Brady Rule Violations... DC Courts getting pummeled due to FEDS Exculpatory Evidence Withholding.

[toobfreak]

What evidence withheld was exculpatory?

The evidence that you have half a brain?

 

[toobfreak]

? Not being immediately arrested for a crime doesn't mean you are not guilty of said crime.

Bad news for Hillary?

 

[Marener]

The evidence that you have half a brain?

The DoJ has a massive database of the videos available to the January 6th defendants.

This is nonsense.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Wonderful. That is what 'remains to be seen' is for.

Sure.

 

[toobfreak]

1. Non sequitor

No such thing.

Now, if you are trying to speak basic logic, then perhaps you meant a non sequitur?

On line internet degrees do have their drawbacks, don't they?

 

[Catsnmeters]

The evidence that you have half a brain?

Blah blah blah.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Trump's legacy will prevail over what the left was trying to do. Make no mistake about that.

Trump's legacy will be his response to COVID and his response to the 2020 election.

Those are the only two things of note that he has as his legacy.

 

[toobfreak]

We have video evidence of Jacob illegally entering the capital as part of the initial mob. That is one of the charges.

How can you be charged with illegal entry into a public building while the security there hold the door for you waving you in? HUH?

 

[toobfreak]

Blah blah blah.

OK. Point made. Quarter brain.

 

[Catsnmeters]

How can you be charged with illegal entry into a public building while the security there hold the door for you waving you in? HUH?

That didn't happen to Jacob and the video proved it.

 

[Oddball]

? Not being immediately arrested for a crime doesn't mean you are not guilty of said crime.

Familiarize yourself with the term "entrapment".

 

[toobfreak]

That didn't happen to Jacob and the video proved it.

So anything we see on the capitol video is PROOF. Got it.

 

[Oddball]

No spin necessary--the Brady Rule is all about potentially exculpatory evidence. the Prosecution has an absolute requirement to disclose all such.
7TB+ plus of discovery shows that the Prosecution was trying to do just that. I think we're going to find that most of the material in question has already been known, and turned over. Yet, another camera angle of the same thing, as it were. The Prosecution acknowledged that the investigation was ongoing and that they would attempt to keep the defense apprised. Intent is important here and I've yet to see any evidence of deliberate with-holding of any potentially exculpatory material.

Perhaps they'll find some...in which case the defense is free to make hay, as it were. Thus far, much sound and fury...but little of the smoking gun of innocence.

The discovery is finding that the feds tried to alter and destroy the exculpatory evidence, hackasaurus rex.

 

[Fueri]

Lawyer much? It is not 'All exculpatory' ---that is a determination that must be made by a court.

Given the 7 terabytes+ of discovery provided it would be hard for anyone to argue anything new being shown....the mere fact of some info not being turned over is not enough as long as good faith is shown..which is to say the defense must prove intent--a deliberate effort to hide relevant info.

Shaman-man's lawyer has already said he asked for this information and it was withheld.

 

[Zincwarrior]

How can you be charged with illegal entry into a public building while the security there hold the door for you waving you in? HUH?

Yes holding the door open for you.

 

[Imnukingfutz]

No they don't. Not if it's not relevant to the charges; meaning it's isn't exculpatory.

Yes, they do. its not up to the prosecution to decide what is relevant or not. The Supreme Court decided that in Brady v. Maryland

Just because the government withheld this information and refused to turn it over to the defense councils, every case should be dismissed. The government can then retry every single person on new charges and see if they can get a jury to convict with the new evidence.

 

[Oddball]

Yes holding the door open for you.

Several other doors to the building had already been opened, and there were a number of people trying to stop those breaking the doors and windows here...But the narrative must be maintained iver everything.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Several other doors to the building had already been opened, and there were a number of people trying to stop those breaking the doors and windows here...But the narrative must be maintained iver everything.

That is a unique and innovative view of the forced entry.

 

[Oddball]

That is a unique and innovative view of the forced entry.

Ive seen a number of videos from you that doorway...Some doing the damage were being physically pulled away....But you flakes have your narrative to maintain, so.....

 

[jbrownson0831]

Its important to have hope I guess. Alas this is not it.

You Dims love you some lawbreakers.