Biden's Pandemic Relief Plan Cut Taxes For Most Americans. Not A Single Republican Voted For It.

Wow, you should really cut back on the faux niwz. It's warping your brain.
which part was faux niwz?

ALL OF IT. IT'S NOT THE DEMOCRATS THAT HAVE BROUGHT THE COUNTRY TO THIS LOWEST POINT SINCE THE GREAT DEPRESSION. IT'S 40 YEARS OF REPUBLICAN TAX, LABOUR AND ECONOMIC POLICIES.

FOR THE PAST 100 YEARS, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS BEEN CLEANING UP THE ECONOMIC MESSES OF REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATIONS.
Every republican administration ends in a recession.
Demofks don’t know economics

Are you seriously suggestinig that Republicans are the party of fiscal responsibility????? How many economic crashes have Democratic policies resulted in?????

Which 2 Presidents have had the best stock market, best employment numbers, lowest illegal immigration, no economic crashes, in the last 40 years?
red herring. President can't pass a budget or set taxes he can only recommend or veto what legislators have passed. To compare properly you must compare who was in control of the Congress at the time and come economies that way. Not who was President.
It really not a red herring. The president's economic team puts together the budget.
 
Last edited:
Wow, you should really cut back on the faux niwz. It's warping your brain.
which part was faux niwz?

ALL OF IT. IT'S NOT THE DEMOCRATS THAT HAVE BROUGHT THE COUNTRY TO THIS LOWEST POINT SINCE THE GREAT DEPRESSION. IT'S 40 YEARS OF REPUBLICAN TAX, LABOUR AND ECONOMIC POLICIES.

FOR THE PAST 100 YEARS, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS BEEN CLEANING UP THE ECONOMIC MESSES OF REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATIONS.
Every republican administration ends in a recession.
Demofks don’t know economics

Are you seriously suggestinig that Republicans are the party of fiscal responsibility????? How many economic crashes have Democratic policies resulted in?????

Which 2 Presidents have had the best stock market, best employment numbers, lowest illegal immigration, no economic crashes, in the last 40 years?
red herring. President can't pass a budget or set taxes he can only recommend or veto what legislators have passed. To compare properly you must compare who was in control of the Congress at the time and come economies that way. Not who was President.

Clinton balanced the budget by raising taxes and the minimum wage in the first year of his first term, over the HOWLS of the Republicans who predicted gloom and doom. Republicans look on in horror as unemployment, dropped, the economy grew at it's fastest pace since Reagan was elected, and the stock market took off. Republicans passed the balanced budget, but it was Clinton's tax increase, and the economic boom which followed his raising the minimum wage, which raised government revenues and made the balance budget possible.
It was the balanced budget that did it in spite of Clinton.

The budget didn't balance itself, fool. The budget balanced because Clinton increased revenues.


Yet the debt increased every year wild willie was in office, go figure.

.
 
What's even more popular than raising taxes on corporations and wealthy individuals? Cutting them for everyone else, which is exactly what Democrats already did through the stimulus checks and tax credits featured in their $1.9 trillion pandemic relief package.

According to new estimates from congressional forecasters, Democratic tax cuts for low- to middle-income earners included in President Joe Biden's relief plan could mean that people making less than $75,000 on average will pay nothing in federal income taxes this year.


I guess there wasn't enough trickle down recipients for Biden's tax cuts, to get Republicans on board.
Pay NOTHING?

How can you demand equal representation for taxation if you PAY NO TAXES?

EVERYONE should have some skin in the game.

So you agree that Amazon needs to pay taxes!!!
 
Wow, you should really cut back on the faux niwz. It's warping your brain.
which part was faux niwz?

ALL OF IT. IT'S NOT THE DEMOCRATS THAT HAVE BROUGHT THE COUNTRY TO THIS LOWEST POINT SINCE THE GREAT DEPRESSION. IT'S 40 YEARS OF REPUBLICAN TAX, LABOUR AND ECONOMIC POLICIES.

FOR THE PAST 100 YEARS, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS BEEN CLEANING UP THE ECONOMIC MESSES OF REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATIONS.
Every republican administration ends in a recession.
Demofks don’t know economics

Are you seriously suggestinig that Republicans are the party of fiscal responsibility????? How many economic crashes have Democratic policies resulted in?????

Which 2 Presidents have had the best stock market, best employment numbers, lowest illegal immigration, no economic crashes, in the last 40 years?
red herring. President can't pass a budget or set taxes he can only recommend or veto what legislators have passed. To compare properly you must compare who was in control of the Congress at the time and come economies that way. Not who was President.
It really a red herring. The president's economic team puts together the budget.


The president can propose a budget, congress is supposed to come up with one as well.

.
 
Wow, you should really cut back on the faux niwz. It's warping your brain.
which part was faux niwz?

ALL OF IT. IT'S NOT THE DEMOCRATS THAT HAVE BROUGHT THE COUNTRY TO THIS LOWEST POINT SINCE THE GREAT DEPRESSION. IT'S 40 YEARS OF REPUBLICAN TAX, LABOUR AND ECONOMIC POLICIES.

FOR THE PAST 100 YEARS, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS BEEN CLEANING UP THE ECONOMIC MESSES OF REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATIONS.
Every republican administration ends in a recession.
Demofks don’t know economics

Are you seriously suggestinig that Republicans are the party of fiscal responsibility????? How many economic crashes have Democratic policies resulted in?????

Which 2 Presidents have had the best stock market, best employment numbers, lowest illegal immigration, no economic crashes, in the last 40 years?
red herring. President can't pass a budget or set taxes he can only recommend or veto what legislators have passed. To compare properly you must compare who was in control of the Congress at the time and come economies that way. Not who was President.

Clinton balanced the budget by raising taxes and the minimum wage in the first year of his first term, over the HOWLS of the Republicans who predicted gloom and doom. Republicans look on in horror as unemployment, dropped, the economy grew at it's fastest pace since Reagan was elected, and the stock market took off. Republicans passed the balanced budget, but it was Clinton's tax increase, and the economic boom which followed his raising the minimum wage, which raised government revenues and made the balance budget possible.
It was the balanced budget that did it in spite of Clinton.

The budget didn't balance itself, fool. The budget balanced because Clinton increased revenues.
You'll never get them to understand that.
 
Wow, you should really cut back on the faux niwz. It's warping your brain.
which part was faux niwz?

ALL OF IT. IT'S NOT THE DEMOCRATS THAT HAVE BROUGHT THE COUNTRY TO THIS LOWEST POINT SINCE THE GREAT DEPRESSION. IT'S 40 YEARS OF REPUBLICAN TAX, LABOUR AND ECONOMIC POLICIES.

FOR THE PAST 100 YEARS, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS BEEN CLEANING UP THE ECONOMIC MESSES OF REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATIONS.
Every republican administration ends in a recession.
Demofks don’t know economics

Are you seriously suggestinig that Republicans are the party of fiscal responsibility????? How many economic crashes have Democratic policies resulted in?????

Which 2 Presidents have had the best stock market, best employment numbers, lowest illegal immigration, no economic crashes, in the last 40 years?
red herring. President can't pass a budget or set taxes he can only recommend or veto what legislators have passed. To compare properly you must compare who was in control of the Congress at the time and come economies that way. Not who was President.

Clinton balanced the budget by raising taxes and the minimum wage in the first year of his first term, over the HOWLS of the Republicans who predicted gloom and doom. Republicans look on in horror as unemployment, dropped, the economy grew at it's fastest pace since Reagan was elected, and the stock market took off. Republicans passed the balanced budget, but it was Clinton's tax increase, and the economic boom which followed his raising the minimum wage, which raised government revenues and made the balance budget possible.
It was the balanced budget that did it in spite of Clinton.

The budget didn't balance itself, fool. The budget balanced because Clinton increased revenues.
The budget balanced because the Republicans limited spending within spending limits.
 
Wow, you should really cut back on the faux niwz. It's warping your brain.
which part was faux niwz?

ALL OF IT. IT'S NOT THE DEMOCRATS THAT HAVE BROUGHT THE COUNTRY TO THIS LOWEST POINT SINCE THE GREAT DEPRESSION. IT'S 40 YEARS OF REPUBLICAN TAX, LABOUR AND ECONOMIC POLICIES.

FOR THE PAST 100 YEARS, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS BEEN CLEANING UP THE ECONOMIC MESSES OF REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATIONS.
Every republican administration ends in a recession.
Demofks don’t know economics

Are you seriously suggestinig that Republicans are the party of fiscal responsibility????? How many economic crashes have Democratic policies resulted in?????

Which 2 Presidents have had the best stock market, best employment numbers, lowest illegal immigration, no economic crashes, in the last 40 years?
red herring. President can't pass a budget or set taxes he can only recommend or veto what legislators have passed. To compare properly you must compare who was in control of the Congress at the time and come economies that way. Not who was President.
It really not a red herring. The president's economic team puts together the budget.
and it goes where?
 
Biden's Pandemic Relief Plan Cut Taxes For Most Americans. Not A Single Republican Voted For It.

If you actually believe that, then you're exactly the kind of ignorantly idiot who vote for these crooks.

Take a look at the source—Daily Kos. Just from that alone, anyone with a vestige of intelligence and awareness knows to assume that whatever the article claims is complete bullshit; and that's even without having the basic grasp of mathematics and economics to recognize the lies for what they are on that basis.
 
We will pay for those stimulous checks by having cost of goods go up in price. Wages in Florida have gone up from 10 an hour to 20 an hour for the same job trying to get employees. while it might seem to be a good thing it means cost of goods go up too.

How does stimulus checks and the cost of goods going up relate to each other? This is really a puzzling claim.

As for wages going up and the cost of goods going as a result, this is like the oldest republican talking point ever. The market dictates whether the price of goods goes up. Has anyone been to a restaurant any time lately? Prices for meals have skyrocketed even when wages for servers are literally next to nothing. Are wages dictating how much you're being charged for a plate of spaghetti? Prices for groceries have also shot up like crazy, despite minimum wage laws being stagnant for 20 years. NEWSFLASH, prices for goods have been going up dramatically for many years now!!
 
Nowhere is Trumpsters' arrogant ignorance more on display than on mathematics and economics.
So you're a fan of Impaired Joe's Six Trillion Dollar economic suicide pact (speaking of arrogant
ignorance)? Such ironic stupidity...though I should be glad the left cannot handle responsibility worth
a fuck!

The sooner the Biden clown show leaves office the better.
 
Nowhere is Trumpsters' arrogant ignorance more on display than on mathematics and economics.
So you're a fan of Impaired Joe's Six Trillion Dollar economic suicide pact (speaking of arrogant
ignorance)? Such ironic stupidity...though I should be glad the left cannot handle responsibility worth
a fuck!

The sooner the Biden clown show leaves office the better.
As a 21-year financial advisor and CFP, 7/63/65, CLU/ChFC, I not only have to soberly and honestly analyze this stuff 24/7/365, I also have to act on it by investing my clients' life savings and retirement dollars in the most informed and educated ways possible.

I don't have the luxury of half-inch deep thinking and one-sided partisan bullshitting. I leave that to people like you. I always have to look big picture, and I don't make stupid assumptions and extrapolations when I know how complicated this stuff is.

Trumpian arrogant ignorance is a stain on this country's history.
 
What's even more popular than raising taxes on corporations and wealthy individuals? Cutting them for everyone else, which is exactly what Democrats already did through the stimulus checks and tax credits featured in their $1.9 trillion pandemic relief package.

According to new estimates from congressional forecasters, Democratic tax cuts for low- to middle-income earners included in President Joe Biden's relief plan could mean that people making less than $75,000 on average will pay nothing in federal income taxes this year.


I guess there wasn't enough trickle down recipients for Biden's tax cuts, to get Republicans on board.

Trump already cut our taxes. Biden got rid of it.

Taxing any Corp or person making $400,000 thousand or more isn't going to get him the money he needs for his many bull shit plans. He will raise taxes on all once he finds out he won't get the money he thinks he will get.

Oh and there wasn't much relief in that bill. There was a plan for we tax payers to bail out Union pension funds and there was also loads of pork in that bill.

His infrastructure bill has 5% of it for actual infrastructure repair, the rest is pure damn de pork which we tax payers will pay for.

I doubt his "tax" cuts will do much for we tax payers.
Trump's approach, contrary to what he campaigned on, was to weight his tax cut to the top 1% and more so top 1%, and pay for it with more deficit dollars.

Biden's plan is to cut taxes weighted towards those households making 150k or less, and he wants to pay for it by raising taxes on households making over $500,000. Now he may not have the revenue in his plan to pay for both tax cuts and new spending, but his plan is EXACTLY what he ran, and won, on.

Personally, I'm not thrilled with either, but unlike 2016 I can say I knew exactly what I'd see from either candidate on both civil behavior and fiscal policy. I'm not thrilled about some of the social spending. For example even in Poor Miss, a kid can go to community college with no tuition if his parents are barely above poverty and he/she makes a 3.0 in HS. In Ga they have the "Hope Scholarships" that are even better. But again a kid has to make the grades to get the money
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top