Biden demands ban on ‘assault weapons,’ high-capacity magazines in first speech to Congress

[Open Bolt]

Wrong. You do not have a right to carry a firearm if you’re a convicted felon. You don’t have a right to posses firearm in a public place that informs to stipulated gun free areas by state, local and federal decree.
You don’t even have a right to go anywhere and say anything* you want in a private place without permission. You can’t practice many of your rights in my domicile if I don’t want you to. It’s quite simple. My rights supercede yours in many cases.

Those are not examples of conflicting rights. Those are examples of things that are not even covered by rights.

Also, non-violent felons do have the right to carry guns. Hopefully soon the Supreme Court will start enforcing that.

 

[Flash]

Now that the stupid Canadians have given up their arms we can go in with our AR-15s and take all their maple syrup and there won't be a damn thing they can do about it.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Also, non-violent felons do have the right to carry guns. Hopefully soon the Supreme Court will start enforcing that.

Actually, it depends on the state where the person committed the felony. According to federal law, no, a felon cannot have a gun. As far as state laws? Depends on the state, and what the felon did, as well as what they do after their conviction. If the felony is pardoned or overturned, they can get their guns back in some cases.

 

[Dagosa]

Those are not examples of conflicting rights. Those are examples of things that are not even covered by rights.

Also, non-violent felons do have the right to carry guns. Hopefully soon the Supreme Court will start enforcing that.

Huh ? Where in the 2@ does it say you can’t have a firearm if you are a 13 year old. Where does it say violent felons can’t have guns. Obviously, other then the 2a which you seem to know nothing* about, you've never read the constitution or SC majority opinions.


Now you’re hoping convicted drug traffickers, car jacking conspirators and child porn traffickers can carry AR15 and conceal handguns, as they are all non violent crimes. Silly comments.

 

[Dagosa]

Those are not examples of conflicting rights. Those are examples of things that are not even covered by rights.

Also, non-violent felons do have the right to carry guns. Hopefully soon the Supreme Court will start enforcing that.

Convicted felons of non violent crimes have shown a poor lack of judgement and distain for the rest of society. Someone steals my money from the vender including the Govt I depend on, should never have a gun legally he could defend himself from the next arrest. It’s stooped we should allow any non violent larceny bad check writer for monies he uses on drugs and theft. The NRA had convicted criminals as their leader. That anyone should support felons having firearms shows a lack of good judgment that should deny them their right to have a firearm either.

Now that the stupid Canadians have given up their arms we can go in with our AR-15s and take all their maple syrup and there won't be a damn thing they can do about it.

Canadians can be well armed. You really don’t know their gun laws do you.

Canadians are well armed. Guess you never read their firearm laws.

 

[Flash]

Canadians are well armed. Guess you never read their firearm laws.

Trudeau's objective is for them to only have single shot hunting rifles that they have to keep at a hunting lodge or range. No match for our semi auto ARs with high capacity magazines.

We will feast on their Maple Syrup and fuck their fat women!

 

[Dagosa]

Trudeau's objective is for them to only have single shot hunting rifles that they have to keep at a hunting lodge or range. No match for our semi auto ARs with high capacity magazines.

We will feast on their Maple Syrup and fuck their fat women!

Let’s see the gun law....you’re just making up shit now. How much wildlife carry AR15 to shoot people do you need to defend yourself from in Canada. You guys are absolutely nuts.

 

[Flash]

Let’s see the gun law....you’re just making up shit now.

That is what the asshole was talking about in the press conference he had a few days ago.

He was going to expand what firearms are illegal to include almost everything except low capacity hunting rifles and who can have them and where they have to be kept and how they can be used. Despicable isn't it?

The sonofabitch said that gun ownership is not a right but a privilege of the fucking government and you must earn that privilege and be significantly restricted in what the privilege affords you.

They are even going to make the citizens turn in their semi auto rifles and that is pretty damn shitty.

Yea, we will be able to take their Maple Syrup if we want. A nation of pussies led by a fucking Communist.

 

[Dagosa]

That is what the asshole was talking about in the press conference he had a few days ago.

He was going to expand what firearms are illegal to include almost everything except low capacity hunting rifles and who can have them and where they have to be kept and how they can be used. Despicable isn't it?

The sonofabitch said that gun ownership is not a right but a privilege of the fucking government and you must earn that privilege and be significantly restricted in what the privilege affords you.

They are even going to make the citizens turn in their semi auto rifles and that is pretty damn shitty.

Yea, we will be able to take their Maple Syrup if we want. A nation of pussies led by a fucking Communist.

Let’s see a reference. Got any proof this is what he said or any legislation he proposed ?

 

[Who_Me?]

Now that the stupid Canadians have given up their arms we can go in with our AR-15s and take all their maple syrup and there won't be a damn thing they can do about it.

That is what the asshole was talking about in the press conference he had a few days ago.

He was going to expand what firearms are illegal to include almost everything except low capacity hunting rifles and who can have them and where they have to be kept and how they can be used. Despicable isn't it?

The sonofabitch said that gun ownership is not a right but a privilege of the fucking government and you must earn that privilege and be significantly restricted in what the privilege affords you.

They are even going to make the citizens turn in their semi auto rifles and that is pretty damn shitty.

Yea, we will be able to take their Maple Syrup if we want. A nation of pussies led by a fucking Communist.

For what purpose do you need high capacity magazines and semi auto rifles?

 

[Flash]

Let’s see a reference. Got any proof this is what he said or any legislation he proposed ?

Here you go Sport

 

[Flash]

For what purpose do you need high capacity magazines and semi auto rifles?

1. Recreational purposes

2. Self defense

3. Security of a free state

By the way, the Bill of Rights doesn't require that a citizen demonstrate a need to keep and bear arms.

You also don't have the right to tell me what I can and cannot do based upon your demented idea of a need.

 

[Dagosa]

Here you go Sport

Hey sport…..they aren‘t required to give up their handguns. It’s called a freeze ? Thre is no mention of semI auto hunting rifles being banned, just mag caps. . Why ?
Because the gun laws are so laxed here, that Maine which( has stooopid gun laws supplied weapons for Canada’s worse mass shooting. We export guns used in crimes to both Canada and Mexico at an alarming rate. Canadians can easily travel to Maine, search for unrestricted firearms on line, then transfer them to Canada anywhere in 3000 miles of woods.

 

[Dagosa]

1. Recreational purposes

2. Self defense

3. Security of a free state

By the way, the Bill of Rights doesn't require that a citizen demonstrate a need to keep and bear arms.

You also don't have the right to tell me what I can and cannot do based upon your demented idea of a need.

All of this shit is made up crappolla.
Security of a free state ? laughable.
None of your rights are absolute, none, nada nix. Just being a citizen of the US guarantees NOTHING except your ability to GET QUALIFIED.
Geesus, you have to show your license and proof of age to buy beer dingbat. You can’t live anywhere you want without a permit, proof of legality. You can’t even go to some public places without being search dufus.

 

[Who_Me?]

1. Recreational purposes

2. Self defense

3. Security of a free state

By the way, the Bill of Rights doesn't require that a citizen demonstrate a need to keep and bear arms.

You also don't have the right to tell me what I can and cannot do based upon your demented idea of a need.

You don’t need high capacity magazines or semi automatic for those reasons.

 

[Flash]

All of this shit is made up crappolla.
Security of a free state ? laughable.
None of your rights are absolute, none, nada nix. Just being a citizen of the US guarantees NOTHING except your ability to GET QUALIFIED.
Geesus, you have to show your license and proof of age to buy beer dingbat. You can’t live anywhere you want without a permit, proof of legality. You can’t even go to some public places without being search dufus.

Shall not be infringed comes as close to being absolute as it possibly could be. Liberals just don't ever seem to understand what that means, do they?

Scalia said that it is not absolute but he never defined what he meant. I suspect that his definition and the definition of Liberal anti gun nuts would be miles apart.

Can you show me in the Bill of Rights where I have to get qualified in order to keep and bear arms? I have read it hundreds of times for the life of me I don't remember seeing it.

 

[Flash]

You don’t need high capacity magazines or semi automatic for those reasons.

 

[Who_Me?]

View attachment 653951

Well I want a bazooka but I can’t legally get one. Why not?

 

[Flash]

Well I want a bazooka but I can’t legally get one. Why not?

Because there are assholes in this country that infringes upon the Constitutions and they get away with it.

Hopefully this New York court case the Supremes are ruling on will stop a lot of the infringements by requiring that the right to keep and bear arms be subject to the same strict scrutiny as all the other individual rights in the Bill of Rights.

Actually you can own a bazooka but it is impossible to get the rockets for it.

You can own a tank.

You can own an artillery piece.

You can own a jet fighter.

I own a machine gun.

You can't own a nuclear weapon because that is restricted by the NRC.

 

[Who_Me?]

Because there are assholes in this country that infringes upon the Constitutions and they get away with it.

Hopefully this New York court case the Supremes are ruling on will stop a lot of the infringements by requiring that the right to keep and bear arms be subject to the same strict scrutiny as all the other individual rights in the Bill of Rights.

Actually you can own a bazooka but it is impossible to get the rockets for it.

You can own a tank.

You can own an artillery piece.

You can own a jet fighter.

I own a machine gun.

You can't own a nuclear weapon because that is restricted by the NRC.

That wasn’t the answer I was looking for. Your reply makes me wonder what is going on in that brain of yours.