Biden DOJ Sides with Porn Industry's Lawsuit Against Texas's Age Verification Law

You're making my point. We restrict the freedoms of assembly and speech because we're protecting children.
Where? You don't have a right to be on school grounds unless you have business there. Just because it's named Public School doesn't mean its open to the public to wonder on in. You do have a right to express yourself freely in public though, even if you're KKK and there are kids around.
 
No it isn't. It's well documented rulings.
You're not blocking the sidewalk if you simply stand in one spot. You'd be blocking it if you had 50 people clustered around you and no one could get past. Why is that even significant? You would not be blocking access to a school if you had 50 people with a loudmouth that left an open space for others to walk through.
 
What doe age verification entail?

Clicking yes or no?

Typing your birth date?

How dumb do you think these kids are?
 
There's something wrong with anyone thinking it's okay for children to have access to pornography
 
You're not blocking the sidewalk if you simply stand in one spot.

Which is legal as an individual. You are just swinging hoping to hit upon something.


You'd be blocking it if you had 50 people clustered around you and no one could get past. Why is that even significant? You would not be blocking access to a school if you had 50 people with a loudmouth that left an open space for others to walk through.

Find an example. You're "what if's" are a complete waste of time. First they were in front of the doors, now they aren't. What next?
 
Where? You don't have a right to be on school grounds unless you have business there. Just because it's named Public School doesn't mean its open to the public to wonder on in. You do have a right to express yourself freely in public though, even if you're KKK and there are kids around.
Heck, we infringe on the 1st even when already born kids are not around. Try to protest inside the buffer zone around an abortion clinic, on the public sidewalk.
 
Which is legal as an individual. You are just swinging hoping to hit upon something.




Find an example. You're "what if's" are a complete waste of time. First they were in front of the doors, now they aren't. What next?
What exactly are you opposing here? Is the 1st sufficient grounds to strike down efforts to limit children's access to pron?
 
What exactly are you opposing here? Is the 1st sufficient grounds to strike down efforts to limit children's access to pron?

Meaningless. Sadly the court will likely uphold the law. It's going to do nothing to actually address the issue though. It will be "give an inch, take a mile though".
 
When they're at school, they're out of their parents' control. Are you advocating for homeschooling?
Why are you giving your kids smart phones in the first place if you’re that worried?

They do not need one
 
They argued back when the Supreme Court tossed this before that it's up to the parents to monitor kids, not the state's.

As noted, some clamor for a nanny state.
So we should stop stores from requiring ID to buy cigarettes and alcohol?
 
15th post
When they're at school, they're out of their parents' control. Are you advocating for homeschooling?

Homeschooling is up to the parents. I wouldn't actually advocate for anything here as it's not my call for others.
 
Heck, we infringe on the 1st even when already born kids are not around. Try to protest inside the buffer zone around an abortion clinic, on the public sidewalk.
You don't have a first amendment right to physically intimidate people. That's what those laws are restricting.
 
And, again, how is this age verification even supposed to be effective?

Don’t you kinda think a horny kid might just lie? Come on….
 
Back
Top Bottom