Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"The Left" is a pretty common concept, even if it eludes you.Moving the goalposts again.Moving goalposts.Depends. How many people are supposed to be part of your 'the Left'?
Classic example of dishonest debate cited in my other thread.
You're done.
Not at all. If your 'The Left' is like 10 guys....then I'd take the word of any 2 or 3 of them. If its like 10,000,000.....I'd need a few more.
My answer to your question is....how many folks I would need from 'the Left' to be convinced would depend on how large 'The Left' is.
So....how large is your 'The Left'?
You are a dishonest poster. Shame on you.
You asked me how many it would take to convince me. How many depends on the size of the group they're supposed to represent. You can't tell me......as you have no idea. Nor, I suspect, care.
Since you failed so utterly in answering my last question, lets try another: Can you factually establish that your sources represent the views of your 'The Left'?
So your sophistry here means you are either stupid or dishonest. In either case it means you are unworthy to engage in any debate.
Bye.
"The Left" is a pretty common concept, even if it eludes you.Moving the goalposts again.Moving goalposts.
Classic example of dishonest debate cited in my other thread.
You're done.
Not at all. If your 'The Left' is like 10 guys....then I'd take the word of any 2 or 3 of them. If its like 10,000,000.....I'd need a few more.
My answer to your question is....how many folks I would need from 'the Left' to be convinced would depend on how large 'The Left' is.
So....how large is your 'The Left'?
You are a dishonest poster. Shame on you.
You asked me how many it would take to convince me. How many depends on the size of the group they're supposed to represent. You can't tell me......as you have no idea. Nor, I suspect, care.
Since you failed so utterly in answering my last question, lets try another: Can you factually establish that your sources represent the views of your 'The Left'?
And what evidence do you have that your examples accurately represent the views of your 'The Left'?
So your sophistry here means you are either stupid or dishonest. In either case it means you are unworthy to engage in any debate.
Bye.
Laughing....you don't need an excuse to run. Just run. When and if you muster the will to answer the questions that clearly confound your argument, I'll be here waiting for you.
"The Left" is a pretty common concept, even if it eludes you.Moving the goalposts again.Not at all. If your 'The Left' is like 10 guys....then I'd take the word of any 2 or 3 of them. If its like 10,000,000.....I'd need a few more.
My answer to your question is....how many folks I would need from 'the Left' to be convinced would depend on how large 'The Left' is.
So....how large is your 'The Left'?
You are a dishonest poster. Shame on you.
You asked me how many it would take to convince me. How many depends on the size of the group they're supposed to represent. You can't tell me......as you have no idea. Nor, I suspect, care.
Since you failed so utterly in answering my last question, lets try another: Can you factually establish that your sources represent the views of your 'The Left'?
And what evidence do you have that your examples accurately represent the views of your 'The Left'?
So your sophistry here means you are either stupid or dishonest. In either case it means you are unworthy to engage in any debate.
Bye.
Laughing....you don't need an excuse to run. Just run. When and if you muster the will to answer the questions that clearly confound your argument, I'll be here waiting for you.
"The Left" is a pretty common concept, even if it eludes you.Moving the goalposts again.
You are a dishonest poster. Shame on you.
You asked me how many it would take to convince me. How many depends on the size of the group they're supposed to represent. You can't tell me......as you have no idea. Nor, I suspect, care.
Since you failed so utterly in answering my last question, lets try another: Can you factually establish that your sources represent the views of your 'The Left'?
And what evidence do you have that your examples accurately represent the views of your 'The Left'?
So your sophistry here means you are either stupid or dishonest. In either case it means you are unworthy to engage in any debate.
Bye.
Laughing....you don't need an excuse to run. Just run. When and if you muster the will to answer the questions that clearly confound your argument, I'll be here waiting for you.
So.....you can't provide any evidence that your examples accurately represent the views of your 'The Left'.
What else have you got?
It would be a ridiculously simple matter to demonstrate reasonable doubt when the kid was shot seconds after assaulting a police officer and reaching for his gun. The standard is a reasonable fear for one's life. The kid's size, his violence, his attempt to wrestle away a fire arm would establish that to virtually any impartial jury.
As for what happened immediately preceding his death, the evidence is ambiguous. The witness accounts were either blatantly false (and recanted) or wildly contradictory. And the forensic evidence backs the shooting occurring during an attempt to surrender as much as it does the young man charging the officer.
Ambiguous evidence immediately preceding the shooting and overwhelming evidence of life threatening violence against a police officer seconds earlier? No prosecutor in the world would touch that one. It couldn't be won.
And the Feds aren't going to touch it either for the very same reason. The evidence simply doesn't support any charges against the officer.
The feds aren't going to touch it because Obama talks shit, but he wags a weak dick. Heck, George H. Bush ordered a prosecution of the guys who beat Rodney King with a lot less to go on.
Witness accounts were taken. Three autopsies were performed. Pictures of the injuries of the officer were taken. Blood samples from Mike Brown were found in the officer's car, on the officer's uniform and on the officer's gun. Surveillance photos of Mike Brown robbing the convenience store were collected.
The evidence simply didn't warrant charges against the officer. Given Brown's theft, assault of the store owner that same night and assault on the officer only seconds earlier the young man being gunned down while attempting a third act of assault is plausible. And supported by the evidence.
What 'uncollected' evidence wasn't retrieved from the scene that would have contradicted the evidence that was?
Well, how about letting Officer Fife check in his own gun, and drive his own vehicle into the police station? HOw about the fact that they didn't record a statement from him and didn't interview him after the shooting. How about the fact the cororner didn't take any photos of the crime scene because the battery on their camera was dead?
The reason why the officer wasn't charged was because the DA rigged the game.
And I'm sorry, shoving a clerk is not a capital crime.
There's a video showing Rodney King being beaten. Where's the video of the Brown shooting? There's an audio recording, and it backs officer Wilson's account. And matches the testimony of Witness 10.
Which is inconsistent with other witnesses, the officer's testimoney and forensic evidence.There's a video showing Rodney King being beaten. Where's the video of the Brown shooting? There's an audio recording, and it backs officer Wilson's account. And matches the testimony of Witness 10.
16 other witnesses said he had his hands up.
There's a video showing Rodney King being beaten. Where's the video of the Brown shooting? There's an audio recording, and it backs officer Wilson's account. And matches the testimony of Witness 10.
16 other witnesses said he had his hands up.
In subsequent interviews with law enforcement, or their testimony before the grand jury, many of the same witnesses acknowledged that they didn’t actually see the shooting,” McCulloch said. “Some were running for cover. Some were relating what they heard from others or as I said, what they assumed happened.” But many witnesses held steadfast to their interviews. “Several other witnesses maintained their original statement that Mr. Brown had his hands int he air and was not moving toward the officer when he was shot,” McCulloch said.
says the guy who openly hates anyone who disagrees with his views especially if you happen to be white...which is at least half the country.....you are no different Dean.....Bloomberg Poll- Americans See Race Relations Worsening Since Obama's Election
It's not that there is more. It's that Republicans are more open about their hatred of blacks, gays and other minorities.
yea every white republican is like that.....did dean coach you?.........No the white folks in the republican party trying ever more unsuccessfully to convince us that there is no racial component in their hyperbolic freakout at having a black president.Of course things have gotten worse. All you white bigots completely lost your shit when he got elected.
You mean, the same white folks that elected him twice? Those white folks Joe?
-Geaux
And why would that be? The question is legit but could be rhetorical as well.
Obama is the king divider. He has a goal to leave this country worse off than the way he found it. Safe to say, he accomplished that in this first 2 years and has been golfing since
-Geaux
------------------------------
Most Americans See Race Relations Worsening Since Obama's Election
President Barack Obama had hoped his historic election would ease race relations, yet a majority of Americans, 53 percent, say the interactions between the white and black communities have deteriorated since he took office, according to a new Bloomberg Politics poll. Those divisions are laid bare in the split reactions to the decisions by two grand juries not to indict white police officers who killed unarmed black men in Ferguson, Mo., and Staten Island, N.Y.
Both times, protesters responded with outrage and politicians called for federal investigations. Yet Americans don’t think of the cases as a matched set of injustices, the poll found. A majority agreed with the Ferguson decision, while most objected to the conclusion in the Staten Island death, which was captured on video. The divergent opinions—52 percent agreed on Ferguson compared with 25 percent who approved of the Staten Island outcome—add to an ongoing discussion that was inflamed when Officer Daniel Pantaleo was seen in the July video putting what appeared to be a chokehold on Eric Garner, a 43-year-old man suspected of selling untaxed cigarettes. Garner could be heard saying, “I can’t breathe,” and died of a heart attack in what a medical examiner ruled a homicide. The grand jury decision not to charge Pantaleo came just 12 days after a similar panel in Ferguson declined to charge Officer Darren Wilson, who in August shot to death 18-year-old Michael Brown. That altercation was not captured on video, and the prosecutor presented evidence of a physical confrontation between the two men before the fatal shots were fired.
Bloomberg Politics Poll Finds Most Americans See Race Relations Worsening Since Obama s Election - Bloomberg Politics
It's because the Rightwing bigots forgot how to control themselves.
Which is inconsistent with other witnesses, the officer's testimoney and forensic evidence.There's a video showing Rodney King being beaten. Where's the video of the Brown shooting? There's an audio recording, and it backs officer Wilson's account. And matches the testimony of Witness 10.
16 other witnesses said he had his hands up.
Carry on.
The Michael Brown episode is over. The Grand Jury had it right. Forensics and witnesses testified to the truthfulness of Wilson.
If you want to make hay...talk about the choke hold death. There was wrong doing there. The police officer was wrong.
The Michael Brown episode is over. The Grand Jury had it right. Forensics and witnesses testified to the truthfulness of Wilson.
If you want to make hay...talk about the choke hold death. There was wrong doing there. The police officer was wrong.
I realize Garner is more sympathetic to the Right Wing because he was a tax cheat, but really, the Brown thing is a lot worse.
Those cops didn't intend to kill Garner, and Garner's own poor health contributed to his death.
Wilson straight up murdered Brown.
Call it what you want, but the result was appreciated. Another dead thug. We need as many as we can pile up in the town square
-Geaux
Call it what you want, but the result was appreciated. Another dead thug. We need as many as we can pile up in the town square
-Geaux
Yes, you aren't a tiny bit racist, Geaux.
Add whites, mexicans and every color under the sun. Hang em high
