Brady Rule Violations... DC Courts getting pummeled due to FEDS Exculpatory Evidence Withholding.

1. Non sequitor
2. Statement without evidence.
3. ok Russobot.
1. How many bots have been here since 2011?
2. Statements without evidence is what you fools live on.
3. America is what this is all about. You seem to miss that point.
 
1. How many bots have been here since 2011?
2. Statements without evidence is what you fools live on.
3. America is what this is all about. You seem to miss that point.
You are totally correct. America IS what this is all about. Your side's views and visions vs our side's. The past vs the future. The ignorant isolationist, American Exceptionalism vs Equity and true fair play.
Your side is losing. They have been for the past 50 years now.
You seem to miss that point~
 
That applies to every case in history so is really a non arguement.
There was no arguement (sic), skippy.
You asked: "What evidence withheld was exculpatory?"
I replied: "Remains to be seen"
Glad you agree since that "applies to every case in history".
 
You are totally correct. America IS what this is all about. Your side's views and visions vs our side's. The past vs the future. The ignorant isolationist, American Exceptionalism vs Equity and true fair play.
Your side is losing. They have been for the past 50 years now.
You seem to miss that point~
Equity is a Marxist joke. Apparently you are one too.
 
Ask you friends? How on earth would I know.

Thats just a smokescreen response

Russobots rarely deny they are Russobots although they will try to sidestep.
My friends are not moderators who should know who is a bot. My God are you stupid.
 
There was no arguement (sic), skippy.
You asked: "What evidence withheld was exculpatory?"
I replied: "Remains to be seen"
Glad you agree since that "applies to every case in history".
So you really have no point.

No proof of this evidence being withheld exists and claiming that it "remains to be seen" is speculation that could be applied to every case.

Essentially anything that "remains to be seen" is pointless speculation that flies in the face of the contention of the title of this thread.
 
Not working your stupid answer about ID is now history, although I guess you could delete it. It is what fascists do.
I freely admit I apologize in not knowing that you and other Russobots had an ID I could check.
 
That was my only point from the beginning.
Dumb ass.
It's a pretty dumb point.

Let's speculate shall we?

We have video evidence of Jacob illegally entering the capital as part of the initial mob. That is one of the charges.

What possible video evidence could their be that would render that conviction moot?
 

Forum List

Back
Top