Biden Chief of Staff Promises Mandatory Buy Back of ALL "Assault weapons" - Suppose they do........

[cnm]

How are those 'regulations' working out in Cook County, (aka Chicago)?

No on has questioned the definitions as far as I know.

 

[Auld Phart]

Misunderstand the question?

Not at all. The question was about defining targeted firearms.

and I pointed out that 'defining' them does little to remove them from use, and/or abuse.

 

[freyasman]

Am I willing to shoot the guy who tries to pull this shit, take his driver's license from his corpse, go to his home address and kill every single living thing there, including his goldfish, and then burn down the house?

What a fucking loony. A deplorable, eh?

You all set the terms and the precedents, game too rough for you all of a sudden?

This is what you're asking for, so either suck it up or run, bitch.

 

[xband]

Gerrymandering is legal again.

 

[candycorn]

The thread has no basis in reality.

 

[freyasman]

The thread has no basis in reality.

I'd be tempted to agree except for, you know..... reality.

 

[Nostra]

An exchange is done voluntarily, Stupid.

You don't have to sign your posts, we know who you are.

Your lack of comedic skills is only surpassed by your lack of intellect.

 

[Nostra]

The thread has no basis in reality.

Are you claiming she didn't say what she was quoted as saying?

 

[candycorn]

The thread has no basis in reality.

Are you claiming she didn't say what she was quoted as saying?

I didn't see the quote. She's not the Chief of Staff.

 

[Nostra]

The thread has no basis in reality.

Are you claiming she didn't say what she was quoted as saying?

I didn't see the quote. She's not the Chief of Staff.

Then you need to actually read the OP, or have someone with a double digit IQ read it to you.

And I didn't say she was the COS, Moron.

 

[jc456]

Biden deputy chief of staff touted 'mandatory buybacks' of assault weapons
Jen O’Malley Dillon previously served as Biden’s campaign manager – but before that, she’d worked for Beto O’Rourke

Biden deputy chief of staff touted 'mandatory buybacks' of assault weapons

A few weeks later, O’Malley Dillon appeared in a video, posted on O’Rourke’s YouTube channel, touting the campaign's plan for "mandatory" buybacks of certain firearms, in addition to a new ban on assault-style weapons.

"We are actually the only campaign with a plan…that supports mandatory buybacks of weapons of war,” she says in the video. "An assault weapon ban is very, very important, and we need to have it. But that only takes weapons of war off the streets in the future. It does nothing for weapons of war that are currently out there."

She estimated the mandatory buyback would affect "15 or 16 million" guns.

The question is........what will you do?
Will the Supreme Court intervene?

According to the Constitution, a 'Well Regulated Militia" consists of individuals within the constituency.
There can be no 'Well Regulated Militia" with only muskets, handguns and shotguns.

It's a fairly safe bet at this point that the Radical left will indeed go for this. They've dreamed of this moment of a century.
A mandatory buyback, gun registration, gun taxes and a plethora of other infringements will surely come to be if Biden is sworn in.

View attachment 418471

I think they'd have to define it.

 

[22lcidw]

I dont have an assault rifle.....

I wished the would stop using the term assault rifle. According to the courts, it has no civil meaning. You have to be specific. The law, as written won't pass the first court it comes to. Now, if they rewrite it to what the courts will accept, I will support it. But I won't be turning my neighbor in. But the law would also have to include the correct wording AND the addition to the 1934 Firearms Act.

Progressive Socialist Broads are the downfall of our nation. Most will not bea round in violence situations if their lives are in danger. But they will cause massive death and destruction before they are through. TV however will keep showing dramas and movies of societies with Prog women in power and control and everything going peachy nice. Reality will be much different. You see it in poor areas where Prog women have little real control as the total environment is out of hand. But that is just an aberration the Prog controlled elites do not address.

 

[jc456]

The thread has no basis in reality.

Are you claiming she didn't say what she was quoted as saying?

I didn't see the quote. She's not the Chief of Staff.

and yet you commented. hmmmmmm that's sad.

 

[jc456]

I dont have an assault rifle.....

I wished the would stop using the term assault rifle. According to the courts, it has no civil meaning. You have to be specific. The law, as written won't pass the first court it comes to. Now, if they rewrite it to what the courts will accept, I will support it. But I won't be turning my neighbor in. But the law would also have to include the correct wording AND the addition to the 1934 Firearms Act.

Progressive Socialist Broads are the downfall of our nation. Most will not bea round in violence situations if their lives are in danger. But they will cause massive death and destruction before they are through. TV however will keep showing dramas and movies of societies with Prog women in power and control and everything going peachy nice. Reality will be much different. You see it in poor areas where Prog women have little real control as the total environment is out of hand. But that is just an aberration the Prog controlled elites do not address.

most of these leaders are too weak to defend themselves and why they stack security guards to protect themselves. then they use those resources to make chest pounding statements.

 

[candycorn]

The thread has no basis in reality.

Are you claiming she didn't say what she was quoted as saying?

I didn't see the quote. She's not the Chief of Staff.

and yet you commented. hmmmmmm that's sad.

Its out of context. She is not Biden's chief of staff.

 

[jc456]

How are those 'regulations' working out in Cook County, (aka Chicago)?

No on has questioned the definitions as far as I know.

there is this

McDonald v. City of Chicago - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[jc456]

The thread has no basis in reality.

Are you claiming she didn't say what she was quoted as saying?

I didn't see the quote. She's not the Chief of Staff.

and yet you commented. hmmmmmm that's sad.

Its out of context. She is not Biden's chief of staff.

it was her quote. who cares.

 

[Blues Man]

I dont have an assault rifle.....

I wished the would stop using the term assault rifle. According to the courts, it has no civil meaning. You have to be specific. The law, as written won't pass the first court it comes to. Now, if they rewrite it to what the courts will accept, I will support it. But I won't be turning my neighbor in. But the law would also have to include the correct wording AND the addition to the 1934 Firearms Act.

Let me guess you'd like any and all semiautomatic rifles with detachable magazines to be banned

 

[jc456]

again, isn't this what the Nazi's did?

 

[Blues Man]

We all know Joe doesn't like to pen original things so he'll most likely try to pass the 94 AWB again.

But that law is easy to get around.

as long as a rifle doesn't have 2 or more of these features, it's not defined as an "assault" rifle

• Folding or telescoping stock
• Pistol grip
• Bayonet mount
• Flash hider or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one
• Grenade launcher