Biden is on TV lying and Blaming Republicans For Everything

3,000 illegals PER DAY are flooding across the border and Biden has ordered them released into our communities after 72 hours without Covid testing. :oops: And they just caught a dozen Iranians trying to sneak in with the hordes :oops:
Unless you can provide a viable link, it is fair to suspect you are a lying piece of shit.

Here you uninformed moron Biden administration’s CBP revives ‘catch and release’ policy at border amid COVID concerns | Fox News
He was quick to call you a liar. I guess he was so inclined to act like a child he could not do a quick search on "border crossings 3,000."

He probably won't like your Fox link. Here is Yahoo...


The lib can't defend allowing thousands of untested potentially Covid infected illegals to flood into the USA daily so it opted for denial. Then I bitch slapped him.
 
Maybe it is the need to try and offset in a small part the large amount of lies that they democrats lie to themselves, each other and the world in general.
I think the final count was that Trump told over 35,000 lies.
And your point is?
You said the democrats tell a large number of lies. Compare that number to 35,000 and get back to me.
So democrats are serious? So when they tell everyone that they want to blowup the White House they actually mean it? We should have put them in jail for threats to naion. I could go on but we both know that democrats lie if they open their mouth. Remember Shiffty Shiff Claiming he had irrefutable proof? Remember that whopper of Guam tipping over? You want to compare one to millions?
 
Name one that resonates with you, please.
That he won bigger in 2020 than he did in 2016.
That he was re-elected president in 2020
Thanks. That's debatable. Since all the evidence has not really been adjudicated, the world may never know what the truth is. Most lawsuits were dismissed on technicalities like "lack of standing" or not being "timely."
Actually the bulk of lawsuits were dismissed because of lack of evidence. Or lawyers refusing to allege "voter fraud" in front of the judge.

You're confused because they spewed fraud, fraud, fraud, on the courthouse steps. But once they got inside, they refused to allege voter fraud.

Rudy Giuliani famously comes to mind, since they released the audio of his appearance outside, and then inside the federal court he filed suit in.
 
Why do you republicans lie to yourselves?
In deep blue areas there will be no improvement in inner city neighborhoods anymore. the me system has plateaued for many years. A percentage get out of it. Changes are needed. Keeping the status quo with endless government payments is a prolonged death sentence to the time the system fails.
 
3,000 illegals PER DAY are flooding across the border and Biden has ordered them released into our communities after 72 hours without Covid testing. :oops: And they just caught a dozen Iranians trying to sneak in with the hordes :oops:
Infect a few. Send them into hispanic communities. Praise nature. In fact, why stop with covid?
 
3,000 illegals PER DAY are flooding across the border and Biden has ordered them released into our communities after 72 hours without Covid testing. :oops: And they just caught a dozen Iranians trying to sneak in with the hordes :oops:
Unless you can provide a viable link, it is fair to suspect you are a lying piece of shit.

Here you uninformed moron Biden administration’s CBP revives ‘catch and release’ policy at border amid COVID concerns | Fox News
You should read your own links. The link you posted doesn't support your lies. Only gives speculations and opinions by former Trump officials.
 
3,000 illegals PER DAY are flooding across the border and Biden has ordered them released into our communities after 72 hours without Covid testing. :oops: And they just caught a dozen Iranians trying to sneak in with the hordes :oops:
Unless you can provide a viable link, it is fair to suspect you are a lying piece of shit.

Here you uninformed moron Biden administration’s CBP revives ‘catch and release’ policy at border amid COVID concerns | Fox News
You should read your own links. The link you posted doesn't support your lies. Only gives speculations and opinions by former Trump officials.

The former DHS Secretary told you straight out you blithering idiot. I bitch slapped you into next week with that link. :talk2hand:
 
So democrats are serious? So when they tell everyone that they want to blowup the White House they actually mean it? We should have put them in jail for threats to naion.
You make a good point, but didn't realize it. The proof of incitement isn't just by judging the words, as some words may sound inciteful but result in no action being taken. While innocent sounding words can cause the crowd to commit insurrection. The proof is in the pudding, not in the recipe.
 
Name one that resonates with you, please.
That he won bigger in 2020 than he did in 2016.
That he was re-elected president in 2020
Thanks. That's debatable. Since all the evidence has not really been adjudicated, the world may never know what the truth is. Most lawsuits were dismissed on technicalities like "lack of standing" or not being "timely."
Actually the bulk of lawsuits were dismissed because of lack of evidence. Or lawyers refusing to allege "voter fraud" in front of the judge.

You're confused because they spewed fraud, fraud, fraud, on the courthouse steps. But once they got inside, they refused to allege voter fraud.

Rudy Giuliani famously comes to mind, since they released the audio of his appearance outside, and then inside the federal court he filed suit in.
I don't think you were following them very closely....

"How have pro-Trump lawsuits been disposed of?
The lawsuits — some filed by Trump’s lawyers and some by separate pro-Trump entities — have fallen short for a couple of different reasons, legal experts said. In fact, “most of the suits suffered from a combination of these problems,” said Barry Richard, a recount attorney in Florida.

Lawsuits that were filed too late. One suit in Pennsylvania targeted a 2019 law that allowed no-excuse absentee ballots in the state. The court, in its ruling dismissing the suit, said the plaintiffs should have been challenged well before the election, rather than after millions of such votes had been cast.


Cases that were dismissed for other procedural reasons. In a Michigan Supreme Court case, petitioners were dissatisfied with the decision of the Board of State Canvassers to declare a winner, but the state supreme court ruled that it had no jurisdiction to review that decision. “It is irresponsible to continue holding out the possibility of a judicial solution to a political dispute that needs to be resolved with finality,” wrote Justice Elizabeth T. Clement.

And in Georgia, Judge Timothy Batten, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, ruled that a lawsuit filed by Sidney Powell, a former Trump lawyer, belonged in state court and was too far-reaching.

“Federal courts are of limited jurisdiction; they are not the legal equivalent to medical hospitals which have emergency rooms that are open 24/7 to all comers,” he said. “In their complaint, the plaintiffs essentially asked the court for perhaps the most extraordinary relief ever sought in any federal court in connection with an election.”

Cases where courts said that alleged violations, even if true, shouldn’t be remedied by canceling votes. This issue came into play with some pro-Trump lawsuits that challenged how much access observers had to the ballot-counting process. Procedural issues, courts decided, “don’t automatically lead to the conclusion that ballots were cast illegally,” said Richard Pildes, a New York University law professor.

In Wisconsin, Supreme Court Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote that a request from a voters’ group to invalidate the entire election would be “unprecedented in American history.”

“This petition falls far short of the kind of compelling evidence and legal support we would undoubtedly need to countenance the court-ordered disenfranchisement of every Wisconsin voter,” Hagedorn wrote.

And Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, said in dismissing one Pennsylvania challenge: “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

Cases where courts rejected lawsuits on the merits. Courts in several cases rejected the idea that what was being alleged amounted to a violation of state or federal law."


This was before the Texas lawsuit, which I thought had the best merits. It was also dismissed for lack of standing...

 
You should read your own links. The link you posted doesn't support your lies. Only gives speculations and opinions by former Trump officials.
The former DHS Secretary told you straight out you blithering idiot. I bitch slapped you into next week with that link. :talk2hand:
The former DHS secretary know shit about what is happening now that he's out of office. He can only speculate as to what's happening.

Which BTW is what Camp told you. But you don't listen.
 
Cases where courts said that alleged violations, even if true, shouldn’t be remedied by canceling votes.

In Wisconsin, Supreme Court Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote that a request from a voters’ group to invalidate the entire election would be “unprecedented in American history.”

This petition falls far short of the kind of compelling evidence and legal support we would undoubtedly need to countenance the court-ordered disenfranchisement of every Wisconsin voter,” Hagedorn wrote.

And Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, said in dismissing one Pennsylvania challenge: “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”
Thanks for making my case.

But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

This petition falls far short of the kind of compelling evidence and legal support we would undoubtedly need to countenance the court-ordered disenfranchisement of every Wisconsin voter,”
 
The 'Great American Apocalypse' continues to unfold.

73BAEDB2-FA9E-425F-9C6D-CE1F03E3B6E4.png
 
3,000 illegals PER DAY are flooding across the border and Biden has ordered them released into our communities after 72 hours without Covid testing. :oops: And they just caught a dozen Iranians trying to sneak in with the hordes :oops:
Unless you can provide a viable link, it is fair to suspect you are a lying piece of shit.

Here you uninformed moron Biden administration’s CBP revives ‘catch and release’ policy at border amid COVID concerns | Fox News
You should read your own links. The link you posted doesn't support your lies. Only gives speculations and opinions by former Trump officials.

The former DHS Secretary told you straight out you blithering idiot. I bitch slapped you into next week with that link. :talk2hand:
You provided a speculative opinion piece from a less than reliable source. Do you know what the word speculative means? Your article is speculation of what may happen in the future in the opinion of a partisan biased person and has absolutely nothing to do with President Biden lying. during his press conference. You are simply deflecting away from my original point that you incompetent fools and morons have not found a single thing President Biden lied abour during his press conference.
 

Forum List

Back
Top