BLOCKBUSTER! Syrian Rebels Take Responsibility For Chemical Attack...

[Contumacious]

You should post to the topic to remain in the thread and avoid personal attacks.

BTW , We are not supporting Assad.

We support the US which is already BANKRUPT.

I support the American GI's who are going to die for nothing intervening in a religious civil war.

I support all those innocent Syrian bystanders who are going to die in the process.

.

 

[Little-Acorn]

BLOCKBUSTER! Syrian Rebels Take Responsibility For Chemical Attack...


Actually the linked articles say nothing of the kind.

They say that a bunch of people who have never used, handled, or even SEEN a chemical weapon, saw some thing that they thought MIGHT look like what they IMAGINED a chemical weapon might look like, even though they've never actually seen a real chemical weapon or been trained in any such.

And then they went of to GUESS that somebody, somewhere, MIGHT have mishandled one, whatever it was.


Are the Ron Paul fanatics still trying to pretend their articles state somewhere that Syrian rebels take responsibility for chemical attacks? While all the while carefully not pointing out which part of the article says that?

 

[The T]

While not realizing it makes them just as bad. YES it's OK to defend one'self...But I fail to see where WE have been attacked BY Syria directly. *I* see a macho PISSING CONTEST between Putin and Obama.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

No matter how WWIII started, it would be America who started it by its unlimited aggression and invasions.

 

[Smilebong]

Actually the linked articles say nothing of the kind.

They say that a bunch of people who have never used, handled, or even SEEN a chemical weapon, saw some thing that they thought MIGHT look like what they IMAGINED a chemical weapon might look like, even though they've never actually seen a real chemical weapon or been trained in any such.

And then they went of to GUESS that somebody, somewhere, MIGHT have mishandled one, whatever it was.

Sounds like the Ron Paul fanatics have nothing, and are simply lying again.

That is what I saw too.


If it was the rebels, it would be all over the mainstream liberal media.

 

[Vox]

Indeed. Obama, IF he goes on with this? Will be stepping into something WE may not ever recover....

Obama NEEDS a war. To divert attention from the problems inside the country and to tighten the grip of internal police on American liberties - this is a blessing for them, so he is going to step into that. Most likely. Though the countyr can not afford this war and does not have anything to win in it.

But the irony of this - libtard bedwetters who were screaming all their lungs off during the Bush era - "poor Iraqi children, poor civilians, we are killing them" - now are screaming their lungs out in support of bombing Syrian children and civilians.

And the libtard bots a.k.a. fakey jumping ahead from their diaper with a banner - "bomb them, bomb them, our missile strike is more humane than their gas

While not realizing it makes them just as bad. YES it's OK to defend one'self...But I fail to see where WE have been attacked BY Syria directly. *I* see a macho PISSING CONTEST between Putin and Obama.

I do not even think it is a contest. Neither side can AFFORD a war.

Either side can benefit from a war, but Obama's projected benefits are bigger - Putin is in a much more stable position and his country is in a better economical shape, though not to the point to be able to handle a war.
And he is already an autocrat obama is just aspiring to become

 

[Vox]

Actually the linked articles say nothing of the kind.

They say that a bunch of people who have never used, handled, or even SEEN a chemical weapon, saw some thing that they thought MIGHT look like what they IMAGINED a chemical weapon might look like, even though they've never actually seen a real chemical weapon or been trained in any such.

And then they went of to GUESS that somebody, somewhere, MIGHT have mishandled one, whatever it was.

Sounds like the Ron Paul fanatics have nothing, and are simply lying again.

That is what I saw too.


If it was the rebels, it would be all over the mainstream liberal media.

no, it won't. the agenda from the WH is - we are going to war, buckle up .

the servitude media are listening.

however, the rebels won't use the gas, because it is not in their best interest, obviously

 

[The T]

Actually the linked articles say nothing of the kind.

They say that a bunch of people who have never used, handled, or even SEEN a chemical weapon, saw some thing that they thought MIGHT look like what they IMAGINED a chemical weapon might look like, even though they've never actually seen a real chemical weapon or been trained in any such.

And then they went of to GUESS that somebody, somewhere, MIGHT have mishandled one, whatever it was.

Sounds like the Ron Paul fanatics have nothing, and are simply lying again.

That is what I saw too.


If it was the rebels, it would be all over the mainstream liberal media.

NOT necessarily. Obama is having problems Domestically...in spades.

Assad apparently (as WE are told), crossed Obama's imaginary 'RED LINE' thrice.

WHY didn't Obama ACT the first time the line was crossed?

 

[The T]

Obama NEEDS a war. To divert attention from the problems inside the country and to tighten the grip of internal police on American liberties - this is a blessing for them, so he is going to step into that. Most likely. Though the countyr can not afford this war and does not have anything to win in it.

But the irony of this - libtard bedwetters who were screaming all their lungs off during the Bush era - "poor Iraqi children, poor civilians, we are killing them" - now are screaming their lungs out in support of bombing Syrian children and civilians.

And the libtard bots a.k.a. fakey jumping ahead from their diaper with a banner - "bomb them, bomb them, our missile strike is more humane than their gas

While not realizing it makes them just as bad. YES it's OK to defend one'self...But I fail to see where WE have been attacked BY Syria directly. *I* see a macho PISSING CONTEST between Putin and Obama.

I do not even think it is a contest. Neither side can AFFORD a war.

Either side can benefit from a war, but Obama's projected benefits are bigger - Putin is in a much more stable position and his country is in a better economical shape, though not to the point to be able to handle a war.
And he is already an autocrat obama is just aspiring to become

^^A lot of truth here...

 

[Smilebong]

Actually the linked articles say nothing of the kind.

They say that a bunch of people who have never used, handled, or even SEEN a chemical weapon, saw some thing that they thought MIGHT look like what they IMAGINED a chemical weapon might look like, even though they've never actually seen a real chemical weapon or been trained in any such.

And then they went of to GUESS that somebody, somewhere, MIGHT have mishandled one, whatever it was.

Sounds like the Ron Paul fanatics have nothing, and are simply lying again.

That is what I saw too.


If it was the rebels, it would be all over the mainstream liberal media.

NOT necessarily. Obama is having problems Domestically...in spades.

Assad apparently (as WE are told), crossed Obama's imaginary 'RED LINE' thrice.

WHY didn't Obama ACT the first time the line was crossed?

Because he is so slow. He is afraid. He is weak. He is now being forced to act.

 

[tinydancer]

Actually the linked articles say nothing of the kind.

They say that a bunch of people who have never used, handled, or even SEEN a chemical weapon, saw some thing that they thought MIGHT look like what they IMAGINED a chemical weapon might look like, even though they've never actually seen a real chemical weapon or been trained in any such.

And then they went of to GUESS that somebody, somewhere, MIGHT have mishandled one, whatever it was.

Sounds like the Ron Paul fanatics have nothing, and are simply lying again.

That is what I saw too.


If it was the rebels, it would be all over the mainstream liberal media.

NOT necessarily. Obama is having problems Domestically...in spades.

Assad apparently (as WE are told), crossed Obama's imaginary 'RED LINE' thrice.

WHY didn't Obama ACT the first time the line was crossed?

I believe the President and the American media are lying. Again.

Because the UN to this date has never ever said Assad crossed the red line.

I played in the garden a bit but I wanted to get back with this goodie. To at this point in time even try to believe Kerry's so called proof just isn't going to happen.

Well to sane people. Who did Kerry and Obama have on the ground to investigate? What proof do they have?

This is a huge dog and pony show so Mr. Nobel Peace Prize Drone Killer can save face.

U.N. has testimony that Syrian rebels used sarin gas: investigator

GENEVA | Sun May 5, 2013 6:13pm EDT


Reuters) - U.N. human rights investigators have gathered testimony from casualties of Syria's civil war and medical staff indicating that rebel forces have used the nerve agent sarin, one of the lead investigators said on Sunday.

The United Nations independent commission of inquiry on Syria has not yet seen evidence of government forces having used chemical weapons, which are banned under international law, said commission member Carla Del Ponte.

"Our investigators have been in neighboring countries interviewing victims, doctors and field hospitals and, according to their report of last week which I have seen, there are strong, concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof of the use of sarin gas, from the way the victims were treated," Del Ponte said in an interview with Swiss-Italian television.

U.N. has testimony that Syrian rebels used sarin gas: investigator | Reuters

 

[Borillar]

Wow. This is some seriously funny shit.

Bush jails citizens without habeaus corpus, waterboards detainees, spies on tens of millions of Americans, starts two wars, creates a massive new Cabinet level department, grows the size of the federal government, doubles the national debt, and creates a massive new entitlement program. The faux conservatives defended and apoligized for ALL of that shit from beginning to end, while simultaneously screaming for war with Iran.

This very day, the same people ***** and whine about Obama tossing a couple missles at Syria, and tremble over the propsect of an imaginary war in their minds.

This brings hypocrisy to a whole new level.

That may be so. But there are also those of us who were against Bush's wars and excesses that now stand in opposition to this administration going down that same road. I voted for Obama, but now I see him as being very much like Bush. He is continuing the same police state domestic policies and is pursuing the same aggressive foreign policies as Bush.

Isn't 12 years of war enough? Do we have to involve ourselves in every conflict around the world? For once, just let the locals sort out their own problems.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Our country is not going to war, it is not going to invade any country.

It is going to put paid to a dictator, that the far right reactionaries like Vox are supporting in their hatred of that which is good in America. Why they would support commies and Baathists is beyond moral understanding.

There is no correlation of Iraq and Syria. One involved "shock and awe" and 400,000 troops for a decade; the other selected strikes against Syrian leadership and gas dump storage units.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Isn't 12 years of war enough? Do we have to involve ourselves in every conflict around the world? For once, just let the locals sort out their own problems.

That can happen after the strikes and our withdrawal. The French appear to be ready to put boots on the ground. I am not sure how I feel about that. Once Assad is dead, let them duke it out.

 

[Trajan]

Meet our new Allies folks.....

WARNING: VIDEO VERY GRAPHIC!

This is an article and you don't have to view the video

*WATCH* US backed Syrian rebels behead Christian bishop (NSFW)

unreal...

 

[francoHFW]

BS- nobody is going to put boots on the ground, we know where the rockets came from and landed, and what happened when they landed, and listened to Syrians generals talking about it. This will be an air strike, and no one will be killed except maybe some Syrians.

 

[tinydancer]

You obviously don't: the implications is that WWIII is far more likely if Assad is not taken down.

Bullshit. Assad has never flown planes into American buildings. Assad has never fought American soldiers.

But AQ has and AQ Syria is strong and powerful.

What it wasn't good enough to take out Mubarak and give Egypt to Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood?

Do you really need to jake it up and give jihadists Syria? You need to **** up the world some more?

Obama giving Syria to Al Qaeda on a silver platter for all the world to see. Unreal.

And piss off that they are just nobodies. Here's a left wing source for you.

Al Qaeda's affiliate in Syria, Jabhat al-Nusra, is generally acknowledged to be the most effective force fighting al-Assad.
Peter Bergen


Its fighters are willing to sacrifice themselves for the cause, are widely viewed as uncorrupt and are not involved in looting as other opposition forces are. A number of them are battle-hardened from other conflicts such as the Iraq War.

Al Qaeda's Syrian affiliate is also well supplied as it benefits from the support of Sunni ultra-fundamentalists in the wealthy Gulf states such as Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

Jabhat al-Nusra, which means the "Victory Front," was listed as a foreign terrorist organization by the U.S. State Department in December and is essentially a splinter organization of al Qaeda in Iraq.

Opinion: Al Qaeda's potent force in Syria - CNN.com

 

[Politico]

You Rightyloons are desperate aren't you.

 

[francoHFW]

Meet our new Allies folks.....

WARNING: VIDEO VERY GRAPHIC!

This is an article and you don't have to view the video

*WATCH* US backed Syrian rebels behead Christian bishop (NSFW)

unreal...

Correct. Not our rebels, BS Pub propaganda, dupe.

 

[JakeStarkey]

TD, yes, it is good and sufficient to strike Assad; no, it is not going to start WWIII; yes, it is good the children of Syria will get a better chance this way.