BREAKING: Jack Smith drops election subversion case against Trum

[WilmerV]

I'm fine with facing that judge. In fact I'm trying to make it so I can look forward to it.

make what?

 

[WilmerV]

Trump is all about revenge.

link?

 

[Mortis]

link?

You know he won't.....most of the times, he "cut and paste" off of some news site, and then tries to take claim for it.

 

[WilmerV]

You know he won't.....most of the times, he "cut and paste" off of some news site, and then tries to take claim for it.

Doesn't he get paid to post here? If so, that is pitiful. He's fired! lmao

 

[Mortis]

Doesn't he get paid to post here? If so, that is pitiful. He's fired! lmao

I wasn't laughing at you or your comment.

He wishes he got paid to post here. He expects reparation. lol

 

[Seymour Flops]

He either committed crimes that deserve prosecution or he didn’t. This sends a terrible signal about how the rule of law operates in the United States.

It isn’t up for a vote—and you shouldn’t escape consequences by winning an election

Keeping him from winning an election was the point of the prosecution. It didn't work, so why beat a dead horse?

 

[WilmerV]

I wasn't laughing at you or your comment.

He wishes he got paid to post here. He expects reparation. lol

IM2. Is this true? Is JR correct?

 

[Delldude]

Yo'

Trump can't be prosecuted after His term.

No way.

 

[berg80]

Will he write it himself or will it be like Robert Mueller, who knew absolutely nothing about the report that he signed?

The answer, of course, is neither. Smith will not write a report of any length or any substance. The last thing that dude wants is to be called in front of Congress and the Senate to be given the Mueller treatment.

Best case scenario for the country is Smith writes a report, submits it to Garland, who then releases it to the public. For obvious reasons trump will try to prevent that from happening.

Repubs in Congress won't be calling Smith to testify about his investigation. At least not in public. His testimony and his report are not anything trump wants in the public domain. What he wants is for the House Crazies to find something to discredit Smith with. Kinda like what you've done to Mueller. Try to diminish him in some way in order to cast doubt on his work product.

This isn't complicated stuff. It's predictable cuz it follows a pattern. It's sad you folks can't figure it out.

 

[Delldude]

Best case scenario for the country is Smith writes a report, submits it to Garland, who then releases it to the public. For obvious reasons trump will try to prevent that from happening.

Repubs in Congress won't be calling Smith to testify about his investigation. At least not in public. His testimony and his report are not anything trump wants in the public domain. What he wants is for the House Crazies to find something to discredit Smith with. Kinda like what you've done to Mueller. Try to diminish him in some way in order to cast doubt on his work product.

This isn't complicated stuff. It's predictable cuz it follows a pattern. It's sad you folks can't figure it out.

Goes away after Trump pardons Himself.

 

[Mortis]

Repubs in Congress won't be calling Smith to testify about his investigation. At least not in public.

The Republicans will hold hearings regarding Smith's (and others) about the Trump trials. And the reasons why Smith was doing what he did.

 

[berg80]

The case had merit. Trump appealed every step delaying the process.

Absolutely true. Garland's timid approach, not wanting to appear to be political and in so doing failing to do his job, is an enormous black mark on what will otherwise be a noble legacy.

 

[Mortis]

Absolutely true. Garland's timid approach, not wanting to appear to be political and in so doing failing to do his job, is an enormous black mark on what will otherwise be a noble legacy.

"Not wanting to appear political..."?

It was all mostly political. Name one other reason why it wwasn't.

 

[berg80]

The Republicans will hold hearings regarding Smith's (and others) about the Trump trials. And the reasons why Smith was doing what he did.

The reason for doing what he did can be found in the indictments of trump. The indictments THREE grand juries voted for.

 

[Mortis]

The reason for doing what he did can be found in the indictments of trump. The indictments THREE grand juries voted for.

Orchestrated by the Democrats. Duh!

 

[berg80]

"Not wanting to appear political..."?

It was all mostly political. Name one other reason why it wwasn't.

trump committed crimes according to the evidence and the THREE grand juries Smith enjoined.

 

[Mortis]

The reason for doing what he did can be found in the indictments of trump. The indictments THREE grand juries voted for.

Btw, those juries were Democrats...in case you didn't know that.

 

[berg80]

Orchestrated by the Democrats. Duh!

Your foolish belief is factually inaccurate.

 

[Mortis]

trump committed crimes according to the evidence and the THREE grand juries Smith enjoined.

No, that isn't even true! They had to crop up something to pin anything on Trump. The Democrats knew that Jack Smith would do their "dirty laundry".

 

[berg80]

Btw, those juries were Democrats...in case you didn't know that.

As you know, that's a lie. I can see you aren't capable of doing anything but repeating debunked talking points so I'm done with you now.