BOOM Rep. Loudermilk Uncovers Text Showing Liz Cheney Was Colluding Directly with Liar 'Trump Grabbed the Steering Wheel' Cassidy Hutchinson

[rightwinger]

There were offfical proceeding, with witnesses

You silly dembots…you can’t tamper with witnesses in official preceding.

You can’t lie to congress, you can’t commit perjury…you dembots are beyond ridiculous

Even in a trial, prosecutors talk to witnesses before they take the stand.

In this case, Hutchinson asked for an opportunity to talk to Cheney beforehand

 

[munkle]

Even in a trial, prosecutors talk to witnesses before they take the stand.

In this case, Hutchinson asked for an opportunity to talk to Cheney beforehand

Why weren't the two Secret Service agents who directly contradicted Hutchinson allowed to take the stand? They wanted to.

 

[0311]

Ms. Hutchinson committed no crime. Nor was she charged with a crime at the the Jan.6 Hearing. Presence of trial counsel is NOT required, recommended yes, required no. Ms. Hutchinson was testifying as to what she saw and what she heard and her own actions on Jan..6.

There was NO Witness Tampering. It was Ms. Hutchinson who fired her original lawyer when he was pressing her to lie to the Jan. 6. Committee. She found a new lawyer that was NOT doing the WH Bidding. MAGA Desperation is an ugly thing to behold

 

[0311]

They sent people to jail on the basis of this "investigation's phony conclusion that J6 was an "insurrection." The rules of evidence apply.

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News

Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach.

revolver.news

But it’s not just Ray Epps and FenceCutterBulwark who appear to have been waiting for the Proud Boys.

Perched right across from FenceCutterBulwark at 12:31 p.m. is the man widely regarded by online researchers as the most infamous of all unindicted January 6 riot leaders—a man unmentioned in the mainstream press but elevated to legendary status online as “#NWScaffoldCommander.”

Don’t let looks deceive you: This extremely peculiar middle-aged man with glasses, a nerdy mask and a blue ballcap has been assigned more notoriety by deep researchers than arguably any other person of the thousands they have indexed. NWScaffoldCommander’s frenetic whirlwind of activities, and apparent role as “the ringleader” of the breach, have made him the subject of Russiagate-level rumor and speculation that he was privy to a January 6 “master plan.”

NWScaffoldCommander (we’ll call him just “ScaffoldCommander” for short) gets his name from being the ostensible “commander” of the prominent “media tower” that overlooked the Capitol’s back terrace on January 6. You’ve probably seen this tower in pictures—it’s the tall temporary structure built in November 2020 so that media crews could properly film the January 2021 inauguration ceremony. Here’s what it looks like without people around:

And here’s what it looked like on January 6, with ScaffoldCommander and his crew controlling it:

S


As you can see, this tower is the most perfect “command post” that anyone seeking to monitor and direct the Capitol crowd could possibly hope for. It stands front and center, everyone can see it, and the man high atop it can see and scream down to all.

One can only imagine the damage a highly aggressive and monomaniacally focused breach leader could do from this perch if he had zero scruples, a plan to attack the Capitol, and an extremely loud megaphone.

If you’ve seen any mid-day January 6 footage, you have probably seen ScaffoldCommander in action without knowing it.

From high atop the tower between 1 p.m. – 2:30 p.m, ScaffoldCommander issued the iconic bellows and non-stop commands that are loud and clear on almost every video clip from January 6 filmed in that time interval. For nearly 90 minutes straight, he bombards the otherwise leaderless crowd below him with endless variations on a single instruction: “Don’t just stand there. Keep moving forward!”

Watch:



But once the crowd had continuously “moved forward” for over an hour, and the very first handful of rioters entered the building, ScaffoldCommander suddenly threw the switch: “Okay we’re in! We’re in! Come on! We gotta fill up the Capitol! Come on! Come now! We need help We gotta fill up the Capitol! They got in.”

This clip below is checkmate. It should make ScaffoldCommander one of the top criminal suspects on the entire FBI Capitol Most Wanted List (spoiler alert: he isn’t even on the list, and no charges have been filed, and the FBI to date has still never acknowledged his existence).

Watch:

Capitol Police Lt. Head of Operations on J6 Says BOTH Police and Protesters Were "Absolutely Set Up" for a Riot on J6​

None of what you have posted has to do with Ms. Cheney, you that right?

 

[struth]

Even in a trial, prosecutors talk to witnesses before they take the stand.

In this case, Hutchinson asked for an opportunity to talk to Cheney beforehand

Not if they are represented by counsel, and they certainly don't get them to commit perjury or alter their prior sworn testimony.

In this case, as the bipartisan subcommittee reported, there is evidene that shows Liz used backchannel means to commuicate with a represented witness, then used encrpyted apps to send messages directly, and got her another attorney she approved of, then Hutchinson gave a fourth, prime time testimony, where she completely changed her testimony, and lied.

The case is being referred to the DOJ for criminal prosecution. They'll determine to charge her or not

 

[rightwinger]

Not if they are represented by counsel, and they certainly don't get them to commit perjury or alter their prior sworn testimony.

In this case, as the bipartisan subcommittee reported, there is evidene that shows Liz used backchannel means to commuicate with a represented witness, then used encrpyted apps to send messages directly, and got her another attorney she approved of, then Hutchinson gave a fourth, prime time testimony, where she completely changed her testimony, and lied.

The case is being referred to the DOJ for criminal prosecution. They'll determine to charge her or not

Not quite

It was the witness Hutchinson who requested the meeting
It would be up to her to have an attorney present.

If you claim Cheney instructed her to perjure herself, the burden of proof rests with you.

Hutchinson has not been charged with perjury

 

[0311]

Not quite

It was the witness Hutchinson who requested the meeting
It would be up to her to have an attorney present.

If you claim Cheney instructed her to perjure herself, the burden of proof rests with you.

Hutchinson has not been charged with perjury

The burden of proof is on the accuser, NOT the accused.

 

[marvin martian]

How did she tamper with a witness?

The investigation is going to show that.

 

[g5000]

After 4 years of repeating about Trump "no one is above the law" will these vomit-inducing Democrats ever face prison? #YeaRight when it's a Republican being prosecuted it is justice when it is a satan-worshipping DemonRat it is "They are trying to get revenge." How clever with words they are. How artful. How sickening.

That's exactly what this is. Its revenge.

This is theater being put on for you rubes. Cheney did nothing illegal.

Hutchinson reached out to Cheney, not the other way around.

Try to get that fact through your head. Hutchinson initiated the contact.

Cheney did nothing wrong.

Did your propagandists tell you this? Did Loudermouth?

No. Of course not. Because then you would see this stack of bullshit exactly for what it is.

 

[0311]

The burden of proof is on the accuser, NOT the accused.

Does the OP have clear and and undeniable proof of witness tampering by Ms. Cheney. Does OP have evidence beyond reasonable doubt as to witness tampering by Ms. Cheney. To date, no such or no such evidence has been presented.

Right now, it's another in a long line half assed, half baked MAG MAGGOT Conspiracy Theories That is why you people love Conspiracy Theories, you do not have to prove them.

 

[rightwinger]

The investigation is going to show that.

 

[rightwinger]

Does the OP have clear and and undeniable proof of witness tampering by Ms. Cheney. Does OP have evidence beyond reasonable doubt as to witness tampering by Ms. Cheney. To date, no such or no such evidence has been presented.

Right now, it's another in a long line half assed, half baked MAG MAGGOT Conspiracy Theories That is why you people love Conspiracy Theories, you do not have to prove them.

All they have is a text showing they made plans to meet
Cheney may have tampered with the witness so we have to assume she did
No evidence of actual tampering

 

[struth]

Not quite

It was the witness Hutchinson who requested the meeting
It would be up to her to have an attorney present.

If you claim Cheney instructed her to perjure herself, the burden of proof rests with you.

Hutchinson has not been charged with perjury

She had an attorney, Liz should never of spoken or used a third party back door channel to speak to her.

I am not the DOJ, she hasn't been charged yet. All that the evidence shows thus far is that there is more then reasonable suspecision that a crime or crimes were committed, and the public certainly has a an interest in knowing what actually happened....so we will leave it up to the DOJ and the Grand Jury to finish the investigation.

 

[rightwinger]

She had an attorney, Liz should never of spoken or used a third party back door channel to speak to her.

I am not the DOJ, she hasn't been charged yet. All that the evidence shows thus far is that there is more then reasonable suspecision that a crime or crimes were committed, and the public certainly has a an interest in knowing what actually happened....so we will leave it up to the DOJ and the Grand Jury to finish the investigation.

If Hutchinson has an attorney, it is her obligation to bring him before speaking.

She was just a witness to a hearing and has no Miranda protections

 

[g5000]

Cheney may have tampered with the witness so we have to assume she did

No.

 

[rightwinger]

I am not the DOJ, she hasn't been charged yet. All that the evidence shows thus far is that there is more then reasonable suspecision that a crime or crimes were committed

OK
Prove perjury by Hutchinson

 

[g5000]

She had an attorney, Liz should never of spoken or used a third party back door channel to speak to her.

I am not the DOJ, she hasn't been charged yet. All that the evidence shows thus far is that there is more then reasonable suspecision that a crime or crimes were committed, and the public certainly has a an interest in knowing what actually happened....so we will leave it up to the DOJ and the Grand Jury to finish the investigation.

Your bullshit is built on quicksand.

Cheney did nothing illegal. Loudermouth is just providing you rubes with revenge entertainment.

 

[rightwinger]

No.

That is what they are claiming…..without proof

 

[g5000]

That is what they are claiming…..without proof

Ah. Sorry. I thought you were saying that.

It sounded bizarre coming from you.

 

[WEATHER53]

Exactly, the Jan. 6 Committee was investigating, there was no trial. More smoke and mirrors by MAGA.

Paid non truth