Bernie’s World

[Penelope]

We do not want your guns, just the assault weapons and large cartridges. Gee you got it all wrong again.

Large cartridge/mags means anything over one round.
So Muskets are good to go.

10 cartridge mags. If only you men would not have such insane issues.

It appears that the essence of this thread is either too painful or too erudite for you.


Democrats/Liberals attempt to switch topics more frequently than the Kama Sutra recommends.

No issues with it, as most conservatives are mass shooters and male. What does Bernie have to do with this topic about guns.

Check the title, dunce.

It isn't 'guns.'

And here I thought it was about gun control. Bernie is not that interesting. I guess I'm in the wrong thread.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Large cartridge/mags means anything over one round.
So Muskets are good to go.

10 cartridge mags. If only you men would not have such insane issues.

It appears that the essence of this thread is either too painful or too erudite for you.


Democrats/Liberals attempt to switch topics more frequently than the Kama Sutra recommends.

No issues with it, as most conservatives are mass shooters and male. What does Bernie have to do with this topic about guns.

Check the title, dunce.

It isn't 'guns.'

And here I thought it was about gun control. Bernie is not that interesting. I guess I'm in the wrong thread.

Nah.....wrong world.


Get off now.

 

[PoliticalChic]

As often exposed in these posts, all six of these share the same views and desires: Communists, Socialists, Liberals Fascists, Progressives and Nazis.



6. The sociologist Peter Berger explained the resemblance of the New Left campus radicals of the sixties to German and Italian Fascists via the following parallels.

1. Both were without a positive view of the future.
2. Both were simply against their society, against stability, classical liberalism, capitalism, and intellectualism.
3. The Nazis, like the New Left, referred to themselves as the “movement,” and hated the “system.”
4. Both complained that liberal democracy was merely a fraud, and rationality merely a prop for the evil status quo.
5. Both fascists and the New Left had faith in the therapeutic value of violence.
6. Watching on television a group of students chanting “The streets belong to the people,” Berger felt almost a physical shock as he remembered a verse of the Nazi “Horst Wessel Lied”: “Clear the streets for the brown battalions.”
7. There was as well a glorification of youth which was explicit in the anthem of Mussolini’s Italy.
8. Both the fascists and the New Left dehumanized their enemies.
9. While the Nazis referred to Jews as ‘pigs,’ the American radicals used the same terminology for the police.
10. For both there was a “mystical elitism” that made them sure they represented a “general will.” Ironic, in the light of the ‘democratic rhetoric’ of the New Left.
11. And despite its democratic rhetoric, the New Left was not only contemptuous of liberal parliamentary democracy, but “fundamentally contemptuous of any procedures designed to find out what people want for themselves…What this elitism means in practice can be readily grasped by watching the manipulations of any SDS group on an American campus.”

Berger and Neuhaus, “Movement and Revolution,” p. 43-47



How did they get many to ignore this and vote Democrat?

Government schooling.

 

[mudwhistle]

And how is that related to overpopulation?



Have you seen this?

"The entire world population could fit in the state of Texas and it’d only have the population density of New York City!
1. People freak out all the time about how we’re overpopulating Earth and we’re all going to die, because we can’t sustain ourselves. There isn’t enough land to produce enough food to sustain us, let alone have any space to move around at all. There are 6.8 billion people on Earth.
2. Calculations show that if we wanted to make everyone in Earth live on a space that had the same population density as New York City, we could fit everyone in about 666,265 square kilometers, which is less than the size of Texas!
3. Not only does that leave the other 49 United States open, but it leaves all the other countries clear and open, too. So, it is pretty safe to say that we have enough space, the entire world except Texas, to farm and ranch for our food supply.
4. Would water be a problem, though? It's calculated that we need 350 billion liters of water per day to properly hydrate 6.8 billion people. It seems like a lot, but the Columbia River alone could produce that amount in less than a day. By the way, the Columbia River is the U.S.’s fourth largest river. So, again, that leaves the rest of the world’s water supply open and ready to servehttp://www.omgfacts.com/lists/10333/The-entire-world-population-could-fit-in-the-state-of-Texas-and-it-d-only-have-the-population-density-of-New-York-City

"If it comes down to the numbers the entire world’s population can fit in Texas. This has been said many times and when it comes down to basic math, it is true. Texas is 268,581 Square miles, if some amazing engineer were to design the father of all complexes; basically a China housing unit on steroids is the only thing that would work. The building would cover the entire state of Texas. Rivers, ponds, and creeks included; literally every square inch of Texas would be engulfed in this building. There would be one thousand square feet per person." The Entire World Population can Sink into the State of Texas


"According to the U.N. Population Database, the world's population in 2010 will be 6,908,688,000. The landmass of Texas is 268,820 sq mi (7,494,271,488,000 sq ft).

So, divide 7,494,271,488,000 sq ft by 6,908,688,000 people, and you get 1084.76 sq ft/person. That's approximately a 33' x 33' plot of land for every person on the planet, enough space for a town house.

Given an average four person family, every family would have a 66' x 66' plot of land, which would comfortably provide a single family home and yard -- and all of them fit on a landmass the size of Texas. Admittedly, it'd basically be one massive subdivision, but Texas is a tiny portion of the inhabitable Earth." Episode 1: Overpopulation: The Making of a Myth - Overpopulation is a myth


Well, the initial calculation was done by Thomas Sowell in 1984, when the world's population was 4.4 billion.http://www.carlopelanda.com/econaut/...n%20Growth.htm

Quote:

In 1984, it was proven by the economist Thomas Sowell that the entire world population (4.4 billion at the time) could live comfortably in the state of Texas. He wrote “Every human being on the face of the Earth could be housed in the state of Texas in one-story, single-family homes, each with a front and a back yard. A family of four would thus have 6,800 square feet- about the size of the typical middle-class American home with front and backyards.”(Carter 99) According to more recent research on the topic, all of the world’s 1997 population (5.84 billion) could fit on the small Island of Bali in Indonesia.(Stiefel 98)

According to my rough calculations, if we assume a world population of 6.7 billion, all the people in the world could fit into Texas and occupy an area of ~1,118 sq. ft. each.

Typical marxists. Take away the guns. Get your totalitarian on.

We do not want your guns, just the assault weapons and large cartridges. Gee you got it all wrong again.

Large cartridge/mags means anything over one round.
So Muskets are good to go.

10 cartridge mags. If only you men would not have such insane issues.

Ten is the smallest mag they make for an AR-15.
Most semi-auto pistols hold 15.

I want to ban AR15 and do they make 5 cartridges for pistols? That would be fine, gives a bad shot a shooting chance in a home invasion. Hunting rifles are different.

You're just hoping for the day that you can disarm the public and herd them into the killing fields.

 

[Penelope]

10 cartridge mags. If only you men would not have such insane issues.

It appears that the essence of this thread is either too painful or too erudite for you.


Democrats/Liberals attempt to switch topics more frequently than the Kama Sutra recommends.

No issues with it, as most conservatives are mass shooters and male. What does Bernie have to do with this topic about guns.

Check the title, dunce.

It isn't 'guns.'

And here I thought it was about gun control. Bernie is not that interesting. I guess I'm in the wrong thread.

Nah.....wrong world.

Yes as far as I'm aware the pop of the earth is about 7.6 billion plus all the people that do not do a census, so wrong world is right. NOT

There are 6.8 billion people on Earth.

 

[Third Party]

The most recent reports also show that about 783 million people, which are about 10% of the world population, are lacking access to quality drinking water.

And how is that related to overpopulation?



Have you seen this?

"The entire world population could fit in the state of Texas and it’d only have the population density of New York City!
1. People freak out all the time about how we’re overpopulating Earth and we’re all going to die, because we can’t sustain ourselves. There isn’t enough land to produce enough food to sustain us, let alone have any space to move around at all. There are 6.8 billion people on Earth.
2. Calculations show that if we wanted to make everyone in Earth live on a space that had the same population density as New York City, we could fit everyone in about 666,265 square kilometers, which is less than the size of Texas!
3. Not only does that leave the other 49 United States open, but it leaves all the other countries clear and open, too. So, it is pretty safe to say that we have enough space, the entire world except Texas, to farm and ranch for our food supply.
4. Would water be a problem, though? It's calculated that we need 350 billion liters of water per day to properly hydrate 6.8 billion people. It seems like a lot, but the Columbia River alone could produce that amount in less than a day. By the way, the Columbia River is the U.S.’s fourth largest river. So, again, that leaves the rest of the world’s water supply open and ready to servehttp://www.omgfacts.com/lists/10333/The-entire-world-population-could-fit-in-the-state-of-Texas-and-it-d-only-have-the-population-density-of-New-York-City

"If it comes down to the numbers the entire world’s population can fit in Texas. This has been said many times and when it comes down to basic math, it is true. Texas is 268,581 Square miles, if some amazing engineer were to design the father of all complexes; basically a China housing unit on steroids is the only thing that would work. The building would cover the entire state of Texas. Rivers, ponds, and creeks included; literally every square inch of Texas would be engulfed in this building. There would be one thousand square feet per person." The Entire World Population can Sink into the State of Texas


"According to the U.N. Population Database, the world's population in 2010 will be 6,908,688,000. The landmass of Texas is 268,820 sq mi (7,494,271,488,000 sq ft).

So, divide 7,494,271,488,000 sq ft by 6,908,688,000 people, and you get 1084.76 sq ft/person. That's approximately a 33' x 33' plot of land for every person on the planet, enough space for a town house.

Given an average four person family, every family would have a 66' x 66' plot of land, which would comfortably provide a single family home and yard -- and all of them fit on a landmass the size of Texas. Admittedly, it'd basically be one massive subdivision, but Texas is a tiny portion of the inhabitable Earth." Episode 1: Overpopulation: The Making of a Myth - Overpopulation is a myth


Well, the initial calculation was done by Thomas Sowell in 1984, when the world's population was 4.4 billion.http://www.carlopelanda.com/econaut/...n%20Growth.htm

Quote:

In 1984, it was proven by the economist Thomas Sowell that the entire world population (4.4 billion at the time) could live comfortably in the state of Texas. He wrote “Every human being on the face of the Earth could be housed in the state of Texas in one-story, single-family homes, each with a front and a back yard. A family of four would thus have 6,800 square feet- about the size of the typical middle-class American home with front and backyards.”(Carter 99) According to more recent research on the topic, all of the world’s 1997 population (5.84 billion) could fit on the small Island of Bali in Indonesia.(Stiefel 98)

According to my rough calculations, if we assume a world population of 6.7 billion, all the people in the world could fit into Texas and occupy an area of ~1,118 sq. ft. each.

Typical marxists. Take away the guns. Get your totalitarian on.

We do not want your guns, just the assault weapons and large cartridges. Gee you got it all wrong again.

Large cartridge/mags means anything over one round.
So Muskets are good to go.

10 cartridge mags. If only you men would not have such insane issues.

It appears that the essence of this thread is either too painful or too erudite for you.


Democrats/Liberals attempt to switch topics more frequently than the Kama Sutra recommends.

When you said topics, did you mean positions?

 

[PoliticalChic]

And how is that related to overpopulation?



Have you seen this?

"The entire world population could fit in the state of Texas and it’d only have the population density of New York City!
1. People freak out all the time about how we’re overpopulating Earth and we’re all going to die, because we can’t sustain ourselves. There isn’t enough land to produce enough food to sustain us, let alone have any space to move around at all. There are 6.8 billion people on Earth.
2. Calculations show that if we wanted to make everyone in Earth live on a space that had the same population density as New York City, we could fit everyone in about 666,265 square kilometers, which is less than the size of Texas!
3. Not only does that leave the other 49 United States open, but it leaves all the other countries clear and open, too. So, it is pretty safe to say that we have enough space, the entire world except Texas, to farm and ranch for our food supply.
4. Would water be a problem, though? It's calculated that we need 350 billion liters of water per day to properly hydrate 6.8 billion people. It seems like a lot, but the Columbia River alone could produce that amount in less than a day. By the way, the Columbia River is the U.S.’s fourth largest river. So, again, that leaves the rest of the world’s water supply open and ready to servehttp://www.omgfacts.com/lists/10333/The-entire-world-population-could-fit-in-the-state-of-Texas-and-it-d-only-have-the-population-density-of-New-York-City

"If it comes down to the numbers the entire world’s population can fit in Texas. This has been said many times and when it comes down to basic math, it is true. Texas is 268,581 Square miles, if some amazing engineer were to design the father of all complexes; basically a China housing unit on steroids is the only thing that would work. The building would cover the entire state of Texas. Rivers, ponds, and creeks included; literally every square inch of Texas would be engulfed in this building. There would be one thousand square feet per person." The Entire World Population can Sink into the State of Texas


"According to the U.N. Population Database, the world's population in 2010 will be 6,908,688,000. The landmass of Texas is 268,820 sq mi (7,494,271,488,000 sq ft).

So, divide 7,494,271,488,000 sq ft by 6,908,688,000 people, and you get 1084.76 sq ft/person. That's approximately a 33' x 33' plot of land for every person on the planet, enough space for a town house.

Given an average four person family, every family would have a 66' x 66' plot of land, which would comfortably provide a single family home and yard -- and all of them fit on a landmass the size of Texas. Admittedly, it'd basically be one massive subdivision, but Texas is a tiny portion of the inhabitable Earth." Episode 1: Overpopulation: The Making of a Myth - Overpopulation is a myth


Well, the initial calculation was done by Thomas Sowell in 1984, when the world's population was 4.4 billion.http://www.carlopelanda.com/econaut/...n%20Growth.htm

Quote:

In 1984, it was proven by the economist Thomas Sowell that the entire world population (4.4 billion at the time) could live comfortably in the state of Texas. He wrote “Every human being on the face of the Earth could be housed in the state of Texas in one-story, single-family homes, each with a front and a back yard. A family of four would thus have 6,800 square feet- about the size of the typical middle-class American home with front and backyards.”(Carter 99) According to more recent research on the topic, all of the world’s 1997 population (5.84 billion) could fit on the small Island of Bali in Indonesia.(Stiefel 98)

According to my rough calculations, if we assume a world population of 6.7 billion, all the people in the world could fit into Texas and occupy an area of ~1,118 sq. ft. each.

Typical marxists. Take away the guns. Get your totalitarian on.

We do not want your guns, just the assault weapons and large cartridges. Gee you got it all wrong again.

Large cartridge/mags means anything over one round.
So Muskets are good to go.

10 cartridge mags. If only you men would not have such insane issues.

It appears that the essence of this thread is either too painful or too erudite for you.


Democrats/Liberals attempt to switch topics more frequently than the Kama Sutra recommends.

When you said topics, did you mean positions?

I expected everyone to make the leap that you did.

 

[PoliticalChic]

A visit to Bernie's World....


For perspective, consider the famous Weathermen ‘Days of Rage’ protests of the Chicago 7 trial in October 1969. Planned as war in the streets, even the Black Panthers decided that these folks were too psychotic even for them. Fred Hampton, deputy chairman of the Illinois chapter of the Black Panther Party (BPP), said “We oppose the anarchistic, adventuristic, chauvinistic, individualistic, masochistic, Custeristic Weathermen.” Susan Braudy, “Family Circle: The Boudins and the Aristocracy of the Left,: p. 188

1. Too nuts for the Black Panthers, but they became respected advisors and co-authors to a Democratic President.
2. At a 1969 “War Council” in Flint, Michigan, Bernardine Dohrn gave her most memorable and notorious speech to her followers. Holding her fingers in what became the Weatherman “fork salute,” she said of the bloody murders recently committed by the Manson Family in which the pregnant actress Sharon Tate and a Folgers Coffee heiress and several other inhabitants of a Benedict Canyon mansion were brutally stabbed to death: “Dig it! First they killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them. They even shoved a fork into the victim’s stomach! Wild!” Discover the Networks | Bernardine Dohrn At other rallies, Dohrn said, "Bring the revolution home, kill your parents -- that's where it's at."

1. 
   After a Chicago Democratic official, Richard Elrod, became paralyzed while fighting with a privileged looter during the Weathermen's "Days of Rage," Dohrn led the Weathermen in a song sung to the tune of Bob Dylan's "Lay Lady Lay":
   
   Lay, Elrod, lay,
   Lay in the street for a while
   Stay, Elrod, stay
   Stay in your bed for a while
   You thought you could stop the Weatherman
   But up-front people put you on your can,
   Stay, Elrod, stay
   Stay in your iron lung,
   Play, Elrod, play
   Play with your toes for a while.

Coulter, “Demonic,” p. 162-163.




There you have Democrat associates, planners, professors, and yet-to-be Democrat candidates.


Yet, the simple-minded vote for them.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

You know Bernie is neither a Democrat nor a liberal, right, cut and paste Queen?

Is he running for president as a Democrat?

 

[PoliticalChic]

You know Bernie is neither a Democrat nor a liberal, right, cut and paste Queen?

Is he running for president as a Democrat?

The lie is clear and evident.....the question is why dopes like that feel the need to pretend.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It is possible that 2020 will sentence all of us to Bernie's World. An election is how we'd get there.

Here's how Bernie got there.....


7. Post war, a huge wave of youth came to age, uncontrolled, and far more wealthy than previous generations, bored, and thinking ‘is this all there is?’ They re-invented the culture, and took it in a direction unAmerican, undemocratic, oppressive of their opposition, and willing to ‘do whatever is necessary.’
Violence has always been part of the discourse of the Left.

They were what they claimed to hate.



8.”The radicals of the sixties did not remain within the universities…They realized that the apocalypse never materialized. “…they were dropping off into environmentalism and consumerism and fatalism…I watched many of my old comrades apply to graduate school in universities they had failed to burn down, so they could get advanced degrees and spread the ideas that had been discredited in the streets under an academic cover.” Collier and Horowitz, “Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About The Sixties,” p. 294-295.



9.“The radicals were not likely to go into business or the conventional practice of the professions. They were part of the chattering class, talkers interested in policy, politics, culture. They went into politics, print and electronic journalism, church bureaucracies, foundation staffs, Hollywood careers, public interest organizations, anywhere attitudes and opinions could be influenced. And they are exerting influence.” Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 51



10.“[The radicals] did not go away or change their minds; the New Left shattered into a multitude of single-issue groups. We now have, to name a few, radical feminists, black extremists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists, activist homosexual organizations, multiculturalists, organizations such as People for the American Way, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL), the National Organization for Women (NOW), and Planned Parenthood.”
Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 53




See who has taken over the Democrat Party? They may not run Bernie for President….but it will be Bernie’s World.

 

[Andylusion]

It looks like as traditional American values decrease, mass shootings increase. When marriage, going to church, and doing things as families increase, mass shootings decrease. How about, as violent "shooter" video games increase, mass shootings increase?

I would argue that mass shooter games are a symptom, not a cause. Japanese have tons of violent video games, and extremely low violence.

What Japanese do have is family values, moral standards, and a homogeneous culture.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Prager outlines the view into Bernie's world.


11. “And a great deal has changed. America is much more ethnically diverse and much less religious. Boys have far fewer male role models in their lives. Fewer men marry, and normal boy behavior is largely held in contempt by their feminist teachers, principals, and therapists. Do any or all of those factors matter more than the availability of guns?” Why So Many Mass Shootings? | National Review

As much as I love Dennis Prager, here he stated the problem….and misses the reason.

Given the choice between all the gun laws Liberals want…vs. all the religious folks I want…which would produce a better nation?

Guns, having guns, has never been the problem. It is the beliefs and values of those in whose hands the guns are found.





12.The period of the 60s opened the door for a factor too often not recognized. Evil.

And sometimes, the truth is right there in front of us.


"Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton both cleave to the teachings of collectivist Saul Alinsky, ..."
Hillary Clinton’s Worldview: A Eulogy – Mallory Millett


"Alinsky famously dedicated his book, Rules for Radicals, the subject of Hillary’s thesis, to Lucifer, “the first radical who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that, at least, he won his own kingdom.”
In 1972, he said in a Playboy interview, “If there is an after-life and I have anything to say about it I will, unreservedly, choose to go to Hell. Hell would be Heaven for me. All my life I have been with the have-nots. Over here if you’re a have-not you’re short of dough. If you’re a have-not in Hell you’re short of virtue. Once I get into Hell I’ll start organizing the have-nots. With a smile. They’re my kind of people.”

Saul Alinsky was the author of Chicago’s community organizing. Barack Obama’s only work experience previous to election as an Illinois senator was as an Alinsky movement community organizer. As state senator, huge number of his votes amounted to a contemptuous “present.” Hillary Clinton’s Worldview: A Eulogy – Mallory Millett




Like the 'undead,' the Democrat Marxists will be back. And, as told in vampire lore, they must be 'invited' in to do their mischief....they need be elected. And to do so, they will have no compunction about lying..... "Lies are their truth. This is why it’s so easy for Obama and Clinton to lie and lie again and again, to obfuscate endlessly."

Give the Devil his due (see what I did there?)....Obama is far and away the most prodigious liar ever to infect the White House.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Bernie Sanders is never going to be president.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Bernie Sanders is never going to be president.

Please don't miss the point.

Whether it is Bernie, or a clone of same, it will make America into Bernie's world.

It's about policies, not persons.

 

[PoliticalChic]

13.“mass shooting, …Every American asks why. What was the killer’s motive? When we read there is “no known motive,” we are frustrated. Human beings want to make sense of life, especially of evil.”
Prager.


An essential element in recognizing evil, in the context I mean it, is that evil is often gratuitous.
There are gradations of evil, true enough, but usually we know the motivation: money, power, love....personal aggrandizement that leads the weak of character to murder, steal, injure, torture....to attain profits of some sort.

But....not just to gain power.....evil can be recognized in the use of power, as well.

"The late Roman emperors were good at this sort of thing ordering someone to be killed in the middle of a dinner party,...and expecting the other guests to laugh. ...trying to be ingenious and unpredictable.

Stalin used to gather cronies and henchmen...for all night dinner-and-drinking sessions; at dawn, for fun, one or two of the guests might be led away, in sodden terror,to be executed by the NKVD. No explanation- just the heavy whimsy of the Antichrist awardng a door prize at the end of his party."
Lance Morrow, "Evil: An Investigation," p. 23

Forcing Americans to bend knee and neck to every insane pronouncement and 'right' imagined by Leftists is in that category.






14. But, what to say when the motive is elusive?

a. "Las Vegas shooting motive eludes investigators as new details emerge about gunman Stephen Paddock"
Las Vegas shooting motive eludes investigators as new details emerge about gunman Stephen Paddock

b. "Texas Church Shooting: More Than Two Dozen Parishioners Killed Federal officials said the motive for the shooting was unclear. " More than two dozen parishioners killed in rural Texas church shooting

c. “Hours before he walked into his workplace and unleashed a barrage of gunfire that killed 12 people, the Virginia Beach gunman wrote his bosses a two-sentence email….document does not shed light on his possible motive nor provide insight…” Virginia Beach Gunman Cited 'Personal Reasons' For Quitting Just Before Mass Shooting




There is, of course, a way to understand most crimes....even some that we claim as 'incomprehensible.'
Evil.
It is the motivation. It may be a force, or the personification...Lucifer himself.
Evil is personified as Lucifer, Satan....the angel who lost his battle with God.
And, it appears, controls the actions of a certain type of person.


And they direct Bernie's World.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Bernie's World has deep roots.


15. The French Revolution, the first fascist movement(The political terms "Right" and "Left" were born in the French Revolution, when two ifferent revolutionary factions took seats in the French National Assembly's hall: the Girondins on the right wing and the Jacobins on the left wing.) It was totalitarian, nationalist, conspiratorial, and populist, the origin of the revolutionary tradition of the Left.

While the American Revolution, essentially conservative, and served as a paradigm for the American right and classical liberals, the left sees its model in the Jacobins.




16. True, many things changed to result in Bernie's world, but the element from the Enlightenment and the French Revolution was the single most essential ingredient.
Not only was religion and morality removed from the public arena, but the Left worked assiduously to make certain that it could never regain it's hold on man's psyche.


Not only did man remove God.....he replaced him.



"When two snipers were terrorizing the Washington, D.C. area, in the fall of 2002, at one point they left a Tarot card, "I am God," in an empty shell casing at the scene of one of their murders. The snipers were a study in the dynamics of doing a certain sort of evil: the gratuitousness of their depredations , the secrecy, the terror, the (one gathers) satanic glee, the random quality of their shootings, the sense of power, the immense injustice of their infliction, the people struck down indiscriminately, with no reason, no order, no rational, all at the whim of the destroyer:
Evil is an imitation of God...."
Lance Morrow, 'Evil', p. 36-37



I say that at some level, motiveless evil is the desire, the attempt to be God-like.....exactly the same motive as Lucifer.

One can see that mirrored in the Democrat Agenda, Bernie's World:

... full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Bernie’s World

….and how the Democrat Party is in a fight on this day whether to being an American political party, or to take up permanent residence in Bernie’s world.

And what that means for America.





"According to the Real Clear Politics average of polls, two old white guys, Joe Biden, 76, and Bernie Sanders, 77, are setting the pace and have together corralled more than half of all Democrats.

....Bernie Sanders, is a socialist with a large and loyal following from his 2016 campaign. For Bernie sits on a huge pile of votes Biden may not be able to win, but which Bernie is denying to any other challenger.

Indeed, Bernie is becoming a problem for a whole host of Democrats.

If he defeats Biden for the nomination, he pulls Democrats a long way to becoming a U.S. replica of the British Labour Party of Jeremy Corbyn.


As of now, there are two lanes to the Democratic nomination -- the centrist-moderate lane Biden occupies almost exclusively, and the left lane where Bernie leads but is being challenged by Elizabeth Warren."
Bernie & Joe: Two Old White Men Take the Lead

 

[PoliticalChic]

Bernie’s world was no secret…..it was predicted.



17. "We can see that all elements of the socialist ideal--the abolition of private property, family, hierarchies; the hostility toward religion--could be regarded as a manifestation of one basic principle: the suppression of individuality.... All this is inspired by one principle--the destruction of individuality or, at least, its suppression to the point where it would cease to be a social force. " Igor Shafarevich
The Socialist Phenomenon
The Socialist Phenomenon by Igor Shafarevich





18. "The ultimate objective of the new policy and of the activity of such an instrument of this policy as the
Novosti Press Agency is not to learn more secrets about the adversary, and not even to teach the masses in the West in the spirit of Marxist-Leninist ideology, but to slowly replace the free-market capitalist society, with its individual freedoms in economic and socio-political spheres of life-- with a carbon copy of the “most progressive” system, and eventually merge into one world-wide system ruled by a benevolent bureaucracy which they call Socialism (or Communism, as the final and supreme stage of this “progress.”)


To effect this gradual change, it is much easier and less painful (and less noticeable for the populace) to change the perceptions of reality, attitudes, patterns of behavior and to create wide-spread demands and expectations, leading ultimately to the acceptance of totalitarianism.
Thus the media is the main target of manipulation by the KGB-controlled “independent, non-government, non-political, public organization” known as the Novosti Press Agency."
Yuri Bezmenov's (aka Tomas Schuman) World Thought Police.
Useless Dissident: World Thought Police: Part One

Yuri Bezmenov worked as a "journalist" for Novosti Press Agency, which was a disinformation and propaganda agency controlled by the Soviet non-military intelligence agency (commonly known as the KGB).



It appears that Pelosi knows what a mistake it would be to run the Democrat Party as precursor to Bernie's world.

 

[Third Party]

Judging by your picture you may be of an age similar to the sixties activists. What would YOU have done if you were there at that time? Write an article on Timothy Leary's world?