Blowing Up Darwin

This thread has proven quite the opposite.
Another shameless and hilarious lie.

No, you would still be laughed out of any room of educated people.

You would still fail a 7th grade science quiz.

Evolution remains a fact, and you remain uneducated and wrong.

Not a thing has changed.
 
Quite a successful thread, well over 1,000 responses. An examination of the scam, Darwin's Theory, and the lack of evidence that supports it.
And why it is so important to Leftists.

This is the topic:

Neither the view that Darwin offered to explain life on earth, or the Bible's version is able to submit to experimentation. There is no "proof" for either.
Both provide elegant explanations.
Both require simple belief.


Notice, further, that the Left poltical view chooses Darwin and abhors God as the explanation, and the Right sees the Judeo-Christian explanation for life on earth, and for Western Civilization itself.
Isn't that interesting?


And this: the Left embraces death, while the Right embraces life.



Why is the Left's version so popular?

“Antonio Gramsci, the philosopher who became the iconic thinker of the 1960s, laid down the blueprint for precisely what has happened in Britain: the capture of all society's institutions, such as schools, universities, churches, the media, the legal profession, the police and voluntary groups. This intellectual elite was persuaded to sing from the same subversive hymn-sheet so that the moral beliefs of the majority would be replaced by the values of those on the margins of society, ....

At the core of those Western majority values lay the Mosaic code, which first gave the world the concept of morality, self-discipline and laws regulating behavior. Who, then, could be surprised that the Jews found themselves in the left's crosshairs?”
Phillips, “Londonistan,” P.118-119


Phillips explains it.
The success was in, as usual, showing your religious nuttery as a debilitating disease.
 
A note to the above two penultimate posters: proof of the success of my thread is that not a one of any of you atheists could provide examples of one species becoming another.

But I am generous to a fault: you can have another chance.

Is there proof that Darwin's Theory has been proven to explain the variety of life on the planet?




Take your time. Maybe your obfuscations can get us to 2000 responses.
 
You're delusional.
....you can redeem yourself by providing evidence of one species 'evolving' into another....


....and refuting this:

AI Overview
Learn more

Yes, Charles Darwin's primary contribution was attempting to explain the variety of life on Earth through his theory of evolution by natural selection, proposing that all living organisms descended from a common ancestor and diversified over time through adaptation to different environments, resulting in the vast diversity of species we see today.




But you can't do either, can you.
 
You're "very" delusional.
....you can redeem yourself by providing evidence of one species 'evolving' into another....


....and refuting this:

AI Overview
Learn more

Yes, Charles Darwin's primary contribution was attempting to explain the variety of life on Earth through his theory of evolution by natural selection, proposing that all living organisms descended from a common ancestor and diversified over time through adaptation to different environments, resulting in the vast diversity of species we see today.




But you can't do either, can you.
 
A note to the above two penultimate posters: proof of the success of my thread is that not a one of any of you atheists could provide examples of one species becoming another.

Lack of evidence does not constitute proof, dimwit.

But I am generous to a fault: you can have another chance.

Is there proof that Darwin's Theory has been proven to explain the variety of life on the planet?

And right back to your stupid demands for proof.

No thanks. You're a waste of time.

Take your time. Maybe your obfuscations can get us to 2000 responses.

Sorry, I have better things to do with my time.
 
A note to the above two penultimate posters: proof of the success of my thread is that not a one of any of you atheists could provide examples of one species becoming another.

But I am generous to a fault: you can have another chance.

Is there proof that Darwin's Theory has been proven to explain the variety of life on the planet?




Take your time. Maybe your obfuscations can get us to 2000 responses.
The proof has been provided. Your religious extremism has morphed into a disease.

Spam your own thread with more of your fraudulent, altered “quotes”
 
Lack of evidence does not constitute proof, dimwit.



And right back to your stupid demands for proof.

No thanks. You're a waste of time.



Sorry, I have better things to do with my time.
"Lack of evidence does not constitute proof, dimwit."

So you're admitting exactly what I said: there is not nor will there be evidence of Darwin's Hoax.

Excellent.


You're making progress.




Now deal with the fact that there is evidence of the contrary to Darwin's Hoax: fossil evidence that species suddenly come into existence with no prior preparatioin.

Suddenly.


Almost as if following the script known as Genesis.


C'mon now......you can do it.
 
The proof has been provided. Your religious extremism has morphed into a disease.

Spam your own thread with more of your fraudulent, altered “quotes”
A note to the above two penultimate posters: proof of the success of my thread is that not a one of any of you atheists could provide examples of one species becoming another.

But I am generous to a fault: you can have another chance.

Is there proof that Darwin's Theory has been proven to explain the variety of life on the planet?




Take your time. Maybe your obfuscations can get us to 2000 responses.
 
Poor PoliticalChic

She and her thread:

giphy.webp
 
Lack of evidence does not constitute proof, dimwit.



And right back to your stupid demands for proof.

No thanks. You're a waste of time.



Sorry, I have better things to do with my time.
In the words of the Brown Bomber:

You can run, but you can't hide.
 
Poor PoliticalChic

She and her thread:

giphy.webp
A note to the above two penultimate posters: proof of the success of my thread is that not a one of any of you atheists could provide examples of one species becoming another.

But I am generous to a fault: you can have another chance.

Is there proof that Darwin's Theory has been proven to explain the variety of life on the planet?




Take your time. Maybe your obfuscations can get us to 2000 responses.
 
A note to the above two penultimate posters: proof of the success of my thread is that not a one of any of you atheists could provide examples of one species becoming another.
Even if true, that doesn't lend a single bit of support to any claim you have ever made, Nor does it undermine evolutionary theory..

In fact, the request itself belies a thorough and embarrassing state of ignorance, in regards to evolution.

It's just as fucking stupid as asking why there are still monkeys.

This is what happens when the terminally uneducated and stupid try to wield logic. It's like a 2 year old finding a gun. Nothing good is going to happen.
 
And, a reminder: the conference at the Royal Society centered on scientists admitting that Darwin's Opus just doesn't work.

There must be some other way to explain the variety of life on Earth.

Could there be a Divine Hand as the cause????


"Indeed, by the end of Day 3 of the meeting, it seemed clear to many of our scientists, and others in attendance with whom they talked, that the puzzle of life’s novelties remained unsolved — if, indeed, it had been addressed at all.

As a prominent German paleontologist in the crowd concluded, “All elements of the Extended Synthesis [as discussed at the conference] fail to offer adequate explanations for the crucial explanatory deficits of the Modern Synthesis (aka neo-Darwinism) that were explicitly highlighted in the first talk of the meeting by Gerd Müller.”
 
Of course, this didn't happen. Evolutionary Theory remains a fact, and deniers remain in their place : shouting into the void on the internet.
 
But I am generous to a fault: you can have another chance.

Is there proof that Darwin's Theory has been proven to explain the variety of life on the planet?
You Lying Filthy POS, you're Lying For Jesus again.
You're DISHONEST to a Fault.
The above bogus claim has already been Dealt with MANY times.
Post #1107 in THIS thread just an hour+ ago


Science doesn't deal in 'proof,' (only math can in the absolute sense) it deals in theories validated over time.
In 160 Years and an explosion of new sciences, NOTHING Contradicts it AND all relevant ones help Affirm it: Radiocarbon dating, DNA, millions of new fossil finds, etc.


Scientific American
15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense
John Rennie, Editor in Chief
June 2002

"1. Evolution is only a theory. It is not a fact or a scientific law.

Many people learned in Elementary school that a theory falls in the middle of a hierarchy of certainty--above a mere hypothesis but below a law.

Scientists do not use the terms that way, however. According to the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), a scientific theory is "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate Facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses." No amount of validation changes a theory into a law, which is a descriptive generalization about nature.
So when scientists talk about the theory of evolution--or the atomic theory or the theory of relativity, for that matter--they are Not expressing reservations about its truth.

In addition to the theory of evolution, meaning the idea of descent with modification, one may also speak of the Fact of evolution.
[......]
`
 
Last edited:
"Lack of evidence does not constitute proof, dimwit."

So you're admitting exactly what I said: there is not nor will there be evidence of Darwin's Hoax.

Excellent.


You're making progress.




Now deal with the fact that there is evidence of the contrary to Darwin's Hoax: fossil evidence that species suddenly come into existence with no prior preparatioin.

Suddenly.


Almost as if following the script known as Genesis.


C'mon now......you can do it.
You're completely full of shit.

It's abundantly clear you have no science education.

Nor math, nor simple logic.

You should stick to your Bible and stay away from science. The scientists will hammer you, you'll be laughed out of the meeting.
 
Back
Top Bottom