- Thread starter
- #201
Are you suggesting more insane right wingers will take shots at him?
Whoever it is, is that what you're implying, that Trump won't be in physical shape to withstand a trial?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you suggesting more insane right wingers will take shots at him?
House Republicans implictly disagreed with you when they failed to produce any sort of a criminal refferal after 2 years of investigations.
Since the DOJ has a policy of not indicting a president, Trump gets away with crimes. But there is one court he wil not get away from and he' probably be facing that judg
You should offer Garland a bj for dragging his feet on appointing a SC to investigate the criminal conman & subhuman Trump.Good news! Now that the election is over, the lawfare shenanigans against Trump, across multiple cases, are no longer relevant. They were initiated with the explicit outcome of interfering with a presidential election. The beauty: Once all these cases are dismissed, the left's accusations about Trump being a felonious criminal just go up in smoke .. POOF!![]()
As expected.
Wonder if Trump will go after Jackie boy?
Will he write it himself or will it be like Robert Mueller, who knew absolutely nothing about the report that he signed?Special Counsel rules call for Smith to write a report on his investigation as Mueller did. It is given to the AG for Garland's review.
If it's possible to keep the report from coming public you can bet trump will. Why would he want to give the public another reminder of his guilt?
Smith asked for a dismissal without prejudice, which means the prosecutor can refile the complaint after Trump finishes his second term. The question is .. why'd he do that? This case has already had many issues, including the legitimacy of Smith's appointment (which led to an earlier dismissal) and the limited immunity recognized in Trump v. US. It's not the scenario of suspending a prosecution and would most likely require a new indictment. Translated: It's over, and Smith is expediting the decision in hopes of getting the final report publicized before Trump starts. You'll be okay.How do your wishful nutbag brainfarts suddenly become "news"?
Federal cases were closed for now because a sitting president can't be criminally tried according to DOJ guidelines. Everything else is just your baseless imagination.
Say that to any lawyer and they'll toss you off the case before it even starts.The only vote that Trump would ever get from me is for conviction if I was on his jury.
WW
When all these cases are dismissed, there are no labels of 'convicted felon.' These cases have no more relevance since Trump kicked Democrat ass in this year's election. Cheers!You should offer Garland a bj for dragging his feet on appointing a SC to investigate the criminal conman & subhuman Trump.
You do that for the orange subhuman sweathog.
Of course he would. It was a political prosecutionMoron, you seriously don't think it's 100% true that Jack Smith wouldn't be dropping this case if Trump lost?
Case is being dropped (for now) because DOJ doesn't prosecute current presidents. It has nothing to do with merits of the case and Jack Smith correctly stated exactly that.
Which court? Tell us genius.Since the DOJ has a policy of not indicting a president, Trump gets away with crimes. But there is one court he wil not get away from and he' probably be facing that judge very soon.
Nope. Statute of limitations. The Donald is off the hook.Because it wasn't.
Jack Smith had no intention of dropping the case, and specifically did so because of DOJ guidance of not prosecuting sitting presidents.
No doubt case will be re-opened once Trump gets out.
Good for you. You let one of the biggrst criminals in history off the hook. That makes you proud?When all these cases are dismissed, there are no labels of 'convicted felon.' These cases have no more relevance since Trump kicked Democrat ass in this year's election. Cheers!
lolYou still have the Fanni case going for you.
Hang in there!
The case had merit. Trump appealed every step delaying the process.Another lie. If the case had merits, they would have pushed for a trial well before the election instead of making it an endless investigation designed to go through the election.
No they won't.lol
They're going to throw her fat ass in jail.
![]()
Judiciary, Oversight, and Ways and Means Committees Release Report on Impeachment Inquiry Finding Joe Biden Has Committed Impeachable Conduct
WASHINGTON — Today, the House Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, and the Committee on Ways and Means released a report onjudiciary.house.gov