Blowing Up Darwin

[Sherlock Holmes]

How frustrating for you.

Your lot in life is to sit on message boards and shout into the void.

Yes, what an apt description of yourself.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Yes, what an apt description of yourself.

And we see the flame out in real time.

It will end this way every time. After several (very hilarious) declarations of victory by the charlatan.

 

[Robert W]

You’re desperately trying to backtrack.

Show us any original research done by any of your ID’iot creationer ministries.

They’re all fronts for hacks and charlatans pressing a religious agenda.

How sad for you. You’re an accomplice to hacks and ftauds.

To put it in simple terms, you promise a certain death. How proud that must make you.

 

[Robert W]

And we see the flame out in real time.

It will end this way every time. After several (very hilarious) declarations of victory by the charlatan.

That will count as number 1 by you.

 

[Robert W]

Evolution remains an accepted fact.

Yes it does remain accepted as fact.
That is not even a decent claim.
The argument is what created life, not if life changed. See your wife? Assuming you have one, who thinks you look like her? She has different features you lack.
So Mr. believes in change, how can a human spring up from pure dirt? Can you and a woman create life? But will life come from pure earth?

 

[Hollie]

To put it in simple terms, you promise a certain death. How proud that must make you.

Why do you feel a need to use your gods to make cheap threats?

 

[Hollie]

What would you accept as proof?

Not interested in your silly games.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Mr. believes in change, how can a human spring up from pure dirt?

Who claims that happened? Only goofballs that believe the iron age mythology of Gensis.

Try to organize your thoughts and state them clearly. This is the science section, not the sock puppet troll section. You need to try to behave like an adult.

Try again?

The answer will be: selection by physical forces.

Just as it was the last 10 times you asked the same question.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The argument is what created life, not if life changed.

Not in a thread about evolution, it isnt..

If you're going to derail a thread, at least organize and articulate your thoughts.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

To put it in simple terms, you promise a certain death. How proud that must make you.

You confuse.your own religious nuttery with the reason and knowledge of normal adults.

He didn't promise anything. He didn't make the rules.

This isn't church, where pedos in funny hats decide the rules of reality by fiat.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Pascal's wager is of course nonsense.

It can be turned right around.

You certainly have proven to be the epitome of nonsense.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You certainly have proven to be the epitome of nonsense.

We are now in the tantrum phase of your thread. It happens in all of your threads.

Cry it all out.

 

[scruffy]

Yikes. Ten more pages of this nonsense?

The Bhudda Gautama, when asked whether God exists, said "that is an irrelevant question".

Why?

Because there's nothing we can do about it, one way or the other.

It's your CHOICE whether you want to have faith or not. If faith floats your boat, go for it.

But don't try to call it science. It's not science.

If you want to talk about science, bring evidence to the table. Show us the evidence. I did, I showed you the evidence. Want to see it again?

Is this a gecko or is it a different species?

 

[PoliticalChic]

We are now in the tantrum phase of your thread. It happens in all of your threads.

Cry it all out.

Quite a successful thread, well over 1,000 responses. An examination of the scam, Darwin's Theory, and the lack of evidence that supports it.
And why it is so important to Leftists.

This is the topic:

Neither the view that Darwin offered to explain life on earth, or the Bible's version is able to submit to experimentation. There is no "proof" for either.
Both provide elegant explanations.
Both require simple belief.


Notice, further, that the Left poltical view chooses Darwin and abhors God as the explanation, and the Right sees the Judeo-Christian explanation for life on earth, and for Western Civilization itself.
Isn't that interesting?


And this: the Left embraces death, while the Right embraces life.



Why is the Left's version so popular?

“Antonio Gramsci, the philosopher who became the iconic thinker of the 1960s, laid down the blueprint for precisely what has happened in Britain: the capture of all society's institutions, such as schools, universities, churches, the media, the legal profession, the police and voluntary groups. This intellectual elite was persuaded to sing from the same subversive hymn-sheet so that the moral beliefs of the majority would be replaced by the values of those on the margins of society, ....

At the core of those Western majority values lay the Mosaic code, which first gave the world the concept of morality, self-discipline and laws regulating behavior. Who, then, could be surprised that the Jews found themselves in the left's crosshairs?”
Phillips, “Londonistan,” P.118-119


Phillips explains it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yikes. Ten more pages of this nonsense?

The Bhudda Gautama, when asked whether God exists, said "that is an irrelevant question".

Why?

Because there's nothing we can do about it, one way or the other.

It's your CHOICE whether you want to have faith or not. If faith floats your boat, go for it.

But don't try to call it science. It's not science.

If you want to talk about science, bring evidence to the table. Show us the evidence. I did, I showed you the evidence. Want to see it again?

Is this a gecko or is it a different species?

View attachment 1054666

Let's cut to the chase:

Is Darwin's theory a "proven fact"?



Is it offered to the public as a "proven fact"?

Didn't you say you are religious and believe in God?


What do you suppose it the reason that atheist Devil worshipper Karl Marx, and subsequent iterations of communists/socialists advance the false theory explaining life on earth.


Is exploring the question of why the religious view, with as much proof as Darwin’s theory, is radioactive for conversations?


BTW.....are there any proven examples of life, other than Petri dish inhabitants, 'evolving'

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yikes. Ten more pages of this nonsense?

The Bhudda Gautama, when asked whether God exists, said "that is an irrelevant question".

Why?

Because there's nothing we can do about it, one way or the other.

It's your CHOICE whether you want to have faith or not. If faith floats your boat, go for it.

But don't try to call it science. It's not science.

If you want to talk about science, bring evidence to the table. Show us the evidence. I did, I showed you the evidence. Want to see it again?

Is this a gecko or is it a different species?

View attachment 1054666

So we are agreeing that Darwin's Theory is without evidence to support it, and simply relies on faith?



Excellent.

 

[scruffy]

Neither the view that Darwin offered to explain life on earth, or the Bible's version is able to submit to experimentation. There is no "proof" for either.
Both provide elegant explanations.
Both require simple belief.

This is a complete and total lie.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Quite a successful thread,

Bwahahaha

Not for you and your childish idiocy.

But it has been a fine demonstration of how ignorant and incapable evolution deniers are.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is a complete and total lie.

This thread has proven quite the opposite.

Or.....you can redeem yourself by providing evidence of one species 'evolving' into another....


....and refuting this:

AI Overview
Learn more

Yes, Charles Darwin's primary contribution was attempting to explain the variety of life on Earth through his theory of evolution by natural selection, proposing that all living organisms descended from a common ancestor and diversified over time through adaptation to different environments, resulting in the vast diversity of species we see today.




But you can't do either, can you.



The truth will set you free.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is a complete and total lie.

In post #58 you said you had an Ivy League education.

Not only did I whip you to bits in this thread.....but I bet my alma mater has a better fight song than yours: