Biden DOJ admits they haven't prosecuted a single person for illegally protesting outside SCOTUS justices' homes

[Marener]

Do you like it in your mouth or up your ass?

Authoritarians like you always want to stick their noses in other people’s business.

GFY

 

[Marener]

I see. So you're an anarchist.

No. I’m a constitutionalist.

So were our founders.

 

[BS Filter]

No. I’m a constitutionalist.

So were our founders.

So am I. I also am a law and order person. You're not.

 

[Marener]

Wait, i thought you guys wanted to prosecute Trump for telling people to riot.

I don’t want to do that.

Although incitement has a long history in common law but actually really hard to prosecute.

 

[Marener]

So am I. I also am a law and order person. You're not.

You’re a jack booted authoritarian. The constitution protects us from people like you.

 

[BS Filter]

You’re a jack booted authoritarian. The constitution protects us from people like you.

By "us", do you mean Black Lives Matter and Antifa?

 

[Marener]

By "us", do you mean Black Lives Matter and Antifa?

No. I mean you proto-fascists.

At least the constitution should protect us unless you get your fellow proto-fascists to control the courts too.

 

[BS Filter]

No. I mean you proto-fascists.

At least the constitution should protect us unless you get your fellow proto-fascists to control the courts too.

What's a "proto-fascist"?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Cool story.

Moroner, that is not a story! It was a fucking fact!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Many were beaten. It’s on video. But you think it’s okay to beat police because they were trained to be beaten.

There wasn’t any mob wearing Biden hats beating police for Biden. There’s a mob wearing Trump hats beating police for Trump.

How many were charged with assaulting a police officer?

 

[Marener]

How many were charged with assaulting a police officer?

A lot. Go count.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

They should only revisit cases that were clearly wrongly decided, like Plessy. Where the constitution was deliberately ignored.

There was no good reason to revisit Roe. Expecially after Kavanaugh, Gorsuch and Barrett all said it was the law of the land.

What was unConstitutional about Plessy when the case was decided?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

They should only revisit cases that were clearly wrongly decided, like Plessy. Where the constitution was deliberately ignored.

There was no good reason to revisit Roe. Expecially after Kavanaugh, Gorsuch and Barrett all said it was the law of the land.

It was at the time. Fortunately, it is no longer.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The people said no.
The people said no.
The people said no.

The Constitution said "yes", dumbass!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It hasn't functioned well. Other than the times it shits the bed and puts in someone who the people didn't want (I haven't even discussed JQ Adams and Benjamin Harrison, who were also pretty bad), it distorts democracy.

Instead of presidential candidates focusing on the good of the whole country, they focus on winning over a few swing states. If you lived in MS or IL, you barely knew a presidential election was going on in 2020. All the action happened in the five states that decided it, plus a couple others where Biden or Trump thought they had a chance of flipping. So really, we only had an election in 10 states. Why is Ethanol still a thing? Because we need to keep those corn farmers in Iowa happy.

That in turn, depresses the national vote. Only 66% of eligible voters voted in 2020. No reason why you should. In 2020, I went out and voted. But Biden was going to win IL, no matter what I did, Dick Durbin had token opposition that year, and my Congressman didn't even draw a Republican opponent. (The Libertarian racked up 20% of the vote from the usual inbreds who didn't want to vote for the guy with the funny Indian name.)

It has institutionalized the two party system by making it impossible for a third party to get any traction. Why? because at the end of the day, even though third parties poll well (Perot in 1992, Anderson in 1980) at the end of the day, people know that they aren't going to win. At best, they'll toss the election into congress. And we all whine every year about how we had to choose the lesser of two evils. (Except 2016, when some of you said, "Fuck it, go with the greater evil". )

It disenfranchises voters of color by giving more weight to predominately white states. Which is why the GOP has been about "White Grievance" since 1968. Trump just cranked it up to 11.

What on God's green earth led you to that idiotic conclusion?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

nope, that's not what the principles of a Democracy is. When people clearly reject someone, that should be the end of the story.

Thank God we are NOT a democracy!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Protesting on public property is protected by the first amendment.

Protesting in front of SCOTUS's homes is protected by law. Don't like the law, get yourself arrested and challenge the law!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I know they wrote a law against it.

That law is plainly unconstitutional.

I don’t believe in authoritarian fascist laws.

Who wrote a law against it?

 

[Marener]

Protesting in front of SCOTUS's homes is protected by law. Don't like the law, get yourself arrested and challenge the law!

The law is discriminatory.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Nope.

Trump supporters hold rally outside Georgia secretary of state's home

Trucks flying Trump and "Stop the Steal" flags drove up and down the street honking their horns outside of Secretary Brad Raffensperger's property.

www.fox5atlanta.com

It’s cool to intimidate Georgia’s Secretary of State if you’re conservative.

He's not a SCOTUS justice, is he?