BREAKING: Jack Smith drops election subversion case against Trum

[berg80]

Anyone want to take a bet on whether trump pardons the remaining defendants in the classified docs case? Kind of a bad look for him seeing those folks get convicted.

 

[AntonToo]

Nope. Statute of limitations. The Donald is off the hook.

Thats false, statutes of limiations can be tolled.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Whoever it is, is that what you're implying, that Trump won't be in physical shape to withstand a trial?

Yes. I'm saying it's possible.

It's also possible that keeps going on crime sprees. And has a bunch of brand new charges waiting for him when he leaves office.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Biden committed crimes and got away with it.

I stopped at your weird little lie.

 

[struth]

I stopped at your weird little lie.

His own DOj concluded he committed crimes, but was too senile to be prosecuted

 

[Mortis]

As expected.
Wonder if Trump will go after Jackie boy?

https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/25/politics/trump-special-counsel-jack-smith/index.html

As I read some of the comments made in this post, it is obviously the case, most of these leftist/Democrats have no clue what they're even "saying".

What does Jack Smith, Fani Willis, Letitia James all have in common?

It's quite simple:

First, they didn't really care about the FULL STORY of what happened on January 6th. I wouldn't doubt, if they were "paid well" behind the scenes by the Democrat Party - "Make sure you get Trump! I don't care how you do it, you just do it!"

Secondly, during the trials - at least the one Jack Smith was prosecuting in, most of those juries were "Democrats". Or at least, they hated Trump, too...so they all went along (ignoring all the shreds of evidence given to them), and just "convicted" Trump.

As for Letitia James, the New York Law firm told her to make sure your "evidence" (or the lack thereof) sticks!
We cannot afford Trump running around freely, he will destroy this party!

Besides, in most of these so-called "trials" had many holes in them. Trump knew it all along, as he mentioned them throughout the Summer (2024).

This basically wasted millions of not, billions of taxpayers' dollars, to "try and get Trump!"

These trials shouldn't have happened in the first place. How about Nancy Pelosi - the Former Speaker? She turned down the offer for the National Guards to "step in". Matter of fact, she knew all along what was about to go down. But since, she didn't seem to care - and was hated Trump, she ignored it.

How about prosecuting her?

Of course, she is a Democrat. And she hated Trump.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

His own DOj concluded he committed crimes, but was too senile to be prosecuted

That's a lie.

I wonder when the last time you opened your mouth without lying was?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

As I read some of the comments made in this post, it is obviously the case, most of these leftist/Democrats have no clue what they're even "saying".

What does Jack Smith, Fani Willis, Letitia James all have in common?

It's quite simple:

First, they didn't really care about the FULL STORY of what happened on January 6th. I wouldn't doubt, if they were "paid well" behind the scenes by the Democrat Party - "Make sure you get Trump! I don't care how you do it, you just do it!"

Secondly, during the trials - at least the one Jack Smith was prosecuting in, most of those juries were "Democrats". Or at least, they hated Trump, too...so they all went along (ignoring all the shreds of evidence given to them), and just "convicted" Trump.

As for Letitia James, the New York Law firm told her to make sure your "evidence" (or the lack thereof) sticks!
We cannot afford Trump running around freely, he will destroy this party!

Besides, in most of these so-called "trials" had many holes in them. Trump knew it all along, as he mentioned them throughout the Summer (2024).

This basically wasted millions of not, billions of taxpayers' dollars, to "try and get Trump!"

These trials shouldn't have happened in the first place. How about Nancy Pelosi - the Former Speaker? She turned down the offer for the National Guards to "step in". Matter of fact, she knew all along what was about to go down. But since, she didn't seem to care - and was hated Trump, she ignored it.

How about prosecuting her?

Of course, she is a Democrat. And she hated Trump.

I see a lot of hot air.

But no arguments.

It's a lot easier to make claims than it is to argue them as true.

 

[struth]

That's a lie.

I wonder when the last time you opened your mouth without lying was?

No it’s not. It’s a fact. You all ignored it

They found he knowingly stole classifed documents and shared some of the Intel with his ghost writer for millions of dollars

 

[JGalt]

Maybe a month has passed since I removed Fort Fun from ignore. I don't mind smart Democrats but when they are zeros plus, they bug me. I removed him from ignore since at that time my hope was he reformed. But sympathy for him is not going to happen by me.

I had 80-something libs on ignore before the election, but restored them all off ignore after the Trump win, just so I could fuck with them.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The case had merit. Trump appealed every step delaying the process.

So, will Jack Smith give a full report and defend it in front of Congress and the Senate?

 

[Leviticus]

This isnt breaking news. It was going to happen no matter what since Trump won the election. The DOJ won't indict a sitting president.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So, will Jack Smith give a full report and defend it in front of Congress and the Senate?

Haha, you are smoking crack if you think the Republicans are going to allow him to publicly lay out his case.in the congress.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

Trump Dance! Everyone is doing it...

 

[Billiejeens]

“Charges” can be serious, you goober, without the foundation for the charges having any actual merit.

This
Of course.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This
Of course.

If only one of you would work up the stones to try to argue why they had no.merit...

 

[Billiejeens]

Because you baselessly ASSume that the "will to proceed" is tied to electoral calculations.

But you are wrong, for serious prosecutors there is more than enough will to proceed with just good ol' evidence of criminality.

What prosecutor wouldn't want to take up a historic case against a former president who tried to steal an election and top secret documents?

You are insane

 

[Blisterfinger]

What is it you think you are refuting?

Number of criminal refferals against Joe Biden as a result of this partisan report - ZERO

They couldn't even find enough for a partisan impeachment.

It's going to take years to clear the stench of criminality out of the White House.

Judiciary, Oversight, and Ways and Means Committees Release Report on Impeachment Inquiry Finding Joe Biden Has Committed Impeachable Conduct

WASHINGTON — Today, the House Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, and the Committee on Ways and Means released a report on

judiciary.house.gov

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

He either committed crimes that deserve prosecution or he didn’t. This sends a terrible signal about how the rule of law operates in the United States.

It isn’t up for a vote—and you shouldn’t escape consequences by winning an election

 

[WilmerV]

The case had merit.

No, it did not.