Biden demands ban on ‘assault weapons,’ high-capacity magazines in first speech to Congress

That wasn’t the answer I was looking for. Your reply makes me wonder what is going on in that brain of yours.
We have no idea what the hell goes through the mind of Liberals that are hell bent on taking away our Constitutional right to keep and bear arms, do we?

It isn't safety because gun laws are only adhered to by those that had no intentions of breaking a law. Crooks ignore the law.

It has to be that Liberals look at the Constitutional right to keep and bear arms as an impediment to making this country a Socialist shithole. We have seen it in other Leftest regimes that deprive their citizens of Liberty. It is the cornerstone of Leftest to do away with the ability of the citizens to oppose Leftest tyranny.

You can vote in Socialism but you have to shoot your way out. Taking away the right to keep and bear arms takes away the ability of the citizens to shoot their way out, doesn't it? We see it all the time in other countries, don't we?
 
For what purpose do you need high capacity magazines and semi auto rifles?
"Need" is serf speak. Americans are not serfs.

We buy high capacity magazines and semi-auto rifles because we feel like it, and we never justify our choices to anyone.


You don’t need high capacity magazines or semi automatic for those reasons.
We don't have to need them. If we choose to go buy some, we will do so. It doesn't matter if anyone else does not like it.


Well I want a bazooka but I can’t legally get one. Why not?
Because the courts are not enforcing the entire Second Amendment yet.


That wasn’t the answer I was looking for. Your reply makes me wonder what is going on in that brain of yours.
His answer looked pretty good to me.
 
Huh ? Where in the 2@ does it say you can’t have a firearm if you are a 13 year old. Where does it say violent felons can’t have guns.
In the definition of Strict Scrutiny.


Obviously, other then the 2a which you seem to know nothing* about, you've never read the constitution or SC majority opinions.
You are the only person here who doesn't know anything about the Constitution or the courts.


That anyone should support felons having firearms shows a lack of good judgment that should deny them their right to have a firearm either.
Luckily for me I have the NRA to uphold the Constitution and prevent you from violating my civil liberties.


All of this shit is made up crappolla.
No it isn't. People do have guns for recreation. People do have guns for self defense.

There isn't any organized militia in the US because of government neglect, but there are people in Europe who have guns for national defense. Switzerland and Finland come to mind.


None of your rights are absolute, none, nada nix.
Any law that conflicts with a constitutional right is absolutely unconstitutional.


Just being a citizen of the US guarantees NOTHING except your ability to GET QUALIFIED.
Americans have a guaranteed right to keep and bear arms.
 
Actually, it depends on the state where the person committed the felony.
Actually no. The Second Amendment applies equally in all states.


According to federal law, no, a felon cannot have a gun. As far as state laws? Depends on the state, and what the felon did, as well as what they do after their conviction. If the felony is pardoned or overturned, they can get their guns back in some cases.
Those laws are unconstitutional.
 
"Need" is serf speak. Americans are not serfs.

We buy high capacity magazines and semi-auto rifles because we feel like it, and we never justify our choices to anyone.



We don't have to need them. If we choose to go buy some, we will do so. It doesn't matter if anyone else does not like it.



Because the courts are not enforcing the entire Second Amendment yet.



His answer looked pretty good to me.
Another gun toting, paranoid, nut job.
 
You are the only person here who doesn't know anything about the Constitution or the courts.
Obviously I do. According to constitutional law, YOU are not the arbiter of the constitution. It lies in the majority opinions of the SC decisions. Your reading doesn’t mean shit. That you guys never refer to majority opinions is proof positive you’re blowing smoke up your a$$.
 
Obviously I do.
All your untrue statements say otherwise.


YOU are not the arbiter of the constitution. It lies in the majority opinions of the SC decisions.
Appeals to authority are logical fallacies in case you didn't realize that.


Your reading doesn’t mean shit.
Your inability to point out any errors in my arguments says otherwise.


That you guys never refer to majority opinions is proof positive you’re blowing smoke up your a$$.
I seldom refer to majority opinions because I think for myself instead of committing appeal to authority fallacies.

But if you prefer to rely on appeal to authority fallacies, go ahead and refer to Amy Coney Barrett's majority opinion later this month.


No, it lies in the majority of opinion of the SC on firearm related decisions.
That is incorrect. The Second Amendment applies equally in all states.


Every state makes their laws with them in mind.
That is incorrect. States dominated by the left deliberately violate people's civil liberties. Leftists think it's fun to violate people's rights.
 
seldom refer to majority opinions because I think for myself instead of committing appeal to authority fallacies.
Right. I bet you can fix your own cell phone because you can think for yourself. Laughable BS.
 
Actually I've never had a cell phone that even needed repair. I'm not sure if they are designed to be repaired or simply replaced. But if repair is possible I could certainly do it.



Laugh at reality all you want, but it's not BS.
Fear driven conspiracy drivel.
 
That is incorrect. Reality is not a conspiracy. Neither is it driven by fear.

I do not share the opinion that reality is drivel.
Preparing for war with the Govt or the all the non whites replacing you ? How does that work ? Busing ?
 

Forum List

Back
Top