benghazi, Benghazi, BENGHAZI!!!

070914.jpg
 
the only answer you need

is Valerie PLAME

THREE year investigation carried on BY DEMOCRATS

But you can cry us a river is you want
Actually, there was an independent prosecutor, who was a Republican, that did the investigation.
 
the only answer you need

is Valerie PLAME

THREE year investigation carried on BY DEMOCRATS

But you can cry us a river is you want

Ended with the conviction of the Vice President of the United States top aide and confident. Highest ranking member of an administration convicted in office since Iran/Contra.
Where you attempting to make a point?

Libby only got nailed on perjury. Everyone including the mother trucking prosecutor knew who had opened their yap about Plame.

And that just happened to be Colin Powell's man. Who was never prosecuted. Armitage.

Bullshit. Total bullshit. Political witchhunt extraordinaire.

So what was your point of bringing up Libby's conviction without mentioning "only convicted of perjury"?

Could it be because you want to continue to smear Libby and the Bush Administration?

:lol: You're a piece of work.

]t's hard to see anything but politics as the motivation for Fitzgerald's handling of the Plame affair. The facts indicate that Fitzgerald knew early on that the original leaker was State Department official Richard Armitage.

So why did Fitzgerald let a cloud hang over White House adviser Karl Rove's head for so long? And why is Fitzgerald continuing to hound Libby, the former vice presidential chief of staff?

The answer seems to be that Armitage, who is charged with nothing and brags that he hasn't even consulted a lawyer, was former Secretary of State Colin Powell's right-hand man and a critic of pre-emptive war in Iraq.

Libby, on the other hand, was an architect of that war strategy. Do doves get a pass in Fitzgerald's book, while hawks get an indictment?

… "Armitage himself was aggressively investigated" by Fitzgerald. So Armitage fessed up at the outset. Fitzgerald long ago knew whom Armitage talked to and when.

And he knew it was Armitage, not Libby, who was responsible for outing Plame
(whose status as a secret CIA operative was dubious at best).

Fitzgerald's contention in October that Libby was "the first official known to have told a reporter . . . about Valerie Wilson" may therefore have been a lie.

Fitzgerald knew in the early days of his politicized witch hunt that no crime was committed.

No one intentionally revealed the identity of a truly covert agent. Yet he made a reporter, Miller, spend nearly 90 days in jail for refusing to reveal her source.

Meanwhile, Fitzgerald refused to reveal to the public the true source. From top to bottom, this has been one of the most disgraceful abuses of prosecutorial power in this country's history. That it's taking place at a time of war only magnifies its sordidness.

… The Plame case proves [Fitzgerald] can bend the truth with the proficiency of the slickest of pols


Plame affair criminal investigation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
the only answer you need

is Valerie PLAME

THREE year investigation carried on BY DEMOCRATS

But you can cry us a river is you want
Actually, there was an independent prosecutor, who was a Republican, that did the investigation.

Conducted the witchhunt. Fitzgerald knew the leak was Armitage.

Christopher Hitchens asserted that Richard Armitage was the primary source of the Valerie Plame leak and that Fitzgerald knew this at the beginning of his investigation.

A month later Armitage claimed that Fitzgerald had instructed him not to go public with this information


Patrick Fitzgerald - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:
And when nothing becomes of 'Benghazi,' the partisan right will childishly sulk and retreat to their delusional redoubt of the 'liberal media' being 'in the bag' for Obama.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Left wing whackos jumped on the lie that the individual who was arrested claimed that "it was the video".

Who's delusional?
 
the only answer you need

is Valerie PLAME

THREE year investigation carried on BY DEMOCRATS

But you can cry us a river is you want
Actually, there was an independent prosecutor, who was a Republican, that did the investigation.

Conducted the witchhunt. Fitzgerald knew the leak was Armitage.

Christopher Hitchens asserted that Richard Armitage was the primary source of the Valerie Plame leak and that Fitzgerald knew this at the beginning of his investigation.

A month later Armitage claimed that Fitzgerald had instructed him not to go public with this information


Patrick Fitzgerald - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Fitzgerald was a Republican independent prosecutor who was appointed by a Republican from the administration, he was not a Democrat, that was my point, and I stand by that... ;)
 
the only answer you need

is Valerie PLAME

THREE year investigation carried on BY DEMOCRATS

But you can cry us a river is you want

Lets not forget about the crazy liberals reaction to bridge gate. One lane closed on a bridge. You might of thought four innocent Americans were murdered. Didn't christie go on a fundraiser after that scandal was revealed? Lol sheesh
 
the only answer you need

is Valerie PLAME

THREE year investigation carried on BY DEMOCRATS

But you can cry us a river is you want

Ended with the conviction of the Vice President of the United States top aide and confident. Highest ranking member of an administration convicted in office since Iran/Contra.
Where you attempting to make a point?

Libby only got nailed on perjury. Everyone including the mother trucking prosecutor knew who had opened their yap about Plame.

And that just happened to be Colin Powell's man. Who was never prosecuted. Armitage.

Bullshit. Total bullshit. Political witchhunt extraordinaire.

So what was your point of bringing up Libby's conviction without mentioning "only convicted of perjury"?

Could it be because you want to continue to smear Libby and the Bush Administration?

:lol: You're a piece of work.

]t's hard to see anything but politics as the motivation for Fitzgerald's handling of the Plame affair. The facts indicate that Fitzgerald knew early on that the original leaker was State Department official Richard Armitage.

So why did Fitzgerald let a cloud hang over White House adviser Karl Rove's head for so long? And why is Fitzgerald continuing to hound Libby, the former vice presidential chief of staff?

The answer seems to be that Armitage, who is charged with nothing and brags that he hasn't even consulted a lawyer, was former Secretary of State Colin Powell's right-hand man and a critic of pre-emptive war in Iraq.

Libby, on the other hand, was an architect of that war strategy. Do doves get a pass in Fitzgerald's book, while hawks get an indictment?

… "Armitage himself was aggressively investigated" by Fitzgerald. So Armitage fessed up at the outset. Fitzgerald long ago knew whom Armitage talked to and when.

And he knew it was Armitage, not Libby, who was responsible for outing Plame
(whose status as a secret CIA operative was dubious at best).


Armitage was a low level scum bag who helped orchestrate the abandonment of POW/MIA's in Vietnam after the war and all during the 80's. Fitzgerald's target was the VP, Cheney. Libby was forced to fall on the sword to save Cheney, but everyone knew it was Cheney in charge. So a Bush Administration official was convicted of being a liar. That is history and will always be history. It took a pardon to keep him quite. Cheney's top man is a convicted liar who lied to save the VP Cheney from being charged with committing an act of treason.
 
The Benghazi failure and it's ensuing coverup and coverup-coverup are beyond Nixonian. Those who defend this president on that issue are political bigots and hypocrites.

Yup. Benghazi didn't need to happen.

There had been many requests for more security because of warnings of an attack. No security was added. Hell. The Red Cross and the Brits pulled out because of those same warnings.

As to the stand down? Troops were ready to rock and roll and were told they had to wait for the permission to be given via Libya. There should have been a fast response team ready to go as well.

All the administration did was try to blame a damned video. A story they stuck to for weeks. Apparantly that fucks re-election was more important than four dead men one of whom was an ambassador.

The whole thing was an abject failure by the State Department run by Hilary. You know the old bat who wants to be POTUS. Hate to think of her as the one in charge. She couldn't even run State.

"What difference does it make." Indeed. One can tell she could care about four dead men on her watch. What a fucking loser she is. She and that fuck int he WH are quite a pair.
 
Last edited:
The House Intelligence Committee, led by Republicans, has concluded that there was no deliberate wrongdoing by the Obama administration in the 2012 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans, said Rep. Mike Thompson of St. Helena, the second-ranking Democrat on the committee.

The panel voted Thursday to declassify the report, the result of two years of investigation by the committee. U.S. intelligence agencies will have to approve making the report public.

Thompson said the report "confirms that no one was deliberately misled, no military assets were withheld and no stand-down order (to U.S. forces) was given."

House panel: No administration wrongdoing in Benghazi attack - SFGate
 
The House Intelligence Committee, led by Republicans, has concluded that there was no deliberate wrongdoing by the Obama administration in the 2012 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans, said Rep. Mike Thompson of St. Helena, the second-ranking Democrat on the committee.

The panel voted Thursday to declassify the report, the result of two years of investigation by the committee. U.S. intelligence agencies will have to approve making the report public.

Thompson said the report "confirms that no one was deliberately misled, no military assets were withheld and no stand-down order (to U.S. forces) was given."

House panel: No administration wrongdoing in Benghazi attack - SFGate

You don't say?!
 
Millions and millions of dollars wasted of my tax dollars, and a gazillion dog and pony shows by the Republicans for political purposes and posturing only, the truth comes out.... Politics stinks to high heaven....yet I still come here....shakes head....

(Same thing will probably happen with the dog and pony shows the republicans are doing against the White house and Lerner, tens of MILLIONS of dollars later, we will find out that the White House was NOT involved, did NOT collaborate with Lerner, and did NOT plan nor direct nor was in collusion to bring down solely tea party conservative groups filing for tax exempt status as a charity/public service....

Sure, the IRS was inappropriately picking groups to audit by name only for expediency, but this was NOT directed by the white house or done for political posturing reasons, is my bet, when this one is finalized.)
 
Snarkalicious take on the article cited above:

It seems that the House Intelligence Committee, despite being weighed down by Michele Crazy-Eyes, has managed to issue a factual report. And there’s more sane-sounding, reality-based facts in the report! We are almost too shocked to keep reporting this:

“There was no ‘stand-down order’ given to American personnel attempting to offer assistance that evening, no illegal activity or illegal arms transfers occurring by U.S. personnel in Benghazi, and no American was left behind.”

Whaa? But the bastion of Truth and Liberty, The Congressional Jester himself, knew – just knew – that there had been a stand-down order given. Not six months ago, cosmic shitstain Rep. Darrell Issa said:

“I have my suspicions, which is Secretary Clinton told Leon [Panetta] to stand down, and we all heard about the stand-down order for two military personnel. That order is undeniable.”

Undeniable, sheeple. It cannot be denied. Denying it would be UNPOSSIBLE! The House Intelligence Committee, after a two-year investigation, has now done the impossible! Damn, we wonder how Issa feels, being bitch-slapped by his own colleagues.


Read more at BENGHAZI Update: House Republican Committee Calls All Other Republicans Liars


:)
 
Snarkalicious take on the article cited above:

It seems that the House Intelligence Committee, despite being weighed down by Michele Crazy-Eyes, has managed to issue a factual report. And there’s more sane-sounding, reality-based facts in the report! We are almost too shocked to keep reporting this:

“There was no ‘stand-down order’ given to American personnel attempting to offer assistance that evening, no illegal activity or illegal arms transfers occurring by U.S. personnel in Benghazi, and no American was left behind.”

Whaa? But the bastion of Truth and Liberty, The Congressional Jester himself, knew – just knew – that there had been a stand-down order given. Not six months ago, cosmic shitstain Rep. Darrell Issa said:

“I have my suspicions, which is Secretary Clinton told Leon [Panetta] to stand down, and we all heard about the stand-down order for two military personnel. That order is undeniable.”

Undeniable, sheeple. It cannot be denied. Denying it would be UNPOSSIBLE! The House Intelligence Committee, after a two-year investigation, has now done the impossible! Damn, we wonder how Issa feels, being bitch-slapped by his own colleagues.
Read more at BENGHAZI Update: House Republican Committee Calls All Other Republicans Liars


:)

Does it give a reason WHY A RESCUE ATTEMPT wasn't done? Especially as the attack took 7 hours?
 
As they fail with each of these trumped up lied, they come up with a new one. This is why they're into the lawsuit/impeachment crap.

More money wasted and more deflection from the fact that the Republicans still Do Nothing but pose for photo ops and take more vacations.
 

Forum List

Back
Top