Brady Rule Violations... DC Courts getting pummeled due to FEDS Exculpatory Evidence Withholding.

[Billy_Bob]

With the revelation that the FED'S withheld video evidence from everyone, now everyone is filing brady act violations with the courts. Due to the size and scope of the violations, the entire Jan 6 narrative is about to collapse onto itself. This is a level of prosecutorial misconduct never before seen in US History. It involves every single Federal Agency from the DOJ down to the CHP.

The corruption is so massive that there is no way to get around it.

This can be seen as a direct attempt to subvert the US Constitution and our civil rights by Pelosi and Democrats in general, but also the DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, among others. This is the total weaponization of the government against US CITIZENS and intentional depravation of rights under the law..

It is no wonder every government agency is apoplectic about being exposed committing criminal acts in violation of the US Constitution. They are circling the wagons today... They have been exposed.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/09/politics/tucker-carlson-january-6-court-cases-us-capitol/index.html

 

[Meister]

This is the legacy of Biden's administration that historians will glean from when
writing history.

My, my......

 

[Catsnmeters]

With the revelation that the FED'S withheld video evidence from everyone, now everyone is filing brady act violations with the courts. Due to the size and scope of the violations, the entire Jan 6 narrative is about to collapse onto itself. This is a level of prosecutorial misconduct never before seen in US History. It involves every single Federal Agency from the DOJ down to the CHP.

The corruption is so massive that there is no way to get around it.

This can be seen as a direct attempt to subvert the US Constitution and our civil rights by Pelosi and Democrats in general, but also the DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, among others. This is the total weaponization of the government against US CITIZENS and intentional depravation of rights under the law..

It is no wonder every government agency is apoplectic about being exposed committing criminal acts in violation of the US Constitution. They are circling the wagons today... They have been exposed.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/09/politics/tucker-carlson-january-6-court-cases-us-capitol/index.html

What evidence withheld was exculpatory?

 

[Zincwarrior]

Its important to have hope I guess. Alas this is not it.

 

[Lastamender]

What evidence withheld was exculpatory?

Are you that stupid along with the idiot that thanked you? When 9 armed officers had a chance to arrest the Shaman and did not. That is your evidence.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Are you that stupid along with the idiot that thanked you?

So you don't know. Thanks.

 

[Ralph Norton]

What evidence withheld was exculpatory?

Remains to be seen.

 

[Billy_Bob]

What evidence withheld was exculpatory?

Prosecutors have the DUTY to supply all information regardless of what they think about it. It is all exculpatory.

In United States v. Bagley, however, the Supreme Court eliminated this request requirement and stated that the prosecution has a constitutional duty to disclose all material, favorable information in their possession to defendants regardless of whether it is requested.

Brady rule | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute​

 

[Catsnmeters]

Remains to be seen.

So you have none and the thread title is a lie.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

With the revelation that the FED'S withheld video evidence from everyone, now everyone is filing brady act violations with the courts. Due to the size and scope of the violations, the entire Jan 6 narrative is about to collapse onto itself. This is a level of prosecutorial misconduct never before seen in US History. It involves every single Federal Agency from the DOJ down to the CHP.

The corruption is so massive that there is no way to get around it.

This can be seen as a direct attempt to subvert the US Constitution and our civil rights by Pelosi and Democrats in general, but also the DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, among others. This is the total weaponization of the government against US CITIZENS and intentional depravation of rights under the law..

It is no wonder every government agency is apoplectic about being exposed committing criminal acts in violation of the US Constitution. They are circling the wagons today... They have been exposed.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/09/politics/tucker-carlson-january-6-court-cases-us-capitol/index.html

Errr..your link does not show 'everyone' or even more than 2, defendants filing or contemplating filing Brady Act violations. Given the vast amount of video evidence already available and the ongoing nature of the investigation, it is unlikely in the extreme that the courts will rule against the Govt. in this case.

The only thing collapsing is your hope of your fantasy of the Jan. 6 crowd avoiding their just deserts coming true~

From your link:

At the time that Carlson’s program aired, defense lawyers had access to 7.36 terabytes of information, including photos, videos and audio recordings, prosecutors wrote in their earlier filing. Those files include searches of 759 digital devices, more than 30,000 clips of body and hand-held camera footage from five law enforcement agencies, and Capitol surveillance camera footage, prosecutors said.
Albert Watkins, the attorney who represented Chansley when he pleaded guilty, told CNN that he had never seen the videos of his client walking with officers in the Capitol.
“The government had a duty to disclose all evidence, especially exculpatory evidence,” Watkins said. “The government’s duty in this regard is not subject to discretion. It is an absolute duty.”
It is not clear, however, whether Chansley could take issue with the new video in court. Chansley pleaded guilty to obstructing an official proceeding in 2021 and was sentenced to 41 months in prison.
During his sentencing hearing, Chansley spoke at length about the guilt he felt for breaking the law and admitted, under oath, actions he took that broke the law inside the Capitol building. Prosecutors say police asked him to leave, and he refused.
In several filings around the time of Chansley’s plea agreement, the Justice Department said that it was still working to process the “massive volume of data that may be relevant
Two months after Chansley accepted a plea agreement, prosecutors wrote in a court filing that they were “still collecting and assembling materials from the numerous entities who were involved in the response to the Breach, and we are still investigating – which means the amount of data (phones, devices, legal process, investigative memoranda) is growing.”
Even in the days before Chansley’s sentencing, prosecutors noted in the case that discovery was still ongoing. “Given the scope of the existing investigation and its on-going nature, we expect that we will continue to obtain materials, which we will produce expeditiously,” prosecutors wrote.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Prosecutors have the DUTY to supply all information regardless of what they think about it. It is all exculpatory.

No they don't. Not if it's not relevant to the charges; meaning it's isn't exculpatory.

 

[Lastamender]

So you don't know. Thanks.

Read the edit.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Prosecutors have the DUTY to supply all information regardless of what they think about it. It is all exculpatory.

Lawyer much? It is not 'All exculpatory' ---that is a determination that must be made by a court.

Given the 7 terabytes+ of discovery provided it would be hard for anyone to argue anything new being shown....the mere fact of some info not being turned over is not enough as long as good faith is shown..which is to say the defense must prove intent--a deliberate effort to hide relevant info.

 

[Oddball]

This is the legacy of Biden's administration that historians will glean from when
writing history.

My, my......

This has been going on for decades.

Nixon, Whitey Bulger, arms for cocaine for hostages, Ruby Ridge, Waco, lying us into ear in Iraq, the entire Obama regime, now all this crap.

The "intelligence community" is an ongoing RICO case.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Read the edit.

Ok. So? The officers already testified why they didn't arrest him.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Lawyer much? It is not 'All exculpatory' ---that is a determination that must be made by a court.

The Brady Rule says you are wrong...

In United States v. Bagley, however, the Supreme Court eliminated this request requirement and stated that the prosecution has a constitutional duty to disclose all material, favorable information in their possession to defendants regardless of whether it is requested.

Brady rule | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute​

 

[Billy_Bob]

Its important to have hope I guess. Alas this is not it.

It's not a hope... It a matter of Law... I guess you can hope that they don't get charged with constitutional violations...

 

[Catsnmeters]

The Brady Rule says you are wrong...

In United States v. Bagley, however, the Supreme Court eliminated this request requirement and stated that the prosecution has a constitutional duty to disclose all material, favorable information in their possession to defendants regardless of whether it is requested.

Brady rule | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute​

You didn't read your entire link did you?

Fail.

 

[Lastamender]

Ok. So? The officers already testified why they didn't arrest him.

So how many lies you going to believe? Epps should be arrested for perjury. When do you think that will happen?

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

The Brady Rule says you are wrong...

In United States v. Bagley, however, the Supreme Court eliminated this request requirement and stated that the prosecution has a constitutional duty to disclose all material, favorable information in their possession to defendants regardless of whether it is requested.

Brady rule | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute​

There's that word, 'favorable'. Also, if the prosecution is shown to have complied to the best of their ability..all is good.