meaningful and correct) is that the initial data transfer from the DNC occurred at speeds impossible via the internet. Instead, he and a few retired intel-community members and some pseudonymous bloggers believe the data was transferred to a USB stick, making the infiltration a leak from someone inside the DNC, not a hack.
The crux of the whole thing — the opening argument — rests on the fact that, according to “metadata,” the data was transferred at about 22 megabytes per second, which Lawrence and Forensicator claim is much too fast to have been undertaken over an internet connection. (Most connection speeds are measured at megabits per second, not megabytes; 22 megabytes per second is 176 megabits per second.) Most households don’t get internet speeds that high, but enterprise operations, like the DNC — or, uh, the FSB — would have access to a higher but certainly not unattainable speed like that.
The2ndAmendment
Gold Member
I think you mean the Trump winners. We won the election.
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
Btw Comey should be Prosecuted for Perjury when he lied in a signed document for a FOIA request over whether or not there were documents and transcripts related to Lynch's illegal meeting with Bill Clinton.
So he's in trouble and so is Lynch who both lied about these documents when In fact there was a treasure trove of communications between The FBI and DOJ about that very thing.
So he's in trouble and so is Lynch who both lied about these documents when In fact there was a treasure trove of communications between The FBI and DOJ about that very thing.
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
Lol lying snowflake.
Say did you forget to burn a flag today?
Neglect to throw a rock through a shop window?
Or say a prayer to Vladimir Putin and Kim Jung Un to make Neo Nazi Herr Hildabeast President?
Maybe you could go find a cop to
Spit on Or statue To Tear Down to make you feel better or pepper spray a little girl because you don't like her hat.
That might make you feel better... cuz feelings.....right?.
Say did you forget to burn a flag today?
Neglect to throw a rock through a shop window?
Or say a prayer to Vladimir Putin and Kim Jung Un to make Neo Nazi Herr Hildabeast President?
Maybe you could go find a cop to
Spit on Or statue To Tear Down to make you feel better or pepper spray a little girl because you don't like her hat.
That might make you feel better... cuz feelings.....right?.
this is the fourth or fifth thread on this...and a little late, it's been debunked...
the assumption by the alleged retired NSA IT guys that the speed was too fast for guciffer to receive the emails on July 5th 2016 over the internet at the time of the transfer... and this is why the Russians could not have done the hacking, they say, unless it was a download from a memory card and the memory card had to come from someone inside the DNC is just utterly ridiculous!!!!!!!!!!
1- the memory stick to Guciffer could have come from the Russians who hacked the DNC over the period of 2015 thru 2016.
2. the FBI tried for over a year to warn the DNC they were being hacked.
3. Guciffer is Russian...lying and claiming to be Romanian....but it was noted that he was in Russia....something to do with meta data showing such....anyway, if he was in Russia, the FSB (the new KGB)with internet service speeds faster than our CIA can probably get. in the USA...the download speed of the DNC email files could have taken a nano second to send to Guciffer from the stolen files the FSB had on hand from their thefts earlier in the year!
READ THIS
The Nation Article About the DNC Hack Is Too Incoherent to Even Debunk
But this article is neither conclusive proof nor strong evidence. It’s the extremely long-winded product of a crank, and it’s been getting attention only because it appears in a respected left-wing publication like The Nation. Anyone hoping to read it for careful reporting and clear explanation is going to come away disappointed, however.
If you want to get to the actual claims being made, you’ll have to skip the first 1,000 or so words, which mostly consist of breathtakingly elaborate throat-clearing. (“[H]ouses built on sand and made of cards are bound to collapse, and there can be no surprise that the one resting atop the ‘hack theory,’ as we can call the prevailing wisdom on the DNC events, appears to be in the process of doing so.”) About halfway through, you get to the crux of the article: A report, made by an anonymous analyst calling himself “Forensicator,” on the “metadata” of “locked files” leaked by the hacker Guccifer 2.0.
This should, already, set off alarm bells: An anonymous analyst is claiming to have analyzed the “metadata” of “locked files” that only this analyst had access to? Still, if I’m understanding it correctly, Lawrence’s central argument (which, again, rests on the belief that Forensicator’s claims about “metadata” are meaningful and correct) is that the initial data transfer from the DNC occurred at speeds impossible via the internet. Instead, he and a few retired intel-community members and some pseudonymous bloggers believe the data was transferred to a USB stick, making the infiltration a leak from someone inside the DNC, not a hack.
The crux of the whole thing — the opening argument — rests on the fact that, according to “metadata,” the data was transferred at about 22 megabytes per second, which Lawrence and Forensicator claim is much too fast to have been undertaken over an internet connection. (Most connection speeds are measured at megabits per second, not megabytes; 22 megabytes per second is 176 megabits per second.) Most households don’t get internet speeds that high, but enterprise operations, like the DNC — or, uh, the FSB — would have access to a higher but certainly not unattainable speed like that.
Lol lying snowflake.
Say did you forget to burn a flag today?
Neglect to throw a rock through a shop window?
Or say a prayer to Vladimir Putin and Kim Jung Un to make Neo Nazi Herr Hildabeast President?
Maybe you could go find a cop to
Spit on Or statue To Tear Down to make you feel better or pepper spray a little girl because you don't like her hat.
That might make you feel better... cuz feelings.....right?.
this is the fourth or fifth thread on this...and a little late, it's been debunked...
the assumption by the alleged retired NSA IT guys that the speed was too fast for guciffer to receive the emails on July 5th 2016 over the internet at the time of the transfer... and this is why the Russians could not have done the hacking, they say, unless it was a download from a memory card and the memory card had to come from someone inside the DNC is just utterly ridiculous!!!!!!!!!!
1- the memory stick to Guciffer could have come from the Russians who hacked the DNC over the period of 2015 thru 2016.
2. the FBI tried for over a year to warn the DNC they were being hacked.
3. Guciffer is Russian...lying and claiming to be Romanian....but it was noted that he was in Russia....something to do with meta data showing such....anyway, if he was in Russia, the FSB (the new KGB)with internet service speeds faster than our CIA can probably get. in the USA...the download speed of the DNC email files could have taken a nano second to send to Guciffer from the stolen files the FSB had on hand from their thefts earlier in the year!
READ THIS
The Nation Article About the DNC Hack Is Too Incoherent to Even Debunk
But this article is neither conclusive proof nor strong evidence. It’s the extremely long-winded product of a crank, and it’s been getting attention only because it appears in a respected left-wing publication like The Nation. Anyone hoping to read it for careful reporting and clear explanation is going to come away disappointed, however.
If you want to get to the actual claims being made, you’ll have to skip the first 1,000 or so words, which mostly consist of breathtakingly elaborate throat-clearing. (“[H]ouses built on sand and made of cards are bound to collapse, and there can be no surprise that the one resting atop the ‘hack theory,’ as we can call the prevailing wisdom on the DNC events, appears to be in the process of doing so.”) About halfway through, you get to the crux of the article: A report, made by an anonymous analyst calling himself “Forensicator,” on the “metadata” of “locked files” leaked by the hacker Guccifer 2.0.
This should, already, set off alarm bells: An anonymous analyst is claiming to have analyzed the “metadata” of “locked files” that only this analyst had access to? Still, if I’m understanding it correctly, Lawrence’s central argument (which, again, rests on the belief that Forensicator’s claims about “metadata” are meaningful and correct) is that the initial data transfer from the DNC occurred at speeds impossible via the internet. Instead, he and a few retired intel-community members and some pseudonymous bloggers believe the data was transferred to a USB stick, making the infiltration a leak from someone inside the DNC, not a hack.
The crux of the whole thing — the opening argument — rests on the fact that, according to “metadata,” the data was transferred at about 22 megabytes per second, which Lawrence and Forensicator claim is much too fast to have been undertaken over an internet connection. (Most connection speeds are measured at megabits per second, not megabytes; 22 megabytes per second is 176 megabits per second.) Most households don’t get internet speeds that high, but enterprise operations, like the DNC — or, uh, the FSB — would have access to a higher but certainly not unattainable speed like that.
I got to ya!
truth hurts, eh?Similar threads
New Topics
-
The Egypt wall with Gaza seems to be working. But supposedly “Walls Dont Work”- Started by ColonelAngus
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
-
Cops Aren't Putting Up With Anything From Rioters- Started by mudwhistle
- Replies: 8
