Black conservatives not welcome @ annual naacp convention

[WheelieAddict]

Old ex hippie riot! Take to the streets! Gonna make a difference! lmao

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

The self-victimizers are the far right as espoused by M.D. above: reactionary losers the lot of them.

. . . the statist bootlick, that fascist pig, JakeStarkey simpered.

You can't even define fascism or statism, or that I fit into either category.

But you certainly do follow The Big Lie tactics of Goebbels and Streicher.

The difference between statism and fascism?! You idiot.

What's the difference between socialism and statism?

What's the difference between positive rights and negative rights?

Never mind. The point is flying right over your head.

The Big Lie, eh? Sort of like how the term liberal has been usurped in the parlance of popular culture to refer to you bootlicking socialists/communists?

That Big Lie?

The nonsense that the fascism of Nazi Germany was a rightwing ideology, when in fact it was a leftwing ideology that originated in Italy under Mussolini, a former Marxist who turned national socialist, admired by American progressives: Woodrow Wilson, Richard Washburn Child, Wallace Stevens, H.G. Wells, Samuel McClure, W.E.B. Du Bois, FDR. . . .

That Big Lie?

Hitler, Mussolini, Roosevelt - Reason.com

By the way, the Hegelian historical dialectic is the philosophical foundation of both communism and fascism, leftwing ideologies that eschew historical liberalism, dumbass.

And what's that other term you statists use? Oh, that's right progressive. Yeah. The progressive march of cultural Marxism toward that totalitarian dystopia: the egalitarianism of mediocrity . . . er . . . the expansion of "freedoms" . . . er . . . the expansion of governmentally imposed positive rights . . . er . . . the artificial normalization of the lunatic fringe at the expense of free-association and private property . . . er . . . the tyranny of mob rule or the strong man raised by the mob . . . er . . . collectivism . . . er . . . the subversion of natural and constitutional law . . . er . . . the universal suppression of inalienable human rights. . . .

That Big Lie?

But don't let me interrupt your delusions. By all means, carry on.

Lefty will never understand anything about the rights of others but for the business end of a loaded gun pointed at his stupid head. But, of course, he really doesn't want to take our guns. . . . Another Big Lie! Perhaps the most cynical of all: one told to suggest that the defenders of the right to keep and bear arms are just being paranoid. LOL! See there, Goebbels, Jr. . . . er . . . JakeStarkey. We get it. We see right through your Big Lie. You political sociopaths are pretty transparent, really.

You're just another thug who has no problem with the prospect of the government fining or jailing a Christian photographer or baker . . . and for what exactly? Refusing to take part in a pagan ritual? Inalienable rights, anybody? Religious liberty, anybody? They're Christians, you friggin' moron! You brown-shirt jackboot!

"The self-victimizers [of] the far right"? Is that what you said, you fascist pig? Sort of like the Big Lie of the Nazis?

"Shut up, Jew, and bake that cake or else we'll fine you out of business! My boot on your face is all you 'self-victimizers' deserve."

That Big Lie?

"Reactionary losers"? Psst. Dumbass, that is the very same rhetoric spouted by the American progressives/fascists of national socialism in the 1920's and 30's about the classical liberals of their time.

That Big Lie?

Oops. WWII. The Holocaust. The devastation of Europe. More than 60 million dead. Not so cool after all, eh? But you bootlicking statists never learn the lessons of history, do you?

And when the self-victimizers of America, fed up with you pc Nazis, take up arms against you and put you down for the rabid dogs that you are, will they be self-victimizers then, *****?

This is you, Goebbels, Jr.:

In the end, what difference does it make?

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

Was she supposed to hug them? They had a booth there, obviously, so how exactly were they not welcomed? No one bared the doors against them now did they Chicken Little.

The "closed-mind" is one who can't see that yelling at someone because you believe them to be wrong isn't the same thing as "intolerance".

The OP is crying because someone voiced a disagreement with some people from Freedomworks;

those people are supposed to be allowed the special privilege of being uncontested in their views.

Indeed, the OP doesn't get it. The people from Freedomworks are actually making a point about the incoherency and hypocrisy of the leftist's collectivist political ideology, which is all about overthrowing the prerogatives of ideological free-association and private property.

And it is not a "special privilege." The prerogatives of ideological free-association and private property are bottomed on the First Amendment, for crying out loud! We're talking about an inalienable, natural and constitutional right.

 

[Freewill]

VIDEO: Black Conservatives Not Welcome @ Annual NAACP Convention | Conservative Outfitters

Wow what a bunch of closed minded liberals !!!!

Not at all. I would venture to say that if a group of Liberals went into a highly-charged Republican convention or organization and tried to sway them to go over to the Democratic side they too would more than likely be kicked out. That was the whole premise here and I agree with the lady NAACP rep who was talking to those two people who told them they were not welcome. And again, there can be no doubt that if the tables were turned around, a Liberal would not be welcomed at a Conservative function to try to sway their members into going to their side. End of story.

Clearly you have now shown us that the black vote is considered a lock by the liberal left. NAACP does not have liberal or democrat in its name. The point of this thread, in my opinion, is that a group that is suppose to help minorities, thus the name, only toes one line and that line is very questionable in if they do help.

 

[LeftofLeft]

White Liberals are for Black Civil Rights......provided blacks vote the way white Liberals tell them too. The NAACP is a shining example of this.

 

[Immanuel]

VIDEO: Black Conservatives Not Welcome @ Annual NAACP Convention | Conservative Outfitters

Wow what a bunch of closed minded liberals !!!!

Not at all. I would venture to say that if a group of Liberals went into a highly-charged Republican convention or organization and tried to sway them to go over to the Democratic side they too would more than likely be kicked out. That was the whole premise here and I agree with the lady NAACP rep who was talking to those two people who told them they were not welcome. And again, there can be no doubt that if the tables were turned around, a Liberal would not be welcomed at a Conservative function to try to sway their members into going to their side. End of story.

Did you think she was a NAACP Rep? I thought she was just a convention goer who was speaking her mind. It didn't seem to me that she was attempting to kick them out. She was just expressing her point of view that they did not belong there. She was rude in how she cut the other lady off, but that is neither here nor there. I am sure that was just her style. She didn't care what the other ladies' point of view was. All she cared about was expressing her own. Kind of like what goes on around here.

I also agree with what others said on the first page of the thread. It doesn't matter what side of the political spectrum we are talking about, someone will always take offense if the other side is represented.

 

[Ibentoken]

The race industry in America is totally leftist. Sick shit.

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

VIDEO: Black Conservatives Not Welcome @ Annual NAACP Convention | Conservative Outfitters

Wow what a bunch of closed minded liberals !!!!

Wow.

Another ridiculous rightwing thread, another inane non-issue, another hasty generalization fallacy.

Wow. Just wow.

Sort of like the latest rash of hysteria of violating the free-association of Christian bakers and photographers, eh? The violation of religious liberty and property rights? Yeah. You're one of those toolss who argues that fagots may legitimately violate the rights of Christians, that fagots may legitimately impose their morality on others. Homofascism.

Hasty generalization fallacy? LOL! It's funny how you leftist thugs get it when the tables are turned. What label should we pin on your guff?

Oh, wait, I've got one:

That's the whole point the conservatives in the video are making, Clayton. The silliness of A imposing itself on B as it cries victimhood. Ideological free-association. It's an inalienable right. Remember? And the point flew right over your head.

The fact that the OP doesn't get it is irrelevant.
___________________________

By the way, let's take look at that other rash of Nazi hysteria running amok within the rank and file of the Big Lie that is Progressivism, the reemergence of the anti-Semitic left in Europe and America:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/media/367066-msnbc-propaganda-arm-of-hamas-2.html#post9510868

http://www.usmessageboard.com/media/367066-msnbc-propaganda-arm-of-hamas-2.html#post9510084

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/366101-israel-defends-itself-31.html#post9505424

 

[ClosedCaption]

But so much as hinting that you disagree with obama on any policy or process is, right?

In your head? yes

Reality?No

Go tell eric holder.

Eric Holder doesnt live in your head tho

 

[JQPublic1]

White Liberals are for Black Civil Rights......provided blacks vote the way white Liberals tell them too. The NAACP is a shining example of this.

So, you are against Black civil rights? You want Blacks to vote for people that think like you?
You are absolutely insane; literally.

 

[JQPublic1]

Again...why do you think they should go away?

Again, because they are useless complainers who are unrepentant hypocrites who use an anachronistic word in their moniker, a word, if used by anyone else would be roundly condemned by these same hypocritical bastards.

Also, for the reason that they call each other "brother" and "sister" as long as the political views are similarly racist and virulently anti-white and anti-conservative.

They are nothing but the black, hateful and racist version of the Ku Klux Klan.

Sounds like the Tea Party. It is funny though, how idiots think someone disagreeing with them is racist. Their is nothing anti-white about the NAACP. anti-conservative perhaps...anti-white, no.

. Nutz, these zealots are dangerous idiots. They have lost touch with reality and are now manufacturing "facts" from hunches. Although
the NAACP was founded by Republican Whites, and whites are still involved as members, the consensus among many,if not most Teapers , is that the organization is anti-White.
Heck, the NAACP isn't even anti-conservative IMHO. A closer look reveals conservative values far more noble than those posited by pseudo-conservatives on the Right