Biden EPA gave a $20 million grant to his own "environmental justice" adviser WHILE SHE WAS STILL WORKING FOR HIM

[martybegan]

Then it’s even more obvious he doesn’t have the constitutional ability to do so.

Until I see a SC case saying otherwise, neener neener mouth breather

 

[Marener]

Until I see a SC case saying otherwise, neener neener mouth breather

So you guys think the president now owns the power of the purse.

If you get the SC to agree, then it’s just proof that the constitution is meaningless.

 

[Marener]

The moderates and lefties on the court in Sebelius modified the rules to protect ******* Obamacare, and you used that as an example you dumb shit.

They didn’t modify the rules, dipshit.

Can Congress coerce state governments to change their laws with spending power? Only if Republicans do it.

 

[protectionist]

. State and local governments are perfectly within their rights to tell those entities under their jurisdiction what they can and can’t do.

FALSE! They cannot tell their police to not comply with ICE, nor can they order their police to

NOT detain or continue to detain any individual solely on

the basis of any immigration detainer or non-judicial

immigration warrant or otherwise comply with an immigration

detainer or non-judicial immigration warrant, thereby constituting a violation of US Code 8 Section 1324.

 

[martybegan]

So you guys think the president now owns the power of the purse.

If you get the SC to agree, then it’s just proof that the constitution is meaningless.

Then Congress needs to write far more specific laws directing funding to specific things. Not just "fund agency X" and let the bureaucrats figure it out.

All Trump has been doing is taking advantage of the open ended laws passed by congress saying "we fund this" without any details.

 

[martybegan]

They didn’t modify the rules, dipshit.

Can Congress coerce state governments to change their laws with spending power? Only if Republicans do it.

They do it with Title IX fucktard, do you support that?

 

[Marener]

They cannot tell their police to not comply with ICE,

Why can't they? The police work for them and are therefore under their jursidiction. You think the police are a higher authority than the government elected by the people?

 

[Foxfyre]

The article made no case or reference to state and local governments violating any laws.

I can say they’re following the law by pointing out that no legitimate case exists that they are breaking it.

The facts are quite clear that you are incapable or unwilling to provide any verifiable example of any problem to anybody being caused by the current Trump Administration other than the loss of jobs of unnecessary and/or inefficient, ineffective, incompetent or corrupt federal employees. And I will add loss of illicit benefits to probably a lot of deep state offiicials.

 

[Marener]

They do it with Title IX fucktard, do you support that?

I just want one rule to apply and not changing the rules to suit Republican political agenda.

I don't think that's asking too much.

 

[protectionist]

Perhaps you could explain exactly how they are abiding by USC 1324.

He could explain how they are NOT doing that, but that wouldn't fit in with his absurd, BS agenda.

 

[martybegan]

I just want one rule to apply and not changing the rules to suit Republican political agenda.

I don't think that's asking too much.

Nice dodge there, dickless.

 

[Marener]

The facts are quite clear that you are incapable or unwilling to provide any verifiable example of any problem to anybody being caused by the current Trump Administration other than the loss of jobs of unnecessary and/or inefficient, ineffective, incompetent or corrupt federal employees. And I will add loss of illicit benefits to probably a lot of deep state offiicials.

It appears you responded to the wrong post as this has nothing to do with our discussion.

 

[Marener]

Nice dodge there, dickless.

I don't know all the peculiarities, but the funding and the policy have to be related. Do they not?

 

[Foxfyre]

In this country, the accuser has to explain exactly how they’re violating the law.

Which several have done and you have yet to provide even a rationale for why they are wrong about that.

 

[protectionist]

That is the subject.

Are you claiming state and local governments can’t pass laws about what the state and local law enforcement can do? Don’t be absurd.

OF COURSE state and local governments can’t pass laws about what the state and local law enforcement cannot do, when that is in conflict with US federal law.
As in the case of US Code 8, Section 1324 (and other US laws)

 

[Delldude]

How do they “hinder” ICE? Be specific because it matters.

This count?

 

[protectionist]

In this country, the accuser has to explain exactly how they’re violating the law.

I've repeatedly done that in this thread, which you laughably pretend is not the case.

Incoming Border Czar: Sanctuary-City Dems Could Be Prosecuted If They Obstruct Trump’s Enforcement of Immigration Law | National Review

Tom Homan drew attention to federal law making it a felony to harbor illegal aliens.

www.nationalreview.com

 

[martybegan]

I don't know all the peculiarities, but the funding and the policy have to be related. Do they not?

Feds fund local law agencies to enforce laws, they don't feel like doing it, they don't get funding.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Maraner is a subverted demoralized zombie.
Any information or opinions that go against its programming it cannot comprehend. No matter what amount of true verified facts presented they will always be rejected by this insect minded troll.
It is a complete waste of time and effort to argue with this pos, and is best ignored.
Just scroll on by.

 

[berg80]

This is the type of blatant, in your face corruption communist and Democrat dictatorships are known for.

Be sure to get back to us when you have evidence of corruption.