Biden EPA gave a $20 million grant to his own "environmental justice" adviser WHILE SHE WAS STILL WORKING FOR HIM

[Foxfyre]

Homan can say whatever he wants, it’s irrelevant.

How do they “hinder” ICE? Be specific because it matters.

This article is pretty specific in how they hinder ICE:

The Unacceptable Risk Sanctuary Cities Pose for Public Safety

The consequences of sanctuary policies extend far beyond the ideological debate surrounding immigration enforcement. These policies enable criminal networks to make communities more dangerous.

www.governing.com

Example from article:
". . .Sanctuary cities hinder ICE’s ability to apprehend and remove people who pose threats to American communities. Consider the crimes committed by the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, or TdA. Many people have seen the video of TdA terrorizing an apartment in Aurora, Colo. This transnational criminal organization, which President Joe Biden’s administration placed sanctions on last year, has ties to human trafficking, drug trafficking and money laundering. . ."

 

[Marener]

Then again, they can do without federal funding for law enforcement in general.

The precedent for that is well set. The Feds did that to force States to comply with the 21 year old drinking age or forfeit road funds or comply with Title IX or forfeit education funds.

First, it'll take a law passed by Congress. Lord Trump can't do it unilaterally.

Somehow the conservative judges on SCOTUS changed the rules when it came to Medicaid expansion. Funny how they like changing the rules whenever it suits them.

 

[Nostra]

This article is pretty specific in how they hinder ICE:

The Unacceptable Risk Sanctuary Cities Pose for Public Safety

The consequences of sanctuary policies extend far beyond the ideological debate surrounding immigration enforcement. These policies enable criminal networks to make communities more dangerous.

www.governing.com

He won’t grasp any of that.

 

[martybegan]

Good luck with that. Putting contingencies on federal funding after the fact is not constitutional. See the ACA and Medicaid expansion.

I answered your point in my next post.

 

[Marener]

This article is pretty specific in how they hinder ICE:

They're not hindering. They're merely refusing to help ICE.

There's a difference. Words have meanings.

 

[martybegan]

First, it'll take a law passed by Congress. Lord Trump can't do it unilaterally.

Somehow the conservative judges on SCOTUS changed the rules when it came to Medicaid expansion. Funny how they like changing the rules whenever it suits them.

The laws passed in the past 40 years have been so ambiguous the deep state and dems have used them to make their own rules.

Now Trump is just doing the same thing, and rightly so as the elected President.

 

[Foxfyre]

They're not hindering. They're merely refusing to help ICE.

There's a difference. Words have meanings.

You didn't read the article did you.

 

[martybegan]

They're not hindering. They're merely refusing to help ICE.

There's a difference. Words have meanings.

And you have a dick constantly in your mouth.

 

[Marener]

I answered your point in my next post.

National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius

Congress can't use spending power to coerce states.

 

[Marener]

You didn't read the article did you.

Did you?

 

[Marener]

The laws passed in the past 40 years have been so ambiguous the deep state and dems have used them to make their own rules.

Now Trump is just doing the same thing, and rightly so as the elected President.

Trump doesn't care about the laws. He thinks he is the law.

 

[protectionist]

Your attempt to make a distinction is irrelevant. The local government has authority to direct their employees how they may and may not behave in their official capacity. If the local government says that they will not cooperate with ICE, they are perfectly entitled to.

All your doing here is blabbering a bunch of meaningless jibberish, that I guess somehow makes you feel good.
Frankly, I'm not interested, and have become quite bored with your going nowhere posts.

 

[Marener]

All your doing here is blabbering a bunch of meaningless jibberish, that I guess somehow make you feel good.
Frankly, I'm not interested, and have become quite bored with your going nowhere posts.

All you do is keep repeating the same unsupported claims about "harboring, concealing" illegal aliens which is idiotic. I've addressed them and that appears to have seriously triggered you.

 

[protectionist]

Trump doesn't care about the laws. He thinks he is the law.

His job is to enforce them, and he's doing that.

 

[Marener]

His job is to enforce them, and he's doing that.

Apparently he thinks he writes them too.

 

[protectionist]

All you do is keep repeating the same unsupported claims about "harboring, concealing" illegal aliens which is idiotic. I've addressed them and that appears to have seriously triggered you.

You've addressed nothing but your own subjective, contorted view of this whole thing, designed to do nothing but make you feel good (until the prosecutions begin)

 

[Foxfyre]

Did you?

Yes I did. I don't post anything I don't read.

 

[otto105]

This is the type of blatant, in your face corruption communist and Democrat dictatorships are known for.

Thank you, DOGE, for uncovering the MASSIVE money-laundering and corruption we endured for the past 4 years (and beyond).

Okay fuckups, what was the grant and what was it used for?

 

[Nostra]

They're not hindering. They're merely refusing to help ICE.

There's a difference. Words have meanings.

See.

 

[protectionist]

They're not preventing federal authorities from doing anything.

They just don't have to help them.

Of course they are. The Illinois sanctuary law I posted shows that as clear as day. Police are being REQUIRED to not comply with ICE.