Bernie’s World

[PoliticalChic]

….and how the Democrat Party is in a fight on this day whether to being an American political party, or to take up permanent residence in Bernie’s world.

And what that means for America.



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.




But first, jump to this week, a result of the factors that created Bernie's World....

1.“This past weekend, Americans learned of another mass shooting, …

Every American asks why. What was the killer’s motive? When we read there is “no known motive,” we are frustrated. Human beings want to make sense of life, especially of evil.

Liberals (in this regard, liberals’ views are essentially the same as leftists’) are virtually united in ascribing these shootings to guns. America had plenty of guns when its mass murder rate was much lower. Grant Duwe, who has a Ph.D. in criminology and is the director of research and evaluation at the Minnesota Department of Corrections, gathered data going back 100 years in his 2007 book, Mass Murder in the United States: A History.

Duwe’s data reveal: In the 20th century, every decade before the 1970s had fewer than ten mass public shootings. In the 1950s, for example, there was one mass shooting. And then a steep rise began. In the 1960s, there were six mass shootings. In the 1970s, the number rose to 13. In the 1980s, the number increased two and a half times, to 32. And it rose again in the 1990s, to 42. As for this century, the New York Times reported in 2014 that, according to the FBI, “mass shootings have risen drastically in the past half-dozen years.”

Given the same ubiquity of guns, wouldn’t the most productive question be what, if anything, has changed since the 1960s and ’70s? Of course it would.

And a great deal has changed. America is much more ethnically diverse and much less religious. Boys have far fewer male role models in their lives. Fewer men marry, and normal boy behavior is largely held in contempt by their feminist teachers, principals, and therapists. Do any or all of those factors matter more than the availability of guns?"
Why So Many Mass Shootings? | National Review



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.

What happened during and since Bernie’s time?


Explained in this thread….

 

[kyzr]

It looks like as traditional American values decrease, mass shootings increase. When marriage, going to church, and doing things as families increase, mass shootings decrease. How about, as violent "shooter" video games increase, mass shootings increase?

 

[mudwhistle]

….and how the Democrat Party is in a fight on this day whether to being an American political party, or to take up permanent residence in Bernie’s world.

And what that means for America.



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.




But first, jump to this week, a result of the factors that created Bernie's World....

1.“This past weekend, Americans learned of another mass shooting, …

Every American asks why. What was the killer’s motive? When we read there is “no known motive,” we are frustrated. Human beings want to make sense of life, especially of evil.

Liberals (in this regard, liberals’ views are essentially the same as leftists’) are virtually united in ascribing these shootings to guns. America had plenty of guns when its mass murder rate was much lower. Grant Duwe, who has a Ph.D. in criminology and is the director of research and evaluation at the Minnesota Department of Corrections, gathered data going back 100 years in his 2007 book, Mass Murder in the United States: A History.

Duwe’s data reveal: In the 20th century, every decade before the 1970s had fewer than ten mass public shootings. In the 1950s, for example, there was one mass shooting. And then a steep rise began. In the 1960s, there were six mass shootings. In the 1970s, the number rose to 13. In the 1980s, the number increased two and a half times, to 32. And it rose again in the 1990s, to 42. As for this century, the New York Times reported in 2014 that, according to the FBI, “mass shootings have risen drastically in the past half-dozen years.”

Given the same ubiquity of guns, wouldn’t the most productive question be what, if anything, has changed since the 1960s and ’70s? Of course it would.

And a great deal has changed. America is much more ethnically diverse and much less religious. Boys have far fewer male role models in their lives. Fewer men marry, and normal boy behavior is largely held in contempt by their feminist teachers, principals, and therapists. Do any or all of those factors matter more than the availability of guns?"
Why So Many Mass Shootings? | National Review



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.

What happened during and since Bernie’s time?


Explained in this thread….

Democrats are Demorats. They are no-longer Americans.
They are anti-Americans.

 

[william the wie]

He hasn't been on the right planet since the anal probe by the UFOs from the lesser Magellanic Cloud gave him the greatest thrill of all.

 

[Third Party]

I still say over population creates a multitude of evils.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

….and how the Democrat Party is in a fight on this day whether to being an American political party, or to take up permanent residence in Bernie’s world.

And what that means for America.



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.




But first, jump to this week, a result of the factors that created Bernie's World....

1.“This past weekend, Americans learned of another mass shooting, …

Every American asks why. What was the killer’s motive? When we read there is “no known motive,” we are frustrated. Human beings want to make sense of life, especially of evil.

Liberals (in this regard, liberals’ views are essentially the same as leftists’) are virtually united in ascribing these shootings to guns. America had plenty of guns when its mass murder rate was much lower. Grant Duwe, who has a Ph.D. in criminology and is the director of research and evaluation at the Minnesota Department of Corrections, gathered data going back 100 years in his 2007 book, Mass Murder in the United States: A History.

Duwe’s data reveal: In the 20th century, every decade before the 1970s had fewer than ten mass public shootings. In the 1950s, for example, there was one mass shooting. And then a steep rise began. In the 1960s, there were six mass shootings. In the 1970s, the number rose to 13. In the 1980s, the number increased two and a half times, to 32. And it rose again in the 1990s, to 42. As for this century, the New York Times reported in 2014 that, according to the FBI, “mass shootings have risen drastically in the past half-dozen years.”

Given the same ubiquity of guns, wouldn’t the most productive question be what, if anything, has changed since the 1960s and ’70s? Of course it would.

And a great deal has changed. America is much more ethnically diverse and much less religious. Boys have far fewer male role models in their lives. Fewer men marry, and normal boy behavior is largely held in contempt by their feminist teachers, principals, and therapists. Do any or all of those factors matter more than the availability of guns?"
Why So Many Mass Shootings? | National Review



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.

What happened during and since Bernie’s time?


Explained in this thread….

It all goes back to Marx. When you take away the fundamentals of civilization and replace it with, immoral actions, then civilization starts to break down. Just ask the Romans. When you dont study history, then history tends to repeat itself.

"Those Who Do Not Learn History Are Doomed To Repeat It." Really?

 

[Penelope]

….and how the Democrat Party is in a fight on this day whether to being an American political party, or to take up permanent residence in Bernie’s world.

And what that means for America.



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.




But first, jump to this week, a result of the factors that created Bernie's World....

1.“This past weekend, Americans learned of another mass shooting, …

Every American asks why. What was the killer’s motive? When we read there is “no known motive,” we are frustrated. Human beings want to make sense of life, especially of evil.

Liberals (in this regard, liberals’ views are essentially the same as leftists’) are virtually united in ascribing these shootings to guns. America had plenty of guns when its mass murder rate was much lower. Grant Duwe, who has a Ph.D. in criminology and is the director of research and evaluation at the Minnesota Department of Corrections, gathered data going back 100 years in his 2007 book, Mass Murder in the United States: A History.

Duwe’s data reveal: In the 20th century, every decade before the 1970s had fewer than ten mass public shootings. In the 1950s, for example, there was one mass shooting. And then a steep rise began. In the 1960s, there were six mass shootings. In the 1970s, the number rose to 13. In the 1980s, the number increased two and a half times, to 32. And it rose again in the 1990s, to 42. As for this century, the New York Times reported in 2014 that, according to the FBI, “mass shootings have risen drastically in the past half-dozen years.”

Given the same ubiquity of guns, wouldn’t the most productive question be what, if anything, has changed since the 1960s and ’70s? Of course it would.

And a great deal has changed. America is much more ethnically diverse and much less religious. Boys have far fewer male role models in their lives. Fewer men marry, and normal boy behavior is largely held in contempt by their feminist teachers, principals, and therapists. Do any or all of those factors matter more than the availability of guns?"
Why So Many Mass Shootings? | National Review



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.

What happened during and since Bernie’s time?


Explained in this thread….

and the crime bill that banned assault weapons expired in 2004. What does this have to do with Bernie?

Since the world is so mess up and men seem to have so many issues, its a good thing to ban assault weapons and over 10 cartridge magazines.

Federal Assault Weapons Ban - Wikipedia

 

[PoliticalChic]

I still say over population creates a multitude of evils.

Be specific.

Worldwide, there is no overpopulation.

 

[georgephillip]

….and how the Democrat Party is in a fight on this day whether to being an American political party, or to take up permanent residence in Bernie’s world.

And what that means for America.



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.




But first, jump to this week, a result of the factors that created Bernie's World....

1.“This past weekend, Americans learned of another mass shooting, …

Every American asks why. What was the killer’s motive? When we read there is “no known motive,” we are frustrated. Human beings want to make sense of life, especially of evil.

Liberals (in this regard, liberals’ views are essentially the same as leftists’) are virtually united in ascribing these shootings to guns. America had plenty of guns when its mass murder rate was much lower. Grant Duwe, who has a Ph.D. in criminology and is the director of research and evaluation at the Minnesota Department of Corrections, gathered data going back 100 years in his 2007 book, Mass Murder in the United States: A History.

Duwe’s data reveal: In the 20th century, every decade before the 1970s had fewer than ten mass public shootings. In the 1950s, for example, there was one mass shooting. And then a steep rise began. In the 1960s, there were six mass shootings. In the 1970s, the number rose to 13. In the 1980s, the number increased two and a half times, to 32. And it rose again in the 1990s, to 42. As for this century, the New York Times reported in 2014 that, according to the FBI, “mass shootings have risen drastically in the past half-dozen years.”

Given the same ubiquity of guns, wouldn’t the most productive question be what, if anything, has changed since the 1960s and ’70s? Of course it would.

And a great deal has changed. America is much more ethnically diverse and much less religious. Boys have far fewer male role models in their lives. Fewer men marry, and normal boy behavior is largely held in contempt by their feminist teachers, principals, and therapists. Do any or all of those factors matter more than the availability of guns?"
Why So Many Mass Shootings? | National Review



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.

What happened during and since Bernie’s time?


Explained in this thread….

And a great deal has changed. America is much more ethnically diverse and much less religious. Boys have far fewer male role models in their lives. Fewer men marry, and normal boy behavior is largely held in contempt by their feminist teachers, principals, and therapists. Do any or all of those factors matter more than the availability of guns?"
Why So Many Mass Shootings? | National Review

Why do you suppose a partisan hack like Dennis Prager doesn't mention the NRA when asking what's changed over the past half-century of gun-pussy propaganda?

The NRA used to be a bipartisan campaign contributor, but that changed in 1994. Here's why

 

[PoliticalChic]

….and how the Democrat Party is in a fight on this day whether to being an American political party, or to take up permanent residence in Bernie’s world.

And what that means for America.



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.




But first, jump to this week, a result of the factors that created Bernie's World....

1.“This past weekend, Americans learned of another mass shooting, …

Every American asks why. What was the killer’s motive? When we read there is “no known motive,” we are frustrated. Human beings want to make sense of life, especially of evil.

Liberals (in this regard, liberals’ views are essentially the same as leftists’) are virtually united in ascribing these shootings to guns. America had plenty of guns when its mass murder rate was much lower. Grant Duwe, who has a Ph.D. in criminology and is the director of research and evaluation at the Minnesota Department of Corrections, gathered data going back 100 years in his 2007 book, Mass Murder in the United States: A History.

Duwe’s data reveal: In the 20th century, every decade before the 1970s had fewer than ten mass public shootings. In the 1950s, for example, there was one mass shooting. And then a steep rise began. In the 1960s, there were six mass shootings. In the 1970s, the number rose to 13. In the 1980s, the number increased two and a half times, to 32. And it rose again in the 1990s, to 42. As for this century, the New York Times reported in 2014 that, according to the FBI, “mass shootings have risen drastically in the past half-dozen years.”

Given the same ubiquity of guns, wouldn’t the most productive question be what, if anything, has changed since the 1960s and ’70s? Of course it would.

And a great deal has changed. America is much more ethnically diverse and much less religious. Boys have far fewer male role models in their lives. Fewer men marry, and normal boy behavior is largely held in contempt by their feminist teachers, principals, and therapists. Do any or all of those factors matter more than the availability of guns?"
Why So Many Mass Shootings? | National Review



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.

What happened during and since Bernie’s time?


Explained in this thread….

It all goes back to Marx. When you take away the fundamentals of civilization and replace it with, immoral actions, then civilization starts to break down. Just ask the Romans. When you dont study history, then history tends to repeat itself.

"Those Who Do Not Learn History Are Doomed To Repeat It." Really?

Three witches....Hegel, Marx, and Darwin

You can add Freud if you like.

 

[PoliticalChic]

….and how the Democrat Party is in a fight on this day whether to being an American political party, or to take up permanent residence in Bernie’s world.

And what that means for America.



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.




But first, jump to this week, a result of the factors that created Bernie's World....

1.“This past weekend, Americans learned of another mass shooting, …

Every American asks why. What was the killer’s motive? When we read there is “no known motive,” we are frustrated. Human beings want to make sense of life, especially of evil.

Liberals (in this regard, liberals’ views are essentially the same as leftists’) are virtually united in ascribing these shootings to guns. America had plenty of guns when its mass murder rate was much lower. Grant Duwe, who has a Ph.D. in criminology and is the director of research and evaluation at the Minnesota Department of Corrections, gathered data going back 100 years in his 2007 book, Mass Murder in the United States: A History.

Duwe’s data reveal: In the 20th century, every decade before the 1970s had fewer than ten mass public shootings. In the 1950s, for example, there was one mass shooting. And then a steep rise began. In the 1960s, there were six mass shootings. In the 1970s, the number rose to 13. In the 1980s, the number increased two and a half times, to 32. And it rose again in the 1990s, to 42. As for this century, the New York Times reported in 2014 that, according to the FBI, “mass shootings have risen drastically in the past half-dozen years.”

Given the same ubiquity of guns, wouldn’t the most productive question be what, if anything, has changed since the 1960s and ’70s? Of course it would.

And a great deal has changed. America is much more ethnically diverse and much less religious. Boys have far fewer male role models in their lives. Fewer men marry, and normal boy behavior is largely held in contempt by their feminist teachers, principals, and therapists. Do any or all of those factors matter more than the availability of guns?"
Why So Many Mass Shootings? | National Review



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.

What happened during and since Bernie’s time?


Explained in this thread….

and the crime bill that banned assault weapons expired in 2004. What does this have to do with Bernie?

Since the world is so mess up and men seem to have so many issues, its a good thing to ban assault weapons and over 10 cartridge magazines.

Federal Assault Weapons Ban - Wikipedia

As even you can see, the graph verifies the OP.

As for Bernie's world......stay with the thread.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

….and how the Democrat Party is in a fight on this day whether to being an American political party, or to take up permanent residence in Bernie’s world.

And what that means for America.



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.




But first, jump to this week, a result of the factors that created Bernie's World....

1.“This past weekend, Americans learned of another mass shooting, …

Every American asks why. What was the killer’s motive? When we read there is “no known motive,” we are frustrated. Human beings want to make sense of life, especially of evil.

Liberals (in this regard, liberals’ views are essentially the same as leftists’) are virtually united in ascribing these shootings to guns. America had plenty of guns when its mass murder rate was much lower. Grant Duwe, who has a Ph.D. in criminology and is the director of research and evaluation at the Minnesota Department of Corrections, gathered data going back 100 years in his 2007 book, Mass Murder in the United States: A History.

Duwe’s data reveal: In the 20th century, every decade before the 1970s had fewer than ten mass public shootings. In the 1950s, for example, there was one mass shooting. And then a steep rise began. In the 1960s, there were six mass shootings. In the 1970s, the number rose to 13. In the 1980s, the number increased two and a half times, to 32. And it rose again in the 1990s, to 42. As for this century, the New York Times reported in 2014 that, according to the FBI, “mass shootings have risen drastically in the past half-dozen years.”

Given the same ubiquity of guns, wouldn’t the most productive question be what, if anything, has changed since the 1960s and ’70s? Of course it would.

And a great deal has changed. America is much more ethnically diverse and much less religious. Boys have far fewer male role models in their lives. Fewer men marry, and normal boy behavior is largely held in contempt by their feminist teachers, principals, and therapists. Do any or all of those factors matter more than the availability of guns?"
Why So Many Mass Shootings? | National Review



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.

What happened during and since Bernie’s time?


Explained in this thread….

and the crime bill that banned assault weapons expired in 2004. What does this have to do with Bernie?

Since the world is so mess up and men seem to have so many issues, its a good thing to ban assault weapons and over 10 cartridge magazines.

Federal Assault Weapons Ban - Wikipedia

In Virginia Tech a mentally ill liberal(redundant statement) went on a killing spree with 2 pistols with several 10 round magazines. Are we to ban pistols next? Why cant we put mentally ill people where they belong, in a padded room, where they can be watched and cared for? It was Jimmy Carter who allowed these people to walk free and now they are in charge of the Democrat Party..


It is idiots like you who took God out of the public schools and instead of teaching kids "right from wrong", good from evil" you indoctrinate the kids to be immoral as hell. When they prove how well your education system is, you then have the deer in the headlights look, and go after guns, not the EVIL liberals who are shooting.

Gun Control Facts: Why a "High Capacity" Magazine Ban Would Not Prevent Mass Shootings

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

I still say over population creates a multitude of evils.

If you put all the population of the planet in one place, shoulder to shoulder, front to back, how much area of the world would be covered by the overpopulation? Name a place, that will give you a clue..

 

[PoliticalChic]

What happened during and since Bernie’s time?



2.The unrest of the sixties was born in June of 1962 at the AFL-CIO camp at Port Huron, Michigan.


Some prior rumblings had been heard in a nascent civil rights movement, and from the Free Speech movement at Berkeley- but it was the Port Huron meetings that represented the heart of Sixties radicalism.
Port Huron was an early convention of SDS, a small group of alienated, left-wing college students, 59 from 11 campuses.

One member gave this prescription: “four-square against anti-Communism, eight-square against American-culture, twelve-square against sell-out unions, one hundred and twenty against an interpretation of the Cold War that saw it as a Soviet plot and identified American policy fondly.”
Todd Gitlin, “The Sixties: Years of Hope, Days of Rage,” p. 109-110

A draft of the meeting can be found at http://www.h-net.org/~hst306/documents/huron.html




3.Lots of loud, undisciplined, radicals, ....very much like today's Democrat Party......the euphoria due to being convinced of their own wisdom, moral purity, and ability to change everything….perhaps what one should expect of those coming of age. And perhaps the elders expected them to grow out of it.

They didn’t.
And their acceptance of violence should have warned society.

They became what we see in Bernie Sanders, Marxist/Socialist/Radical…..and all of the authors of the plans of the Democrat Party…. now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

See if you recognize the similarity in this Margaret Mead, anthropologist, quote: The natives are superficially agreeable, but they go in for cannibalism, headhunting, infanticide, incest, avoidance and joking relationships, and biting lice in half with their teeth.

One wonders, if she were still alive, what her view of this Democrat Party would be.




And, the seeds of destruction of Western Civilization.

 

[Third Party]

I still say over population creates a multitude of evils.

Be specific.

Worldwide, there is no overpopulation.

The most recent reports also show that about 783 million people, which are about 10% of the world population, are lacking access to quality drinking water.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

I still say over population creates a multitude of evils.

Be specific.

Worldwide, there is no overpopulation.

The most recent reports also show that about 783 million people, which are about 10% of the world population, are lacking access to quality drinking water.

I asked if you put all the population into an area, how much of it would be covered by people? Once you do this, I can then give you other statistics.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I still say over population creates a multitude of evils.

Be specific.

Worldwide, there is no overpopulation.

The most recent reports also show that about 783 million people, which are about 10% of the world population, are lacking access to quality drinking water.

And how is that related to overpopulation?



Have you seen this?

"The entire world population could fit in the state of Texas and it’d only have the population density of New York City!
1. People freak out all the time about how we’re overpopulating Earth and we’re all going to die, because we can’t sustain ourselves. There isn’t enough land to produce enough food to sustain us, let alone have any space to move around at all. There are 6.8 billion people on Earth.
2. Calculations show that if we wanted to make everyone in Earth live on a space that had the same population density as New York City, we could fit everyone in about 666,265 square kilometers, which is less than the size of Texas!
3. Not only does that leave the other 49 United States open, but it leaves all the other countries clear and open, too. So, it is pretty safe to say that we have enough space, the entire world except Texas, to farm and ranch for our food supply.
4. Would water be a problem, though? It's calculated that we need 350 billion liters of water per day to properly hydrate 6.8 billion people. It seems like a lot, but the Columbia River alone could produce that amount in less than a day. By the way, the Columbia River is the U.S.’s fourth largest river. So, again, that leaves the rest of the world’s water supply open and ready to servehttp://www.omgfacts.com/lists/10333/The-entire-world-population-could-fit-in-the-state-of-Texas-and-it-d-only-have-the-population-density-of-New-York-City

"If it comes down to the numbers the entire world’s population can fit in Texas. This has been said many times and when it comes down to basic math, it is true. Texas is 268,581 Square miles, if some amazing engineer were to design the father of all complexes; basically a China housing unit on steroids is the only thing that would work. The building would cover the entire state of Texas. Rivers, ponds, and creeks included; literally every square inch of Texas would be engulfed in this building. There would be one thousand square feet per person." The Entire World Population can Sink into the State of Texas


"According to the U.N. Population Database, the world's population in 2010 will be 6,908,688,000. The landmass of Texas is 268,820 sq mi (7,494,271,488,000 sq ft).

So, divide 7,494,271,488,000 sq ft by 6,908,688,000 people, and you get 1084.76 sq ft/person. That's approximately a 33' x 33' plot of land for every person on the planet, enough space for a town house.

Given an average four person family, every family would have a 66' x 66' plot of land, which would comfortably provide a single family home and yard -- and all of them fit on a landmass the size of Texas. Admittedly, it'd basically be one massive subdivision, but Texas is a tiny portion of the inhabitable Earth." Episode 1: Overpopulation: The Making of a Myth - Overpopulation is a myth


Well, the initial calculation was done by Thomas Sowell in 1984, when the world's population was 4.4 billion.http://www.carlopelanda.com/econaut/...n%20Growth.htm

Quote:

In 1984, it was proven by the economist Thomas Sowell that the entire world population (4.4 billion at the time) could live comfortably in the state of Texas. He wrote “Every human being on the face of the Earth could be housed in the state of Texas in one-story, single-family homes, each with a front and a back yard. A family of four would thus have 6,800 square feet- about the size of the typical middle-class American home with front and backyards.”(Carter 99) According to more recent research on the topic, all of the world’s 1997 population (5.84 billion) could fit on the small Island of Bali in Indonesia.(Stiefel 98)

According to my rough calculations, if we assume a world population of 6.7 billion, all the people in the world could fit into Texas and occupy an area of ~1,118 sq. ft. each.

 

[Moonglow]

….and how the Democrat Party is in a fight on this day whether to being an American political party, or to take up permanent residence in Bernie’s world.

And what that means for America.



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.




But first, jump to this week, a result of the factors that created Bernie's World....

1.“This past weekend, Americans learned of another mass shooting, …

Every American asks why. What was the killer’s motive? When we read there is “no known motive,” we are frustrated. Human beings want to make sense of life, especially of evil.

Liberals (in this regard, liberals’ views are essentially the same as leftists’) are virtually united in ascribing these shootings to guns. America had plenty of guns when its mass murder rate was much lower. Grant Duwe, who has a Ph.D. in criminology and is the director of research and evaluation at the Minnesota Department of Corrections, gathered data going back 100 years in his 2007 book, Mass Murder in the United States: A History.

Duwe’s data reveal: In the 20th century, every decade before the 1970s had fewer than ten mass public shootings. In the 1950s, for example, there was one mass shooting. And then a steep rise began. In the 1960s, there were six mass shootings. In the 1970s, the number rose to 13. In the 1980s, the number increased two and a half times, to 32. And it rose again in the 1990s, to 42. As for this century, the New York Times reported in 2014 that, according to the FBI, “mass shootings have risen drastically in the past half-dozen years.”

Given the same ubiquity of guns, wouldn’t the most productive question be what, if anything, has changed since the 1960s and ’70s? Of course it would.

And a great deal has changed. America is much more ethnically diverse and much less religious. Boys have far fewer male role models in their lives. Fewer men marry, and normal boy behavior is largely held in contempt by their feminist teachers, principals, and therapists. Do any or all of those factors matter more than the availability of guns?"
Why So Many Mass Shootings? | National Review



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.

What happened during and since Bernie’s time?


Explained in this thread….

This liberal has firearms in his house and has all his life, and my kids have guns and have all their lives, yet the propaganda you post claims that all liberals have the same views as the Democrats which is untrue , it is another syllogistic fallacy that Policlickbait always tries to post.

 

[Moonglow]

"According to the U.N. Population Database, the world's population in 2010 will be 6,908,688,000. The landmass of Texas is 268,820 sq mi (7,494,271,488,000 sq ft).

So, divide 7,494,271,488,000 sq ft by 6,908,688,000 people, and you get 1084.76 sq ft/person. That's approximately a 33' x 33' plot of land for every person on the planet, enough space for a town house.

Given an average four person family, every family would have a 66' x 66' plot of land, which would comfortably provide a single family home and yard -- and all of them fit on a landmass the size of Texas. Admittedly, it'd basically be one massive subdivision, but Texas is a tiny portion of the inhabitable Earth." Episode 1: Overpopulation: The Making of a Myth - Overpopulation is a myth
Yeah for an idiot it is easy to squeeze people onto a land mass but the ecological ability to sustain that many people is not possible because of water resources and infrastructure modern people need to exist. Are people going to live on top of mountains and in stream and river valleys also? Where are the farms that feed these people?

 

[jillian]

….and how the Democrat Party is in a fight on this day whether to being an American political party, or to take up permanent residence in Bernie’s world.

And what that means for America.



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.




But first, jump to this week, a result of the factors that created Bernie's World....

1.“This past weekend, Americans learned of another mass shooting, …

Every American asks why. What was the killer’s motive? When we read there is “no known motive,” we are frustrated. Human beings want to make sense of life, especially of evil.

Liberals (in this regard, liberals’ views are essentially the same as leftists’) are virtually united in ascribing these shootings to guns. America had plenty of guns when its mass murder rate was much lower. Grant Duwe, who has a Ph.D. in criminology and is the director of research and evaluation at the Minnesota Department of Corrections, gathered data going back 100 years in his 2007 book, Mass Murder in the United States: A History.

Duwe’s data reveal: In the 20th century, every decade before the 1970s had fewer than ten mass public shootings. In the 1950s, for example, there was one mass shooting. And then a steep rise began. In the 1960s, there were six mass shootings. In the 1970s, the number rose to 13. In the 1980s, the number increased two and a half times, to 32. And it rose again in the 1990s, to 42. As for this century, the New York Times reported in 2014 that, according to the FBI, “mass shootings have risen drastically in the past half-dozen years.”

Given the same ubiquity of guns, wouldn’t the most productive question be what, if anything, has changed since the 1960s and ’70s? Of course it would.

And a great deal has changed. America is much more ethnically diverse and much less religious. Boys have far fewer male role models in their lives. Fewer men marry, and normal boy behavior is largely held in contempt by their feminist teachers, principals, and therapists. Do any or all of those factors matter more than the availability of guns?"
Why So Many Mass Shootings? | National Review



It all changed during Bernie’s formative years…..just before and during the 60s.

What happened during and since Bernie’s time?


Explained in this thread….

You know Bernie is neither a Democrat nor a liberal, right, cut and paste Queen?