Zincwarrior
Diamond Member
1. Non sequitorNot being an American is your problem.
2. Statement without evidence.
3. ok Russobot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1. Non sequitorNot being an American is your problem.
Yes, and the corollary is: we don't know what the evidence is until we see it.Because proof of otherwise hasn't been shown.
Innocent until proven guilty. Remember?
1. How many bots have been here since 2011?1. Non sequitor
2. Statement without evidence.
3. ok Russobot.
That applies to every case in history so is really a non arguement.Yes, and the corollary is: we don't know what the evidence is until we see it.
Thus my original comment: remains to be seen.
You are totally correct. America IS what this is all about. Your side's views and visions vs our side's. The past vs the future. The ignorant isolationist, American Exceptionalism vs Equity and true fair play.1. How many bots have been here since 2011?
2. Statements without evidence is what you fools live on.
3. America is what this is all about. You seem to miss that point.
There was no arguement (sic), skippy.That applies to every case in history so is really a non arguement.
Ask you friends? How on earth would I know.1. How many bots have been here since 2011?
Thats just a smokescreen response2. Statements without evidence is what you fools live on.
Russobots rarely deny they are Russobots although they will try to sidestep.3. America is wat this is all about. You seem to miss that point.
Equity is a Marxist joke. Apparently you are one too.You are totally correct. America IS what this is all about. Your side's views and visions vs our side's. The past vs the future. The ignorant isolationist, American Exceptionalism vs Equity and true fair play.
Your side is losing. They have been for the past 50 years now.
You seem to miss that point~
My friends are not moderators who should know who is a bot. My God are you stupid.Ask you friends? How on earth would I know.
Thats just a smokescreen response
Russobots rarely deny they are Russobots although they will try to sidestep.
So you're saying you all have an ID of some sort. Interesting fact I did not know.My friends are not moderators who should know who is a bot. My God are you stupid.
So you really have no point.There was no arguement (sic), skippy.
You asked: "What evidence withheld was exculpatory?"
I replied: "Remains to be seen"
Glad you agree since that "applies to every case in history".
You do not carry ID? I keep forgetting how fucking special you are.So you're saying you all have an ID of some sort. Interesting fact I did not know.
I did not know there was a special Russobot ID program. No one tells me anything.You do not carry ID? I keep forgetting how fucking special you are.
Not working your stupid answer about ID is now history, although I guess you could delete it. It is what fascists do.I did not know there was a special Russobot ID program. No one tells me anything.
Have you watched all 41,000 hours? No?No proof of this evidence being withheld exists and claiming that it "remains to be seen" is speculation that could be applied to every case.
I freely admit I apologize in not knowing that you and other Russobots had an ID I could check.Not working your stupid answer about ID is now history, although I guess you could delete it. It is what fascists do.
Yep. Remains to be seen. That's all you have.Have you watched all 41,000 hours? No?
Then what it does or does not contain REMAINS TO BE SEEN.
Duh
That was my only point from the beginning.Yep. Remains to be seen. That's all you have.
Dig a little deeper, dumbass.I freely admit I apologize in not knowing that you and other Russobots had an ID I could check.
It's a pretty dumb point.That was my only point from the beginning.
Dumb ass.