BOOM Rep. Loudermilk Uncovers Text Showing Liz Cheney Was Colluding Directly with Liar 'Trump Grabbed the Steering Wheel' Cassidy Hutchinson

[munkle]

The Jan. 6 Committee was a trial proceeding. It was to determine the events of that day. It was NOT a criminal proceeding. Miranda would not apply. The presence of an attorney was NOT required. Ms. Hutchinson testified on what she heard and saw that day. Thank you for playing grasping at straws.

All you are saying is it was ok for her to lie.

 

[ThisIsMe]

So what?

This was an investigation not a trial. The purpose was fact finding. Cheney is free to talk to any witness to find out what her planned testimony would be and whether it is relevant to the investigation.
If she instructed Hutchinson to lie, then you may have a case

Really? The investigators are allowed to talk to the witnesses before their testimony? Are you seeing the text coming out of your fingers? Had anyone on the trump team did that, you'd be calling for them to be sent to the gulag

 

[rightwinger]

Really? The investigators are allowed to talk to the witnesses before their testimony? Are you seeing the text coming out of your fingers? Had anyone on the trump team did that, you'd be calling for them to be sent to the gulag

Do you think a Prosecutor does not talk to witnesses on a case before he puts them on the stand?

 

[struth]

Do you think a Prosecutor does not talk to witnesses on a case before he puts them on the stand?

Not behind their attorneys back, and they certainly don’t get them to change their testimony from their prior two times they testify

That’s corrupt

Maybe Fani and Bragg do things like that

 

[Care4all]

Not behind their attorneys back, and they certainly don’t get them to change their testimony from their prior two times they testify

That’s corrupt

Maybe Fani and Bragg do things like that

Gosh almighty....

Cassie wanted to talk to Cheney about her lawyer, who Cassie did not trust. Of course Cassie would not bring her lawyer, that she did not trust.


Could you be any more dishonest?

 

[struth]

Gosh almighty....

Cassie wanted to talk to Cheney about her lawyer, who Cassie did not trust. Of course Cassie would not bring her lawyer, that she did not trust.


Could you be any more dishonest?

You didn’t read the investigation? She said her attorney had her best interest at heart

She was contacted by Cheney through back channels and an encrypted text app by Liz

And then changed her testimony to lies and put on prime time tv to lie

Why you think that’s ok. Is mind blowing

 

[rightwinger]

Not behind their attorneys back, and they certainly don’t get them to change their testimony from their prior two times they testify

That’s corrupt

Maybe Fani and Bragg do things like that

It is Hutchinsons right to have an attorney present during questioning
Hutchinson requested the meeting but it is HER responsibility to bring him

Show where Cheney made her change her testimony

 

[rightwinger]

You didn’t read the investigation? She said her attorney had her best interest at heart

She was contacted by Cheney through back channels and an encrypted text app by Liz

And then changed her testimony to lies and put on prime time tv to lie

Why you think that’s ok. Is mind blowing

Hutchinson had an attorney provided by Trump
That attorney had Trumps interests in mind not his clients

Hutchinson fired him

 

[struth]

It is Hutchinsons right to have an attorney present during questioning
Hutchinson requested the meeting but it is HER responsibility to bring him

Show where Cheney made her change her testimony

Geez dembot

Why are you ignoring the fact that Liz used backchannels to talk to her behind her attorney’s back to begin with?

Why do you dembots like to start the story halfway through the book?

 

[struth]

Hutchinson had an attorney provided by Trump
That attorney had Trumps interests in mind not his clients

Hutchinson fired him

The text message show that no it wasn’t an attorney provided by trump, and more importantly before Liz’s backchannels, she liked her attorney and believed he had her best interest at heart

Why do you lie? And continue to ignore bipartisan investigations?

 

[rightwinger]

The text message show that no it wasn’t an attorney provided by trump, and more importantly before Liz’s backchannels, she liked her attorney and believed he had her best interest at heart

Why do you lie? And continue to ignore bipartisan investigations?

That is why she contacted Cheney
She wasn’t comfortable with her attorney

You still have no criminal act on Cheneys part

 

[DStar777]

The purpose was fact finding.

No it wasn't. If it was, the Secret Service agents in the Limo would have been called to testify. Why weren't they?

Secret Service plans to respond to Jan. 6 committee regarding Trump's actions, after Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony

The Secret Service wants to respond "regarding the new allegations surfaced in today's testimony," said Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi.

www.cbsnews.com

You do realize you need actual evidence of a crime

... says the person who likely believed what Trump is accused of without real evidence.

 

[rightwinger]

No it wasn't. If it was, the Secret Service agents in the Limo would have been called to testify. Why weren't they?

Secret Service plans to respond to Jan. 6 committee regarding Trump's actions, after Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony

The Secret Service wants to respond "regarding the new allegations surfaced in today's testimony," said Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi.

www.cbsnews.com

... says the person who likely believed what Trump is accused of without real evidence.

Wasnt relevant to the investigation

Trumps temper tantrum in the limo was just an amusing side note

 

[ThisIsMe]

Do you think a Prosecutor does not talk to witnesses on a case before he puts them on the stand?

it wasn't a trial. It was a congressional committee investigating a political opponent. A committee member trying to derail a president talking to a witness before having them testify is unethical.

 

[rightwinger]

it wasn't a trial. It was a congressional committee investigating a political opponent. A committee member trying to derail a president talking to a witness before having them testify is unethical.

Exactly

A Congressional investigation has much greater latitude than a prosecutor in a criminal trial

There are no laws against a Congressional Committee member talking to a potential witness…….Republicans are making it up

 

[struth]

That is why she contacted Cheney
She wasn’t comfortable with her attorney

You still have no criminal act on Cheneys part

I don’t know if it’s criminal

Let’s let the DOJ decide

 

[rightwinger]

I don’t know if it’s criminal

Let’s let the DOJ decide

OK
Then lets prosecute any Republican that ever speaks to a witness at a Congressional hearing

 

[struth]

OK
Then lets prosecute any Republican that ever speaks to a witness at a Congressional hearing

How about just the ones that tamper with witnesses…

Or will xiden give them blanket pardons?

 

[rightwinger]

How about just the ones that tamper with witnesses…

Or will xiden give them blanket pardons?

Where did Cheney tamper with a witness?
You guys ever hear of evidence?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

After 4 years of repeating about Trump "no one is above the law" will these vomit-inducing Democrats ever face prison? #YeaRight when it's a Republican being prosecuted it is justice when it is a satan-worshipping DemonRat it is "They are trying to get revenge." How clever with words they are. How artful. How sickening.

These are not small crimes. Lying to Congress. Covering up the 2020 stolen election insurrection. Traitors. 20 years, just like they gave Stewart Rhodes and Proud Boys who were not even in DC on J6.

New Texts Reveal Liz Cheney Communicated with Cassidy Hutchinson About Her Select Committee Testimony—without Hutchinson’s Attorney’s Knowledge—Despite Cheney Knowing it was Unethical

U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration

cha.house.gov

source

View attachment 1055294



Liar Cassidy Hutchinson Trump "tried to grab the steering wheel"

House GOP report debunks ex-Trump aide Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony on ex-prez trying to wrangle SUV to Jan. 6 panel

A Republican-led House committee on Monday released a report debunking claims by ex-Trump aide Cassidy Hutchinson that the former president attempted to commandeer a Secret Service SUV on Jan. 6, 2…

nypost.com

"House GOP report debunks ex-Trump aide Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony on ex-prez trying to wrangle SUV to Jan. 6 panel"

"Hutchinson, who at the time was an aide to former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, testified to the select committee that she was told Trump had shouted: “I’m the f—ing president! Take me up to the Capitol now!” before he tried to grab the steering wheel from the driver in a desperate effort to join his supporters marching towards the Capitol.

Loudermilk’s report notes that Hutchinson’s testimony was “directly refuted” by White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations Anthony Ornato – the man who according to Hutchinson, told her the anecdote – and the Secret Service agent driving the SUV.

“Ornato testified that the first time he had ever heard the story Hutchinson claims Ornato told her on January 6, was during Hutchinson’s public testimony,” the oversight subcommittee report states.

“Hutchinson’s testimony was also contradicted by the [Secret Service] agent who was with President Trump on January 6,” the subcommittee found, which notes that “Hutchinson’s accusation came up only after the Secret Service agent’s attorney proactively brought up the subject” to select committee investigators.


Hutchinson’s testimony was debunked by several witnesses, including the driver of the Secret Service SUV.
AP
“The driver testified that he specifically refuted the version of events as recounted by Hutchinson,” according to the report. “The driver of the SUV testified that he ‘did not see him reach [redacted]. [President Trump] never grabbed the steering wheel. I didn’t see him, you know, lunge to try to get into the front seat at all.’”

The select committee “hid the driver’s full testimony and only favorably mentioned his testimony in its Final Report, it did not release the full transcript,” Loudermilk’s committee determined. "

Sedition, treason, insurrection, witness tampering, et. al