benghazi, Benghazi, BENGHAZI!!!

Vigilante

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
51,329
Reaction score
18,064
Points
2,290
Location
Waiting on the Cowardly Dante!!


I LIKE this, just goes to show you we Patriots want to PROTECT our freedom and liberty, while these perverse subversive Democrats care more about fucking their boyfriend, or next door neighbors wife.... Breaking it down, for those who are IQ challenged! .... No wonder HOWEY is involved!
Google the First Amendment.

If you care about your own country, you fight just as hard for porn as you do any other form of speech.

You don't care though. You prove it every single time you post.

Lucky for you, others do care. And, they care just as much about your rights as their own.
No, you care NOTHING for my rights!

The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances.

Just as you subversives believe there is a separation of church and state, that is an interpretation by a fucked up judge of Jefferson's "wall of separation between church and state" referring to a NATIONAL RELIGION, there is nothing about pornography, as Freedom of Speech. As a matter of fact there are laws in EVERY STATE about child pornography, and to you pond scum, you'll simply believe an AGE requirement is all that is necessary to define the matter. Because you and your subversives have no morals, ethics, or principles, fail to believe in traditional American culture, our borders and one language to keep our country cohesive, all depends on ones INTERPRETATION! THIS is why we currently NEED a CONSERVATIVE SCOTUS, to bring us back from the brink you FAGERALS have brought this country to! So stick that gun up your ass!
 

Vigilante

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
51,329
Reaction score
18,064
Points
2,290
Location
Waiting on the Cowardly Dante!!

idb

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
13,663
Reaction score
1,581
Points
265
Location
Arrowtown, New Zealand
The Benghazi failure and it's ensuing coverup and coverup-coverup are beyond Nixonian. Those who defend this president on that issue are political bigots and hypocrites.
Yup. Benghazi didn't need to happen.

There had been many requests for more security because of warnings of an attack. No security was added. Hell. The Red Cross and the Brits pulled out because of those same warnings.

As to the stand down? Troops were ready to rock and roll and were told they had to wait for the permission to be given via Libya. There should have been a fast response team ready to go as well.

All the administration did was try to blame a damned video. A story they stuck to for weeks. Apparantly that fucks re-election was more important than four dead men one of whom was an ambassador.

The whole thing was an abject failure by the State Department run by Hilary. You know the old bat who wants to be POTUS. Hate to think of her as the one in charge. She couldn't even run State.

"What difference does it make." Indeed. One can tell she could care about four dead men on her watch. What a fucking loser she is. She and that fuck int he WH are quite a pair.
I wonder if you've ever bothered to read that statement in context.

Johnson: No, again, we were misled that there were supposedly protests and that something sprang out of that -- an assault sprang out of that -- and that was easily ascertained that that was not the fact, and the American people could have known that within days and they didn’t know that.

Clinton: With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. Now, honestly, I will do my best to answer your questions about this, but the fact is that people were trying in real time to get to the best information. The IC has a process, I understand, going with the other committees to explain how these talking points came out. But you know, to be clear, it is, from my perspective, less important today looking backwards as to why these militants decided they did it than to find them and bring them to justice, and then maybe we’ll figure out what was going on in the meantime.
In Context: Hillary Clinton's 'What difference does it make' comment | PolitiFact
 

Jackson

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
26,603
Reaction score
6,711
Points
290
Location
Nashville
Thread to keep track of the latest in the trumped-up Benghazi scandal.

Let's start with this...

Lawmakers: No 'stand down' order given in Benghazi attack - Washington Times

Remember the far RW talking point about "Who gave the order to stand down!?!"

Well as you can see above, it's clearly not true. Just as the entire made up scandal is one series of lies and garbage after the next.

More revelations to come, feel free to share...
Thank you. I think I will share, Marc. So, there was no order to stand down? Fine. I will accept that. Now post the link showing there was an order to rescue these men.

Keep in mind during the hearings it was discovered the State Dept was listening in real time to the happenings. But no one has mentioned the efforts to rescue these men,although we have military all over the Middle East.
 

Jackson

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
26,603
Reaction score
6,711
Points
290
Location
Nashville
While you're at it, post the reasons why the requests for more security were turned down in the months leading up to SEPT.11TH, because there were no good reasons given by the State Dept. during the Hearings. That would made a helluva difference, now, wouldn't it. It may have even discourage the attack altogether, one might think.


But of course, one might say, "What difference does it make!!!!" :mad:



Come on back Marc and talk with me.
 
Last edited:

idb

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
13,663
Reaction score
1,581
Points
265
Location
Arrowtown, New Zealand

Luddly Neddite

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
63,805
Reaction score
9,858
Points
2,040
While you're at it, post the reasons why the requests for more security were turned down in the months leading up to SEPT.11TH, because there were no good reasons given by the State Dept. during the Hearings. That would made a helluva difference, now, wouldn't it. It may have even discourage the attack altogether, one might think.


But of course, one might say, "What difference does it make!!!!" :mad:



Come on back Marc and talk with me.
One might say that only if they want to mis-quote Secty Clinton.
 

Jackson

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
26,603
Reaction score
6,711
Points
290
Location
Nashville
Just heard that the report states that no military support or action was withheld.
Republicans are quickly running out of phoney scandals.
It won't matter to their nutcase wing.
There will still be a sizable section repeating the old talking points whether they're debunked or not.
I don't usually respond to posters who refer to posters as 'nutcase wing.' I reply to serious posters who have a command of the English language and like a debate.
 

Jackson

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
26,603
Reaction score
6,711
Points
290
Location
Nashville
While you're at it, post the reasons why the requests for more security were turned down in the months leading up to SEPT.11TH, because there were no good reasons given by the State Dept. during the Hearings. That would made a helluva difference, now, wouldn't it. It may have even discourage the attack altogether, one might think.


But of course, one might say, "What difference does it make!!!!" :mad:



Come on back Marc and talk with me.
One might say that only if they want to mis-quote Secty Clinton.
"What difference at this point does it make?" Closer? :)
 

EriktheRed

Eh...
Joined
Jun 27, 2009
Messages
8,030
Reaction score
1,170
Points
200
Location
IL
Thread to keep track of the latest in the trumped-up Benghazi scandal.

Let's start with this...

Lawmakers: No 'stand down' order given in Benghazi attack - Washington Times

Remember the far RW talking point about "Who gave the order to stand down!?!"

Well as you can see above, it's clearly not true. Just as the entire made up scandal is one series of lies and garbage after the next.

More revelations to come, feel free to share...
Thank you. I think I will share, Marc. So, there was no order to stand down? Fine. I will accept that. Now post the link showing there was an order to rescue these men.

Keep in mind during the hearings it was discovered the State Dept was listening in real time to the happenings. But no one has mentioned the efforts to rescue these men,although we have military all over the Middle East.
Yup, those goalposts just gotta be gettin' heavier and heavier...
 

idb

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
13,663
Reaction score
1,581
Points
265
Location
Arrowtown, New Zealand

Jackson

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
26,603
Reaction score
6,711
Points
290
Location
Nashville
Thread to keep track of the latest in the trumped-up Benghazi scandal.

Let's start with this...

Lawmakers: No 'stand down' order given in Benghazi attack - Washington Times

Remember the far RW talking point about "Who gave the order to stand down!?!"

Well as you can see above, it's clearly not true. Just as the entire made up scandal is one series of lies and garbage after the next.

More revelations to come, feel free to share...
Thank you. I think I will share, Marc. So, there was no order to stand down? Fine. I will accept that. Now post the link showing there was an order to rescue these men.

Keep in mind during the hearings it was discovered the State Dept was listening in real time to the happenings. But no one has mentioned the efforts to rescue these men,although we have military all over the Middle East.
Yup, those goalposts just gotta be gettin' heavier and heavier...
That was a clever answer, but the questions were always there. But I like your wit.
 

Luddly Neddite

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
63,805
Reaction score
9,858
Points
2,040
While you're at it, post the reasons why the requests for more security were turned down in the months leading up to SEPT.11TH, because there were no good reasons given by the State Dept. during the Hearings. That would made a helluva difference, now, wouldn't it. It may have even discourage the attack altogether, one might think.


But of course, one might say, "What difference does it make!!!!" :mad:



Come on back Marc and talk with me.
One might say that only if they want to mis-quote Secty Clinton.
"What difference at this point does it make?" Closer? :)
Its still out of context and not related to what you posted.
 

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
54,552
Reaction score
12,273
Points
2,180
Location
In a Republic, actually
Yup. Benghazi didn't need to happen.

There had been many requests for more security because of warnings of an attack. No security was added. Hell. The Red Cross and the Brits pulled out because of those same warnings.

As to the stand down? Troops were ready to rock and roll and were told they had to wait for the permission to be given via Libya. There should have been a fast response team ready to go as well.

All the administration did was try to blame a damned video. A story they stuck to for weeks. Apparantly that fucks re-election was more important than four dead men one of whom was an ambassador.

The whole thing was an abject failure by the State Department run by Hilary. You know the old bat who wants to be POTUS. Hate to think of her as the one in charge. She couldn't even run State.

"What difference does it make." Indeed. One can tell she could care about four dead men on her watch. What a fucking loser she is. She and that fuck int he WH are quite a pair.
I wonder if you've ever bothered to read that statement in context.

Johnson: No, again, we were misled that there were supposedly protests and that something sprang out of that -- an assault sprang out of that -- and that was easily ascertained that that was not the fact, and the American people could have known that within days and they didn’t know that.

Clinton: With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. Now, honestly, I will do my best to answer your questions about this, but the fact is that people were trying in real time to get to the best information. The IC has a process, I understand, going with the other committees to explain how these talking points came out. But you know, to be clear, it is, from my perspective, less important today looking backwards as to why these militants decided they did it than to find them and bring them to justice, and then maybe we’ll figure out what was going on in the meantime.
In Context: Hillary Clinton's 'What difference does it make' comment | PolitiFact
Of course not.

That would undermine the phoney scandal that is 'Benghazi.'
 

Vigilante

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2014
Messages
51,329
Reaction score
18,064
Points
2,290
Location
Waiting on the Cowardly Dante!!

TooTall

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
10,751
Reaction score
1,624
Points
265
I wonder if you've ever bothered to read that statement in context.

Johnson: No, again, we were misled that there were supposedly protests and that something sprang out of that -- an assault sprang out of that -- and that was easily ascertained that that was not the fact, and the American people could have known that within days and they didn’t know that.

Clinton: With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. Now, honestly, I will do my best to answer your questions about this, but the fact is that people were trying in real time to get to the best information. The IC has a process, I understand, going with the other committees to explain how these talking points came out. But you know, to be clear, it is, from my perspective, less important today looking backwards as to why these militants decided they did it than to find them and bring them to justice, and then maybe we’ll figure out what was going on in the meantime.
In Context: Hillary Clinton's 'What difference does it make' comment | PolitiFact
Of course not.

That would undermine the phoney scandal that is 'Benghazi.'
Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?
Or was it because security at Benghazi was not a priority, even though the British and the Red Cross recognized the fact that Muslims are big on attacking on one of their holidays (911). Hillary isn't smart enough to figure that out, or it just doesn't matter.
 
Last edited:

Claudette

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2009
Messages
35,864
Reaction score
5,878
Points
1,130
I wonder if you've ever bothered to read that statement in context.


In Context: Hillary Clinton's 'What difference does it make' comment | PolitiFact
Of course not.

That would undermine the phoney scandal that is 'Benghazi.'
Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?
Or was it because security at Benghazi was not a priority, even though the British and the Red Cross recognized the fact that Muslims are big on attacking on one of their holidays (911). Hillary isn't smart enough to figure that out, or it just doesn't matter.
You know it didn't matter to Hilbat. She said it didn't

Benghazi was something that didn't need to happen.

State could have beefed up security like they had been asking for for months or pulled our people out of that shithole. They did neither so four good men died because of their abject incompetence.

Those that think Benghazi is a fake scandal are lying to themselves. It was tragedy that should never have happened.
 

idb

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2010
Messages
13,663
Reaction score
1,581
Points
265
Location
Arrowtown, New Zealand
Of course not.

That would undermine the phoney scandal that is 'Benghazi.'
Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?
Or was it because security at Benghazi was not a priority, even though the British and the Red Cross recognized the fact that Muslims are big on attacking on one of their holidays (911). Hillary isn't smart enough to figure that out, or it just doesn't matter.
You know it didn't matter to Hilbat. She said it didn't

Benghazi was something that didn't need to happen.

State could have beefed up security like they had been asking for for months or pulled our people out of that shithole. They did neither so four good men died because of their abject incompetence.

Those that think Benghazi is a fake scandal are lying to themselves. It was tragedy that should never have happened.
Have you read the report?
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top