BackAgain
Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Yeah. Cite where “media” was mentioned.It was mentioned about "my media". I wasn't aware I had any media. What do you not understand?
What do you understand?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah. Cite where “media” was mentioned.It was mentioned about "my media". I wasn't aware I had any media. What do you not understand?
Then why didn't you just post THAT link instead of a link for the National Enquirer?Uh, the source is the New York Times in which they link to in the third paragraph. I see you lack reading skills.
And it seems no one is able to explain it to me.
So? Democrats have done the very same thing, especially during the pandemic. If you didn't get with the program, you were fired from your job without being able to collect unemployment, weren't allowed out in public without your vaccine papers, and medical professionals who dared step outside the democrat party's official line lost their licenses, not to mention all of the woke nonsense being forced on many people and states who wanted no part of it.No response, eh? How about how Trump imposing tariffs on Brazil, despite our having a trade surplus with them? How does that make sense, except that Trump is exacting political rather than economic sanctions against someone he personally doesn’t like?
Why do I have to keep repeating myself. That was Merrick Garland’s call. In a normal administration the DOJ is independent, not the president’s attack dog.Lol, Biden had four years to do it. Why didn't he?
What does that have to do with tariffs, skippy?!So? Democrats have done the very same thing, especially during the pandemic. If you didn't get with the program, you were fired from your job without being able to collect unemployment, weren't allowed out in public without your vaccine papers, and medical professionals who dared step outside the democrat party's official line lost their licenses, not to mention all of the woke nonsense being forced on many people and states who wanted no part of it.
I'm beginning to believe you are a troll. Trump is a politician. All politicians lie. It's part of the job description.No, he doesn't lie! He is an unwavering beacon of truth!
Who cares? It’s either acceptable or unacceptable.BHO used the Auto Pen like 1/8th the amount Biden did ( In two terms)
I've made that mistake before. Expect to be hit with a barage of pop ups that light up like a Christmas Tree.Fair enough. I'm not going to give GP pundit the click.
Do you actually have proof of that? Personally, I've never heard of the autopen before for presidential E.O.'s and pardons. I mean you might be right but, personally, I'm in favor of limiting these things to such a small number the autopen would be obsolete.Autopen was never a problem before. You guys love changing the rules to suit your own purposes, like true fascists.
But you guys say that everything Trump says is a lie.![]()
Trump admits to using autopen after declaring Biden's pardons void due to autopen
President Donald Trump claimed without evidence early Monday that his predecessor’s pardons for members of the House select committee that investigated the Jan. 6, 2021, attacks on the Capitol are invalid because then-President Joe Biden didn’t use a real pen. And when asked on Monday if he has...www.msnbc.com
No one cares what you're personally in favor of.Do you actually have proof of that? Personally, I've never heard of the autopen before for presidential E.O.'s and pardons. I mean you might be right but, personally, I'm in favor of limiting these things to such a small number the autopen would be obsolete.
Yeah, I remember at least one time that Biden was unaware of an EO that he had supposedly signed. I'm guessing it's like cock roaches. When you find one, you pretty much have several more.No. If Joe didn't personally authorize a pardon (or anything else bearing his signature), it's not valid.
Your people are in deep trouble.
Only if he approves or knowsWho cares? It’s either acceptable or unacceptable.
How does Biden actually know?Another way of saying it is the story from the NYT was intentionally misrepresented by the OP.
In an interview with The New York Times, Mr. Biden said that he had orally granted all the pardons and commutations issued at the end of his term, calling President Trump and other Republicans “liars” for claiming his aides had used an autopen to do so without his authorization.
“I made every decision,” Mr. Biden said in a phone interview on Thursday, asserting that he had his staff use an autopen replicating his signature on the clemency warrants because “we’re talking about a whole lot of people.”
I don't give a rat's a$$ about reversing Fauci's pardon...This is huge! It seems people inside the illegal Biden administration were taking turns being president.
![]()
BIDEN AUTOPEN SCANDAL: NY Times Confirms Biden Did Not Sign Off on All Pardons - WH Chief of Staff Zeints Approved Fauci's Pardon | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
The Biden Autopen Scandal just got worse.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Sounds fascist to me. Why can’t Trump change his behavior, such as protecting elite pedos?
Just today President Trump threatened to put a 100% tariff rate against Russia if they don't come to the table.
So was that "fascist"?
In 2023, President Biden levied a 35% to 70% tariff against Russia on over 100 Russian metals, minerals, and chemical products.
So was that "fascist"?
I'm thinking there should be a chain of evidence just like in criminal investigations. If that chain is broken then there is no chain of evidence linking a pardon or an EO to Biden actually giving permission to have the autopen sign his signature and that evidence shouldn't just be Biden saying at a later date, 'Oh yeah, I gave permission to use the autpen for that".If the President’s auto pen was used by a staffer of any level, then how can it ever be said that the demented ex-President was even aware of it?
I believe that this raises an even larger question, once again.
How can anybody know whether or not he had any involvement in other uses of his auto pen?
As has been asked many times here by other members of this Board (like Crusader Frank or Oddball), who was actually running our Executive Branch? Also, what effect does it have on the legitimacy of any legislation that he purportedly “signed?”