Dangerous Rabble poses threat to National Security.
You know holston, if you'd drop the Nazi shit, you'd be a good poster....
I'm not a Nazi. What I have to say about all the Jewish Political and Social activism in this country is just the truth.
Most people know little or nothing about Judaism, their culture, their race, their ethnicity, their tribalism, or even what Zionism is all about.
You cannot always identify a "Jew" by his appearance.
What concerns me about them is related to JUDAISM itself. It is not what most people would assume it to be. It is by no means as "harmless" as they would suppose it to be or as the Jews themselves present it to be.
This is because it carries with it the vestiges of TALMUDISM, which has less to do with the Old Testament itself than it does the teachings of men who are the spiritual heirs to the Pharisees and Sadducees of yore.
Because the "Jewish" culture grew out of those
traditions the Jews CULTURE carries with it the same baggage. Their culture is inundated with those teachings and traditions. They bear more likeness to the teachings of Machiavelli than any thing Moses or the Old Testament prophets taught.
What has resulted from all that is a quasi religious SOCIAL ORDER, centered around the ethnic group of the Ashkenazim people and their mixed race offspring. The Ashkenazim themselves were originally derived from various mixtures of the Khazarian and Hebrew people and whatever else that entered the mix along the way.
They have maintained their ethnic and tribal identities despite the dilution of racial characteristics that has resulted from miscegination.
It used to be that the majority of Americans knew NOTHING about Muslims. Most of them would not have been able to tell you anything about Islam and some of them probably would not have even been able to identify it as a religion.
Because of the US involvement in Israel's affairs and particularly since 9/11 the majority of people ARE STILL largely IGNORANT about Islam, but they now would mostly identify it as a major religion..... A DANGEROUS ONE.
Not so?
So although they have now a nodding acquaintance with Islam, and Muslims, they still are about as IGNORANT ABOUT JUDAISM as they ever were.
Up until 9/11 you could not have convinced most Americans that Islam was of any significance to them or that it was a force to be reckoned with. I remember when no one paid any attention to me when I mentioned the subject to them.
Now the same situation exists with Judaism, and "Jews" as it did then for Islam and Muslims.
People in the US can no longer afford to ignore EITHER of these religions BECAUSE they are not merely writings contained in books somewhere. They are represented by substantial masses of people who live according to their tenets and act on them both POLITICALLY AND SOCIALLY.
Those who think that Judaism is nothing but an innocuous blip on the religious radar screen are ill informed. It is far more than that. It has become a MAJOR POLITICAL force and force for SOCIAL CHANGE.
In fact, the US government is now overwhelmingly under the influence and directives of people who are of the JUDAIC and ZIONIST persuasions.
This is not "anti-Semitic" to say so. It is merely a statement of FACT.
Non Jews can no more ignore the influence of Jewish ORGANIZATION than they can Muslim organization.
Both of these entities now exist within the boarders of the US. The difference is that the influence and control of the US by proponents and practitioners of JUDAISM far and away outstrips that of any other religion or ethnic control.
To say that they are here now and must be dealt with accordingly is no more "racist" than saying that there are at least 20 million illegal immigrants in the US.
The difference is that any dummy can easily recognize an ordinary Mexican by his racial features.
When I speak of a "Jew" I am talking about a group of people who often so closely resemble Anglo Saxon people that the majority of non-Jews cannot tell the difference.
This does not mean that Jews are unable to tell the difference themselves. Indeed they are the most keenly aware of those differences. A similarity in appearance doesn't necessarily imply any similarity in ideology, political or religious belief, or any other factor which would influence behavior. Can you tell the difference between say, a "Republican and a Democrat" by their appearance. I am not saying that there is any longer a practical difference between the two, but only if there was.
If there is no difference between a Jew and a non-Jew, then what pray tell IS the difference? IF there is no difference, then WHY would a person have any need to denote any distinction when none is there? Why would a person call himself a Jew if there was nothing about the title which would distinguish itself from any other?
So what I am speaking of largely pertains to AN IDEOLOGY, both POLITICAL and SOCIAL, and a RELIGIOUS MIND SET that has deep roots in the CULTURE of Jews and carries with it both ethnic and racial aspects.
Is it "anti-Semitic" of me to identify them as Jews when they identify themselves as such?
Why for example would it be "anti-Semitic" of me to call Ruth Ginsberg or Elana Kagan Jews if they call themselves that?
The reason why so many people resort to calling others "Nazi" or "anti-Semite" whenever they hear someone speak critically of them is because they have been conditioned by years and years of media and educational conditioning. It never occurs to them that there could be any other reason why a non Jew would even mention it other than some secret desire to load them all into cattle cars and have them gassed.
There IS! ( I'm not referring to my secret desire to have Ginsberg and Kagan gassed with cow farts.)
ANY ORGANIZATION which exists to induce changes into the POLITICAL scene, the SOCIAL climate, or alter the demographic landscape of this country or otherwise revamp it's legal system must be dealt with according to those terms.
In other words, any organization which seeks to effects those types of changes and lobbies and promotes the same, whether on TV, movies , advertising, in Universities, public schools or by any other means, opens itself up to the same scrutiny, criticism, and public awareness as the like of Clivan Bundy does.
Is that not a fair proposal to you?
Or do you believe that JEWISH LOBBIES and POLITICAL ACTIVIST groups such as the ADL, the JDL, The World Jewish Congress, Chabbad Lubavitch, or the Bnai Brith should be allowed to continue their work and intervention into all aspects of government and society without any oversight or public scrutiny at all?
If you think that they can simply be ignored without incurring any risk at all, then you are ignoring the fact that 9/11 and the resulting invasion of Iraq, Afghanistan were a direct result of the UNCONDITIONAL SUPPORT of APARTHEID ISRAEL in foreign affairs. And this unconditional support was a direct result of the influence of JEWISH MONEY and JEWISH LOBBIES.
In short, ALL the JEWISH organizations have ONE THING IN COMMON;
THEY ARE ALL
JEWISH.
This means that it's members lobby on behalf of JEWS.
Doesn't that smack of "racism" and religious advocacy to you?
So what makes me a "Nazi" for calling attention to the inordinate amount of influence they are exerting on US POLITICS and SOCIETY?
Is it because that the "Jews" would rather that I did not do so?
If not, then why would they object?
Is there any reason why they would prefer to go unnoticed?
If you are inclined to take them at face value as they project their public image, then would you be as considerate towards those Islamic institutions which present themselves to the public as being charitable institutions as well? You are aware that the media has charged that some Mosques and ostensible Muslim charities have served only as fronts for religious extremism aren't you? And you have heard of cases in which certain men calling themselves "Ministers of Christ" did the most un-Christian things haven't you?
Do you believe it would be offensive to question the motives, intentions, or activities of anyone who presented an outward appearance of working solely in the interest of charity or as a benevolence so long as they assumed a "Christian" name?
Would a tank be any less of a tank if I painted it pink and put flowers on it?
I'm just trying to get people to think about who is calling all the shots in this country and why it is poised on the verge of bankruptcy, totalitarianism, and total self destruction.
It is no more racist of me to suggest that there may be "Jews" and Zionist ideologues among the ranks of that hidden cabal than it would be if I was trying to lay the entire blame at the feet of the Clintons, the Bushes or even Yomamma! I'm not trying to pick on the "Jews" per say as much as I want to get at their ring leaders. It's about cutting off the head of the snake so that the body dies with it.
I think it is dangerous to allow one particular group immunity to prosecution or even simple criticism based upon their ethnic or religious identity. And I am not asking for any special protection under the law in the event that I am caught committing an illegal, unethical, or immoral act. If someone robs or assaults me, then I only expect the law to administer justice in the prescribed manner as it would for anyone else. I am not calling for legislation which would punish those who offend me with additional severity.
No one thinks there is anything wrong with calling the hand of a hypocrite or Charlatan just because he is using the name of Christ to mask his con games. The same SHOULD BE said about Jewish, black, or Mexican crooks.
So save your "Nazi" and racist epithets for someone who really deserves it. Judaism is no less important as a topic for discussion and no less potent than something like Marxism than the dangers of cows stepping on turtles or mooching Harry Reid's grass. The entire Bolshevik revolution was based around it, and that resulted in a great deal of bloodshed.
I hope this country doesn't erupt in a civil war just because some people don't like the idea of eating hamburgers. Just look at those poor cows. What did they ever do to you?