Former Biden Aide Admits Staff Felt Justified Doing ‘Undemocratic Things’

[jknowgood]

Again, you are claiming the DNC tried to kill Trump with zero proof, you are squirming for recognition of yer hero. And yes, the Clintoons were harassed in civil courts by the GOP. I can tell you didn't live through the 1990s. They were after Hillary Clinton until 2018, with her last brush with Senate investigators.

No, Clinton lied. That's what got him.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

You voted for the Jan 6 traitor Trump.

Nothing tops that stupidity.

What did Trump do on January 6 that makes him a traitor?

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

What did Trump do on January 6 that makes him a traitor?

Try to get Mike Pence to steal the election for him, for starters.

Thank god Pence is a patriot and did the right thing and essentially told Trump to go fuck himself.

 

[Moonglow]

No, Clinton lied. That's what got him.

He tried to stay loyal to the Bro Code.

The "bro code" is a collection of unspoken rules and expectations for how men should behave among themselves, often emphasizing male solidarity and avoiding confrontation, especially when it comes to other men's relationships. Essentially, it's a code of conduct for men to prioritize their male friendships over women, and it's frequently expressed as "bros before hoes". The Bro Code can be seen as a way for men to maintain status within their group, and it often involves upholding a particular definition of masculinity, according to a psychology blog.

Here's a more detailed look at the key aspects of the bro code:
Core Principles:

• Bros before hoes:
  This is the most famous rule, emphasizing that male friendships are prioritized over romantic interests or relationships with women.
• • Non-confrontational:
    Men are expected to avoid publicly criticizing or challenging other men, even if they have made mistakes.
  • Loyalty:
    The Bro Code often involves defending other men, even if their behavior is questionable, and protecting their secrets.
  • Hierarchical Social Structures:
    The Bro Code can be seen as reinforcing male hierarchies and a focus on competition and status.
    

Examples of Bro Code Rules:

• • You don't talk about the other men's dating lives.
    
  • If a bro is suddenly overly generous, you should check in on him.
    
  • You don't badmouth a bro's girlfriend.
    
  • You never "rat out" another bro, even if their behavior is wrong.
    

Criticisms of the Bro Code:

• • Harmful to Women:
    The Bro Code's focus on men and their relationships can be seen as dismissive of women's needs and perspectives.
  • Toxic Masculinity:
    Some argue that the Bro Code promotes a narrow and restrictive definition of masculinity that can be detrimental to men's well-being.
  • Lack of Ethical Considerations:
    The Bro Code's emphasis on loyalty and avoiding confrontation can lead to unethical behavior.

 

[Thinker101]

He tried to stay loyal to the Bro Code.

The "bro code" is a collection of unspoken rules and expectations for how men should behave among themselves, often emphasizing male solidarity and avoiding confrontation, especially when it comes to other men's relationships. Essentially, it's a code of conduct for men to prioritize their male friendships over women, and it's frequently expressed as "bros before hoes". The Bro Code can be seen as a way for men to maintain status within their group, and it often involves upholding a particular definition of masculinity, according to a psychology blog.

Here's a more detailed look at the key aspects of the bro code:
Core Principles:

• Bros before hoes:
  This is the most famous rule, emphasizing that male friendships are prioritized over romantic interests or relationships with women.
• • Non-confrontational:
    Men are expected to avoid publicly criticizing or challenging other men, even if they have made mistakes.
  • Loyalty:
    The Bro Code often involves defending other men, even if their behavior is questionable, and protecting their secrets.
  • Hierarchical Social Structures:
    The Bro Code can be seen as reinforcing male hierarchies and a focus on competition and status.

Examples of Bro Code Rules:

• • You don't talk about the other men's dating lives.
  • If a bro is suddenly overly generous, you should check in on him.
  • You don't badmouth a bro's girlfriend.
  • You never "rat out" another bro, even if their behavior is wrong.

Criticisms of the Bro Code:

• • Harmful to Women:
    The Bro Code's focus on men and their relationships can be seen as dismissive of women's needs and perspectives.
  • Toxic Masculinity:
    Some argue that the Bro Code promotes a narrow and restrictive definition of masculinity that can be detrimental to men's well-being.
  • Lack of Ethical Considerations:
    The Bro Code's emphasis on loyalty and avoiding confrontation can lead to unethical behavior.

Damn, is that where Dems spent $20 million, to learn the Bro Code?

 

[Moonglow]

Damn, is that where Dems spent $20 million, to learn the Bro Code?

I am not sure, ask them.

 

[Moonglow]

Trump pardoned man 1 month after mother attended $1M per person fundraiser: Report

President Trump pardoned Paul Walczak, a man who had pleaded guilty to tax crimes, one month after his mother attended a major fundraiser for the president, according to a new report from The New York Times. The Times reports that a pardon application submitted around Trump’s inauguration cited...

www.yahoo.com

 

[Nostra]

You voted for the Jan 6 traitor Trump.

Nothing tops that stupidity.

You voted for a pervert who molested his own daughter.

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

You voted for a pervert who molested his own daughter.

Whoa.....them poignant words, gomer!

 

[Couchpotato]

What's an opinion worth? The guy gave an opinion about other people's thoughts? Not their actions or actual doings of undemocratic things, in that quote of his quoted in your op....?

So you think they felt justified for thinking about doing undemocratic things?

 

[Couchpotato]

If you think that was only based on simple opinion, then I don't know what else to say Kitty...other than do a little more reading and research, out side of your closed circuit media comfort zone.....

That's been verified as complete and utter bullshit. Please tell me you know this.

 

[Moonglow]

So you think they felt justified for thinking about doing undemocratic things?

How is a pardon a democratic action?

 

[Couchpotato]

How is a pardon a democratic action?

Did I say a pardon was undemocratic? I guess definitionally the way we do pardons isnt exactly democratic, no one votes on it. I highly doubt that if put to a vote Hunter or Fauci would received a pardon.

 

[buckeye]

The real crime was forcing Biden on those of us who knew he was too old and run-down to compete for reelection, claiming he won a primary nobody else credible competed in.

No, the real crime is democrats who roll over and allow the DNC to treat them as useful idiots, which they are.

What's wrong with you people??? The RNC would never get away with the shit the DNC does.

 

[Oddball]

No, Clinton lied. That's what got him.

Trying to intimidate Linda Tripp into doing his lying for him was the worst of it.

 

[multivita-man]

No, the real crime is democrats who roll over and allow the DNC to treat them as useful idiots, which they are.

What's wrong with you people??? The RNC would never get away with the shit the DNC does.

I don't entirely disagree. As I put it to others a while ago when we were having our pants-shit moment over Joe Biden's debate debacle, the Republicans had their revolution in 2015-16. They overthrew the party elites, and more importantly, they were able to replace them with a brand that could win elections. The results might be nail-bitingly close, but they've proven that the MAGA brand can win, and more than just once.

The problem for Democrats is that, even though there is a strong desire to get rid of the gerontocracy that has essentially become the party's elites, there's no clear winning brand. AOC and Bernie Sanders aren't the future of the party. Some of their ideas actually do have traction across demographics, but they are not the right salespeople, if that makes sense.

 

[22lcidw]

Which means nothing....That just means there are a bunch of imbecile MAGA dumb fucks on the Internet that don't care about facts or the truth.

The Internet is a fucking cesspool and is the #1 reason Trump is currently in the White House. The Internet has given a forum to a bunch of mentally disturbed, racist MAGA imbeciles such as yourself to prop each other up every day and reassure each other and pretend that you all are decent, normal people.

But you all are not decent people. And you all are not normal people.

Shit, if the Internet existed in the 1960s so that all the racists in the South could jerk each other off every day like you MAGAs do on here, Martin Luther King would have been a total failure and the Civil Rights Movement would have been a total failure.

The FCC lost its power to control subversion years ago. When we went to commentators and the entertainers on TV became political shills, it was just a matter of time where common sense was jettisoned from a way of communication that could push propaganda into the minds of the populace including the children. Combined with the education system drifting away from real learning and promoting indoctrination instead, has weakened our nation in an incredible manner. You are on the stage and have been for decades. We are in decline. That means you are failing or perhaps that is what you want as your agendas are by design.

 

[buckeye]

I don't entirely disagree. As I put it to others a while ago when we were having our pants-shit moment over Joe Biden's debate debacle, the Republicans had their revolution in 2015-16. They overthrew the party elites, and more importantly, they were able to replace them with a brand that could win elections. The results might be nail-bitingly close, but they've proven that the MAGA brand can win, and more than just once.

The problem for Democrats is that, even though there is a strong desire to get rid of the gerontocracy that has essentially become the party's elites, there's no clear winning brand. AOC and Bernie Sanders aren't the future of the party. Some of their ideas actually do have traction across demographics, but they are not the right salespeople, if that makes sense.

Yes, it makes sense. If Bernie actually had balls, none of that would have happened to democrats. He allowed the DNC to remove him. He went quietly as was demanded of him.

Democrat are used to falling in line for their masters. It's been that way for hundreds of years.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Try to get Mike Pence to steal the election for him, for starters.

Thank god Pence is a patriot and did the right thing and essentially told Trump to go fuck himself.

This happened in December, not on January 6.

The question was: What did Trump do on January 6 that makes him a traitor?

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

This happened in December, not on January 6.

The question was: What did Trump do on January 6 that makes him a traitor?

Do you understand what an absurd, horrible "point" that you're making, simp?

So Trump was a traitor trying to get Pence to steal the 2020 election in December.....but not on Jan 6???

Thank you for conceding defeat.

And you are wrong about Jan 6 also, by the way. Trump called Pence on the morning of Jan 6 and told Pence it would be a "career killer" if Pence certified the election for Biden. --

Trump warned Pence certifying election results would be a ‘career killer,’ witness testifies – Just Vote

justvote.org