Black conservatives not welcome @ annual naacp convention

[JQPublic1]

NAACP is short for National Association for Advancement of Colored People.

First of all, why do these hypocrites still have the word "COLORED" in their name??

If anyone referred to the President as "COLORED" that person would be condemned as racist, yet these bunch of hypocrites get away with their hypocrisy, scot free.

Second: Is a black person who has a conservative mindset not a "COLORED" person?

Third: Is the advancement of "COLORED" people the exclusive purview of Democrats? Are there no Republican "COLORED" people who might have intentions to advance "COLORED" people? Do all conservative "COLORED" people strive to keep the "COLORED" people from advancing?

Fourth: How has the NAACP has succeeded, so far, advancing "COLORED" people?

Fifth: Is the NAACP in support of shakedown artist so-called Reverend Jesse Jackson? Or the promoter of racial hatred and unrepentant Tawna Browley apologist so-called Reverend Al Sharpton?

Sixth: Is the NAACP supporting the so called Reverend whose name no one should remember, who referred to a duly elected United States Senator as a ventriloquist dummy?

Finally: Why is still there an NAACP with a "COLORED" President in the White House?

Why do you think the NAACP should go away?

Why do you think that a useless collection of never-do-well complainers who use an anachronistic and out-of-date and OFFENSIVE word like COLORED in the name of their organization, with a COLORED President, a COLORED Attorney General and more COLORED people in ALL government institutions than numbers would warrant, should still exist.

When used by whites, "people of color" usually carries a friendly and respectful connotation, but should not be used as a synonym for black; it refers to all racial groups that are not white.

 

[Nutz]

So according to you this organization shouldnt have any ideas or a mission statement. This is the only organization in the world that shouldnt have beliefs but should just accept everything thrown at them? Again the only reason you think they should is because you think they should.

Sure theres more than one solution but that doesnt mean that they have to accept any and everyone who is black just because they're black. Unless you are now advocating for that. Are you?



Again, they do they simply dont agree with everyone all the time. Just like every single person living or dead. How unfair of all of us....err...I mean, How unfair of the NAACP ONLY? *growl*




Dont forget the southern strategy

In your own words, what is the goal or mission of the NAACP.

Whatever they want it to be which also affords them to right to disagree with people who happen to be black also.

Why does this organization have to be the only one of its kind to accept every idea from everybody regardless if they agree or not?

But it is an organization for minorities...are you saying there should be monolithic thought. The reason I asked what is the goal of the NAACP -

Is it an organization to elect officials or is it an organization to pool resources and minds to better minority communities. I personally believe they would accomplish more apolitically than politically.

 

[Bush92]

Why do you think the NAACP should go away?

Why do you think that a useless collection of never-do-well complainers who use an anachronistic and out-of-date and OFFENSIVE word like COLORED in the name of their organization, with a COLORED President, a COLORED Attorney General and more COLORED people in ALL government institutions than numbers would warrant, should still exist.

When used by whites, "people of color" usually carries a friendly and respectful connotation, but should not be used as a synonym for black; it refers to all racial groups that are not white.

Black liberal (like all liberals) are closed minded to other views. However, White liberals are condescending and narcissistic. Black liberals do not take their eye off the prize. Political power. They also use the race card effectively to cast conservatives as villains, with suburban White liberals supporting them as if it's the 1960's civil rights movement all over again. Let's them throw off their dysfunctional White guilt, like when they voted for Obama. Feel good vote. Then they could go to Starbucks and talk about supporting Obama in public and thus pronounce to the world, "Hey look at me...I'm not racist!"

 

[ClosedCaption]

In your own words, what is the goal or mission of the NAACP.

Whatever they want it to be which also affords them to right to disagree with people who happen to be black also.

Why does this organization have to be the only one of its kind to accept every idea from everybody regardless if they agree or not?

But it is an organization for minorities...are you saying there should be monolithic thought. The reason I asked what is the goal of the NAACP -

No but I have yet to hear why they should accept views they disagree with just because you think they should be different than everyone else

Is it an organization to elect officials or is it an organization to pool resources and minds to better minority communities. I personally believe they would accomplish more apolitically than politically.

Those are one in the same you cant seek to improve communities and ignore the politicians who will be in charge of those communities

 

[JakeStarkey]

Oh, whine whine.

The far right reactionary weirdos in the GOP would block the mainstream Republicans they call RINOs, so they are unhappy they are being clobbered on by the rest of the party.

The far right whines about how others threat them as they treat others.

 

[Pheonixops]

Why do you think that a useless collection of never-do-well complainers who use an anachronistic and out-of-date and OFFENSIVE word like COLORED in the name of their organization, with a COLORED President, a COLORED Attorney General and more COLORED people in ALL government institutions than numbers would warrant, should still exist.

When used by whites, "people of color" usually carries a friendly and respectful connotation, but should not be used as a synonym for black; it refers to all racial groups that are not white.

Black liberal (like all liberals) are closed minded to other views. However, White liberals are condescending and narcissistic. Black liberals do not take their eye off the prize. Political power. They also use the race card effectively to cast conservatives as villains, with suburban White liberals supporting them as if it's the 1960's civil rights movement all over again. Let's them throw off their dysfunctional White guilt, like when they voted for Obama. Feel good vote. Then they could go to Starbucks and talk about supporting Obama in public and thus pronounce to the world, "Hey look at me...I'm not racist!"

I'm a Liberal, show me a post of mine on this thread that demonstrates that I am "closed minded" . Making inaccurate blanket generalizations only gets your point across to mouth breathing low information voters who are mental midgets and thrive on the "no think" blanket generalizations.

 

[Nutz]

Whatever they want it to be which also affords them to right to disagree with people who happen to be black also.

Why does this organization have to be the only one of its kind to accept every idea from everybody regardless if they agree or not?

But it is an organization for minorities...are you saying there should be monolithic thought. The reason I asked what is the goal of the NAACP -

No but I have yet to hear why they should accept views they disagree with just because you think they should be different than everyone else

You don't have to accept dissenting views but you should listen. If the goal is the same, you should entertain their ideals. Otherwise, you are no better than a racist teaper!

Those are one in the same you cant seek to improve communities and ignore the politicians who will be in charge of those communities

That is if you believe the government should handle issues that are better suited for individual communities...we have different political ideologies...that is fine, but in the end...the NAACP should not solely be a haven for democrats of color. It should celebrate diversity and success within the parameters of its function...to socially and economically advance people of color.

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

VIDEO: Black Conservatives Not Welcome @ Annual NAACP Convention | Conservative Outfitters

Wow what a bunch of closed minded liberals !!!!

Well, to be sure, lefty has no principles worth talking about, and he's a closed-minded lout. But why would a conservative wish to join the NAACP? Why should its leftist members welcome a conservative?

Free-association.

But here's the real irony. This loudmouth galoot, like the leftists on this thread, suddenly, out of nowhere, understands the concept of free-association!

What is lefty's agenda? Why, it's the utter annihilation of the prerogatives of free-association and private property via the impositions of the state on those individuals or enterprises that don't share lefty's ideology!

Behold lefty's magical thinking.

Leftists are political sociopaths.

 

[ClosedCaption]

But it is an organization for minorities...are you saying there should be monolithic thought. The reason I asked what is the goal of the NAACP -

No but I have yet to hear why they should accept views they disagree with just because you think they should be different than everyone else

You don't have to accept dissenting views but you should listen. If the goal is the same, you should entertain their ideals. Otherwise, you are no better than a racist teaper!

Those are one in the same you cant seek to improve communities and ignore the politicians who will be in charge of those communities

That is if you believe the government should handle issues that are better suited for individual communities...we have different political ideologies...that is fine, but in the end...the NAACP should not solely be a haven for democrats of color. It should celebrate diversity and success within the parameters of its function...to socially and economically advance people of color.

It does all those things the problem isnt the NAACP its your perception of the NAACP.

When did they ever shut someone down with opposing views? Never. Yet you believe that they have when really all that it is is that they disagree with them. But you think they should entertain the ideas anyway....Why? You dont know but the NAACP should be the only Org to do that? Again why? You dont know

Sorry but just because someone agrees with the issues one party champions doesnt mean they are against the other guys or hate them.

Thats just republicans crying that no one likes them so they say the teacher was mean instead of looking at their own responsibility in it

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

Was she supposed to hug them? They had a booth there, obviously, so how exactly were they not welcomed? No one bared the doors against them now did they Chicken Little...

it's called fauixrage. if someone doesn't buy her BS, then they are meanies and she's being victimized.

I think she gets paid by the hour for that.

Shut up, jillian. Your mindless hypocrisy is showing again. Better zip that up.

These pundits are merely pulling on lefty's chain. They're not demanding that the government effectively overthrow the NAACP's political charter.

They're not demanding that Christian organizations or businesses, for example, except pagans as members or participate in pagan rituals.

That's statist thugs like you all day long, crying, "I'm a victim. Come Big Daddy government and beat them down for me. Violate their natural and constitutional rights for me."

Like I said leftists are political sociopaths.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The self-victimizers are the far right as espoused by M.D. above: reactionary losers the lot of them.

 

[M.D. Rawlings]

The self-victimizers are the far right as espoused by M.D. above: reactionary losers the lot of them.

. . . the statist bootlick, that fascist pig, JakeStarkey simpered.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The self-victimizers are the far right as espoused by M.D. above: reactionary losers the lot of them.

. . . the statist bootlick, that fascist pig, JakeStarkey simpered.

You can't even define fascism or statism, or that I fit into either category.

But you certainly do follow The Big Lie tactics of Goebbels and Streicher.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

VIDEO: Black Conservatives Not Welcome @ Annual NAACP Convention | Conservative Outfitters

Wow what a bunch of closed minded liberals !!!!

Wow.

Another ridiculous rightwing thread, another inane non-issue, another hasty generalization fallacy.

 

[Unkotare]

The "closed-mind" is one who can't see that yelling at someone because you believe them to be wrong isn't the same thing as "intolerance".

But so much as hinting that you disagree with obama on any policy or process is, right?

In your head? yes

Reality?No

Go tell eric holder.

 

[AntiParty]

VIDEO: Black Conservatives Not Welcome @ Annual NAACP Convention | Conservative Outfitters

Wow what a bunch of closed minded liberals !!!!

Supporters of gun control laws welcome at NRA conventions? Are gay groups welcome at CPAC?

Actually, guns aren't allowed at NRA conventions.

 

[AntiParty]

"controlling the conversation" is a funny tactic. The people that control it by yelling or cutting off individuals always think they win the debate. Fox news 101.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Was she supposed to hug them? They had a booth there, obviously, so how exactly were they not welcomed? No one bared the doors against them now did they Chicken Little.

The "closed-mind" is one who can't see that yelling at someone because you believe them to be wrong isn't the same thing as "intolerance".

The OP is crying because someone voiced a disagreement with some people from Freedomworks;

those people are supposed to be allowed the special privilege of being uncontested in their views.

 

[tinydancer]

"controlling the conversation" is a funny tactic. The people that control it by yelling or cutting off individuals always think they win the debate. Fox news 101.

I don't have television but last I saw a couple of years back the News department of FOX never cut anyone off.

Are you meaning their political talk shows?

 

[tinydancer]

Was she supposed to hug them? They had a booth there, obviously, so how exactly were they not welcomed? No one bared the doors against them now did they Chicken Little.

The "closed-mind" is one who can't see that yelling at someone because you believe them to be wrong isn't the same thing as "intolerance".

The OP is crying because someone voiced a disagreement with some people from Freedomworks;

those people are supposed to be allowed the special privilege of being uncontested in their views.

Last time I rioted was against a dude called LBJ. Last time I rioted was against democrats becoming a militarized entity. Last time I rioted was against an unfair war brought on by circumstance but put pedal to the metal by a D to placate those who put him in power.

Last time I rioted seems like yesterday. I think it is now time to pull my ass out of my happy life and start to riot again.



Its a rush to stand for what you beleive in. To stand against a line of of them. It is time to bring back power to the people.