Brady Rule Violations... DC Courts getting pummeled due to FEDS Exculpatory Evidence Withholding.

[jbrownson0831]

That is a unique and innovative view of the forced entry.

Forced entry? You mean the DC cops lost their keys?

 

[jbrownson0831]

? Not being immediately arrested for a crime doesn't mean you are not guilty of said crime.

Is that a Joe Biden quote??

 

[Catsnmeters]

So anything we see on the capitol video is PROOF. Got it.

Are you suggesting an alternative?

Are you going to try to pull a Kellyane Conway?

 

[Zincwarrior]

Forced entry? You mean the DC cops lost their keys?

Does your USMB not permit viewing of pictures? That would explain your statement.

 

[jknowgood]

What evidence withheld was exculpatory?

Over 40,000 hours of servalance footage they hid. That shows their lies.

 

[jbrownson0831]

Does your USMB not permit viewing of pictures? That would explain your statement.

Two pictures do not represent an entire story.
Were you a member of the J6 Committee? That would explain your statement.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Yes, they do. its not up to the prosecution to decide what is relevant or not. The Supreme Court decided that in Brady v. Maryland

Just because the government withheld this information and refused to turn it over to the defense councils, every case should be dismissed. The government can then retry every single person on new charges and see if they can get a jury to convict with the new evidence.

Certainly it is up to the prosecutors to determine that. That is why they are culpable if later in it is found they, with intent, left relevant evidence of the charging crime hidden.

What evidence did the govenrment withhold that is relevant to any of the convictions?

Prove the the govenrment withheld that evidence on purpose.

Good luck counselor.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Over 40,000 hours of servalance footage they hid. That shows their lies.

Prove they hid relevant evidence.

I'll wait.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Shaman-man's lawyer has already said he asked for this information and it was withheld.

Well...if he can prove he asked for the specific evidence..in writing...and it's not just boiler-plate discovery request worded like, "all information available", perhaps he has a shot. No wait, he still doesn't because the judge already ruled that the escort of police officers was not exculpatory but well-explained by their testimony that they were merely escorting him to keep him from overt violence and waiting for the furor to die down..as they suspected that arresting him may inflame the rioters further.
Yeah...dude is still toast...but nice Kabuki anyway~

 

[Fueri]

Well...if he can prove he asked for the specific evidence..in writing...and it's not just boiler-plate discovery request worded like, "all information available", perhaps he has a shot. No wait, he still doesn't because the judge already ruled that the escort of police officers was not exculpatory but well-explained by their testimony that they were merely escorting him to keep him from overt violence and waiting for the furor to die down..as they suspected that arresting him may inflame the rioters further.
Yeah...dude is still toast...but nice Kabuki anyway~

The Federal government seemingly intentionally withheld information requested by the defense during the prosecution of citizens of this country and your only comment is that this is 'kabuki'

This is a problem beyond Jan 6, if the government has now decided that people's rights and their duties as officers of the courts no longer matter. This shouldn't be a partisan issue at all.

 

[Catsnmeters]

The Federal government seemingly intentionally withheld information requested by the defense during the prosecution of citizens of this country and your only comment is that this is 'kabuki'

This is a problem beyond Jan 6, if the government has now decided that people's rights and their duties as officers of the courts no longer matter. This shouldn't be a partisan issue at all.

I stopped reading at "seemingly".

 

[Fueri]

I stopped reading at "seemingly".

That you choose to remain ignorant was worth posting to you.

Super job.

 

[Catsnmeters]

That you choose to remain ignorant was worth posting to you.

Super job.

Do you think a judge is going to keep reading after "seemingly"?

Non stop speculation. That is all we have here.

Doesn't work in court.

 

[Fueri]

Do you think a judge is going to keep reading after "seemingly"?

Non stop speculation. That is all we have here.

Doesn't work in court.

Yes, he would, because they're supposedly not partisan dopes. But he would of course ask for evidence, such as that already stated by the attorney that material was requested and not provided. And that judge would be smart enough to review that evidece before dismissing it.

Given that I, personally, am not that lawyer and do not have those court filings, I am forced to use a qualifer until those are made public.

Not all that complex, really, it is simply remaining reserved and relating the information available.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Yes, he would, because they're supposedly not partisan dopes. But he would of course ask for evidence, such as that already stated by the attorney that material was requested and not provided. And that judge would be smart nogh to review that evidece before dismissing it.

Given that I, personally, am not that lawyer and do not have those court filings, I am forced to use a qualifer until those are made public.

Not all that complex, really, it is simply remaining reserved and relating the information available.

What material did he request that was denied?

 

[Fueri]

What material did he request that was denied?

The videos of his client in their posession. According to him, they did not provide the videos recently released.

 

[Catsnmeters]

The videos of his client in their posession. According to him, they did not provide the videos recently released.

Be specific please. What videos, relevant to the charges, was not released?

 

[Fueri]

Be specific please. What videos, relevant to the charges, was not released?

I don't have to be specific to satisfy your desire to reframe this.

The defense asked for videos of their client in the possession of the government and, according to them, they were not provided.

 

[Catsnmeters]

I don't have to be specific to satisfy your desire to reframe this.

The defense asked for videos of their client in the possession of the government and, accirding to them, they were not provided.

Cool story bro.

Looks like the shaman will be set free any day now.

Good luck.

 

[Fueri]

Cool story bro.

Looks like the shaman will be set free any day now.

Good luck.

Cool misrepresentation of anything I've said. Bro.